killings

MAGA pastor says Trump has 'better understanding' of Bible than the Pope

It’s been a strange year for presidential-papal relations as the Trump administration has spent the past several months antagonizing the Pope. Now in the latest installment of this unholy saga, a prominent MAGA pastor has declared that Trump has a “better understanding” of the Bible than the head of the Catholic Church.

Appearing on Fox News on Saturday, firebrand Pastor Robert Jeffress took issue with the Pontiff. While he did call the Pope a “good man” who is “sincere in his faith,” he went on to say that he is “sincerely wrong when it comes to Iran.”

“God created the church and government for two distinct purposes,” asserted Jeffress, saying it was the job of the former to bring people to Jesus and of the latter to protect citizens. “The great irony is it looks like President Trump has a better understanding of what the Bible teaches about the rule of the government than the Pope has.”

While he claims to be a Christian, Trump is famously ignorant of the Bible, having made repeated gaffes when asked about his scriptural views. Even so, his political movement has been largely driven by the support of Christians, particularly evangelicals.

But in recent months, many of Trump’s religious followers have had a crisis of faith due to his attacks on the Pope.

The conflict took root in January, when, during a closed-door meeting at the Pentagon, Trump officials told a representative of the Vatican that “America has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side.” A Trump official then “reached for a fourteenth-century weapon and invoked the Avignon Papacy, the period when the French Crown used military force to bend the bishop of Rome to its will.”

Not long after news of that confrontation emerged, as the war with Iran spiraled out and Defense Secretary began delivering violent prayers in which he asked God for “overwhelming violence of action against ⁠those who deserve no mercy,” the Pope responded by saying that Jesus “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them, saying: ‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood.'" This kicked off a proper beef between the president and the Pope, with the former railing that the latter is “weak on crime” and “catering to the radical left,” who, for his part, continued to make veiled references to the importance of peace.

This culminated with a post from Trump bearing an AI-generated image of himself as Jesus, a move that was so broadly disliked that even some of his own followers began calling him the Antichrist. A whopping 87 percent of Americans say they disapprove of Trump’s Jesus post, including 80 percent of his own 2024 voters.

But Jeffress has stuck with Trump through it all, rejecting the Pope’s position and accepting whatever the president suggests.

“He told us that Iran was within weeks of getting a powerful weapon that would destroy Israel, much of the Middle East, and could bring great harm to America, and he had no choice but to act,” said Jeffress.

According to U.S. Intelligence, however, Iran was nowhere near developing nuclear weapons before the war began.

'This is a coup': MAGA melts down as Obama visits Canada amid Trump takeover talk

On Thursday, a seemingly innocuous social media post by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney touched off an unexpected MAGA meltdown. “Welcome back to Canada, President [Barack Obama]” Carney tweeted along with a video showing the former president’s arrival in Toronto. While Obama was visiting Canada to deliver a keynote speech to a think tank, the followers of President Donald Trump decided there was something more nefarious going on, accusing him of breaking federal laws.

“Why is Barack Hussein Obama meeting with world leaders while President Trump is in office?” posted far-right influencer and prominent Trump ally Laura Loomer. “This is a coup.”

She and others, like conservative influencer Nick Sortor, proceeded to suggest that Obama should face consequences for allegedly violating the Logan Act, which, as the Daily Beast reports, “prohibits private citizens from engaging in unauthorized negotiations with foreign governments.”

“Obama needs to sit down and figure out his freaking place before his a-ss ends up in prison for violating the Logan Act,” Sortor declared. “Trump is our President. You’ve been sidelined, Hussein.”

Numerous comments on and re-shares of Carney’s original post expressed similarly accusatory sentiments, with more than a few bringing back Trump’s old tagline, “Lock him up!”

Others took issue with Carney referring to Obama as the “president.”

“It’s FORMER President zero,” said one commenter. “If he’s claiming to act on behalf of the American people in your ‘talks,’ he’s in violation of the Logan Act.”

“[Mark Carney] so do you mean Barack Obama is still president since you just called him President Barack Obama?” said another. “This should worry the U.S. a little.”

There are several problems with all this MAGA outrage. First, it is common practice for former commanders-in-chief to be referred to as “president.” Second, Obama wasn’t in Canada to negotiate anything, and former presidents frequently deliver keynote speeches and other addresses to organizations around the world.

But third, these angry MAGA followers ignore the fact that Trump himself met with foreign leaders during the Biden administration. In July 2024, he met with then-Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Then that October, it was revealed that Trump had held a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Later that month, Trump held a similar phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Major cases 'hobbled by turmoil' as 'shock waves ripple through' Trump’s DOJ

Major cases at the Department of Justice are "hobbled by” turmoil as “more than a half-dozen prosecutors have been demoted or pushed out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia,” the Washington Post reported Saturday.

The “turmoil” comes amid the fallout from the DOJ’s revamped effort to prosecute former FBI director James Comey. A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of North Carolina last month indicted Comey on two counts related to an Instagram post by the former FBI director that depicted the phrase “86-47.” Prosecutors allege Comey’s post can reasonably be construed as a threat against the president. As the Post notes,”most legal analysts say [the charges] have little merit and stem primarily from President Donald Trump’s animus toward the former FBI chief.”

Meanwhile, as the DOJ pursues Trump’s vendetta, insiders say a “key prosecutorial office” remains “understaffed and weakened.”

According to the Post, citing 10 current and former prosecutors, several DOJ officials “have voluntarily decamped or scrambled to find new jobs, fearful they could be asked to work on cases that violate their principles.”

“Major cases, including one involving a terrorist attack in Afghanistan, have been hobbled by the turmoil,” the Post reports.

In that case, former Eastern District of Virginia national security chief Michael Ben’Ary was pushed out amid the trial of Mohammad Sharifullah, whom Trump himself has described as “the top terrorist” behind the 2021 attack at Kabul airport’s Abbey Gate. According to the Post, after his firing, Ben’Ary “left a scorching letter taped to his office door, warning that his abrupt departure could hurt the Abbey Gate trial.”

In April. A jury “[convicted] Sharifullah of a terrorism offense, [but] deadlocked and declined to find him guilty of playing a deadly role in that specific attack,” the Post reports. Deputy director the National Security Section for the Eastern District of Virginia, Troy Edwards, had also been on the Sharifullah case. As the Post notes, Edwards, who is Comey’s son-in-law, left the department following the former FBI director’s indictment.

“As the Justice Department gears up for the second prosecution of Comey, the costs to the department of the president’s crusade are mounting,” the Post reports. “The shock waves rippling through the Justice Department underline the high price of the president’s single-minded pursuit of his adversaries to its personnel, resources and mission.”

Trump’s DC plan will convert miles of popular riverfront park to 'exclusive' golf course

Along the banks of the Washington Channel in the nation’s capital sits the East Potomac Park, a popular green space offering 330 acres of open fields, picnic grounds, tennis courts, and lanes for running and cycling. At over 100 years old, the park is a celebrated “part of the culture in D.C.” But according to renovation plans obtained by the Washington Post, President Donald Trump wants to radically change the park, installing an “exclusive” golf course at the expense of public access.

“Based on the renderings being circulated to potential donors,” reports the Post, “the public golfing facility in the park that has long attracted hackers of all stripes because of its affordability and accessibility would be gone, as would a miniature golf course, the oldest continuously operating one in the country, which underwent a $1 million renovation in 2024. Hains Point, the tip of the peninsula popular with early-morning birdwatchers and weekend barbecuers, would be incorporated into the new course and seemingly inaccessible to anyone not playing golf.”

When asked about the changes, park regular DJ Rice was not happy, saying, “Everything can’t be exclusive. You have to leave something to the people.”

“To think this place would be changed to anything other than what it is is crazy,” said fellow D.C. resident Tai Smith. “It has been a part of the culture in D.C. for such a long time.”

While the renderings have yet to be approved, they suggest significant changes that will shape the park and largely alter its use. Stakeholders are quick to argue that the project is still in its early conceptual stages, but in a hearing on Monday, a federal judge suggested that the effort is more advanced than is being admitted, noting the ongoing fundraising efforts and existence of the renderings.

“Something is happening,” said U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes. “I don’t know what it is. When you have a pledge going out with pictures, asking people for money, we’re pretty far down the road, okay? So I think there’s been more happening.”

The plans and lack of clarity about the process have many in D.C. concerned about the president’s intentions.

“If we lose it, it will be a big ding to the quality of life for average Washingtonians,” said 70-year-old Mike Copperthite, who has spent 32 years riding with a group of 200 bicyclists who meet every weekday at noon to follow the loop through the park. “Everybody’s upset about it,” he said of Trump’s proposal. “But this guy doesn’t ask for permission. He just does it anyway.”

Hoping to put a stop to the changes, 26-year-old Alex Rosen launched SaveEastPo.com to help organize opposition.

“I was frustrated because I’m not a political person and I did not want to do this,” said Rosen. “But I love East Potomac and think it’s an amazing place as it is right now. So I thought I might as well try. Everyone I’ve talked to doesn’t understand why this is some sort of priority for the administration.”

“To do what [Trump] wants to do would completely destroy the park,” said 70-year-old Blayne Beeler, who comes to the park to fish. “This will no longer be for the people.”

'MAGA vibe shift': Conservative media darling's demise 'a long time coming'

Puck reports Ben Shapiro’s MAGA entertainment site Daily Wire, “with its sweeping layoffs and a steep drop-off in audience, has actually been a long time coming.”

“Media analysts have noted a drastic decline in The Daily Wire’s audience, including the loss of 80,000 YouTube subscribers so far this year,” reports Puck media writer Dylan Byers. “Kyle Tharp, a researcher who tracks political influence online, said Ben’s hemorrhaging audience represented ‘the steepest decline of any major political channel in 2026.’ (‘He’s lost the juice,’ Kyle told me.) Meanwhile, The Daily Wire recently enacted layoffs that, I’m told, affected 42 employees, or a little under 20 percent of the headcount.”

Sources close to the company claim the cuts are a course correction after years of mismanagement and overhiring, and they attribute audience loss to platform algorithms. But Byers reports Shapiro’s competitors and other industry insiders suspect the falling off more concerns a “MAGA vibe shift,” and the growing unpopularity of his support for Israel and the war in Iran.

“In any event, political pundits are a notoriously combative species, and Ben’s critics have delighted in the chance to twist the knife,” said Byers. “Candace Owens, who has been in a perennial fight with Ben since her termination from The Daily Wire two years ago in the wake of her antisemitic remarks, has alleged that much of Ben’s audience comes through inorganic paid channels.”

MAGA influencer Tucker Carlson, meanwhile, claimed Shapiro represents “the outer fringe of the outer fringe. … Nobody watches this stuff, there’s no audience for this, there is no constituency for it.”

A shift is some of it, wagers Byers, but Shapiro and the other co-founder and co-C.E.O. Caleb Robinson were growing increasingly disillusioned with Jeremy’s Boreing management, particularly with his infatuation with an eight-figure in-house behemoth called The Pendragon Cycle. Boreing began working on that project, a seven-episode Arthurian fantasy series, in 2023.

Just before his departure, Boreing told Axios that The Daily Wire was “not closed off to an offer” from a potential buyer like Fox.

“Eighteen months, seven episodes of The Pendragon Cycle, and one vibe shift later, one wonders if they’ve already missed their window,” said Byers.

'The American people are onto' John Roberts as a 'savvy political operator'

Chief Justice John Roberts has long been fond of asserting the apolitical nature of the Supreme Court. Way back in 2009, when he was just four years into his tenure, he declared, “The most important thing for the public to understand is that we’re not a political branch of government.” Nearly two decades later, he said something similar, on Wednesday telling a conference of legal experts, “We’re not part of the political process,” although he did admit that the public doesn’t agree with that assertion.

According to Salon’s David Daley, his claims raise two key points. First, that the Court’s recent decision to gut the Voting Rights Act has been part of his politically-motivated plan for just as long as he’s been claiming the Court isn’t political. And second, “that the American people are onto him.”

As Daley explains, Roberts entered the Court in 2005 as a “savvy political operator” who framed himself as a “sensible midwestern institutionalist,” understanding “that it would be easier to enact his reactionary agenda if he could maintain the illusion that the Court functioned above the grubby influence of partisan politics.” Since then he’s instilled Democratic senators and legal experts with the idea that he’s just an umpire calling balls and strikes.

“But it has curdled with the American people,” says Daley, “who see clearly how the strike zone changes on the most important questions based on which party benefits electorally. Roberts is no umpire. He has, patiently and strategically, shifted the nation and the Constitution dramatically to the right on voting rights, immigration, the regulatory state, reproductive rights, gun control and executive power.”

When it comes to the Voting Rights Act specifically, the Roberts Court's first blatant attack came in 2013, when a decision on Shelby County v. Holder froze many of its key enforcement mechanisms. But as Daley notes, this was no mere judicial opinion, but a policy effort pushed by the Republican political machine.

“Wealthy donors on the right,” writes Daley, “centered around a little known but staggeringly powerful organization called DonorsTrust — often called the right’s ATM — helped fund, along with other major conservative foundations, the organization that developed the Shelby County case and identified the plaintiffs. Then they covered the seven-figure legal fees for the Supreme Court case. They also funded the Federalist Society, which helped vet the judges who decided it, and supported the conservative law professors who generated theories, legal concepts and amicus briefs. But if we are to believe the chief justice, there’s nothing to see here. Just law. Not power.”

Daley suggests that this is more than mere hypocrisy, but part of a long-term Republican effort to supplant the public will.

“Republicans needed the courts to enact this ultra-conservative agenda precisely because it could not be won at the ballot box,” says Daley. “The Voting Rights Act, after all, was reauthorized nearly unanimously by a Republican Congress and president, George W. Bush, in 2006. But they concurrently placed Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito on the bench to slowly erode it from within, a crime with no political fingerprints. And so they embarked on a decades-long quest to capture the courts.”

And as Daley notes, while the GOP attempts to circumvent voters by a range of means, such as gerrymandering Congressional maps, it takes far less effort to do it from the Court, as the “math is easier. There are only nine justices. Win five seats and you have the last word on nearly every question in American politics.”

According to Daley, Americans recognize that the Court “has become an enemy of democracy and voters alike,” which is why polling shows public confidence in it at a historic low. He lists many actions that can be taken to remedy the situation, such as enlarging the court, randomizing case justice selection, putting term limits on justices, and more.

In the end, says Daley, “his longest-lasting legacy will be that Roberts has shown everyone that the Court is emphatically a partisan, political institution,” and that Americans should “use our power to reform it and bring an arrogant body back into line.”

Busted: Top Trump official admits to conflict-of-interest in 'slam dunk' video

Associate Deputy Secretary Karen Budd-Falen, a Trump appointee to the Interior Department, has confessed on video to her involvement in policy matters that could directly benefit her family business. This, say ethics watchdogs, may violate federal law.

Speaking before the Congressional Western Caucus event in December, reports the Washington Post, Budd-Falen noted that grazing policy is part of her job, and “the thing that probably was the closest to my heart was grazing regulations.” Her remarks are only now coming to light, prompting calls for an ethics investigation.

Per the Post, “Budd-Falen and her husband own at least five cattle or ranch operations in Nevada and Wyoming, according to her federal financial disclosure forms, each valued at more than $1 million. The couple’s companies additionally hold allotments that allow them to graze cattle on about one-quarter-million acres of federal land overseen by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management. In the video, Budd-Falen discusses relaxing limits on grazing using a ‘categorical exclusion’ that also applies to land controlled by her husband, following the death of her father-in-law. She said that she aims to increase the number of grazing allotments handed out to ranchers and no longer declare areas as critical habitat for endangered species, a designation that can hurt landowners.”

In light of this admission, the nonpartisan watchdog group Campaign for Accountability has announced plans to send a letter to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and the House Natural Resources Committee demanding that Congress investigate whether Budd-Falen violated ethics laws. The group also wants an investigation into whether the Interior Department’s ethics office failed in its role as an independent check on her conflicts of interest.

“The situation with Karen Budd-Falen seems to be quite brazen in the scheme of conflicts of interest,” said the group’s executive director Michelle Kuppersmith. “She is, by her own admission, working on policy for grazing that will likely directly impact her own financial interests. And they’re not even trying to hide it.”

According to the Post, “Ranchers have lobbied the Trump administration to relax environmental restrictions and expand their access to public land for grazing, while environmental advocates say increased cattle grazing comes at the expense of wild animals and their habitats.” Budd-Falen, says experts, stands to benefit from reduced regulations.

Said Richard Painter, a former chief ethics lawyer under the George W. Bush administration, if Budd-Falen has received federal grazing rights from Interior, “that would be a pretty slam-dunk financial conflict of interest.”

According to three independent ethics experts and two watchdog groups, this is just the latest example of the Trump administration’s pattern of disregarding conflict-of-interest laws.

Trump stuck on 'talking points' no one believes while Iran war spirals

CNN Senior writer Zachary Wolf says President Donald Trump keeps teasing that a deal to end the war with Iran is nearly over, but it never is — and voters are getting angry.

“It’s one of a series of Iran talking points he has been repeating for months,” said Wolf. “The war itself has changed — evolving from one of shock and awe to a monthlong ceasefire in which each side has imposed a costly blockade on the other. But Trump’s talking points have stayed the same.’

Like a skipping record, Wolf said Trump keeps repeating that the U.S. is in charge, Iran’s military is devastated and things are going to be over soon. However, these aren’t answers. They’re not even correct.

This, said Wolf, is a problem because situation’s change but Trump’s braggadocio never does.

“There is a ceasefire, but Iran has gained leverage by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz. But the talking point remains the same,” said Wolf. And just before the ceasefire, Trump argued the war was going according to his plan, claiming we are “weeks ahead of schedule." But days later, on March 26, he got mad that Iranians were not willing to agree to a U.S. proposal and began lobbing threats on Truth Social. Indeed, the only thing that’s changed was Trump stopped claiming the was is “ahead of schedule.”

“All this makes it very difficult to know how seriously to take his assurances about the proximity of a deal,” said Wolf, and “the White House messaging on the war has been ineffective, if dour polling is to be believed.”

Still, Trump keeps going with it: “It’ll be over quickly,” he told a tele-rally for a Republican candidate in Georgia this week.

“… I think it’s got a very good chance of ending, and if it doesn’t end, we have to go back to bombing the hell out of them,” he told PBS earlier in the week.

“… Very soon,” he told reporters on March 9.

And with each timeframe slippage the end of the war remains “just off in the distance,” far enough away to infuriate voters and bedevil his Republican Party fighting to maintain a House and Senate majority.

Trump’s morning rant backfires after he cites old poll that actually proves the opposite

Mediaite reports President Donald Trump kicked off his Saturday morning social media rant with a poll “defending” his war in Iran.

The problem: It’s old information — and he read it wrong.

“Very important. This is where our Nation stands!!! President DJT” Trump wrote, while posting a link to an article from a pro-Trump outlet.

But the outlet did not deliver the news he was probably looking for, despiteits nature as Trump-friendly propaganda.

The article, “Majority say preventing Iran from acquiring nukes more important than ending war: Poll,” used a single data point from a Rasmussen-affiliated poll claiming “a narrow majority of 53 percent of U.S. voters say it is more important to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon than it is to end the fighting, according to a Napolitan News survey” and that “a further 60 percent prioritize preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon on stabilizing energy prices in the U.S.”

But Mediaite reports both the article and the poll was from early April — and that the rest of that poll delivered no good news for Trump’s deeply unpopular war.

“Currently 39 percent of voters favor the attacks on Iran while 54 percent oppose them,” Mediaite reports, citing the poll. Additionally, Traditional GOP voters opposed Trump’s attacks on Iran by a margin of 51 percent to 40 percent.

Support for the war was near 40 percent since its onset, while opposition has fluctuated from a low of 46 percent, after the first missile strikes, to a high of 61 percent at the beginning of April as Iran’s retaliatory closure of the Strait of Hormuz and subsequent fuel and grocery costs increased.

Insiders reveal alarming message Trump’s DOJ sent seasoned prosecutors

New York Times White House correspondent Peter Baker found himself surprised by the Trump administration’s sheer aggression in pursuing the perceived enemies of President Donald Trump.

CNN reported on Friday that DOJ southern district prosecutor Jason Reding Quiñones arrived in Washington DC, last month to update top Justice Department officials about a distinct lack of progress. Trump’s people wanted prosecutors building criminal cases against former CIA Director John Brennan and other government officials who dared to investigate Trump between 2016 and 2024.

But sources told CNN that Quiñones’ office opened the meeting with a “firm” assessment that there was not a strong case, and that any case the DOJ fabricated would never make it to a guilty verdict — if it even managed to struggle past a grand jury.

“With Reding Quiñones sitting near her, Maria Medetis Long, the seasoned prosecutor who has led the probe since its start, told acting Deputy Attorney General Colin McDonald and Trent McCotter, his top deputy, that the case against Brennan was too weak to bring, and the evidence didn’t support the charges of lying to Congress that Justice officials and House Republicans have sought,” said CNN, according to “people briefed on the matter.”

But Long’s assessment got a frosty reception from Trump’s lieutenants.

“That’s not good enough,” was the message she received, according to two people briefed on the meeting.

It was an ominous warning, considering Trump had fired former Attorney General Pam Bondi for failing to prosecute his political enemies.

It did not help that at an earlier meeting with Bondi in April — the day Trump fired her, according to CNN — Reding Quiñones had told Bondi that prosecutors in his office “could bring the charges over lying to Congress against Brennan by the end of the year,” according to people briefed on the matter.

Now, with Trump’s personal lawyer Todd Blanche holding sway over the freshly politicized DOJ, “the latest update from Florida set the stage for a major shakeup to deliver on what Reding Quiñones has been promising since last fall,” reports CNN.

CNN reports nonpartisan prosecutors working in Florida began evacuated the department soon after Trump installed or elevated his hatchet-men.

“We all saw what Trump had said during the campaign, so people knew what was possible,” a former senior prosecutor in the office said. “But no one expected them to just come in and destroy everything. So much experience in that office, just gone.”

National emergency as Republicans no longer try to hide their poison

It comes at us in waves …

It relentlessly pounds away at our heart and soul, threatening to break us in two …

This week it again washed ashore in all the likely places — Alabama, Tennessee, Virginia, and finally our corrupted, irredeemable “Supreme” Court housed in what was once the world’s cradle of democracy, Washington, D.C.

Donald Trump’s Republicans not only refuse to atone for America’s original sin, but are intent on re-injecting its poison into a new generation’s veins just to make good and sure we never properly heal.

Anytime our so-called united states get within striking distance of truly congealing into a democratic republic where there really is liberty and justice for ALL, the well-funded GOP fiends, who stay plenty flush by dividing us, spread their unlimited cash and outsized influence to make sure the crack between us widens and can never be crossed.

Nothing scares these morally busted garbage peddlers more than a cohesive electorate, or a fair election.

The reality of a Black president, and a Black woman vice president was so unbearable for these bog-snorters and their shattered moral compasses that the final House district in Tennessee that stood on a foundation of fairness and true representation was set aflame by their tiki torches Thursday.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is now just a relic from a time America at least gave the appearance it was interested in evolution.

The Republican Party has become so brazen in their odious efforts to erase Black people, they no longer feel the need to wear hoods while they pile high barriers to voting booths, and leadership positions in our government, universities, and places of influence.

This is a national emergency.

Better to just incinerate a healthcare program that insures tens of millions of Americans with no viable alternative in place, than to continue anything with Obama’s name on it.

Better to enter an unwinnable and costly war with Iran than continue with the peace our nation’s only Black president brokered in our planet’s most volatile region.

At its core America is a racist country, and there is plenty of dirty money to be made by the clutch of bankrupt billionaires who spend all their time keeping it that way.

America is not, nor has it ever been, a great nation. The insistence on implying anything different is borne of weakness not strength. We are a dark room without mirrors. We can’t bear to look at ourselves, so we look outside our windows and find fault with others who don’t share our skin color.

If actions are stronger than words, then a nation that engages in one senseless war after another, steps on the necks of its own citizens, and confuses a truly rich life with one of wealth and appalling privilege is a complete and utter failure.

It is not remotely great.

Time and again, America has diagnosed its sickness, and made good-faith efforts to cure it, before grotesque men like Rupert Murdoch have decided there was no money to be made in a nation strong enough to admit its weaknesses.

Exploiting our original sin for their gain is, to quote Hillary Clinton, “deplorable.”

I have seen far too many people of both political parties say we cannot make everything about race. Well, I say we can no longer afford not to, because looking away has never worked.

Without fail, these pleas come from the mouths of white people, who are either insulated from hard truths, or worse are just too cowardly to address this terribly sad reality.

I cannot pretend to know what is truly inside a Black man’s heart and mind, but I can seek it out, and do what I can to help with their centuries-old afflictions.

Better to look like a fool while running a good and noble errand in the name of equality, than doing the fool’s work of pretending everybody is good and equal in America.

As an old, white man I am highly qualified to diagnose my condition which is, and always has been, privilege. Too many white men were born halfway up the ladder, but confuse it with making a mighty climb. These are the people who go through their empty lives holding onto a lofty status that was never earned.

There are the people who are inside this corrupted Trump White House who are almost too stupid and ridiculous to imagine. Forget the president, what about his crooked, no-talent cabinet that includes Pete Hegseth, Markwayne Mullin, Lee Zeldin, Howard Lutnick, Scott Bessent, Sean Duffy and RFK Jr.?

None of these people got their jobs on any merit. Quite the opposite: They got their jobs because of their allegiance to a broken and bigoted man, who grew up in a world where loyalty and respect weren’t earned, but claimed by a wretched, cold hand holding tight to a whip.

There has never been a single time and place in history where diversity, equity and inclusion was needed more, because America has never been sicker.

This strain of bigotry might be the most lethal one yet, because it is coming from the very top of our government, and filtering its way through our elected offices, our military, our highest courts, and into our schools.

It is crawling over us, and there are seemingly no barriers to prevent its spread … except one: US.

We must all do what we can to turn racism away, and stay true to our hearts. We must rally like-thinkers, and amplify our quest to finally and once and for all address America’s inequity, and grab it by its roots and shake it.

We must call it what is.

Silence is not an option, only a pacifier.

Until this is finally done — and it must be done — millions of beautiful people will continue to suffer needlessly for simply entering this world a certain color.

Is there really anything more sickening and tragic than that?

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here, and follow him on Bluesky here.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.