Search results for "Georgia probe"

Nevada journalist warns of 'trick' Trump is playing with FBI’s Georgia elections probe

During his Wednesday, January 21 speech at the 2026 World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, U.S. President Donald Trump repeated his debunked claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him and promised that "people will soon be prosecuted for what they did."

"It was a rigged election," Trump told Davos attendees. "We can't have rigged elections."

European reporters were quick to fact-check Trump, noting that one recount after another confirmed that 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden won the election fair and square.

But a week later in Georgia, on Wednesday, January 28, FBI agents searched an elections center looking for 2020 election records. Georgia was among the swing states that Trump lost in 2020 but won in 2016 and 2024.

In some January 29 posts on X, formerly Twitter, Nevada Independent CEO Jon Ralston stressed that the search is about much more than Georgia and much more than 2020.

Ralston said of the FBI search, "Outrageous and frightening. No basis to do this, all court cases Trump filed came to naught in 2020. And don't forget this from Trump in '22: 'Clark County, Nevada, has a corrupt voting system...' Does anyone think he'll stop w/[Georgia]? And still: The silence of the GOP lambs."

Referencing the 2026 midterms in a separate tweet, Ralston posted, "This has little to do with 2020. With the likelihood of the GOP losing the House in November and the Senate perhaps in play, this is all about what Trump is planning for this year's election. Calling an election corrupt so you can corrupt an election is quite the trick."

Prediction: Trump 'running backward' into defeat in this red state — again

President Donald Trump must be trying to lose the state of Georgia for the Senate, says Atlanta Journal Constitution Senior Political Columnist Patricia Murphy, otherwise he wouldn’t be trying so hard to repeat the history of his last humiliating failure.

“Instead of visiting the state, talking to voters, stumping with GOP nominees, or most obviously, telling Georgians what Republicans might do to bring down the cost of living, the president is running backward into the fire of the 2020 election that he lost here and refuses to accept,” said Murphy.

There are pivotal elections underway with Republicans fighting for their lives, but the White House is bust announcing that Trump will deliver a major Thursday “address to the nation” to revive disproven claims that he actually won the 2020 election in Georgia. He might even allege that Georgia’s two 2020 Senate races were stolen in the process.

“Ironically, anyone who lived through the 2021 Senate runoffs can tell you that it was Trump who cost former U.S. Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue their seats, not some international plot,” said Murphy. “He sunk their chances with performances like the one he delivered at a rally in Dalton the night before the runoffs. Instead of focusing on Loeffler and Perdue and the work they had done in Washington, Trump started and stayed on the subject he just can’t let go.”

“Hello, Georgia!” he announced. “By the way. There’s no way we lost Georgia. There’s no way. That was a rigged election, but we’re still fighting it, and you’ll see what’s going to happen.”

Loeffler and Perdue lost the next day, she added.

Murphy said Trump was back in Georgia two years later to campaign against Republicans Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the top state leaders who had rejected Trump’s ploy to overturn Georgia’s election results in 2020. Again, Murphy said Georgia voters in the primary and general elections rejected campaigns focused on claims of rigged elections, and Trump’s preferred candidates running against Kemp and Raffensperger went down in flames.

“Fast forward to this week, with a Senate seat and an open governor’s race on the line, and Trump is still talking about the election he lost here six years ago,” said Murphy. “But this time, his focus on 2020 goes much further than just a speech he’s planning. Not only did the FBI seize hundreds of boxes of 2020 election materials from a Fulton County warehouse earlier this year — an FBI memo obtained by the AJC showed that the agency has ‘surged’ 260 FBI agents to investigate Fulton County ahead of a July 17 deadline.”

And Trump is flubbing his old war. Last week, a federal judge appointed by Trump drop-kicked a subpoena from Trump’s politicized Department of Justice that had sought the names, addresses, phone numbers and other personal information about all of Fulton County’s 2020 election workers. Murphy said U.S. District Court Judge Billy Ray called the request both “staggering” and pointless.

“The downstream effects of all this won’t hurt the president in November. He’s not on any ballot in 2026,” said Murphy, adding that the damage will instead be done to U.S. Rep. Mike Collins, the Republican challenging U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff.

“Rick Jackson, the GOP nominee for governor, won’t be helped either,” Murphy assured. “Although he’s well positioned with plenty of money, a compelling personal story and no particular relationship with Trump before this election to explain, GOP operatives know Jackson’s chances of victory depend heavily on Ossoff’s margins. If Ossoff beats Collins by a huge margin, Jackson could only outperform Collins by so much.”

“Why Trump wants to dig out his losing Georgia playbook now is anyone’s guess. But Collins and Jackson would be wise to reject it, acknowledge Georgia’s legal election results and forge their own path to win in November,” Murphy said.

'Completely unprecedented': Why Trump keeps lying about 2020

We get an update on elections and voting rights in the United States from Mother Jones's national voting rights correspondent, Ari Berman, who warns of President Donald Trump's escalating attempts to “try to claim dictatorial power” and commit an “unprecedented intervention” into the 2026 midterm elections. Whether it takes the form of claims of foreign interference, canceling mail-in voting or requiring proof of citizenship, “[t]he bottom line here is they keep lying about the 2020 election so that they can justify massive interference in the 2026 election,” says Berman. “That’s something that we all need to be very vigilant about.”

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González.

President Trump’s Department of Justice continues to investigate the 2020 election results in Fulton County, Georgia, a state President Trump repeatedly falsely claims he won in 2020. Now CBS News is reporting the FBI fired two of its officials after they voiced concerns over the probe, claiming it was politically motivated. Their firings come months after the FBI raided an election office in Georgia’s Fulton County, seizing computers and ballots related to the 2020 election. Last week, a federal judge in Atlanta quashed a DOJ subpoena seeking the names and personal information of Fulton County’s 2020 election workers.

Meanwhile, President Trump has forced out the last remaining members of the Election Assistance Commission, a bipartisan, independent agency tasked with certifying voting systems and helping local election officials. The White House fired the Democratic commissioners, Thomas Hicks and Benjamin Hovland. And a third commissioner, Republican Christy McCormick, was given the chance to resign, which she did. The committee’s remaining member, Republican Donald Palmer, stepped down in April to join the Heritage Foundation. Trump’s dismantling of the Election Assistance Commission comes less than four months before midterm elections, following last month’s Supreme Court ruling granting the president more power to fire members of independent agencies.

For more on all of this, or as much as we can do in the next few minutes, we’re joined by Ari Berman, the national voting rights correspondent for Mother Jones.

Thanks so much for being with us, Ari. Start off by talking about the judge quashing the request for information of Fulton County election workers, and then going on to the primetime address President Trump is expected to give on Thursday night.

ARI BERMAN: Hi, Amy. Well, thank you for having me back on the show.

So, what happened in Fulton County, Georgia, was the Justice Department was trying to get access to the personal information of thousands of election workers from the 2020 election, and the judge said, “You can’t have that personal information. And also, you can’t bring charges against them, because it’s too late.” It’s been now six years since that election.

But the disturbing thing here is that Georgia is just a microcosm of what they’re planning to do to interfere in the midterms. The raid on Fulton County, Georgia, the taking of 700 boxes of ballots, that is a preview of the type of suppression and intimidation the Trump administration wants to do everywhere in 2026. And we’re seeing this with the primetime address the president is planning to give. He’s going to lie and say there was rampant fraud and foreign interference in the 2020 election, so that he can then say we have to seize voting machines, we have to stop mail voting, we have to do all the things that he tried to do in 2020 but was unsuccessful.

And the bottom line here is they keep lying about the 2020 election so that they can justify massive interference in the 2026 election. It really is that simple. You put all the different moves of the administration together, that is the underlying goal, to build a narrative that will justify some kind of unprecedented intervention in the midterms to challenge how people vote, how votes are counted and how elections are certified.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Now, Ari, you’ve been covering election news for years now. You’re one of the top experts in the country on it. Have we ever seen any attempt by a federal government to actually squash free and fair elections like we’re seeing now? And to what degree do you fear that Trump could be successful?

ARI BERMAN: No, Juan, I think it’s completely unprecedented, what the Trump administration is trying to do. We’ve never seen the full weight of the federal government mobilized in such a way to try and interfere in free and fair elections and to try to undermine elections in so many different ways, from how people vote to how elections are administered to how elections are ultimately certified here.

Now, I do think the problem that the president has is that the Constitution is very clear that states, with oversight from Congress, run their elections, and the president has very little role in doing that. And so, time and time again, what Trump wants to do is blocked in court. His executive orders have been blocked in court. So much of what the Justice Department has tried to do has been blocked in court. So, that’s the silver lining of this, is that, yes, the president is becoming more authoritarian, more desperate, but that doesn’t mean he’s going to be any more successful in trying to do this. He can say the 2020 election is rigged. He can say that he wants to seize voting machines or stop mail voting, but, ultimately, states have the power to run their elections. And that’s the saving grace of our constitutional system right now to stand up to what Trump is doing.

AMY GOODMAN: What he’s going to say on Thursday night, what you understand?

ARI BERMAN: Well, what I understand is he’s going to allege foreign interference in the 2020 election, which has been extensively studied. There was no evidence of interference in that election. If there was any interference, it was Russia trying to help Trump. But there was no evidence that Iran or Venezuela or China or the other countries that Trump is going to name interfered in that election.

But he’s going to say they interfered, so that he can create the predicate for then interfering in the midterms to say, “I can now have the power to seize voting machines. I have the power to shut down mail voting. I can try to put in place proof of citizenship to register to vote.” He can’t unilaterally do any of those things, but he’s going to try to claim dictatorial power for himself, through the propaganda that his administration is generating, to try to lay the predicate for some kind of dramatic intervention of the midterms. And that’s something that we all need to be very vigilant about.

AMY GOODMAN: And threatening to arrest election officials if any noncitizens vote? We have 20 seconds.

ARI BERMAN: Well, it’s just an example of further weaponization of the Justice Department, from trying to uphold the laws to trying to intimidate election workers into following Trump’s agenda. And I think election workers are going to stand up to it. But, again, it sets a very chilling precedent.

AMY GOODMAN: We want to thank you, Ari Berman, for joining us, national voting rights correspondent for Mother Jones.


'Authentic follower of Christ' pleads guilty to stealing $140M from MAGA donors

Georgia political fundraiser Brant Frost IV, known for bundling major donations for MAGA and Tea Party causes for the GOP, pleaded guilty Tuesday to wire fraud.

Frost’s guilty plea before U.S. District Chief Judge Leigh Martin May is the latest development surrounding the collapse of First Liberty Building & Loan, and it is the first criminal conviction related to the downfall of the Newnan-based firm. Federal regulators accused the company last year of operating “a $140 million Ponzi scheme that targeted conservative and faith-based investors across Georgia and beyond.”

The AJC reports the plea “closes one chapter in a scandal that reverberated through Georgia conservative circles after First Liberty abruptly shut down operations last June.” Days later, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission sued the company and Frost, alleging the lender “used new investor money to cover obligations to earlier investors while portraying the business as a conservative, faith-driven alternative to traditional banking, with promises of big returns.”

First Liberty, which was not a federally insured bank, sold investment products known as “First Liberty Notes,” promising annual returns as high as 13 percent to accredited investors. AJC reports the company’s website promoted company executives as “authentic followers of Christ” and pitched the business as a conservative alternative for investors wary of traditional financial institutions.

“They didn’t steal from me. They stole God’s money,” complained 77-year-old retired electrical worker Thomas Todd, who invested $750,000 with First Liberty. The AJC reported Todd was even preparing to write another six-figure check when the company suddenly collapsed.

“I pray for them every day — every morning. They need those prayers. But they also need to pay for what they did.” Todd said of the Frost family.

Todd also insisted that his donations would have gone to churches and other religious charities had he not wasted them on Forst and his company’s Ponzi scheme.

ACJ reports Court-appointed receiver S. Gregory Hays has “spent months trying to recover money for investors, tracing tens of thousands of transactions across a maze of accounts.”

In recent filings, Hays warned many victims are unlikely to recover most of their losses.

Trump’s election raid goes to court as judge gets saddled with 'conspiracy theories'

President Donald Trump's push to find evidence of fraud in the 2020 election is facing an early legal hurdle, according to the Washington Post, with the FBI headed to court over allegations it used "conspiracy theories" and long-debunked lies to dupe a judge into signing a warrant for the raid on a Georgia election center.

In late January, the FBI conducted a raid of an election center in Fulton County, Georgia, seizing a large amount of ballots and materials from the 2020 presidential election. Trump has long insisted, without concrete evidence, that widespread fraud tipped that race to Joe Biden, and has pushed his subordinates to conduct new investigations to dig up proof. Experts also fear that the raid will be used to build a pretense to meddle in future elections.

Officials in Fulton County have since sued in an attempt to compel the Trump administration to return 650 boxes of materials seized in January, with the case set to go before U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee on Friday. At the heart of the county's argument is the accusation that the FBI presented dubious or outright false information to a magistrate in order to get them to sign off on the warrant for the highly controversial raid.

"Fulton County officials maintain that agents duped a federal court magistrate into approving the warrant by presenting conspiracy theories and previously debunked claims of election irregularities as evidence of possible crimes," the Washington Post's report explained. "Lawyers for Fulton County have called the seizure of its 2020 election materials, and the warrant that authorized it, 'unprecedented in American history.' They have characterized the theories cited to obtain the warrant as little more than 'ill-informed… speculative assertions that, even if true, concern records of no consequence to the outcome of the election.'”

One of Fulton County's attorneys on the case, Y. Soo Jo, recently warned in a written filing that the federal government's conduct surrounding the raid might also act as voter suppression, arguing that, "knowing that the federal government can physically seize and rummage through election records long after the election has been certified will predictably chill voter participation and undermine voters’ confidence in the security and secrecy of their ballots."

Trump's Justice Department has already attempted to argue that U.S. Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas's approval of the warrant, in and of itself, means that the raid was justified. These arguments, however, have fallen flat, with Judge Boulee, a Trump appointee, shooting them down in court.

The affidavit requesting the warrant was originally submitted to Salinas by FBI Agent Hugh Raymond Evans. According to the Post, the arguments it put forward were heavily reliant "on accounts from 11 people — many of whom are prominent election deniers or members of Georgia’s Republican-controlled State Election Board," suggesting that "unknown persons" might have been trying to meddle with the 2020 election in the state.

"But the issues Evans cited, including claims of duplicate ballots and missing ballot images, have been addressed by previous audits and investigations that found no evidence of wrongdoing," the Post's report detailed. "County officials described many of them in a court filing as 'types of human errors that… occur in almost every election — without any intentional wrongdoing whatsoever.'”

The report continued: "For instance, Evans cited the fact that Fulton County no longer has scanned images of all 528,777 ballots cast in the 2020 race as evidence of a possible tampering. But officials have dismissed that shortcoming as insignificant, given they still have original paper versions of those ballots. The affidavit also suggested that the county may have scanned more than 3,000 ballots twice during a recount of the 2020 vote. But previous state investigations have produced no evidence that those double scans meant the ballots were actually counted twice. Even if they were, those earlier probes concluded, the outcome would have benefited Trump."

'The 2020 election is over': Judge throws out MAGA lawsuit and imposes steep fine

One week after President Donald Trump sent FBI agents to seize Fulton County’s 2020 ballots as part of a criminal probe, a Georgia judge has apparently had it up to here with Trump-style election deniers.

“The 2020 election is over,” said Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney, dismissing Trump-supporters’ lawsuit and effort to review ballots and materials they allege would prove Trump should have won Georgia.

On top of tossing the suit, the judge ordered the four plaintiffs — consisting of a treasure hunter and members of a Georgia affiliate of the Tea Party Patriots — to pay nearly $40,000 to Fulton County and the county Superior Court clerk’s office for filing the frivolous suit.

McBurney ruled the lawsuit “presented zero factual or legal questions” concerning the county’s liability for certain claims and gave the plaintiffs until Monday to pay the attorney fees.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution (AJC) reports McBurney's ruling is the “latest twist” in a long-running legal battle that centers on allegations of voting fraud in the 2020 election. Lead plaintiff Garland Favorito has become an influential figure among a group of Georgians who are convinced that fraud cost Trump the election, despite countless state and federal investigations finding no evidence of significant fraud in 2020. Then-President Joe Biden’s victory was confirmed by two recounts, including a hand count of every ballot.

One of Favorito’s consultants reviewing ballot images was Jovan Pulitzer, an inventor and scavenger who the AJC reports as having once “searched for the Ark of the Covenant.” Another face behind the fight was Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, who joined Pulitzer in spreading election fraud conspiracies during a state Senate hearing at the Georgia Capitol.

“An attorney for Favorito, Todd Harding, has been involved in at least three other lawsuits alleging fraud in Georgia’s November and January U.S. Senate elections,” AJC reported in 2021.

“This is nothing more than a circus that’s being put on by those who promote the ’big lie’ that Trump won the election,” Fulton Commission Chairman Robb Pitts said in 2021. “Where does it end? The votes have been counted. The elections have been certified. It’s over.”

But even today, it apparently is not over because Trump has sent his politicized FBI to investigate and count ballots on their own under the cover of a federal warehouse.

New details expose extensive prep behind Trump admin's controversial raid

The Missouri prosecutor overseeing an investigation into the 2020 vote in Fulton County, Georgia, has taken part in meetings since last fall with lawyers tasked by President Donald Trump to reinvestigate his loss to Joe Biden.

Thomas Albus, whom Trump appointed last year as U.S. attorney for Missouri’s Eastern District, has had multiple meetings set up with top administration lawyers to discuss election integrity.

At those meetings was Ed Martin, a Justice Department lawyer who until recently led a group investigating what the president has described as the department’s “weaponization” against him and his allies, according to a source familiar with the meetings who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution.

White House lawyer Kurt Olsen, who has been tasked with reinvestigating the 2020 election, also was directed to join at least one of the meetings, according to the source. Both Martin and Olsen worked on behalf of Trump to try to overturn the 2020 election results, and a federal court sanctioned Olsen for making false claims about the reliability of voting machines in Arizona.

The meetings reveal new details about the length of the preparations for, and people involved in, the January FBI raid on Fulton County, which election and legal experts told ProPublica was a significant escalation in Trump’s breaking of democratic norms.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi picked Albus and has granted him special authority to handle election-related cases nationwide, even though his earlier work as a federal prosecutor didn’t involve election law or election-related cases. The meetings with Martin, Olsen and other lawyers for the Justice Department were described by the source as being about “election integrity,” a term the Trump administration has used to describe investigations into its false claims that elections are rigged.

Martin, Olsen, Albus and others declined to answer questions about the meetings and other detailed questions from ProPublica. The White House and the Justice Department also did not respond to questions.

The meetings came at a particularly crucial time.

Martin’s efforts to obtain election materials from Fulton County, a Democratic stronghold, had hit a wall. In August, he sent a letter demanding that a Fulton County judge allow him to access tens of thousands of absentee ballots for “an investigation into election integrity here at the Department of Justice,” but he had reportedly received no reply.

Martin explained to Steve Bannon on a podcast that aired around the time of the meetings that although the White House had given Olsen the official mandate to reinvestigate the 2020 election, “inside DOJ, myself and a couple of others have been working also on the same topic” — including getting the Fulton County ballots. But Martin described progress as a “challenge.”

Bannon, who served as Trump’s chief strategist in his first term, asked why Martin didn’t just “get some U.S. marshals to go down and seize” the ballots.

Martin suggested it was easier said than done, but agreed: “Look, we’ve got to get” the ballots.

Before long, Albus and Olsen were interviewing witnesses for their case. Kevin Moncla, a conservative researcher, told ProPublica that he spoke to Albus and Olsen a couple of times, both together and separately, around the turn of the year. He identified himself as Witness 7 in the affidavit that persuaded a judge to sign off on the raid, and the affidavit mentions a 263-page report he authored that activists believe may have justified the raid, ProPublica has reported. Moncla has a long history of working with Olsen, dating back to an attempt by Kari Lake, a Republican candidate for governor in Arizona, to overturn her 2022 loss.

Just a few weeks after those interviews, in late January, Albus was listed as the government attorney on the search warrant that authorized the seizure of roughly 700 boxes of election material in Georgia, far outside of Albus’ usual jurisdiction.

Former U.S. attorneys from both parties said it was rare for a federal prosecutor from one region to take on cases in other states or be granted the nationwide authority Albus has been given.

Under Trump, senior roles across the White House, DOJ and FBI have increasingly been filled by a small, interconnected group of Missouri lawyers with longstanding ties to one another.

Another top federal official in the meetings was Jesus Osete, the principal deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights. Before joining the Justice Department, Osete worked in the Missouri attorney general’s office, where he represented the state in at least five lawsuits against the Biden administration regarding vaccine mandates, immigration and other policies. Osete did not respond to requests for comment or to a detailed list of questions.

When the FBI raided Fulton County’s election center, Andrew Bailey, another lawyer from the same political circles, was in charge. Before joining the FBI as deputy director, he had used his position as Missouri’s attorney general to pursue high-profile cases against prominent Democrats and said he supported all efforts to investigate Biden, his family and his administration.

A spokesperson for the FBI declined to answer detailed questions about Bailey.

Last year, Roger Keller, a veteran federal prosecutor from Albus’ office, was brought in to help prosecute New York Attorney General Letitia James for alleged mortgage fraud in Virginia after the original career prosecutors on the case were replaced by political appointees. After a judge dismissed the case, two federal grand juries declined to indict James again, and Keller returned to Missouri.

Trump’s solicitor general, D. John Sauer, previously served as Missouri’s solicitor general under state attorneys general Josh Hawley and Eric Schmitt. He and Schmitt signed Missouri’s amicus brief supporting efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Sauer later represented Trump in his presidential-immunity case, successfully arguing before the Supreme Court that Trump was entitled to broad immunity from prosecution.

Albus’ connection to the other Missouri lawyers goes back decades. Unlike some of the others, though, he has never held elected office or had a high public profile, nor has he waged culture-war campaigns like Bailey or Martin. Instead, he spent most of his career as a federal prosecutor and as a judge in a Missouri state circuit court.

Emails show Albus exchanging brief messages with Martin in 2007, when Albus was an assistant U.S. attorney in St. Louis and Martin was chief of staff to then-Gov. Matt Blunt. The emails were part of records from the Blunt administration that became public after being released under Missouri’s Sunshine Law.

In the email exchange, Albus put in a good word for a St. Louis lawyer who was a finalist for an appellate court judgeship, and Blunt ultimately selected that candidate.

Albus served as first assistant to Schmitt from early 2019 until Albus was appointed by Gov. Mike Parson to fill a circuit court judge vacancy in early 2020. Schmitt, now a U.S. senator, praised Albus as “one of the finest prosecutors I have ever met” when endorsing his nomination for U.S. attorney in December.

Lawyers who appeared in Albus’ court rated him as well prepared, professional and attentive, according to Missouri judicial performance reviews. They said he followed the evidence, applied the law correctly and gave clear reasons for his rulings.

Albus came under more critical scrutiny after Trump named him interim U.S. attorney last summer. Much of that attention centered on a fraud case he inherited when he took office. Prosecutors alleged that developers in St. Louis falsely claimed to be using minority- and women-owned subcontractors to qualify for city tax breaks, conduct the Justice Department has historically treated as wire fraud.

One of the defendants was represented by lawyer Brad Bondi, the brother of Pam Bondi.

The developers’ lawyers argued that even if the government’s claims were true, they were legally irrelevant because the Trump administration had taken the position that tax breaks based on race or gender were unlawful. Albus accepted those arguments and dropped the case. As part of the resolution, Albus personally hand-delivered to City Hall a check of about $1 million from one of the developers’ companies as restitution. He told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that he intervened “to make it clear” his office wanted to drop charges and hand-delivered the check “to make sure they got it.”

In a letter to Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Congressional Democrats said the dismissal of the St. Louis case and other cases in which the Justice Department intervened on behalf of Brad Bondi’s clients raised “significant broader ethical concerns.” In the St. Louis case, and in a separate matter involving another Brad Bondi client whose charges were dropped, a Justice Department spokesperson said Pam Bondi’s relationship with her brother had “no bearing on the outcome.”

A spokesperson for the developers said their lawyers communicated only with the U.S. attorney’s office in St. Louis about the case and had no direct contact with Pam Bondi. He said the dismissal reflected “a recognition that this case should never have been brought in the first place.” Brad Bondi did not respond to a request for comment.

Weeks later, around the time of Albus’ meetings about election integrity, he posed with Martin in Martin’s office, flanked by a framed photo of Trump and a copy of “A Choice, Not an Echo,” the influential conservative manifesto by Phyllis Schlafly arguing that Republican voters were being manipulated by party elites and the media.

Martin posted the photo on X with the caption, “Good morning, America. How are ya’?”

Trump’s election fraud playbook runs headfirst into a problem he can’t fix

President Donald Trump and his administration spent months trying to meddle with the electoral process in various states, but the blue wave was so large it was, in Trump’s own words, “too big to rig.”

The two biggest legal challenges before the midterms have effectively been put to rest, reports Slate. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court put an end to the Department of Justice’s suit against California election officials, which argued they must put aside some 20,000 mail ballots the feds thought were from noncitizens. A day earlier, a federal judge threw out the DOJ’s Alaska case, which sought to set aside certain Senate race ballots in the event Republican Dan S. Sullivan was defeated. In nearly all cases where the DOJ has taken states to court for access to their voter rolls, the federal government has come up short.

Some election challenges remain, with a couple of major Senate races and House seats not yet decided. The AFL-CIO has sued the DOJ to stop demands that state and local officials cordon off disputed ballots, under threat of prosecution if those ballots are counted.

In Alaska, the DOJ sent 20 Democrats letters warning they could be targets of a federal probe for donor fraud and conspiracy and should hold on to certain records. Joyce Vance, ex-U.S. attorney for Alabama’s Northern District, found the notion of prosecuting them strange on her Substack, given the Alaska Supreme Court has already ruled both Dan Sullivans could be on the ballot.

None of this is on the level of what followed the 2020 presidential election, the report notes. Since Tuesday night, the president and his allies have been much more restrained. Charles Stewart III of MIT sees a likely reason for the lower-key approach: “these intellectual wars, election administration wars” are not delivering results for them politically or strategically.

Should the Trump administration or Republican candidates challenge tight Senate races in Mississippi or Alaska, “the heavy hitters of both the Democratic and Republican parties, with respect to legal talent, will not be spread thin,” Stewart told Slate. “I think it will be much easier for attacks on the democratic process to be beaten back.”

The numbers bear this out, with Democrats notching double-digit wins in states like Texas and Georgia. Even in the closer contests, Democrats have put together comfortable vote counts that largely fall outside margins of error. That presents a mathematical problem for Republicans. Democrats have won 54 Senate seats so far, and once the Senate confirms the results, the Trump administration does not have the Republican majority needed to push its legal shenanigans through this time.

Republicans throw in the towel already on getting anything done this year

Republicans are reportedly throwing in the towel already for the rest of the year, per Politico, giving up on initial plans to push through new legislation in their impending "lame duck" window.

In a new report published Tuesday morning, Politico explained that the GOP has "deferred" a considerable amount of its legislative plans for this year, having previously hoped that "post-election release of political pressure" after the all-important midterms might allow them some room to get things done.

"Fat chance, many GOP lawmakers now say," the report detailed. "Beyond the uncertainties surrounding the midterms and a potential transition of power on Capitol Hill, members will return to Washington facing a considerable list of must-pass bipartisan bills but also potentially messy internal leadership fights, a foul national mood and a mere 24 legislative days to get anything done."

In addition, there is now some doubt as to whether or not a large number of GOP lawmakers will even bother to show up in Washington, D.C., during the lame duck period post-midterms.

“The question becomes: Who shows up for work after the elections?” Rep. Austin Scott, a Georgia Republican, said in an interview. “Attendance is an issue right now.”

Some matters, Scott noted, are must-pass, including a measure to extend government funding past December 11 and getting the annual Pentagon policy bill sorted. Other possibilities, like "Major pieces of legislation to reauthorize farm, transportation and surveillance programs," are "loaded with potential partisan flashpoints" and might get bogged down for too long in debate. Some Republicans are also unsure about trying to push through bills during a time when Democrats might already be pushing them around with greater powers.

“What do you think?” Sen. Thom Tillis, a retiring North Carolina Republican, said with an "exasperated" tone when asked about the potential for lame duck productivity this year. “I mean, why? If you think about it, if Democrats win the House, why would they?”

The GOP might also have internal squabbling to deal with in the last few weeks of the year.

"And though the elections will be over outside the Capitol, internal politicking could continue for weeks in both chambers," Politico added. "A Democratic flip of the House could spark a potentially chaotic cascade of GOP leadership elections, especially with [House Speaker Mike] Johnson giving mixed signals about his intentions in that scenario. He broached the possibility he might not remain atop his conference in a Fox News interview last week, then said in a CBS News interview published Monday that he expected 'my colleagues would ask me to continue leading this conference' even after a loss. [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune says he is running again for GOP leader regardless of the election outcome, and no other senator has signaled they will challenge him. That hasn’t stopped some conservatives, in and out of the chamber, from questioning whether Trump will blame him if the majority is lost."

'Rare' move by Don Lemon judge reveals concerns about 'botched grand jury'

Former CNN host Don Lemon, along with other local reporters, has been in an entrenched battle with a Minneapolis prosecutor claiming that journalists reporting on a protest at a church were part of the protest. They all vehemently deny the charges and have produced interviews and videos from that day to back up their legitimacy.

There's concern among the defendants that Justice Department lawyers may have misled the grand jury to secure the indictments against the journalists. Lemon and the other reporters, including targeted investigative reporter Georgia Fort, asked for access to the grand jury transcript to more closely examine what the grand jury was told and by whom.

The defendants allege that a Department of Homeland Security officer lied under oath in a statement to the judge in the case. They think that was then used to secure the indictment.

CNN reported that the judge presiding over the case has demanded the transcripts now, too. That judge intends to probe this week whether the Department of Homeland Security officer lied when he told the grand jury that he watched a video of the protest and saw the journalists protesting.

"On August 18, Minnesota federal Judge Laura Provinzino issued a short but extraordinary order demanding the Justice Department provide her a wide swath of grand jury materials related to Lemon and his co-defendants, including presentations made by prosecutors and case agents, and the totality of communications prosecutors had with grand jurors resulting in their indictments," said the report.

It's only the latest in a growing list of judges demanding grand jury information amid concerns about the DOJ's candor.

"Federal judges in Wyoming, Illinois and Virginia have either thrown out charges or seriously admonished federal prosecutors for missteps in front of the grand jury," said CNN. "The botched grand jury presentments have prompted a historical review of cases in Chicago and, in some courts, new rules requiring defendants to be notified when a grand jury declines to indict."

Tuesday is the deadline for the DOJ to hand over what prosecutors presented to the grand jury when they made the case in January and February. The judge mandated that the DOJ give "any introduction, legal instructions, witness testimony, closing arguments and answers to questions from grand jurors."

The legal teams for the journalists have fought for the grand jury details for weeks, asking that, at a bare minimum, they should be reviewed by the judge for "irregularities."

As a former federal judge told CNN, it's extremely rare for a defense attorney to demand the grand jury transcripts. It's "even more rare that judges grant the motions," the judge said. Yet, it keeps happening.

“There is a high bar to getting grand jury materials,” said Mark Wolf, a former Massachusetts District Court judge. “You have to have some direct or circumstantial evidence that there has been some defect in the grand jury proceeding.”

Provinzino explained in the ruling that she weighed both sides of the question and, after she finished reading through the documents, she would decide whether grounds existed to dismiss the case due to a “matter that occurred before the grand jury.”

The behind-the-scenes strategy Trump is using to silence his loudest critics

When we think of strongman dictatorships we often imagine tanks in the streets, but those usually come in the later stages of repression (think Tienanmen Square) and often are never even needed (think today’s Russia). Instead, as every dictator on Earth can tell you, you don’t have to silence the entire country; all you have to do is shut up a few strategically-selected people visibly and publicly enough and the rest of the country will get the message and back away.

That’s the message of this week’s raid on Ilhan Omar’s home, and so many other atrocities committed by Trump’s eager fascist lickspittles over the past 21 months. He and his advisors are simply repeating a long and well-trod history.

On the morning of March 14, 1757, King George II ordered Admiral John Byng executed by firing squad on the quarterdeck of the HMS Monarch in Portsmouth harbor. His crime? He’d just lost a battle off the coast of Minorca. Two years later, Voltaire wrote the event into his novella Candide, having the hero of his story watch the execution from the deck of a nearby ship. When a sailor standing with him asks why Byng was killed, his hero replied:

“In this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, to encourage the others. Pour encourager les autres.”

The phrase has been foundational to the rise of every tyrant in history since. Pick a few people, make an example of them, and the fear will spread across the population in a way that’s just as effective as an army of secret police.

The genius, as Voltaire pointed out, is that it costs almost nothing yet, when done right, can have enormous impact on public behavior.

Trump has been running this play since the day he took office, and this week he ran it again, this time on a member of Congress just three weeks before an election.

Reports suggest that Homeland Security Investigations — a division of ICE — raided Ilhan Omar’s house in Washington looking for paperwork her late father filled out when she was a child refugee. She has not been charged with a crime and, as is so common, ICE isn’t explaining what they’re up to here.

That same afternoon Trump called her “totally crooked” and went off on her that night in Youngstown, Ohio calling the country she came from “one of the worst countries anywhere on the planet” while the crowd chanted “deport.”

Ever since March, this administration has apparently been looking for ways to take down this high-profile and unapologetic critic of Trump and his many criminal and authoritarian acts. Back in March, JD Vance told a rightwing podcaster that Omar had “definitely committed immigration fraud” and that Stephen Miller was working out “how do you go after her, how do you investigate her, how do you build a case.”

As former Homeland Security Chief of Staff Miles Taylor told me on my radio/TV program when Trump went after him, Comey, and others, the raid itself is the punishment.

To destroy a person financially, to traumatize them emotionally, and to scare the hell out of their colleagues in a way that will make them shut up you don’t need a conviction. Hell, you don’t even need a trial. Just a subpoena, a lawyer letter filled with threats, or a raid can lead to hundreds of thousands in lawyer bills and months of sleepless nights.

This has now — like in Russia — become standard operating practice. And it reaches all the way down to a single mother of two in New Jersey; Joanne Carducci, who posts as JoJoFromJerz on Substack, revealed last month that lawyers for the president and first lady spent the first half of this year sending her letters demanding a retraction, an apology, and money over her online criticism of Melania Trump. She bravely describes in detail how threats left her worrying about her children, her home, and her livelihood.

And that’s one of the most low-profile of the cases; we never would have known if she hadn’t spoken up. How many other authors and commentators have been similarly threatened? Odds are 99% will never write about it, particularly if the threats also contain demands for confidentiality like hers apparently did.

— There’s James Comey, indicted twice now, most recently for putting a photo of seashells on social media. It’s been six months since he was charged, and he won’t even be arraigned until January of next year. And the Justice Department fired his daughter from her job as a federal prosecutor in Manhattan.

— Letitia James, who got a fraud conviction against Trump, was indicted for mortgage fraud last October and after the case was dismissed in November Todd Blanche brought the same case before two more grand juries over two weeks; both still refused to indict her. Now Bill Pulte is going after her.

— Lisa Cook was merely the first Black woman to be a governor of the Federal Reserve, an intolerable situation for this racist, revanchist regime. After the Supreme Court blocked Trump’s efforts to fire her, last week Trump signed an order for her to appear at a closed-door kangaroo court “hearing” on November 5th, two days after the election.

— They went after Senator Adam Schiff, who had to set up a legal defense fund to deal with the consequences.

— Cassidy Hutchison, who at 25 sat in front of the January 6th committee and told her story, has — bizarrely — the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ coming after her.

— When Trump turned his machine against former CIA Director John Brennan, who’s been publicly criticizing Trump, two prosecutors in a row quit so they’ve staffed the case with military lawyers and a former clerk to Judge Aileen Cannon.

— And then there’s Davey Hearn, the three-time Olympian who touched the Reflecting Pool that Trump had hired a donor and friend to re-paint. He was arrested, Jeanine Pirro indicted him for a 10-year felony, and last week his lawyers asked the inspectors general to investigate what they called a “nightmare.” I’m not holding my breath; the arrest for publicly embarrassing Trump was the entire point.

The press is getting the same treatment.

— Don Lemon and Georgia Fort, two Black journalists, were arrested in January at Pam Bondi’s personal direction for covering a protest at a St. Paul church, even though a federal magistrate had already refused to sign the warrant for lack of probable cause. Prosecutors later had to admit the sworn claim that the two were “chanting with agitators” was simply false, but their motions to dismiss the arrest are still pending and racking up legal bills.

— Trump went after George Stephanopoulos and ABC and they stupidly gave him $16 million dollars to make it go away. Instead, though, Trump turned his guns (and his lickspittle, Brendan Carr) on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel.

— And as of Friday, the Justice Department has antitrust demands out to all five networks for briefly suspending pool coverage after the White House banned CNN.

These are just the tip of the iceberg of Trump’s efforts to intimidate and shut down his critics. Reuters reported that the Trump regime has put up a cross-agency task force, meeting since May of last year, to coordinate punishment of perceived enemies.

Their Pulitzer-winning reporting on this issue has counted at least 470 targets of retribution by last November, including 128 federal workers fired and 112 security clearances pulled. The group Protect Democracy has an even more extensive tracker of these efforts to silence dissent and truth.

None of this is new, strategy-wise. In the weeks after the Reichstag fire in 1933, Hitler opened a detention facility at Dachau and threw a few thousand leftwing commentators, politicians, and journalist (among them Carl von Ossietzky) in as a message to the rest of the country.

Stalin exploited the 1934 murder of Sergei Kirov as an excuse for show trials that were really designed to cow every party official and newspaper editor who may think of opposing him.

In 2003, the early days of what has since become his dictatorship, Putin jailed just one billionaire oligarch, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and all the rest immediately fell into line. When a few press outlets dared challenge him, reporter Anna Politkovskaya was shot dead in her apartment building’s elevator and the Russian press hasn’t spoken up since.

And it’s been tried here before, too, by the guy who taught this to Trump himself.

Joe McCarthy never succeeded in sending anybody to prison for being a communist, but he didn’t have to. As I point out in The Last American President, he and his chief counsel Roy Cohn very publicly destroyed the careers of a few people and, as a result, thousands of teachers, screenwriters, diplomats, and union organizers quietly shut up. What we’re watching today is the Cohn method with the full weight of the United States Department of Justice behind it.

I’ve even encountered a small taste of this in my career. In the late 1960s and early 1970s I was a reporter and the morning news anchor at WITL-AM/FM in Lansing, then the number one station in Michigan’s capital.

One morning a state police officer and a federal agent walked into our newsroom and told us that they were about to make a mass arrest a few miles away at a house full of young people who’d stopped paying their federal taxes to protest the Vietnam War. They asked us, politely, to not report it because, they said, they didn’t want to encourage the movement.

After they left, my news director and I argued about it for several hours. It was ultimately his call, though, and we didn’t run the story. Nobody threatened us, but nobody had to. Two men with badges and the power to make your life miserable had asked a favor, and we gave it to them, and I’ve carried that around for more than fifty years.

If a polite request could do that to a newsroom in 1970, think about what a pre-dawn raid on a congresswoman does to every reporter, prosecutor, professor, and civil servant watching the news this week.

The judges who’ve been about the only force in America capable of stopping Trump have been feeling it the most. U.S. Marshals logged 564 threats against federal judges in fiscal 2025, and Judge John McConnell in Rhode Island — who Trump and his allies called a “monster” and a “lunatic” for blocking a funding freeze — had marshals tell him they’d identified at least six credible death threats.

Judge Esther Salas, who now spends her time warning her colleagues about what his rhetoric produces, knows the power of Trump’s intimidation efforts. In 2020 her only son, Daniel, opened the door of their New Jersey home to a Trump supporter in a delivery uniform who’d written that she was a “lazy and incompetent Latina judge appointed by Obama” and shot Daniel dead. He was twenty.

Trump’s goal is a quiet country. A country where the prosecutor doesn’t bring the case against the powerful donor, the reporter doesn’t file the story, the professor doesn’t sign the letter, the grand juror doesn’t want the hassle, and the judge wonders about her family before she rules.

That’s what the admiral on the quarterdeck was for. You don’t need to arrest a nation to get there. You just need to arrest a few hundred people loudly enough and often enough, and eventually everyone else essentially arrests themselves.

What gives me hope, however, is how the courts have been holding the line.

Three Virginia grand juries looked at Letitia James and said no. A Minnesota magistrate refused to sign the Don Lemon warrant. Judges in Alexandria rebuked prosecutors from the bench. Career lawyers in Florida walked out of the grand conspiracy case rather than put their names on it. The Supreme Court, of all institutions, told Trump he can’t fire Lisa Cook on a whim.

But the lesson history teaches us when we look at how dozens of democracies have been felled by fascist strongmen is that after the legislature and much of the press are cowed eventually the courts will crack, too. The only thing that will prevent that is if Democrats can take power in Congress and use the power of the subpoena to expose this fascist scheme.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.