breaking news

'Stupid' Trump working overtime to kill the GOP: analysis

Bulwark writer Will Saletan says it’s beginning to look more and more like Democrats are paying President Donald Trump to cut their ads, considering how hard Trump is working to put Dems in charge of Congress.

“So, the midterm elections are coming up and there's one person who's working really, really hard to make sure that Donald Trump and the Republicans lose — and that person is Donald Trump,” said Saletan on a Saturday Bulwark podcast. “Seriously, for weeks, this guy has been publicly admitting that he deliberately started the Iran war, knowing [that] he knew that it would screw the economy.”

Saletan replayed footage of Trump claiming he was expecting — and was fine with — destroying even more American voters’ wealth than he already has to wage his war on Iran.

“So, when I did this, I thought the market would go down 25 percent. And I think I thought that was a great deal of it. If it went down 25 percent, I was satisfied. I said, because we cannot let these people have a nuclear weapon. They'll use it. We can't,” Trump said. “I also thought oil would go up to $200, $250, maybe $300 [a barrel].”

“Okay. Just for context, 25 percent is basically the 1929 Stock Market Crash,” Saletan pointed out. “Trump is saying that he thought doing that would be a ‘great deal.’ And he thought $300 for a barrel of oil would have been fine. That is more than four times what oil cost before the war.”

Saletan added that gas prices in the United States are currently about $4.50 a gallon. But doing the math on a $300 barrel of oil, Trump is basically admitting ‘he'd be fine if gas went above $10 a gallon.’

Saetan then played footage of Trump bragging that foreign nations are having to buy U.S. oil after Iran shut down oil transport in the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the U.S./Israeli joint strikes. But Trump is not telling us that when other countries buy up our oil, that leaves less oil for Americans, which drives up U.S. prices.

“Now, either he's too stupid to understand that or he thinks you're too stupid to figure out that he's helping American oil companies by screwing you,” Saletan said, before citing a quote from Navy Federal Credit Union Chief Economist Heather Long saying “for the first time in three years, [Trump’s] inflation is wiping out all wage gains.”

“What a great message for the midterms,” said Saletan, while adding that even as U.S. households are getting drained dry Trump is requesting a 50 percent increase defense budget, from $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion — which amounts to an extra “$4,000 from every man, woman, and child in America.”

“He’s already got your vote. He got to be president,” said Saletan, and then added that it now falls to America voters to “make sure that his party Loses control of Congress and maybe, just maybe, you'll start to get a government that actually cares about you.”

Critics go ballistic following announcement of Trump's new Orwellian commission

The Department of Justice is finalizing a deal to launch President Donald Trump’s secretive $1.7 billion “slush fund” for his allies, and sources tell ABC News that the name for the fund will be the "President Donald J. Trump Truth and Justice Commission."

Additionally, the fund is predicted to contain a compensation fund of $1,776,000,000 to pay claims made by people purporting to be victims of government "weaponization." This includes people involved in the attempted overthrow of U.S. democracy in Trump’s fake electors scheme in 2020.

ABC News reports the proposed deal is “likely to face legal hurdles,” but social media critics are already tearing into the proposal.

critics on social and has already been criticized by Democrats as a "slush fund" for Trump's allies -- arose after months of deliberations between the White House and DOJ officials who originally attempted to craft a legal justification for the settlement to compensate Trump directly.

“This plan is just root and branch unconstitutional: Trump and interim attorney General Todd Blanche are colluding to steal $1.7B from taxpayers to mete out to Trump's friends and thugs in Trump's sole discretion,” said Lawfare Senior Editor Roger Parloff on X.

“Straight-up looting taxpayer money,” howled Republicans Against Trump on X.

“Ah yes, demanding exactly $1.776 billion to fund the 'Truth and Justice Commission.' Because nothing says 'Patriotism' quite like weaponizing a historical date to secure an absolute bag of taxpayer cash,” said another critic on X. “George Washington is spinning so fast right now we could hook him up to the grid and solve the energy crisis.”

Other critics quickly referenced the Orwellian name of the commission, with one commenter on BlueSky calling the scheme “straight out of 1984,” a reference to George Orwell’s book.

Other critics said the commission name — bundled with Trump and Republicans’ other bad policies — would probably resurface after November.

“‘The President Donald J. Trump Truth and Justice Commission.’ I like the sound of that,” Bulwark writer Will Saletan. Liz Cheney can adopt that name when Democrats retake the House and she gavels in the commission to investigate the Trump administration's crimes.

MS NOW drops excruciating supercut of Republicans surrendering on the economy

MS NOW footage shows Republicans twisting themselves into knots to avoid criticizing President Donald Trump’s devastating gaffe admitting he “doesn’t care” what kind of suffering his Iran war puts on Americans.

When a reporter asked Trump “what extent are Americans’ financial situation motivating” him to end the Iran war,” Trump answered: “Not even a little bit.”

“The only thing that matters when I'm talking about Iran, they can't have a nuclear weapon. I don't think about Americans’ financial situation,” Trump continued. “I don't think about anybody.”

But it was Republican’s follow-up to the outrageous statement that appears to be keeping the outrage going.

“I don't know that he said that,” said White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who was caught by a reporter on Thursday.

“I think that was just a sort of a throwaway line,” quipped Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).

“Did he say that? I don't have a comment about that. Mostly because I think he actually does care,” said U.S. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.).

“I would have to find out the context of it. I'm sorry,” said Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), ducking quickly down a hall.

“Don't take it out of context,” barked U.S. Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas). “The American people love him.

“I don't know the context in which he made that comment,” insisted House Speaker Mike Johnson.

“I don't think the president said that,” said Vice President JD Vance, in contradiction to the actual video. “I think that's a misrepresentation of what the president said.”

“Well, you heard it yourself,” said Table for Five host Abby Phillip. “And it does seem like in this moment when gas prices are about $4.50 a gallon, it's a moment when, even before the gas prices were $4.50 a gallon, Americans’ were not happy with how [Trump is] handling the economy. It just seems … that this is just sort of going from bad to worse.”

- YouTube youtu.be

Republicans are finally getting honest — and it will demolish them: Analysis

USA Today writer Rexx Huppke says it’s time for Republicans and President Donald Trump to put up or shut up because blaming Biden is no longer a winning strategy.

“That excuse ain’t working anymore,” said Huppke, citing a May 12 CNN poll showing an eye-watering 70 percent of Americans disapproving of Trump’s handling of the economy.

U.S. inflation is higher than it was when the much-maligned Biden left office, leaving behind a strong economy that had rebounded from the COVID-19 pandemic. But that was then, said Huppke.

“Gas prices north of $5 per gallon are now," Huppke said. "That’s President Trump’s doing. But whenever a Republican is pressed on the economy, on food prices, on energy prices, they can only reflexively say, ‘Well, Biden blah blah blah …'"

But rather than address the needs of those struggling, Huppke said Trump is either defending his decision to “start a war nobody wanted or parading around talking about his White House ballroom or multimillion-dollar work being done painting the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool bright blue.”

But they’re not putting up, said Huppke. And — and more surprisingly — they’re not shutting up either. In fact, they’re being brutally, refreshingly honest.

“I’m proud of President Donald Trump and his loyal Republican lawmakers. After years of pretending, it seems they’ve finally grown confident enough to flatly admit they don’t give a rip about regular Americans. This is real progress!” said Huppke, quoting Rep. Jim Jordan’s (R-Ohio) May 14 statement about soaring gas prices with the claim, “that’s life.”

Coupled with Trump’s earlier assertion that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” Republicans are finally saying out loud what many Americans “have known for so long, deep in their guts,” said Huppke. “Trump doesn’t think about anybody other than himself.”

Huppke said arguments from the “president and his lackeys” saying “we cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon” also aren’t resonating with American, especially with no clear evidence that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon or posed a threat to America.”

“Republicans care about rich people. They cater to the wealthy and promise you that largesse will trickle down your way eventually,” said Huppke. “They will send regular Americans to war for no reason then tell the regular Americans back home to suck up the costs of their folly. Politicians like Trump will dump billions into vanity projects that do nothing for you. And now they’re admitting it, loudly and proudly.”

“It’s pathetic,” said Huppke.

Trump's 'lawless' retaliation won clemency for election denier: Official

Top Colorado Democrats and democracy advocates were among those outraged and puzzled Friday after Democratic Gov. Jared Polis commuted the sentence of Tina Peters, a former county clerk and 2020 election denier who aided Trump in his scheme to derail the 2020 election. Those critics now include Colorado’s own state secretary Jenna Griswold, who spoke to MS NOW’s “Weekend” panel in terms of treachery.

“Tina Peters was no political prisoner,” said Griswold. “She compromised her voting equipment, trying to prove Trump's big lie. Her actions, and then her lies and conspiracies about her actions were used to further destabilize our elections and increase the threat level to election officials. So, the fact that she is going to be released early, in what I view is special treatment is just ridiculous.”

Griswold, who worked with state legislators to pass a new election insider threat law making it a felony to compromise voting equipment, added that the clemency sends a message to Trump's followers that if they break the law, they may get off on federal and state charges: “It will embolden the election denialism movement in this country at a time that is quite dangerous with our upcoming elections.”

MS NOW anchors replayed headlines revealing Trump’s open war against the state of Colorado since returning to the White House last year. These include headlines declaring the administration’s move to “dissolve national climate research lab in Colorado: last December, his veto of a bipartisan bill to fund clean water pipeline in southeastern Colorado, and Trump’s freeze on aid for low-income Colorado families in January. Trump also rejected — for a second time — the state’s plea for disaster aid in April.

“I believe that the retribution has something to do with it,” Griswold said. “Trump has been obsessed with Tina Peters. She is one of or was one of the last people in the entire nation facing accountability for attacking American elections … so he really wanted her out. He tried to unlawfully pardon her himself. That didn't work. Tried to get her moved into federal custody in the federal prison system. That didn't work, tried over and over to pressure the governor to pardon.”

“Look, I know it's really tough to have federal aid cut,” added Griswold. “… But if we placate this lawless president who tries to bully his way into getting people to follow his lawless orders, democracy can fall.”

- YouTube youtu.be

Voters are done with 'reality TV' politicians: Analysis

New York Times opinion columnists EJ Dionne and attorney Sarah Isgur are catching hints that President Donald Trump is turning American voters off to the kind of loud and stupid personalities willing to “eat a cockroach” for money.

Dionne began his assessment with a comparison to Civil Rights worker Fannie Lou Hamer claiming to be “sick and tired of being sick and tired.”

“I think a lot of Americans, beyond their partisanship even — especially normie Republicans, who aren’t MAGA — are just tired of this. And so, these states will be a test of that,” said Dionne, speaking to voters forced to vote in freshly mangled districts that Republicans are gerrymandering.

Isgur pointed out that polling from Trump-supporting Republicans “has remained remarkably consistent that they are still on Trump’s team,” but she agreed that less cultlike Republicans are getting sick of the news and the same chaotic face churning it to froth.

“I learned from The New York Times recently that reality TV viewership has dropped off a cliff. Hollywood is no longer producing new reality shows,” said Isgur. “They’re canceling the ones that are already out there. And so, basically, after a quarter-century of the reality TV experiment, it has — to use the original meaning of it — jumped the shark. How many times do you need to see someone eat a cockroach to be like, ‘Yep, people eat cockroaches for money, I guess’”

“And so, I think as we have been becoming tired of reality television, you will see voters get tired of reality TV politics, because the two are inextricably linked,” Isgur continued. “Reality TV politics grew as reality TV grew, and it will die as reality TV dies. And you’re seeing little examples of this along the way. You have the Democratic primary, for instance, in Texas, between Jasmine Crockett — far more the traditional reality TV candidate, very aggressive, negative online, attention-seeking — versus James Talarico, who ran a very traditional grass-roots model — having an actual ground game, a positive message — whom I’ve referred to as the ‘Ted Lasso’ candidate. And I think you will see more of those candidates break through.”

Dionne took issue with Isgur corralling Crockett in the pen with “reality TV candidates” and predicted Talarico “may run a clip of you talking about him as the Ted Lasso candidate.” But he also noted a distinct drop in sales of Trump political paraphernalia, possibly linked to voter disenchantment.

“Someone had a story recently, that the sales of Trump paraphernalia, that they sell branded, are way down, apparently. And maybe it’s Trump inflation, but I don’t think so. … I do think what’s going on is more political than a pure market or mood analysis suggests, even though I think some of your points make some sense to me,” said Dionne. “Our colleague at the Times, Kristen Soltis Anderson, recently wrote about a real difference between MAGA Republicans and what she called “normie” Republicans. And normie Republicans are really disenchanted, to the point where their turnout in this election may be very low — that the MAGA side will turn out, but that those Republicans will not.”

'He’s fighting for us': MAGA voters hold fast as Trump pillages their bank accounts

Reuters reporter Brad Brooks reports that many rural MAGA still embrace President Donald Trump’s policies, no matter how it hurts them.

Colorado resident Amy Van Duyn knows the price of gasoline has doubled to $4.34 per gallon since President Donald Trump returned to the White House last year.

"I used to fill my tank for $36," Van Duyn, 42, told Reuters. "Now $36 gets me half a tank."

Her co-worker Tonyah Bruyette told Reuters that when it's time to buy groceries, she's left wondering where all her money went, declaring: "We're putting it in the tank rather than on our table."

Nevertheless, people like Bruyette are sticking with Trump.

"It feels like he hears us," said Bruyette, "that he is fighting for us."

Meanwhile, 65-year-old retired commodities broker Jim Miller said enduring the “momentary pain of high gas prices” was worth preventing Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon.

"I struggle, like everybody else does, but I'm willing to sacrifice a little," said Miller, who cites stories of American resilience during World War II. "That's been totally lost in this country, people's willingness to sacrifice."

The same goes for 66-year-old trader Mike Urbanowicz, who industry is actively suffering under Trump’s war. But even with gas prices blistering his industry, he said Trump was "naive" to think he could quickly solve the issue. And he expected prices to remain high into the fall, even if there was a breakthrough in stalled U.S.-Iran peace talks.

Still, he says he preferrs the status quo to Democrats, whom he saw as moving towards "full-blown socialism."

And in Fort Morgan, Lexys Siebrands told Reuters that the war with Iran as inevitable: "Something was going to happen eventually, whether it was Iran doing something to us or us doing it to them."

"It's just where we are with this war," said her mother, Jyl Siebrands. "People just have to give it time."

When asked if there was anything that might shake her faith in Trump's handling of the war or the economy, Jyl Siebrands said: “No. I'm all on board."

The pattern observed in rural America suggests a complex relationship between economic hardship and political loyalty.

Many Trump supporters in energy-dependent and agricultural communities continue to back his policies despite facing rising costs for fuel and groceries. Some attribute their loyalty to a belief that Trump understands their concerns, while others frame economic struggles as temporary sacrifices necessary for national security or to prevent what they see as unfavorable Democratic policies.

For many rural voters, support for Trump appears rooted in cultural identity and opposition to perceived liberal governance rather than immediate economic benefit.

It's a racket: How online influencers are 'getting paid' to manipulate your vote

More often than not an online influencer will remind his or her audience that they are being paid for their services, even if the announcement isn’t completely overt. That’s the case with progressive influencer Carlos Eduardo Espina and others, said New York Times writer Ken Bensinger.

“[Espina] revealed a surprising endorsement to his 14.5 million followers on TikTok: He would support Tom Steyer, the billionaire running for California governor as a Democrat.

“I really believe Tom Steyer is different,” Espina said in a posted speech. “He could be traveling around the world or doing whatever he wants, but he wants to serve the people of this state.”

Bensinger points out, however, that Steyer’s campaign was paying him $100,000 “to help win the election.”

“The $100,000 fee, buried in campaign finance records, is described as a payment for “strategic advice and campaign surrogacy.” The money went to a limited liability company in Texas that Mr. Espina also used to receive a travel reimbursement from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2024,” said Bensinger, adding that the financial report offers a rare peek into the world of “pay-for-play social media, where content creators and marketing firms are compensated to promote candidates and opinions in an environment that offers few disclosure requirements.

Over on the conservative side of the spectrum, Bensinger reports marketing firm Creator Grid, “has received almost $875,000 from the Republican National Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee since late 2023, including a payment of $35,840 in February.” On its website, Creator Grid says it “connects Republican candidates with the internet’s most powerful conservative influencers.” But don’t expect to see many similar revelations because political social media agencies scarcely appear in F.E.C. records.

“In part, that is because much of the money to the creators originates from nonprofit advocacy organizations that are not required to report their spending, rather than from campaigns or political action committees,” Bensinger reported.

Last summer when right-wing influencer Dominick McGee, known as “Dom Lucre,” blasted former President Barack Obama on X for opposing the extension of the Trump tax cuts for wealthy Americans he was paid for the post, said Bensinger. And his post was viewed 1.3 million times.

And influencer Jessica Reed Kraus revealed that a post she amplified on X by Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) was part of an organized campaign offering influencers money in exchange for amplifications.

“I didn’t do anything wrong here,” Kraus insisted. “Anything I am getting paid for, I don’t want people to think I wasn’t.”

This, however, is the same undisclosed networking that made possible embarrassing revelations of international support of influencers by Russian and Chinese entities.

Measles rages in Florida as DeSantis touts 'freedom'

“Convenient mythologies require neither evidence nor logic.” — Edward S. Herman, “Manufactured Consent: The Political Economy of Mass Media”

In a number of articles on its website, PEN America explains in striking detail the right-wing Trojan horse of “parental rights,” illuminating the threat caused by policymakers focused on this theater in the culture war.

PEN — which has gained a global reputation for standing “at the intersection of literature and human rights to protect free expression in the United States and worldwide” — argues that “parents’ rights” is not a source of freedom as claimed, but the crux of an ideological rigidity exercised by MAGA Republicans.

Replace the terms “books” and “literature” with “vaccinations” in the narratives, and the poisonous effects of “parents’ rights” and “medical freedom” on Florida’s public health system becomes clear.

Under the guise of “freedom,” the DeSantis administration including Surgeon General Joe Ladapo has established policies that have directly contributed to the measles outbreak that has spread across the state.

Yet, despite the proliferation of this disease, which has placed Florida fourth in the United States with 152 confirmed cases in 2025-26 and 145 confirmed cases so far this year, state officials have acted as if “there’s nothing to see here.”

Collier County is the center of an outbreak that began in January at Ave Maria University. The number of reported cases out of Collier has remained steady at 106, with most cases affecting those aged 15 to 24. According to the Florida Department of Health, Florida is up to 150 cases this year as of the week ending May 2. Officials note that there is “a continuing slowdown in infections after outbreaks earlier this year.”

Contagion

Measles is one of the most contagious communicable diseases on record. With the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, measles is easy to control. The MMR vaccine is credited with saving the lives of millions of people globally over the past 50 years.

Traditional medical experts warn that unvaccinated children need to stay home after measles exposure to stop transmission of this highly contagious disease. If not, chances of a prolonged outbreak increase significantly. Among unvaccinated people, nine of 10 who’re exposed will get infected.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, Republican legislators, and some health officials might have avoided the outbreak had they treated it as a strictly health-related issue not a politically charged one. And if DeSantis and Ladapo weren’t so cavalier about tossing around inaccurate data, taking problems out of context, or selectively presenting information, Florida wouldn’t be in this situation.

Experts point to vaccine hesitancy and fear sown by MAGA Republicans as reasons why fewer parents are interested in vaccinating their children. According to Politico, vaccine hesitancy has “evolved into a central pillar of the MAGA movement’s health policy, often blending medical skepticism with a desire to dismantle public health regulations.”

Skepticism of COVID-19 vaccines, and a growing distrust of traditional childhood vaccines, are “closely tied to the “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) agenda led by figures such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.,” Politico writes.

The publication cites a 2023 Morning Consult poll showing that “as the number of voters more doubtful of vaccines has risen — despite scientific evidence that they’re safe and effective — it has come almost exclusively from one political party. While opposition to more established vaccines is still far from a majority position among Republicans, significant numbers question their safety and say Americans shouldn’t be encouraged to get them.”

Hubris

Katelyn Jetelina and Kristen Panthagani capture perfectly the hubris surrounding Florida’s widening measles epidemic.

Jetelina, an epidemiologist, and Panthagani, an emergency physician at Yale University, have written that by ignoring common sense and medical advice, Florida’s health officials risk a mushrooming measles outbreak. Negligence by Lapado, DeSantis, and the MAHA crew has endangered citizens and inflamed the outbreak.

“This is happening in a state with a growing skepticism of vaccinations and an ongoing debate between individualism and the good of the larger population that came to a head during the COVID pandemic,” the authors write in a 2024 opinion piece in Scientific American.

“But containing measles, which can spread quickly, should not be up for debate. Yet this is what is happening in Florida, and it’s putting children’s health at risk.”

A 2025 study from the Cureus Journal of Science and Medicine, published in PubMed, examines how “declining vaccine uptake and growing vaccine hesitancy created pockets of susceptibility that enabled the outbreak.”

DeSantis and Lapado are vigorously pushing to make it easier for parents to opt their children out of mandatory school vaccines — a proposal the Florida House refused to pass in the 2026 regular session and the just-completed special session.

‘Parental rights’

“Since 2021, the Sunshine State has led the country in advancing the parental rights agenda. Contrary to its name, this agenda has used fuzzy, coded language to manufacture moral panic, and to deliver control over what students can read and learn in schools not into the hands of all parents but to a particular segment of citizens — some not even parents but community members,” PEN America officials and researchers said.

“The cumulative effect has been to privilege some parents’ ideological preferences above all others, tie the hands of educators, and limit students’ access to information through curricular prohibitions and book bans.”

The same dynamic applies to health care and vaccines.

In its report on “parental rights” legislation, PEN cautioned that despite the fact that encouraging greater parental involvement in schools can seem like common sense, “these bills have an ulterior motive driving them: to empower a vocal and censorship-minded minority with greater opportunity to scrutinize public education and intimidate educators with threats of punishment.”

In Florida, the DeSantis administration and Republicans in the Legislature have taken up the battle cry. Ladapo and DeSantis announced in a press conference their intention of eliminating childhood vaccine mandates. Medical experts note that all 50 states enforce childhood vaccine mandates, with all states allowing medical exemptions and more than half — including Florida — allowing religious exemptions

Lyndon Haviland of the CUNY School of Public Health and Health Policy blames the “perfect storm” of vaccine skepticism, failed leadership, and broken trust as the core reasons for the outbreak.

The eruption of measles in Texas, Florida, and elsewhere, she contends, aren’t isolated events.

Manufactured distrust

“Cases have also surfaced in Alaska, California, New Mexico, New York City, Georgia, Rhode Island, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Concern that reports will continue to grow is rising,” she writes.

“It’s especially worrisome considering that the measles virus was completely eliminated in the U.S. as recently as the year 2000. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention attributed this achievement to a “highly effective vaccine program in the United States, as well as better measles control in the Americas region.”

So, how did we get here?

“The answer: distrust. Distrust in health experts, who years ago were revered as national authorities on serious medical issues. Distrust in public health agencies, the CDC, and the Food and Drug Administration specifically, once respected as credible information resources. Distrust in the strength and rigor of vaccine testing protocols, the pharmaceutical industry itself and the broader politicization of public health.”

Haviland and other health experts fear ‘America, which was once considered a world leader in public health, has lost decades of progress in preventing the spread of a deadly disease with a provably safe therapy that has successfully saved millions of American lives.”

The focus on vaccine hesitancy “underplays the significant backlash against vaccines and the flood of anti-vaccine misinformation to which many Americans have been subjected,” Haviland continues.

“The reality is that Americans are increasingly adopting a more dismissive mindset in the way they view vaccine efficacy. Skepticism, rather than hesitancy, is a more accurate term to describe America’s perception of vaccines — and it shows no sign of slowing down.”

A certain arrogance

There is a certain arrogance the MAGA multitude carry. They act as though they have a direct line to God and the divine right to determine what’s best for the rest of us. Hence, the series of seemingly endless toxic, selfish crusades that former youth pastor and author John Pavlovitz argues “amplify baseless anti-science propaganda.”

This poisonous mindset has a human cost. Almost 90,000 people in the Sunshine State have died because of COVID; others have succumbed to preventable diseases like the flu.

There’s no telling when this measles outbreak will end but many in health circles and elsewhere will not stop fighting to protect America’s people against this destructive public health crisis.

Kevin Griffis, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy’s director for media relations and public affairs, in an April 22 opinion piece wrote, “Americans can handle hard truths. What they should not have to tolerate is selective concern dressed up as science. … Public health depends on trust. Trust depends on honesty.”

“When the nation’s top health official pretends otherwise — or claims ignorance when it is politically convenient, so as not to raise the ire of MAHA activists — it is not public health leadership. It is yet another example of politics and ideology trumping evidence.”

Critics worry Colorado Dem just sent a 'dangerous message'

Top Colorado Democrats and democracy advocates were among those expressing concern on Friday after Democratic Gov. Jared Polis commuted the sentence of Tina Peters, a former county clerk and 2020 election denier backed by President Donald Trump.

“Today, Gov. Polis delivered a victory to every person urging President Trump to seize control of elections in 2026,” said Aly Belknap, executive director of the advocacy group Common Cause Colorado, in a statement. “By commuting Tina Peters’ sentence, Gov. Polis dealt a massive blow to Colorado’s ability to run its own elections and uphold its own judicial system.”

“This decision sends a dangerous message that Colorado will tolerate criminal meddling in election systems and equipment when it is done to make a political statement,” Belknap warned. “Authoritarians create martyrs out of people like Tina Peters to fuel outrage, mobilize supporters, and excuse lawbreaking in service of their agenda.”

“But authoritarians cannot dismantle democracy on their own. They need powerful people to give them consent. Today, Gov. Polis gave President Trump that consent. This is a shameful day for Colorado,” she added. “Gov. Polis’ decision undermines election security, weakens accountability, and permanently stains his legacy.”

Since returning to office last year, Trump has pardoned his supporters who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, fought for access to state voter rolls, said that Republicans “ought to nationalize the voting” in direct defiance of the Constitution, generated fear that he’ll have federal agents surround polling sites in November, and even repeatedly suggested that the 2026 elections shouldn’t be held at all.

Trump also gave Peters a symbolic federal pardon and pressured Polis—who is term-limited and set to leave office next January—to act on her case. The president was not able to free Peters from her nine-year sentence himself because a jury convicted her of state felonies and misdemeanors for her role in breaching election equipment in 2021.

After the governor’s decision, which was announced alongside dozens of other pardons and commutations, and sets up Peters to be released from prison on June 1, the president wrote on his Truth Social platform, “FREE TINA!”

Peters also turned to social media on Friday, thanking Polis, apologizing for her “mistakes,” and writing that “upon release, I plan to do my best through legal means to support election integrity and, based on my own personal experiences, to elevate the cause of prison reform.”

In an interview with The New York Times, Polis denied trying to placate the president by freeing the former clerk. He said that “she committed a crime; she deserves to be a convicted felon,” but “she was given an unusually harsh sentence.”

As the newspaper detailed:

The governor’s decision came after Mr. Trump cut hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money for Colorado, moved to dismantle a leading climate and weather research center in Boulder, rejected disaster relief for rural counties in the state that had been hammered by floods and fire, and vetoed an urgently needed water pipeline for rural Colorado.In the interview, Mr. Polis pointed out that Mr. Trump had other grievances against Colorado, such as its mail-in voting system, and said he was not making his commutation decision with the expectation that Mr. Trump would undo his actions against Colorado.
“That’s not something I ever considered,” he said.

Meanwhile, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold declared that “this clemency grant to Tina Peters is an affront to our democracy, the people of Colorado, and election officials across the country. The governor’s actions today will validate and embolden the election denial movement, and leave a dark, dangerous imprint on American democracy for years to come.”

US Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) said that “Tina Peters is guilty as sin and a disgrace to Colorado. She tried to undermine Colorado’s free and fair election system. When she was caught red-handed, she was prosecuted by a Republican district attorney and rightfully convicted by a jury of her peers. Reducing her sentence sends the wrong message to those seeking to undermine trust in our elections, and it will do nothing to deter Donald Trump’s illegal attacks on Colorado. I strongly disagree with this decision.”

Fellow US Senate Democrat Michael Bennet, who is running for governor, was similarly critical, saying: “I vehemently disagree with Gov. Polis’ decision to commute Tina Peters’ sentence. She broke the law, undermined our elections, and was convicted by a jury of her peers. With Trump continuing to attack Colorado, we must stand strong for our institutions and the rule of law.”

David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, told Democracy Docket that “it’s unfortunate to see the governor of Colorado succumbing to the bullying tactics of election conspiracy theorists. He has thrown state and county election officials, Republicans and Democrats, under the bus after they resisted the corruption Ms. Peters engaged in and withstood attacks for many years as a result.”

Even another former Republican clerk—Matt Crane, who’s now executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association—sounded the alarm, arguing that “Tina Peters’ actions have made life harder, not only for election officials here in Colorado, but make no mistake, for election officials all across the country. Her conduct became a rallying point for election conspiracy movements that fueled hostility and distrust towards the very people responsible for administering free and fair elections.”

“Rather than standing with public service servants and defending one of our nation’s most cherished rights, the right to vote, Gov. Polis is bending the knee to the same political forces and conspiracy movements that are actively undermining confidence in our democratic institutions,” Crane said. “That choice carries consequences far beyond this single case.”

Fox News' fraud exposed: Inside the real-time con that's hollowing out America

Whenever a new poll comes out showing Trump’s abysmal ratings, public reactions follow a pattern. Public comments don’t question Trump’s disapproval rating. Rather, millions of people question the flip side: how does 38% of the nation still support such an obvious charlatan? Are supporters delusional? Suicidal?

Specifically, does MAGA not know that 15 million Americans, mostly their own, have now lost health insurance because of him? Can they not read the Walmart price tags they hold in their own hands? Do they not know he’s weakening the NATO alliance their granddads fought for, or that he single-handedly empowered one of the most dangerous regimes in the world?

The answer is ‘No, no, and no.’ Nearly 40% of the country—38%, to be exact— can’t connect the dots on who’s making their lives harder. We don’t need another study to figure out why, because it couldn’t be more obvious: As of May 12, 2026, 38% of the nation still supports Trump because 38% of the nation watches Fox News, purveyors of pure Trump propaganda. And compared to other consumers, Fox News viewers do not diversify their sources.

After the 2020 election, the Pew Research Center did a deep dive to learn what Americans heard, perceived and knew about it. Researchers found, for example, that 63% of Fox News viewers had given Trump an “excellent” rating on Covid. Trump suggested injecting bleach into unspecified orifices while over 1 million Americans died, yet Fox viewers thought he did an excellent job??

More accurately it was a con job, perpetrated by Fox News.

Fox News propaganda

Coming into the present news cycle, the Pope-Trump conflict illustrates the con in real time. Pope Leo XIV criticized Trump’s war with Iran by condemning leaders who manipulate religion for military gain. Trump, manifestly devoid of impulse control, immediately shot back on Truth Social that the Pope was “weak on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy” as if he were a political adversary. In follow up Fox News Digital interviews, Trump doubled down and refused to apologize as Fox hosts clapped like seals.

While most media outlets questioned Trump’s sanity for attacking the spiritual leader of 1.4 billion people, Fox dissembled with headlines like, “60 Minutes accused of using left-leaning Cardinals to bait Trump into feud with Vatican” and “Pope Leo says remarks about world being ‘ravaged by a handful of tyrants’ were not aimed at Trump. When Trump dispatched Marco Rubio to patch things up with the Pope last week, most media reported that it didn’t work, but Fox called it a big success and applauded what a great job Rubio did.

Fox News even tried to accuse other media networks of intentionally ‘baiting’ a response from Trump. They invited Elise Stefanik onto the network to tell Pope Leo XIV to “stay out of politics,” while other guests labelled the Pope’s foreign policy views ‘wrong’ and ‘liberal.’ Sean Hannity questioned whether the Pope fully understood the Iran conflict, and several other Fox commentators questioned whether the Pontiff had “read the Bible” about geocomplexities in Iran. To be clear, not one Fox host questioned whether Trump had “read the map” before he delivered the Strait of Hormuz to the mullahs.

The First Amendment protects political speech but it does not protect fraud

The Pope example alone illustrates how MAGA is being lied to on a daily basis, but it’s just one example. Fox News serves up daily falsehoods about climate change, immigrants, public education, NATO, black crime, ICE, and the war in Iran to craft a pro-Trump narrative, assuming their lies are legally protected by the First Amendment as “political speech.”

Enough damage is now evident to challenge that legal assumption.

In 2010, Supreme Court republicans fast-tracked America’s slide into oligarchy when they ruled in Citizens United that corporate political donations were a form of free speech. Citizens United further clarified that, under the First Amendment, political speech warrants the “highest level of protection against government regulation” following the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan’s restatement, and an earlier ruling that any regulations on political speech must withstand the highest level of strict scrutiny.

But while First Amendment protection for political speech is old news, there’s another long-toothed maxim: The First Amendment does not protect fraud. In 2012, under United States v. Alvarez, the Court confirmed that fraud is a ‘narrowly limited class of speech’ not entitled to First Amendment protection. In Alvarez, the Court struck down the Stolen Valor Act, a law that made lying about military medals a crime, because no one gained a ‘material advantage’ from the lie. Unless someone is profiting from their false speech, the court ruled, there’s no actionable fraud—they’re simply lying. But false speech connected to economic gain on one side and economic harm on the other is fraud, legally unprotected under the First Amendment.

Under this definition, Fox News is engaged in classic consumer fraud. Fox admitted in the Dominion case that they lied to their viewers for profit, and paid out nearly $1 billion in settlement as a result. But their lies didn’t stop after that case, they continue to sell 24/7 Trump propaganda as ‘news.’ They are perpetrating the same fraud, one that hooks viewers, profiting Fox and their corporate backers, while materially harming victims by convincing them to vote against their own economic interests.

Under Supreme Court precedent, Fox News isn’t engaging in protected political speech. It’s engaging in commercial fraud. And the victims aren’t just Fox viewers, even though studies show they are harmed the most: the entire nation is enduring political violence, extreme division and rumblings of civil war because 38% of the country is being lied to.

Albert Einstein once said, “A people that were to honor falsehood…would be unable, indeed, to subsist for very long.” Is mere national survival a sufficient justification to return to requiring accuracy in the news? Is it legally sufficient to pass strict scrutiny? If it is not, after a Democrat-run Congress returns to the Fairness Doctrine, this high court will have elevated partisan interests to the point of national suicide.

Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. She writes the free Substack, The Haake Take.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.