Search results for "Georgia probe"

Nevada journalist warns of 'trick' Trump is playing with FBI’s Georgia elections probe

During his Wednesday, January 21 speech at the 2026 World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, U.S. President Donald Trump repeated his debunked claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him and promised that "people will soon be prosecuted for what they did."

"It was a rigged election," Trump told Davos attendees. "We can't have rigged elections."

European reporters were quick to fact-check Trump, noting that one recount after another confirmed that 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden won the election fair and square.

But a week later in Georgia, on Wednesday, January 28, FBI agents searched an elections center looking for 2020 election records. Georgia was among the swing states that Trump lost in 2020 but won in 2016 and 2024.

In some January 29 posts on X, formerly Twitter, Nevada Independent CEO Jon Ralston stressed that the search is about much more than Georgia and much more than 2020.

Ralston said of the FBI search, "Outrageous and frightening. No basis to do this, all court cases Trump filed came to naught in 2020. And don't forget this from Trump in '22: 'Clark County, Nevada, has a corrupt voting system...' Does anyone think he'll stop w/[Georgia]? And still: The silence of the GOP lambs."

Referencing the 2026 midterms in a separate tweet, Ralston posted, "This has little to do with 2020. With the likelihood of the GOP losing the House in November and the Senate perhaps in play, this is all about what Trump is planning for this year's election. Calling an election corrupt so you can corrupt an election is quite the trick."

Trump’s election raid goes to court as judge gets saddled with 'conspiracy theories'

President Donald Trump's push to find evidence of fraud in the 2020 election is facing an early legal hurdle, according to the Washington Post, with the FBI headed to court over allegations it used "conspiracy theories" and long-debunked lies to dupe a judge into signing a warrant for the raid on a Georgia election center.

In late January, the FBI conducted a raid of an election center in Fulton County, Georgia, seizing a large amount of ballots and materials from the 2020 presidential election. Trump has long insisted, without concrete evidence, that widespread fraud tipped that race to Joe Biden, and has pushed his subordinates to conduct new investigations to dig up proof. Experts also fear that the raid will be used to build a pretense to meddle in future elections.

Officials in Fulton County have since sued in an attempt to compel the Trump administration to return 650 boxes of materials seized in January, with the case set to go before U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee on Friday. At the heart of the county's argument is the accusation that the FBI presented dubious or outright false information to a magistrate in order to get them to sign off on the warrant for the highly controversial raid.

"Fulton County officials maintain that agents duped a federal court magistrate into approving the warrant by presenting conspiracy theories and previously debunked claims of election irregularities as evidence of possible crimes," the Washington Post's report explained. "Lawyers for Fulton County have called the seizure of its 2020 election materials, and the warrant that authorized it, 'unprecedented in American history.' They have characterized the theories cited to obtain the warrant as little more than 'ill-informed… speculative assertions that, even if true, concern records of no consequence to the outcome of the election.'”

One of Fulton County's attorneys on the case, Y. Soo Jo, recently warned in a written filing that the federal government's conduct surrounding the raid might also act as voter suppression, arguing that, "knowing that the federal government can physically seize and rummage through election records long after the election has been certified will predictably chill voter participation and undermine voters’ confidence in the security and secrecy of their ballots."

Trump's Justice Department has already attempted to argue that U.S. Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas's approval of the warrant, in and of itself, means that the raid was justified. These arguments, however, have fallen flat, with Judge Boulee, a Trump appointee, shooting them down in court.

The affidavit requesting the warrant was originally submitted to Salinas by FBI Agent Hugh Raymond Evans. According to the Post, the arguments it put forward were heavily reliant "on accounts from 11 people — many of whom are prominent election deniers or members of Georgia’s Republican-controlled State Election Board," suggesting that "unknown persons" might have been trying to meddle with the 2020 election in the state.

"But the issues Evans cited, including claims of duplicate ballots and missing ballot images, have been addressed by previous audits and investigations that found no evidence of wrongdoing," the Post's report detailed. "County officials described many of them in a court filing as 'types of human errors that… occur in almost every election — without any intentional wrongdoing whatsoever.'”

The report continued: "For instance, Evans cited the fact that Fulton County no longer has scanned images of all 528,777 ballots cast in the 2020 race as evidence of a possible tampering. But officials have dismissed that shortcoming as insignificant, given they still have original paper versions of those ballots. The affidavit also suggested that the county may have scanned more than 3,000 ballots twice during a recount of the 2020 vote. But previous state investigations have produced no evidence that those double scans meant the ballots were actually counted twice. Even if they were, those earlier probes concluded, the outcome would have benefited Trump."

'The 2020 election is over': Judge throws out MAGA lawsuit and imposes steep fine

One week after President Donald Trump sent FBI agents to seize Fulton County’s 2020 ballots as part of a criminal probe, a Georgia judge has apparently had it up to here with Trump-style election deniers.

“The 2020 election is over,” said Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney, dismissing Trump-supporters’ lawsuit and effort to review ballots and materials they allege would prove Trump should have won Georgia.

On top of tossing the suit, the judge ordered the four plaintiffs — consisting of a treasure hunter and members of a Georgia affiliate of the Tea Party Patriots — to pay nearly $40,000 to Fulton County and the county Superior Court clerk’s office for filing the frivolous suit.

McBurney ruled the lawsuit “presented zero factual or legal questions” concerning the county’s liability for certain claims and gave the plaintiffs until Monday to pay the attorney fees.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) reports McBurney's ruling is the “latest twist” in a long-running legal battle that centers on allegations of voting fraud in the 2020 election. Lead plaintiff Garland Favorito has become an influential figure among a group of Georgians who are convinced that fraud cost Trump the election, despite countless state and federal investigations finding no evidence of significant fraud in 2020. Then-President Joe Biden’s victory was confirmed by two recounts, including a hand count of every ballot.

One of Favorito’s consultants reviewing ballot images was Jovan Pulitzer, an inventor and scavenger who the AJC reports as having once “searched for the Ark of the Covenant.” Another face behind the fight was Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, who joined Pulitzer in spreading election fraud conspiracies during a state Senate hearing at the Georgia Capitol.

“An attorney for Favorito, Todd Harding, has been involved in at least three other lawsuits alleging fraud in Georgia’s November and January U.S. Senate elections,” AJC reported in 2021.

“This is nothing more than a circus that’s being put on by those who promote the ’big lie’ that Trump won the election,” Fulton Commission Chairman Robb Pitts said in 2021. “Where does it end? The votes have been counted. The elections have been certified. It’s over.”

But even today, it apparently is not over because Trump has sent his politicized FBI to investigate and count ballots on their own under the cover of a federal warehouse.

New details expose extensive prep behind Trump admin's controversial raid

The Missouri prosecutor overseeing an investigation into the 2020 vote in Fulton County, Georgia, has taken part in meetings since last fall with lawyers tasked by President Donald Trump to reinvestigate his loss to Joe Biden.

Thomas Albus, whom Trump appointed last year as U.S. attorney for Missouri’s Eastern District, has had multiple meetings set up with top administration lawyers to discuss election integrity.

At those meetings was Ed Martin, a Justice Department lawyer who until recently led a group investigating what the president has described as the department’s “weaponization” against him and his allies, according to a source familiar with the meetings who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.

White House lawyer Kurt Olsen, who has been tasked with reinvestigating the 2020 election, also was directed to join at least one of the meetings, according to the source. Both Martin and Olsen worked on behalf of Trump to try to overturn the 2020 election results, and a federal court sanctioned Olsen for making false claims about the reliability of voting machines in Arizona.

The meetings reveal new details about the length of the preparations for, and people involved in, the January FBI raid on Fulton County, which election and legal experts told ProPublica was a significant escalation in Trump’s breaking of democratic norms.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi picked Albus and has granted him special authority to handle election-related cases nationwide, even though his earlier work as a federal prosecutor didn’t involve election law or election-related cases. The meetings with Martin, Olsen and other lawyers for the Justice Department were described by the source as being about “election integrity,” a term the Trump administration has used to describe investigations into its false claims that elections are rigged.

Martin, Olsen, Albus and others declined to answer questions about the meetings and other detailed questions from ProPublica. The White House and the Justice Department also did not respond to questions.

The meetings came at a particularly crucial time.

Martin’s efforts to obtain election materials from Fulton County, a Democratic stronghold, had hit a wall. In August, he sent a letter demanding that a Fulton County judge allow him to access tens of thousands of absentee ballots for “an investigation into election integrity here at the Department of Justice,” but he had reportedly received no reply.

Martin explained to Steve Bannon on a podcast that aired around the time of the meetings that although the White House had given Olsen the official mandate to reinvestigate the 2020 election, “inside DOJ, myself and a couple of others have been working also on the same topic” — including getting the Fulton County ballots. But Martin described progress as a “challenge.”

Bannon, who served as Trump’s chief strategist in his first term, asked why Martin didn’t just “get some U.S. marshals to go down and seize” the ballots.

Martin suggested it was easier said than done, but agreed: “Look, we’ve got to get” the ballots.

Before long, Albus and Olsen were interviewing witnesses for their case. Kevin Moncla, a conservative researcher, told ProPublica that he spoke to Albus and Olsen a couple of times, both together and separately, around the turn of the year. He identified himself as Witness 7 in the affidavit that persuaded a judge to sign off on the raid, and the affidavit mentions a 263-page report he authored that activists believe may have justified the raid, ProPublica has reported. Moncla has a long history of working with Olsen, dating back to an attempt by Kari Lake, a Republican candidate for governor in Arizona, to overturn her 2022 loss.

Just a few weeks after those interviews, in late January, Albus was listed as the government attorney on the search warrant that authorized the seizure of roughly 700 boxes of election material in Georgia, far outside of Albus’ usual jurisdiction.

Former U.S. attorneys from both parties said it was rare for a federal prosecutor from one region to take on cases in other states or be granted the nationwide authority Albus has been given.

Under Trump, senior roles across the White House, DOJ and FBI have increasingly been filled by a small, interconnected group of Missouri lawyers with longstanding ties to one another.

Another top federal official in the meetings was Jesus Osete, the principal deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights. Before joining the Justice Department, Osete worked in the Missouri attorney general’s office, where he represented the state in at least five lawsuits against the Biden administration regarding vaccine mandates, immigration and other policies. Osete did not respond to requests for comment or to a detailed list of questions.

When the FBI raided Fulton County’s election center, Andrew Bailey, another lawyer from the same political circles, was in charge. Before joining the FBI as deputy director, he had used his position as Missouri’s attorney general to pursue high-profile cases against prominent Democrats and said he supported all efforts to investigate Biden, his family and his administration.

A spokesperson for the FBI declined to answer detailed questions about Bailey.

Last year, Roger Keller, a veteran federal prosecutor from Albus’ office, was brought in to help prosecute New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud in Virginia after the original career prosecutors on the case were replaced by political appointees. After a judge dismissed the case, two federal grand juries declined to indict James again, and Keller returned to Missouri.

Trump’s solicitor general, D. John Sauer, previously served as Missouri’s solicitor general under state attorneys general Josh Hawley and Eric Schmitt. He and Schmitt signed Missouri’s amicus brief supporting efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Sauer later represented Trump in his presidential-immunity case, successfully arguing before the Supreme Court that Trump was entitled to broad immunity from prosecution.

Albus’ connection to the other Missouri lawyers goes back decades. Unlike some of the others, though, he has never held elected office or had a high public profile, nor has he waged culture-war campaigns like Bailey or Martin. Instead, he spent most of his career as a federal prosecutor and as a judge in a Missouri state circuit court.

Emails show Albus exchanging brief messages with Martin in 2007, when Albus was an assistant U.S. attorney in St. Louis and Martin was chief of staff to then-Gov. Matt Blunt. The emails were part of records from the Blunt administration that became public after being released under Missouri’s Sunshine Law.

In the email exchange, Albus put in a good word for a St. Louis lawyer who was a finalist for an appellate court judgeship, and Blunt ultimately selected that candidate.

Albus served as first assistant to Schmitt from early 2019 until Albus was appointed by Gov. Mike Parson to fill a circuit court judge vacancy in early 2020. Schmitt, now a U.S. senator, praised Albus as “one of the finest prosecutors I have ever met” when endorsing his nomination for U.S. attorney in December.

Lawyers who appeared in Albus’ court rated him as well prepared, professional and attentive, according to Missouri judicial performance reviews. They said he followed the evidence, applied the law correctly and gave clear reasons for his rulings.

Albus came under more critical scrutiny after Trump named him interim U.S. attorney last summer. Much of that attention centered on a fraud case he inherited when he took office. Prosecutors alleged that developers in St. Louis falsely claimed to be using minority- and women-owned subcontractors to qualify for city tax breaks, conduct the Justice Department has historically treated as wire fraud.

One of the defendants was represented by lawyer Brad Bondi, the brother of Pam Bondi.

The developers’ lawyers argued that even if the government’s claims were true, they were legally irrelevant because the Trump administration had taken the position that tax breaks based on race or gender were unlawful. Albus accepted those arguments and dropped the case. As part of the resolution, Albus personally hand-delivered to City Hall a check of about $1 million from one of the developers’ companies as restitution. He told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that he intervened “to make it clear” his office wanted to drop charges and hand-delivered the check “to make sure they got it.”

In a letter to Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Congressional Democrats said the dismissal of the St. Louis case and other cases in which the Justice Department intervened on behalf of Brad Bondi’s clients raised “significant broader ethical concerns.” In the St. Louis case, and in a separate matter involving another Brad Bondi client whose charges were dropped, a Justice Department spokesperson said Pam Bondi’s relationship with her brother had “no bearing on the outcome.”

A spokesperson for the developers said their lawyers communicated only with the U.S. attorney’s office in St. Louis about the case and had no direct contact with Pam Bondi. He said the dismissal reflected “a recognition that this case should never have been brought in the first place.” Brad Bondi did not respond to a request for comment.

Weeks later, around the time of Albus’ meetings about election integrity, he posed with Martin in Martin’s office, flanked by a framed photo of Trump and a copy of “A Choice, Not an Echo,” the influential conservative manifesto by Phyllis Schlafly arguing that Republican voters were being manipulated by party elites and the media.

Martin posted the photo on X with the caption, “Good morning, America. How are ya’?”

Judge blocks key agent in Georgia ballot‑seizure case from answering questions

U.S. District Court Judge J. P. Boulee, who is overseeing the Fulton County, Georgia, ballot case, has quashed the subpoena for FBI Agent Hugh Raymond Evans, who provided the one affidavit used to support the search warrant to seize the ballots from the 2020 election, reported Lawfare legal analyst Anna Bower.

It's a huge hit before the Friday evidentiary hearing over the raid on the elections office.

Fulton County officials believe that Evans deliberately misled the judge in the case by promoting 2020 election conspiracy theories from one of President Donald Trump's own allies to get the warrant for the ballots.

Boulee was appointed by the first Trump administration.

“In searching for evidence of a crime in Fulton County, President Trump has, in some sense, returned to the scene of his own…Now Trump is using the power of the federal government to seize the very ballots cast by voters whose will he once sought to subvert," Bower wrote in her piece, walking through the specifics of the case ahead of the hearing.

Marc Elias' Democracy Docket explained that the Justice Department has already made one mistake in revealing information about the probe when it unsealed the affidavit.

"Following the raid, the DOJ also initially told Fulton County officials that it wouldn’t oppose Evans testifying about the affidavit," the report explained. "Thomas Albus, a Missouri-based U.S. attorney overseeing the DOJ’s probe into the 2020 vote in Georgia, said in February that he couldn’t imagine Evan’s testimony 'will be an issue.'"

The DOJ then made a huge pivot three days later.

Republican-aligned company to pay nearly $7 million to scammed MAGA donors

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports a Republican-aligned financial services firm agreed Wednesday to repay $6.7 million to more than 40 investors who lost money in the collapse of politically connected First Liberty Building & Loan.

The payoff is tied to a widening investigation into a conservative group that created a massive Ponzi scheme primarily afflicting Republican donors. First Liberty Building & Loan’s restitution agreement is merely one facet of the “$140 million … scheme that defrauded some 300 investors overall,” reports AJC. “A recent court filing now contends First Liberty raised about $156 million from investors.”

First Liberty once courted conservative-leaning investors and touted its ability to “say yes to borrowers when the big banks said no,” but it shut down last June and took investors’ money with it. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission soon stepped in, filing a lawsuit accusing the company of operating an investment scheme. State agency probes soon followed.

The Wednesday settlement agreement comes weeks after Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s hit former Bankers Life adviser Nathaniel Darnell with a $500,000 fine and referred his case to local prosecutors for possible criminal charges over allegations that he deceived First Liberty investors, the AJC reports.

Retired electrical worker Thomas Todd invested $750,000 with First Liberty, and was even preparing to write another six-figure check when the company imploded.

“I pray for them every day — every morning. They need those prayers. But they also need to pay for what they did,” Todd told AJC, while adding that his donations would have been better spent going to churches and other religious charities.

“They didn’t steal from me,” said Todd. “They stole God’s money.”

AJC reports the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in July accused Frost IV in a lawsuit of orchestrating the scheme, funneling millions to the family to boost conservative causes. Federal authorities froze First Liberty’s assets, and Frost publicly apologized.

Georgia Republicans are loathe to denounce the Ponzi scheme connected to Republican financier and First Liberty founder Brant Frost IV — or to even address the topic. But Raffensperger is open about his willingness to investigate Republicans behind the scheme, and he appears to be slipping into an anti-corruption role in the state’s primary for Republican governor.

How a MAGA election board’s Trump loyalists paved the way for FBI voting search

After Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential election to the Democratic nominee — former Vice President and ex-U.S. Sen. Joe Biden (D-Delaware) — his claim that the election was stolen from him was repeatedly debunked by numerous vote recounts. And some of the debunking came from conservative Republicans, including Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, then-U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and then-Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey.

But Trump, now 13 and one-half months into his second presidency, continues to double down on his false claim that he won the 2020 election. In January, FBI agents searched an election center in Fulton County, Georgia, seizing 2020 election records.

In an article published on March 5, CNN reporters Tierney Sneed and Zachary Cohen describe ways in which the Georgia State Election Board helped pave the way for the FBI search.

"For most election administrators around the country," Sneed and Cohen explain, "the FBI's recent seizure of 2020 Atlanta-area ballots was shocking. But for some members of the Georgia State Election Board, the search was a welcome development. Led by the commission's vice chair, Janice Johnston — a retired obstetrician who, according to court filings, had no experience working elections prior to 2021 — the board's conservative majority has been relentlessly pursuing fraud theories about Donald Trump's defeat in the 2020 presidential election."

The CNN journalists continue, "After subpoenaing some of the Fulton County election records themselves, the board invited the Justice Department's assistance last year, itself, resulting in a Trump Administration civil lawsuit in December that preceded the search warrant secured through a federal criminal probe. Johnston and another MAGA-aligned board member, former media personality Janelle King, were witnesses cited by the FBI in its application to justify seizing the records, as were other election deniers who have made frequent appearances before the board to allege a tainted 2020 result."

According to David Worley — a Democrat who formerly served on the Georgia State Election Board — Johnston objected when told she couldn't enter the Fulton County election center's inner storage room during the FBI search. Johnston didn't object to the search, but rather, wanted to get some credit for it and argued, "It's our subpoena."

Salleigh Grubbs, another Republican on the Georgia State Election Board, told CNN, "It's way past time for these matters to have been investigated." And she said it was "great" that the FBI search took place.

Failed Republican candidate gets quiet consolation prize at Trump's DOJ

Dan Bishop has been lucky enough to score several jobs in President Donald Trump's administration after he failed to win in a primary race and it isn't the first time.

Writing for the Rachel Maddow Show blog, producer Steve Benen noted Bishop was first hired after he gave up his North Carolina House seat to run for attorney general in the state. He lost. So the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) hired him.

After less than a year, he left OMB for a prime spot at the U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina. After five months, he was shifted to another job: Winning Trump's 2020 campaign, in 2026.

Trump has spent the first part of the year revisiting the 2020 election, which he lost to President Joe Biden. In Fulton County, Georgia, the FBI seized ballots from the past election. In Maricopa County, Arizona, in early March, an FBI agent took more than three dozen hard drives and servers containing data from a partisan audit of the 2020 election from the state Senate building. The audit was done by the company "Cyber Ninjas" and lambasted by legal experts and watchdog groups as a "sham audit."

Benen cited the Wall Street Journal report, which cited Bishop's recent "quiet" appointment to the investigative team at the Justice Department.

"Attorney General Pam Bondi, last week, quietly authorized Dan Bishop, a U.S. attorney in North Carolina, to pursue election-related probes across the country, according to a copy of the order," the Journal cited. One DOJ official told the reporters that "Bishop, a former congressman who voted against certifying Biden’s 2020 win, will also examine voter-roll data the Justice Department has been collecting from states in an effort to determine whether noncitizens have illegally registered or cast ballots."

Benen wrote, "Given his record, it’s tough to be optimistic about Bishop overseeing these efforts in a detached and independent way."

The report indicated that "the lines have grown blurry," Benen said, when it comes to how the DOJ is being used to pursue 2020 election conspiracy theories. While Bishop is concerned, Benen, it's the combination of all of it that sent up the red flags.

"Making matters worse is the scope of the efforts. The Bishop news is important, but it dovetails with the president and his team seizing ballots and election records in Georgia and Arizona; seizing voting equipment in Puerto Rico; waging an aggressive campaign to acquire voter rolls from states where Democrats won; organizing an unnecessary FBI elections 'briefing' for state officials; and providing Kurt Olsen, one of Trump’s highly controversial former campaign lawyers, with classified information as he tried to advance election conspiracy theories," Benen explained.

While it's part of Trump's continued efforts to relitigate the 2020 election, it's also part of a larger campaign to restrict voting rights.

As Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained it in 2020, “If Republicans don’t challenge and change the US election system, there will never be another Republican president elected again. President Trump should not concede. We’re down to less – 10,000 votes in Georgia. He’s going to win North Carolina. We have gone from 93,000 votes to less than 20,000 votes in Arizona, where more – more votes to be counted.”

Trump further commented in early March that passing voter restrictions “will guarantee the midterms."

'Stole God's money': GOP corruption may upend swing state's Republican primary

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that retirees who fell victim to a far-reaching Republican Party-affiliated Ponzi scheme are poised to redirect the trajectory of the GOP primary in Georgia.

“At 93, retiree [Jay McMaster] spent a lifetime building a nest egg — starting as a boy shining shoes for 35 cents an hour at Woolworth’s, then saving carefully through decades of work in the food service industry,” reported AJC. “When his sister’s health began to fail, McMaster wanted to help cover her care. He invested a total of $1.3 million with First Liberty Building & Loan after hearing about the politically connected, Newman-based lender on conservative radio.”

But all that’s gone now, said AJC, wiped out in what federal regulators say was a $140 million Ponzi scheme. Now McMaster is sharing his story to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s (R) ongoing probe into the aftermath.

Raffensperger, who is in a crowded Republican race for governor, is leaning into his office’s probe into First Liberty and pushing ferociously against a Republican-majority legislative effort to strip his office of the authority to investigate the scheme.

Raffensperger’s staunch anti-corruption message — and his commitment as the sole Republican gubernatorial contender willing to address the scheme — could result in Georgia's next governor being the only Republican willing to stand against President Donald Trump after Trump pressured Georgia officials to reverse the state’s election results in 2020.

“I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state,” Trump demanded of Raffensperger while ongoing tallies showed state voters soundly jettisoning Trump in the ballot count.

Raffensperger refused to give Trump his undeserved victory in 2020, and even retained an audio recording of Trump’s plea to give to investigators. For that betrayal, Trump endorsed Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones over Raffensperger in the Republican gubernatorial primary. Jones served as a fake elector in 2020 and has labored to undermine Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis' election interference investigation Trump and several co-conspirators with a criminal conspiracy to steal Georgia's 2020 election.

Georgia Republicans are loathe to denounce the Ponzi scheme connected to Republican financier and First Liberty founder Brant Frost IV — or even address the topic. But Raffensperger is vocal about his willingness to investigate Republicans behind the scheme. And he is joined by the scheme’s many victims, who are vouching for him on the campaign trail.

“More than $300,000 in charitable or political contributions have been returned, but that’s a fraction of nearly $1.4 million in campaign donations tied to the Frost family that The Atlanta Journal-Constitution identified,” AJC reported.

The AJC also referenced 77-year-old retired electrical worker Thomas Todd, who invested $750,000 with First Liberty. He was even preparing to write another six-figure check when the company collapsed.

“I pray for them every day — every morning. They need those prayers. But they also need to pay for what they did.” Todd said of the Frost family, adding that his donations would have gone to churches and other religious charities had he not directed them to the Ponzi scheme.

“They didn’t steal from me,” said Todd. “They stole God’s money.”

Georgia officials batter Trump admin's arguments for seizing voter files

The Daily Beast reports Georgia officials are “shredding” the FBI’s justification for seizing Fulton County’s 2020 voter rolls, writing in a new filing that their evidence fell “woefully short” of showing probable cause.

“In a petition demanding the return of 2020 election ballots, officials accused the FBI of having ‘serious’ omissions in its … petition for a search warrant to raid the county’s election office near Atlanta,” the Beast reports.

“Instead of alleging probable cause to believe a crime has been committed, the affidavit does nothing more than describe the types of human errors that its own sources confirm occur in almost every election — without any intentional wrongdoing whatsoever,” said the filing. The filing also argues that the federal government breached the Fourth Amendment protecting individuals against “unreasonable searches and seizures” by the government.

“The Fourth Amendment demands ‘probable cause’ — not ‘possible cause,’” the filing argues.

A former special agent in charge of the FBI’s Atlanta field office had his own issues with the FBI’s rationalization for the seizure and was removed after he raised concerns. Prior probes for fraud had come up empty., and even conservative judges had shut down many of President Donald Trump’s arguments of fraud in 2020.

Fulton County officials told the courts in their Tuesday filing that the Trump administration dredging for evidence in Georgia’s most Democratic County was based on hypotheticals and conspiracy.

“Despite years of investigations of the 2020 election, the affidavit does not identify facts establishing probable cause that anyone committed a crime,” the filing said. “Instead, [the FBI] all but admits that the seizure will yield evidence of a crime only if certain hypotheticals are true.”

The Beast reports local officials also cited FBI witness statements alleging that the search was based on the hope of finding wrongdoing rather than on probable cause.

“It is woefully deficient for an affiant to say that if I develop additional evidence at some later point in time, the seized property would potentially be evidence of a crime,” the filing reads. “Probable cause requires more: a reasonable likelihood that a crime did, in fact, occur.”

“The newest filing … also poked holes in the FBI’s witnesses’ findings that supposedly prompted it to act,” reports the Beast. “’Witness 5’ claimed to have received data that may have shown proof of a crime ‘second hand,’ from an unidentified person, but not to the degree Trump has long alleged. In reality, Witness 5 said that the purported error added votes for Donald Trump—not the other way around.”

FBI raids Fulton County election operations center

Fox News digital is reporting that the FBI staged a raid on an elections office in Georgia on Wednesday.

According to the report, "agents were seen entering the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center ... Fox News Digital is told the probe is related to the 2020 election."

FBI Atlanta told The Georgia Record it is "executing a court authorized law enforcement action" at the facility Fox News says "state officials opened in 2023."

"[The facility] was designed to streamline election processes," Fox News reports.

"Our investigation into this matter is ongoing so there are no details that I can provide at the moment," a spokesperson told the Georgia Record.

As the report notes, "The Department of Justice Civil Rights Division sued Fulton County recently over election records from the 2020 election."

"I’m at the site of a Fulton County elections office where FBI officials confirmed they are conducting 'court authorized activity' but declined further comment for now. Trump has repeatedly threatened to open an investigation into his 2020 defeat in Georgia," Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Greg Bluestein wrote on X.

Legal analysts on social media are demanding to see the warrant that was approved by a federal judge.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.