MSN UK

Trump subpoenas Arizona’s 2020 election docs

President Donald Trump's ongoing war against his 2020 election loss continues as he has now subpoenaed the Arizona election documents.

It's the latest step the president has taken to search. Trump's Justice Department previously took possession of Fulton County, Georgia's election ballots after a Trump ally alleged there were hijinks in 2020. A judge then granted a subpoena allowing the FBI to take copies of the 2020 ballots. The FBI took all of the ballots.

Ongoing litigation around the 2020 election is one of the reasons Fulton County alleged it was improper for the FBI to take all of the ballots.

Politico reported that on Facebook, Arizona Senate President Warren Peterson wrote that he “received and complied with a federal grand jury subpoena for records relating to the Arizona State Senate’s 2020 audit of Maricopa County” last week. He said that the FBI now has all of the records.

It's unclear if they have copies of the ballots or the ballots themselves.

Trump went to court over 60 times over the election, but failed at every effort to fight ballots.

Trump goes to war with his own economic agenda

When Donald Trump was on the campaign trail in 2024, he hammered the Biden Administration relentlessly over the economy — including then-Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee. Trump blamed Harris and then-President Joe Biden for high prices, promising to bring them down "on Day 1" if he won the election. And he focused heavily on grocery prices as well as the cost of gas.

But 13 and one-half months into Trump's second presidency, inflation is still a major concern for many Americans. And New York Magazine's Ed Kilgore, in an article published early Monday afternoon, March 9, argues that Trump is now at odds with his own cost-of-living messages — especially when it comes to energy prices.

"Donald Trump's 'war of choice' against Iran is a big departure from his administration's alleged determination to focus on improving the domestic economy and addressing concerns about affordability before crucial midterm elections this November," Kilgore explains. "But aside from the president's spectacular failure to stay on message, there is a more specific problem with the sudden lurch into a regional war in the Middle East. To the extent Trump had an actual affordability agenda, other than calling concerns about living costs 'a hoax,' a central pillar was keeping energy prices low by demolishing any obstacles to maximum exploitation of fossil-fuel resources."

Kilgore continues, "Aside from the beneficial effect this might have on prices for other goods and services influenced by energy costs, the 'drill baby drill' mentality was designed to reduce gasoline pump prices — one of the most visible inflation indicators from the perspective of regular folks. Suddenly, the United States has produced an energy-price crisis for itself and for the whole world, Reuters reports."

According to Kilgore, "American motorists could soon pay more at the pump amid spiking oil prices due to the U.S.-Israel attacks on Iran, with experts predicting gasoline prices could rise sharply this week."

Trump, Kilgore notes, made a "decision to subordinate economic policy to another presidential military adventure."

According to Fortune's Jim Edwards, the war in Iran is going badly from both an economic standpoint and a national security standpoint.

Edwards, in a March 9 article, reports, "It's day 10 of the war with Iran. The price of oil briefly hit $119 per barrel this morning, and stock markets fell sharply around the world as it became clear that the war would become worse before it got better: Iran appointed Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of its recently killed leader, as its new supreme leader. He's a hardliner who will likely seek revenge for the death of his father…. Fortune’s Jason Ma reported that, when asked in the Oval Office last week for the worst-case scenario in Iran, Trump replied, 'I guess the worst case would be we do this and then somebody takes over who’s as bad as the previous person, right? That could happen.' That is exactly where we are right now."

Kilgore points out that rising energy prices could be a major problem for Republicans in the 2026 midterms.

"Shortly before the 2024 presidential election," Kilgore notes, "I was filling up my car with gas in California, and someone had placed on the pump a little decal of Trump pointing at the per-gallon prices and saying, Biden did this! If pump prices continue to go up in 2026, it will be even easier to show that Trump did this! And the price will be paid not just by consumers but by Republican candidates whose affordability arguments have been blown up by the explosions in Iran."

'Poison for the party in power': Trump chaos toxic to GOP ahead of 2024 midterms

Donald Trump's war on Iran has led to skyrocketing gas prices across the U.S., and according to one reporter, it is creating a "poison for the party in power" ahead of the 2026 midterms.

In the wake of joint military strikes by the U.S. and Israel, Iran ordered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway through which most of the Gulf States' petroleum is shipped to the rest of the world. According to new reports, with 20 percent of the world's oil supply disrupted by this closure, Trump's decision to go to war against Iran has created the biggest oil crisis in history. As of Monday, the price of a barrel of crude oil was hovering just over $100 for the first time since 2022, when sanctions against Russia severely impeded the global supply of oil.

Appearing on a CNN panel Monday afternoon, Marc Caputo, a reporter for Axios, said that while Trump and his administration had managed to stick to a consistent message about the issue, higher gas prices are inescapably a toxic development for Republicans, as the party in control of the federal government is always blamed for them by voters.

"Last week, Susie Wiles, the chief of staff for the White House, sent up an emergency flare and said, we really need to focus on what's going to happen to gas prices," Caputo said. "And that's before they really started to spike high, I mean, it was clear they were on the increase. So they're having good message discipline."

He continued: "In the meantime, the president sort of set the edge there and said, this is going to be the message. But the reality is, higher gas prices are poison for the party in power, and the increases here are something like we haven't seen in a long time. I don't recall seeing it this fast. And that's going to cause great concern not just in the White House, but in the Republican Party more broadly. And obviously, just with regular people... Oil is still the lifeblood of the economy, and when it costs more, it costs everyone more."

Rising gas prices are considered the most visible form of inflation in the U.S. economy, as Americans see them listed outside of numerous gas stations as they drive around every day. Major increases have, as Caputo said, often proven to be detrimental for the leading parties in power. Spiking gas prices in 2022, alongside historic inflation across the economy, were a major factor in tanking former President Joe Biden's approval ratings. As Republicans face the prospect of a midterms bloodbath from voters angered by the persistently high cost of living, skyrocketing gas prices could make the situation even worse for them.

"Our team went through some of the Senate battleground states, just to give you a sense of the political impact," CNN host Dana Bash detailed during the segment. "The snapshot where we are right now, since we do, of course, have an election in November. Look at this: Ohio up 23 percent, Michigan 20 percent, North Carolina 19, Maine 17, Georgia 15. And nationally up 16 percent."

Trump and his allies have insisted that the current supply chain disruptions and gas price spikes are only temporary issues while the conflict in Iran plays out, and they should subside soon. Trump has also insisted that these price hikes are the price that must be paid by Americans to remove the current Iranian government regime, even though most Americans oppose his strikes against the Middle Eastern nation.

Explosive details of 13-year-old Trump accuser confirmed by local reports

Details involving Jane Doe number 4 in the file related to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein were confirmed by local news investigators after the survivor was found to be from South Carolina.

A report by The Post and Courier confirmed the details about her roots in South Carolina. This survivor was recruited after her mother handed out fliers saying her 13-year-old daughter was available for babysitting jobs.

In 2019, Jane Doe came forward and was interviewed by the FBI four times about her encounters in the early 1980s. This was the individual that Hillary Clinton referenced in her comments to the House Oversight and Reform Committee.

During the testimony, Clinton commented, "And this latest example of the missing files about the allegations, and they are absolutely nothing more than allegations, but the FBI interviewed that witness four times. You don't interview a non-credible witness four times. You don't put into the FBI reporting 'protect this source' if you think there is nothing to it. So, of course, I would like to know, like every other American deserves to know, what is in those files and who is going to hold people accountable? Because the Justice Department seems to be either unwilling or incapable of doing so."

Longtime Epstein reporter and researcher Julie K. Brown wrote about Doe in a report for the Miami Herald last week. She noted on Substack, "This story is massive, and it will take a village of journalists to put the threads together."

Doe's reports to the FBI include accusations of Epstein, President Donald Trump and at least two other people of sexually assaulting her when she was 13. She alleged that she was told to engage in oral activity with Trump, who allegedly forced her head down. She bit him, and in response, he punched her in the head.

The Post and Courier researched some of the details the survivor provided about the account, including Epstein renting a home from her mother. She was then called to that home by Epstein, and the pattern of abuse began.

Among those allegations was that Epstein took photos of her posing nude and tried to extort her mother to keep the images secret. Her mother couldn't afford what was demanded by Epstein, the allegations said, and she stole $22,000 from the real estate firm she worked for in an effort to pay for it. The Post and Courier also confirmed this detail using public records.

The survivor also "offered the name of an Epstein business associate on Hilton Head Island who became a central figure in the drama, with specifics that are reflected in public records," the report also said.

Another one of the individuals she alleged was involved was an Ohio businessman "affiliated with a Cincinnati-based college." The outlet found the alleged person and confirmed that the man was part of a for-profit school.

Trump continues to deny all of the allegations surrounding his involvement with Epstein.

Congressman who claimed he’s leaving GOP still plans to caucus with GOP

Over the weekend, Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley (CA) announced he was switching parties to be an independent, denouncing the new California redistricting operation that would draw him out of his congressional seat. He announced, however, that he was making the change "immediately," which is a new detail.

"Today, I filed for reelection as 'No Party Preference.' This means I will not have a party affiliation on the ballot or as an officeholder. That’s how it already is with most offices in our state: mayors, city councilors, school board members, county supervisors, sheriffs, and DAs are all nonpartisan," he wrote on X.

After the video went live, Axios reported that his staff said it wasn't a "done deal" yet. But on Monday, it appeared it was.

As some in the comments asked, "Will you still caucus with the Republicans? Then shut up."

Indeed, Kiley will caucus with Republicans for “administrative purposes” for “the remainder of this term," he claimed.

It puts the current ranking of the House at 217 Republicans, 214 Democrats and Kiley, who will presumably be considered an Independent.

There hasn't been an independent in the House since Rep. Justin Amash, who left the GOP in 2019, noted his libertarian slant when he left the party. He then briefly ran for president. He ran for U.S. Senate in Michigan, but as a Republican again. He lost in the primary.

Critics stunned as Trump administration reveals reasons for NTSB official’s abrupt firing

The White House was a revolving door during Donald Trump's first presidency, which found him clashing with many of his appointees and announcing their firings on social media. Firings of administration officials, however, haven't been nearly as common during Trump's second term, as he has made a point of surrounding himself with MAGA loyalists. But on Thursday, March 5, the news broke that Trump was firing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and nominating Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma).

Noem wasn't the only one who was fired that week. CBS News reported that Todd Inman had been fired the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

In a statement to CBS News, Inman said he learned he was being fired on March 6. And details on possible reasons why he was fired emerged on March 9.

"To date," Inman told CBS News on March 8, "I have not received any reason for this termination."

But CBS News' Jennifer Jacobs, on March 9, tweeted, "NEWS: White House is citing use of alcohol on the job, harassment of staff, misuse of govt resources as reasons Todd Inman removed from National Transportation Safety Board, per @CBSNews @emmacnicholso . Inman was the NTSB's initial on-scene spokesman at midair collision in D.C. He said Sunday he hadn't been given reason for dismissal."

Inman served in the U.S. Department of Transportation during Trump's first presidency, reporting to then-Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao (who is married to former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell).

Inman, on March 8, referenced the aviation disasters that occurred during his time on the NTSB.

Inman told CBS News, "Having been the member on scene for two of the largest aviation incidents in the past two decades, working with all of the impacted families and first responders has made me appreciate how the original mission of the NTSB is more crucial now than ever before. Witnessing these horrible accidents have undoubtedly taken a toll on me and my family and has changed my perspective in a positive way on how we regulate safety for the traveling public."

Inman's firing is generating a lot of comments on X.

Inside Elections' Nathan Gonzales tweeted, "Kind of interesting reasoning in light of news about another Cabinet official."

Business consultant John Hochroth posted, "Are they firing him because he did these things, or because he didn't do enough of them?"

X user Jocelyn Johnson remarked, "Real reason for his dismissal: he refused to blame DEI for the crash."

Another X user, Piper Holmes, wrote, "So basically we’ll never know why he was fired. (It's not like this administration is ever truthful)."

'Blatant racism': MAGA rep sparks backlash with 'flatly un-American' claim

As House Republicans gather this week at President Donald Trump’s golf resort in Doral, Florida, one member has ignited outrage with a racist and Islamophobic social media screed that’s drawing sharp condemnation.

“Muslims don’t belong in American society,” declared U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN). “Pluralism is a lie.”

There are roughly four million Muslims in the United States, including about 40,000 in Ogles’ home state.

U.S. Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI) responded, writing: “The founders put freedom of religion in the FIRST Amendment for a reason. Muslims have lived in America since the 1600s. E Pluribus Unum, an ode to our pluralism, has been our country’s traditional motto since 1782.”

“Maybe it’s YOUR values that don’t belong in American society,” he concluded.

The Independent’s D.C. Bureau Chief Eric Michael Garcia called it, “Blatant racism and islamophobia from a sitting member of Congress.”

The Bulwark’s Joe Perticone observed, “It’s wild that the type of things Steve King had his committee assignments stripped for are now almost median House Republican views.”

Politico’s Carla Marinucci called Congressman Ogles’ remark “Reprehensible.”

HuffPost’s Arthur Delaney posted the text of the First Amendment.

Writer Charlotte Clymer called for Ogles to be expelled from the House

“Ultimately,” warned journalist and attorney John Teufel, “I do believe that either fascism is ascendant in the United States for decades, or there will have to be a civil war or some sort of Balkanization.”

“I don’t think there’s a magic third option of resurgent liberal democracy. Not with elected leaders like this,” he observed.

Calling his statement “hateful, disgraceful, and flatly un-American,” Seth Taylor, a former DNC delegate, slammed Congressman Ogles.

“I’m telling you plainly: you do not get to decide which faiths belong in this country. That is not your job, and it is not your right,” he wrote as part of a lengthy statement. “Pluralism is not a lie. It is one of the core strengths of America. Religious liberty means all of us. It means Christians, Jews, Muslims, and people of every other faith or no faith at all. ”

“People like you love to wrap yourselves in the Constitution while trampling its most basic promises,” he added. “Your rhetoric is bigotry, not leadership. It is division, not patriotism. And it should be condemned without hesitation,” Taylor added.

But far-right influencer Laura Loomer, who at times has had the ear of President Donald Trump, wrote: “Amen. More GOP reps need to start saying this.”

Virginia Republicans rage against ex-GOP governor: 'Missing in action' while eyeing 2028

Republicans in Virginia are turning on the state's former GOP governor, Glenn Youngkin, according to the Wall Street Journal, accusing him of being "missing in action" in the fight against the pro-Democrat gerrymander underway in the state and decrying his ambitions to run for president in 2028.

Youngkin served as the governor of Virginia from 2022 to 2026 and was succeeded in office this year by Democrat Abigail Spanberger. Spanberger rode a wave of growing anti-MAGA sentiment into office, one of the many Democrats to post major electoral victories in 2025 by running on affordability and opposition to Donald Trump's agenda. She has wasted little time since assuming the governorship, signing numerous executive orders and throwing her support behind major Democratic legislative initiatives, including a new redistricting effort to counteract GOP gerrymanders in other states.

It was in the battle to stop this redistricting push where Virginia Republicans say that Youngkin let them down. A group of GOP lawmakers from the state told WSJ in a report published Monday that they approached the outgoing governor in November and urged him to throw his support behind the fight in a big way. Now, they say his efforts fell well short, with Youngkin neglecting to take part in fundraising efforts and appearing in no anti-redistricting ads.

Rep. Rob Wittman, a Virginia Republican at risk of losing his seat in the new Democrat-backed district map, said that the former governor was "adamant to say he was not going to get involved" in the fight during that November meeting, causing immense frustrations.

"Glenn is just missing in action," Wittman said.

Another vulnerable Virginia Republican, Rep. Ben Cline, said that Youngkin was a major opponent of redistricting while in office, but "went quiet" as soon as he left. He retained hope that the former governor would return "as one of the strongest opponents of gerrymandering" in the state soon.

As the prominent former governor of a purple state, Youngkin has long been floated as a prime candidate for a future GOP presidential nomination, with reports indicating that he may be considering a run in 2028 to potentially succeed Trump in the White House. Wittman said that Youngkin's handling of the redistricting fight has left many in the GOP with a dim view of his nationwide ambitions.

"If you’re not going to fight for your own state, for your own party, that’s pretty poor testament to what you would do if the president were to select you for a position," Wittman said.

Youngkin's representatives and allies strongly contested these characterizations of his involvement with the fight. Wittman later said that his comments were made "in the heat of the moment," and that he and the governor are now on the "same page."

Trump scrambles as cybersecurity experts warn fed purge undermines US threat capabilities

The Trump administration is revising its hiring policies just a year after a massive purge of federal employees.

Prior job cuts have, in the words of some cybersecurity experts, "undermined" U.S. threat capabilities, according to a report in The Washington Post.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), responsible for defending domestic infrastructure against cyberattacks, was particularly gutted by the loss of 40 p ercent of its workforce in last year's government purges. That loss of personnel has created “operational blind spots,” the Post reports.

“With the loss of hundreds of experts, CISA’s ability to detect threats from the most significant adversary, China, as well as others like Russia and Iran, is severely diminished, and now is not the time for the U.S. to let down its guard,” said a former agency official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid retribution.

CISA did not respond to a request for comment about the shortages.

“We probably have some skills that we now need to hire back, quite frankly,” Scott Kupor, the head of the Office of Personnel Management, said to the Washington Post. “There’s no question anytime you do restructurings … sometimes you over-restructure, sometimes you under-restructure.”

This new hiring push comes with newly created job classifications that make hiring and firing easier, the Post reports. The administration is now focused on becoming a “launchpad” for college graduates and early-career professionals in health care, program management and technology roles.

Supporters claim the moves will make government more responsive to elected leadership. The concept centralizes hiring decisions and expands political appointee input.

Critics claim that the civil service’s historic nonpartisanship is threatened, particularly as diversity initiatives are rolled back.

Despite the hiring push, those who were cut are not welcome to return, the Post reports, citing an internal memo it obtained. This is done “to avoid the risk of impaired objectivity — a conflict of interest that occurs when former personnel are tasked with auditing, closing, or settling actions they may have previously initiated or overseen.”

Senior White House officials have been personally involved in shaping the rebuild, the Post reports. Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has been active in hiring discussions, according to two people familiar. “The president has certain priorities in the administration, and when we decide to actually exercise and do those priorities, people may call that political,” Kupor said. “But to me, that’s the way the process was designed.”

The new hiring push will still leave government employment far below prior levels before Elon Musk’s DOGE initiative took an axe to staffing and eliminated entire agencies. To date, despite claims that the cuts would trim a bloated bureaucracy and reduce the national debt, “... the government spent more in 2025 than it had the previous year."

The Post reports that Trump’s administration fired, laid off or accepted buyouts from more than 387,000 employees since the president’s inauguration. That was countered by the hiring of roughly 123,000 workers, according to the Office of Personnel Management.

Kupor said there are more “opportunities to reshape” agencies this year, suggesting additional staff reductions could come in some departments, but declined specifics.

'Completely ignored': Inside the FBI’s years-long shrug at Epstein’s house of horrors

The Justice Department seems to be taking a renewed glance at trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico ranch, which was largely ignored when investigations began in 2019.

The Guardian reported Monday that the recent disclosure of documents from the DOJ showed added attention to the so-called Zorro Ranch. The sprawling property is one of the many sites believed to be where Epstein abused underage girls. At no point has the federal government conducted a search.

That isn't to say that New Mexico wasn't on the feds' radar.

Former New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas told The Guardian, “In spring 2019, our office investigated activity in New Mexico that was still viable for prosecution, including contact with multiple victims."

“During that time, the US attorney’s office in New York asked us to pause any further state investigation or prosecution related to Epstein, informing us that they were already conducting an active multijurisdictional prosecution,” Balderas said. “We shared all our reports and interviews to ensure they had all investigative leads and respected their request to refrain from further parallel investigation. We kept the matter open, investigated Epstein’s land leases, and continued offering our legal resources to the DoJ for further prosecution.”

He noted that neither the main DOJ nor the New York office shared anything with them. Instead, New Mexico stepped back from its investigation.

One Dec 2019 email captured a federal prosecutor telling a lawyer for Epstein’s estate co-executors that they had “not searched the New Mexico property."

Balderas told The Guardian that his office asked federal authorities “to use any available asset forfeiture tools to seize the ranch” in 2020.

“We expect to have additional information to share about our investigation as it continues to progress,” a spokesperson for the current state attorney general told The Guardian.

The brother of the victim, Virginia Giuffre, Sky Roberts, gathered a crowd outside the ranch over the weekend to demand more be done to expose those who worked with Epstein to traffic and exploit the girls, reported KOAT.

"It's a little surreal," Roberts said. "It's very important that we show that we're here in unity, and we're not going away. Whether it's on the Capitol steps or we get to come to New Mexico, we're going to do it. These survivors deserve it. This is about so much more than the survivors."

It's unclear whether the interest in Zorro Ranch was prompted by New Mexico's decision to begin its own investigation into the ranch. The New York Times reported on March 1 that in February, state officials formed a "truth coalition" with bipartisan state legislative members eager to probe the history of the ranch.

"We got word that this was happening about two days ago and we knew we had to be here," Amanda Roberts told KOAT during the weekend protest. "We're so proud of New Mexico, the citizens of New Mexico, the legislators that have pushed for this investigation. It sets the tone for the rest of the United States, and we're backing every single survivor who has suffered in silence. We're here for Virginia."

“Not only has it been overshadowed, it’s been completely ignored,” argued Albuquerque radio D.J. Eddy Aragon, who has spent years investigating Epstein.

The Santa Fe New Mexican reported that the new owner, Republican Texas businessman and former state Sen. Don Huffines, was ordered to immediately stop renovations after the ranch was purchased. Huffines is currently running for state comptroller in Texas. Construction has already begun on what he plans to turn into a Christian retreat; however, it appears he hasn't filed for any permits with the state or local governments.

Among the 3 million documents released by the Justice Department in the past months, one individual contacted federal authorities on Nov. 25, 2019, “to report an email he received offering 7 videos of sexual abuse and the location of two foreign girls buried on Zorro Ranch." An FBI report doesn't appear on the tip until Oct. 2021.

Aragon has been talking about the allegations about women buried on the ranch for years, noting that he, too, got an email from a source in 2019 offering the information for money. He said that he forwarded the email to the FBI.

The Guardian spoke with New Mexico defense attorney John Day, who explained that there are some challenges to getting a search warrant for the property seven years after the death of Epstein. However, former Sen. Huffines indicated he was cooperating, so it is doubtful he would block any effort to search all 7,500 acres, which would amount to just under 12 square miles.

Day said that given the length of time that has passed, it might be difficult to find much evidence.

He said that the first steps would be in sifting through "the human side" of the investigation, meaning anyone who could have worked on the ranch. The other key investigation would be to search all the Epstein documents for any mention of "New Mexico" or individuals with zip codes in the state.

New Mexico's Department of Justice emailed the U.S. DOJ asking for another version of the email indicating girls might be buried at the ranch. The state DOJ also spoke with Stephanie Garcia Richard, New Mexico’s state land commissioner, about agricultural leases that Epstein's ranch had for more than 25 years.

'Out of touch' Kai Trump brags about ritzy shopping trip with Secret Service in tow

As the granddaughter of President Donald Trump and daughter of Donald Trump Jr., 18-year-old Kai Trump enjoys full U.S. Secret Service protection when she's out in public. Now, Kai Trump is drawing strong criticism for publicizing a TikTok video and a shopping spree at a time when the United States is at war with Iran.

A video posted on TikTok shows Kai Trump with jets in the background while the words "she does what she wants and she looks cool doing it" are heard over music. Another video, posted on YouTube, shows her in the upscale Los Angeles grocery store Erewhon. And her activities are generating a lot of comments on X, formerly Twitter.

The Russian government-owned RT tweeted, "Kai Trump SLAMMED online for 'out of touch' TikTok featuring war machines 'She does what she wants & she looks cool doing it' How cool is war?"

Wayne Waldrop, CEO of Bloom Wave Digital Marketing, disagreed with the argument that "Kai is off limits."

Waldrop posted, "Kai Trump made herself not off limits the second she decided to post content aura farming in front of military aircrafts. She is a grown adult and she should fight in her Grandpa's war if she supports it so much and thinks it is so cool. Why do American lives have to be lost while they smile and film the behind the scenes? Also, she could have at least read the room and hold off on her shopping videos one week into a new war her family helped start."

In a separate tweet, Waldrop highlighted Kai Trump's shopping spree and wrote, "This title is absolutely wild. Kai Trump decided to flex her shopping trip with her Secret Service detail while the whole country is struggling and war is breaking out."

Waldrop also complained, "I can't believe she still couldn't just pretend for like two weeks."

Journalist Saul Gonzales commented, "New generation, new grifts."

X user Jayce Mcwood said of Kai Trump's video, "It's disrespectful"

Another X user, Francis Pentangelo, tweeted, "How much are taxpayers shelling out so she has security to go around making videos? They're all grifters."

Attorney Tracey Gallagher, "Give me a break. Put a uniform on."

Lindsey Graham’s new job is a 'PR role for Trump’s war': columnist

In Feb. 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump blasted Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), assuming he'd start World War III. Now, it's Trump that is on board with war after one commentator said Graham led Trump on a leash toward the attacks on Iran.

“He’s one of the dumbest human beings I’ve ever seen… you’ll end up starting World War III with a guy like that," Trump told Fox News.

Writing for Zeteo.com, Prem Thakker alleged that it was Graham who "helped dog-walk him into his disastrous war in Iran — a baseless and illegal conflict that’s pierced the illusion that the president is a dovish exception to the bloodthirsty conservative movement."

Graham has hedged these past few weeks, saying that he wants regime change to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. However, he's also demanded that countries in the region get involved in the effort with the U.S.

“We’re going to blow the hell out of these people,” Graham pledged. “When this regime goes down, we’re going to have a new Mideast,” he fantasized.

He then gave away the game: “We’re going to make a ton of money," he said, explaining that “Venezuela and Iran have 31 percent of the world’s oil reserves.”

Thakker noted that Graham seemed to gleefully brandish a hat reading "Free Cuba," indicating that the president is working his way through the list of nations he appears to want to impact. After his attack on Venezuela, Trump explained that his foreign policy doctrine has been about the Western hemisphere. Then he waged the Iran war.

On Sunday, after Israel bombed several oil facilities, Thakker noted that Graham rushed to Fox cameras to rejoice: “Donald J. Trump saved the world from real chaos… Thank God Trump did this.”

"Graham’s PR role for Trump’s war is all the more interesting given his apparent role in making the war happen," Thakker closed. "The efforts have been as pathetically paternalistic as Graham reportedly playing a word-association game with our man-child president, encouraging him to go to war."


Trump’s global oil crisis now the biggest in history: report

The global oil supply disruption brought on by Donald Trump's war against Iran is now the biggest crisis of its kind in history, according to a new report from CNBC, and it shows no signs of stopping anytime soon.

In the immediate aftermath of the U.S. and Israel's joint military strikes against the Middle Eastern nation last weekend, Iran ordered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a body of water that connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, through which nearly all of the Gulf States' crude oil is shipped to the rest of the world. This closure effectively halted shipments of around 20 percent of the world's oil supply and set gas prices skyrocketing at a time when consumers are still feeling the sting of inflation.

According to a new report from the Associated Press, the price of a barrel of crude oil peaked at nearly $120 as of Monday morning, before dipping back down to around $101, which still represents a spike of over 20 percent since the start of military operations in Iran. These soaring oil prices have had a disastrous impact on the broader global economy, with stock prices tumbling all over the world on Monday morning.

Citing a new report on the crisis from Rapidan Energy, CNBC on Monday reported that Trump's disruption of the global oil supply was now by far the worst in history. With 20 percent of the world's oil supply impacted, the current circumstances have more than doubled the impact of the Suez Canal crisis of 1956, after Britain, France and Israel invaded Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, which stifled roughly 10 percent of the supply. The report also noted that the current crisis is nearly three times as bad as the Arab oil embargo of 1973, which resulted in historically crippling oil shortages the world over.

What makes the Hormuz closure so much worse than past crises, according to Rapidan's report, is that now, there are far fewer spare reserves of petroleum to work with. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates hold most of the world's "swing capacity" of oil, according to CNBC, and they are two of the nations impacted by the current closure.

“The conflict has not only taken offline a historically high share of global supply – it has simultaneously disrupted the primary holders of spare capacity,” Rapidan's report explained. “The result is a market with no meaningful cushion. There is no swing producer positioned to step in.”

The Trump administration has reportedly floated the prospect of dipping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to bring prices down, though experts note that this supply is not nearly enough to offset the disruption caused by the closure of Hormuz.

'Increasingly frustrated' lawmakers expose lack of details in security briefings

U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to go to war with Iran is drawing widespread criticism among Democrats, and some Republicans are critical as well — including Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky) and former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), both of whom view the military strikes as a betrayal of the non-interventionist "America First" platform he embraced in 2024.

In an article published on March 9, MS NOW reporter Kevin Frey details the frustrations of Democratic lawmakers who believe that the Trump Administration isn't being forthcoming with them about the war with Iran.

"As President Donald Trump wages a military campaign against Iran, key Democrats on Capitol Hill are growing increasingly frustrated with what the administration is sharing with them," Frey explains. "Or, more precisely, what the administration isn't sharing. It's a concern that predates the Iran conflict — and, to some extent, the current White House. But when lawmakers have gathered recently behind closed doors to hear from administration officials about ongoing operations, Democrats say they've been struck by the dearth of new information they're receiving."

Fellow MS NOW reporter Matt Fuller, linking to Frey's article on X, formerly Twitter, noted, "If you've ever wondered what those classified briefings on Capitol Hill are actually like — what members actually learn about Iran strikes — the answer is hardly nothing. An in-depth look at what the Trump administration is sharing — or what it isn't."

Rep. Joseph Morelle (D-New York) is among the House Democrats expressing his frustration.

Morelle told MS NOW, "I don't think you, at the end, get really anything more in these classified briefings with the Trump Administration than you would by watching MS NOW or CNN. There's no sort of real in-depth analysis or information that you couldn't get by reading the paper or looking at the news."

Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California) told MS NOW, "Virtually nothing in these stupid briefings is actually classified. Gen. Caine and (Defense Secretary Pete) Hegseth try to dazzle us with how amazing our military is. The Republicans all clap. And then, (Secretary of State Marco) Rubio does a bunch of fast talk."

'Good luck in the midterms': Anti-Trump conservatives circle the water around the president

Prominent anti-Trump conservatives are speaking out, sensing a weakened president prosecuting an unpopular war as oil prices soar and markets plunge.

“You know, in the end, Trump’s name will be synonymous for the single most evil and destructive person to ever hold the Presidency, and it won’t even be close,” wrote The Lincoln Project’s Rick Wilson.

In a parody of President Trump, Wilson wrote: “I killed 500,000 people by botching COVID, wrecked our economy with a foolish trade war, set loose murderous domestic secret police, ripped off Americans in billion-dollar crypto scams, covered Epstein, sold out our allies, started a second Great Depression and World War III.” He then called it “a hell of a resume.”

Former Trump Homeland Security Chief of Staff Miles Taylor noted, “My former GOP colleagues are still ‘standing by their man’ — the month he starts a war, slaughters civilians, starts a global financial panic, puts Americans in the crosshairs of terrorist attacks, and is accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.”

“Good luck in the midterms,” he added.

Taylor also wrote: “The ‘American experiment’ doesn’t mean what is used to. Now it means testing what happens when you give a senile sociopath nuclear weapons.”

Wilson continued, writing, “At least when we’re paying $8 a gallon for gas, the global economy is in a shambles, World War III is raging, and the living envy the dead, Donald Trump will have a new shiny ballroom.”

Pointing out that the president wore a USA baseball cap when he attended the dignified transfer of American service members killed in Kuwait, Wilson noted, “Trump wearing a ball cap at Dover is repugnant beyond words. He is grotesque. As always, imagine what Fox et al would have done if Biden or Obama did so.”

Predicting a possible Democratic wave in November, The Bulwark’s Bill Kristol noted: “Democrats at +6 on the generic ballot among registered voters. 74% of Dems say they have high interest in the fall’s election, compared to 61% of Rs. So among likely voters probably at something like +7 or 8. On the way to a Dem wave, but not yet there.”

The Atlantic’s Tom Nichols, a retired U.S. Naval War College professor, commented, “It’s almost as if we don’t have a strategy.”

And he warned, “Don’t have a war led by people who are in over their heads.”

And on Saturday, responding to a Trump social media post, Wilson wrote: “Just so we’re quite clear, the President is insane.”

Inside the cult-like psychology that keeps Trump allies loyal

After President Donald Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Salon's Amanda Marcotte — in a biting article published on March 6 — argued that she "excelled in debasing herself to please her boss" only to get fired anyway. Noem, Marcotte observed, even altered her physical appearance to please Trump. But in the end, according to Marcotte, Noem's loyalty was rewarded with a firing via social media.

Marcotte revisited the subject of MAGA loyalty to Trump during an appearance on The New Republic's "The Daily Blast" podcast posted on March 9. Host Greg Sargent noted that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's "cult-like obsequiousness gets dialed up to 11" whenever the "news gets particularly bad for Donald Trump," and Marcotte explained the "psychology" behind Leavitt and other Trump loyalists.

Marcotte told Sargent, "I think at the end of the day, the most important psychology that keeps these people on board is just that admitting that Trump is bad or wrong or a failure is admitting that all those people who, for a decade, have been telling you that you made a mistake were right. And what's weird is the longer this drags on, the harder it is for them to let go without some kind of offramp. And I will say, if there ever was an offramp, I do kind of think the Iran war might be it — because again, they don't want another [George] Bush."

Marcotte added, "Trump ran pretty explicitly the first time as: I am not another Bush. He made fun of the Bush that was in the race, and here he is, another Bush."

Trump's loyalists, Marcotte emphasized, are so invested in defending him that they refuse to publicly acknowledge all the things that are wrong with his administration — from Iran to the economy.

Marcotte told Sargent, "I agree that (Leavitt's) first and foremost motivation is making her boss feel good so she keeps her job. I would love to like look inside her head and see if she actually thinks it makes a difference to say these obsequious, like laughable things — if she thinks she's actually persuading anybody, or if it's just Trump, her boss, like managing her boss' feelings, because it might just be that…. I think we're seeing a lot of people who are behaving like they don't know what to do. They don't know what's going to happen next."

Marcotte continued, "They're at the whims of a mercurial boss who may not be remembering super well what he said one minute to the next. And I think that there is no plan here. I think that they're just kind of winging it in the most like ridiculous way."

Time may be running out for Republicans who oppose Trump

One need only watch MS NOW or read The Bulwark to see examples of well-known conservatives and libertarians who have vehement contempt for President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. Three of MS NOW's top hosts — former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough, ex-White House Communications Director Nicolle Wallace and former Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele — were prominent figures in the pre-MAGA GOP of the past. And The Bulwark features a who's-who of Never Trump conservatives, including Bill Kristol, Mona Charen (a former Nancy Reagan speechwriter), Sarah Longwell and Tim Miller (an ex-GOP strategist).

Yet Trump dominates the Republican Party in 2026, and many GOP lawmakers and governors are afraid to offer even tepid criticism of the president.

In an op-ed published by the New York Times on March 9, Jon A. Shields — who teaches at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California — stresses that at the local level, there are still conservative Republicans in red states who haven't gone full MAGA. But he fears that their place in the GOP might be endangered.

"Millions of Americans of all political stripes have moved to red states since 2020, mostly looking for a better quality of life," Shields argues. "Why does Republican governance in the states still seem so, well, competent? Partly, it's because many local Republican elites have been quietly resisting the MAGA-fication of their party, even in the heart of Trump country. But that resistance is increasingly fragile — and it may not hold out much longer."

Shields adds, "If the old guard is driven out of the party once and for all, many Americans will eventually confront an unexpected legacy of President Trump's revolution: a nation where there are no sound alternatives to progressive rule."

Shields cites Wyoming as an example of a deep red state where local Republicans haven't necessarily gone total MAGA.

"Plenty of traditional Republicans have either retired or lost their own primaries," the Claremont McKenna professor explains. "But enough of them have hung on to give the old Republican elite a significant bloc in the state legislature…. This Republican civil war is being waged in many red states, mostly beneath the radar of the national media…. These clashes have gone largely unnoticed outside the states where they’re happening, and have become visible only when they have clear national significance."

But how much longer non-MAGA Republicans in red states will be able to hang on in local politics, according to Shields, remains to be seen.

"The anti-MAGA resistance in state Republican parties is real," Shields writes. "It's widespread. But it's not clear whether it can turn back the MAGA tide. So far, the tide is still coming in. Old guard Republicans everywhere are on their heels, clinging to shrinking vestiges of power. Since 2016, they have suffered numerous setbacks across the country, while Mr. Trump and his allies have exerted increasing influence far down the ballot."

Rick Wilson amused by Republican senator's newfound 'moral clarity' on Trump

After President Donald Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and nominated Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma) for the position, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) called for Trump to fire another person in his second administration: White House adviser Stephen Miller.

Never Trump conservative Rick Wilson and liberal journalist Molly Jong-Fast discussed Tillis' outspokenness on a March 8 video for their YouTube show "Fast Politics." And they attributed Tillis' willingness to criticize Trump officials to the fact that the conservative senator isn't seeking reelection in the 2026 midterms.

Although Tillis plans to serve out the rest of his term, he will be exiting Congress in early January 2027. Tillis, facing an aggressive GOP primary challenge for not being MAGA enough, decided against seeking another term.

Jong-Fast, with amusement in her voice, said of Tillis, "He's had that thing where, when you're a Republican and you decide you're not going to run again, you become suddenly very brave."

Also sounding amused, Wilson — a former GOP strategist who expressed his disdain for President Donald Trump and the far-right MAGA movement by leaving the Republican Party and becoming an independent — told Jong-Fast, "You gain superpowers, in fact…. Incredible superpowers that allow you to have a shred of moral clarity for years of having your lips firmly attached to Trump's backside…. But Tillis has become a born-again hard MOFO, and he has been ripping the living hell out of tiny Santa Monica Goebbels, Stephen Miller, on the Sunday shows. It's been a delight. "

Jong-Fast, commenting on Trump's decision to fire Noem and nominate Mullin, told Wilson, "The real story here is Stephen Miller, who is running the show."

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Republican senator calls for firing of another high-level Trump official

Although firings were common during President Donald Trump's first term, he hasn't fired nearly as many people since returning to the White House — a fact often attributed to his insistence on being surrounded by unquestioning MAGA loyalists this time. But the firing of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem marked the departure of a high-level official from Trump's second administration.

Now, conservative Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) is calling for the firing of another Trump loyalist: White House policy adviser Stephen Miller.

During a Sunday morning, March 8 appearance on CNN, Tillis told host Jake Tapper that Miller is a "big problem" for the Trump Administration.

When Tapper asked Tillis if "Stephen Miller should go, he quickly responded, "Oh, of course, I do."

"He is not worried about substance," Tillis said of Miller. "He's more worried about form, but I also think that he has an outsized influence over the operations of the Cabinet. And I believe we've got qualified Cabinet members there that sometimes are doing less than what they want to, because of his direction and his outsized influence. He's a big problem in this administration. He has been from the beginning."

Miller, Tillis argued, is having a very negative influence on Trump's immigration policies.

The conservative senator told Tapper, "It gives me pause that you had people like Stephen Miller calling the shots. It was Stephen Miller who said it was the position of the United States that we should go after Greenland. And Stephen Miller, that's been repeatedly responsible for embarrassments for the president of the United States by acting too quickly speaking, first, and thinking later."

- YouTube www.youtube.com

DC insider tears apart Trump's case for going to war in a point-by-point rebuttal

In a Saturday, March 7 post on his Truth Social platform, U.S. President Donald Trump offered a vigorous defense of his decision to go to war with Iran and claimed that the operation is going extremely well. But Trump's arguments got a strong pushback from Never Trump conservative Tim Miller, who stressed that the president is failing to offer a "coherent" explanation for getting the United States into war.

Trump's escalation with Iran represents a continuation of his longstanding adversarial stance toward the Iranian regime. Since taking office, Trump has pursued an aggressive posture toward Tehran, withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018 and reimposing strict economic sanctions.

The administration has repeatedly accused Iran of destabilizing the Middle East through its support of proxy militias and regional actors. Throughout his first term, Trump authorized military strikes against Iranian military commanders, including the 2020 assassination of General Qasem Soleimani, which significantly raised tensions and prompted retaliatory threats from Iran. These actions set the stage for an increasingly confrontational relationship, one that Trump has continued to fuel with inflammatory rhetoric and hardline policies upon his return to office.

In a video for the conservative website The Bulwark, Miller — a frequent guest on MS NOW and a former GOP strategist — went over Trump's points, one by one, and took them apart.

Trump posted, "Iran, which is being beat to HELL, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors, and promised that it will not shoot at them anymore. This promise was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attacks."

Miller, in a mocking tone, told viewers, "I don't think they've apologized to their Middle East neighbors."

Trump wrote that Iran was "looking to take over and rule the Middle East" — to which Miller responded, "Maybe aspirationally."

Trump called Iran as "the loser of the Middle East," and Miller described that rhetoric as comparable to a "nine-year-old."

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Conservative newspaper makes a strong case against Trump's war

During his first presidency, Donald Trump was a relentless critic of neoconservatives —arguing that the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a total disaster. And his America First views, greatly influenced by paleoconservative Patrick Buchanan, were often described as "isolationist."

But Trump, since returning to the White House, has taken a much more interventionist turn — from the capture of former President Nicolás Maduro to pushing for the U.S. to buy Greenland (an idea that European leaders vehemently oppose) to calling for Canada to become "the 51st state." And Trump escalated his interventionism by going to war with Iran.

In an op-ed published by the conservative Washington Examiner on March 8, journalist Timothy P. Carney lays out some reasons why Republicans should proceed with caution when it comes to war.

"If we take conservatism to be a real habit of mind, grounded in insights and a sound anthropology," Carney writes, "then the full weight of conservatism comes down against regime changes and wars of choice…. Overthrowing the current order, even when that order is rife with problems, typically makes things worse. More broadly: Dramatic changes to complex systems always create unintended and unforeseen consequences, and those consequences are often very bad."

Carney continues, "This isn't merely a foreign policy view. This is something the conservative believes so deeply he may not say it out loud. It's why he's skeptical of grand new plans and revolutions, whether cultural, economic, or otherwise. It's not that we live in the best of all possible worlds, it's that we live in a world more complex than we can imagine. Our power of reason is awesome, but humans trying to rearrange civilization are like amateurs tinkering with a home's electrical system — there's a high risk of disaster."

Carney goes on to describe the "lessons" of the United States' "21st Century regime-change wars."

"In Afghanistan," Carney explains, "we very quickly dethroned the Taliban, and then sunk into a 20-year occupation that ended in a humiliating and deadly retreat in 2021….

We spent more than $9 billion to try and end narcotics trade and production in Afghanistan. This was a total failure. By 2018, Afghanistan was supplying more than 90 percent of the world's opium…. The Iraq War, likewise, was quickly declared a success."

Carney continues, "Our military demolished Iraq's, deposed Saddam Hussein, and soon arrested him. For a moment, we were, as the war's champions predicted, greeted as liberators. Mission Accomplished! But then things spiraled way down. The primary premise for the war, that Saddam was about to use 'weapons of mass destruction,' proved false. The government we stood up collapsed. Our efforts to import Madison democracy failed, and in the vacuum, terrorism blossomed and then spread throughout the region. Many experts argue that the war created ISIS, which then brought hell on the region for many years. Domestically, the war became incredibly unpopular, and led to the Democratic takeover of Congress in 2006 and Barack Obama's election in 2008. Iraq today is one of the worst places on the planet to live."

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.