Frontpage videos

'Wants to sound like a dictator': Conservative slams Trump over newest executive order

President Donald Trump's decision to rename the Defense Department to the "Department of War" is being fervently criticized by multiple journalists and commentators.

A White House official confirmed Thursday that Trump planned to sign an executive order on Friday to rebrand the Department of Defense as the Department of War, allowing the use of that name as a secondary title for the time being.

During a Thursday appearance on CNN, David Axelrod — who was a senior advisor to former President Barack Obama – said the decisions shows that "the president is really intent on turning the clock back to the 19th century."

READ MORE: 'Republicans are coming for your guns!' Trump DOJ ripped over 'legally illiterate' policy

"So, the Department of War, and tariffs and spheres of influence, where countries just grabbed their neighbors and and gobble up their territory, and we do away with the civil service and so on. But I think he likes the sound of it as much as he likes military parades. The whole militarism thing is, he thinks, is a good reality show," Axelrod told host Jake Tapper on CNN.

Conservative Jonah Goldberg also spoke during the segment. "A lot of this has more to do with appearances he wants. It's like changing the name of the Department of Defense, the Department of War, sounds really macho and costs almost nothing. It's just easy," Goldberg said of Trump.

He went on to say that Trump "definitely wants to sound like a dictator and seem like a dictator, but he actually falls short often from actually crossing the lines."

"Like, he's not betrayed the Supreme Court yet. His flag burning amendment thing was actually a nothingburger. If he actually read the text, but he kind of counts that his biggest fans and his biggest foes will take the bait and take him at his word. And that creates a whole politics that are to his advantage," Goldberg said.

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Greene seizing 'opportunity' by exploiting Trump's 'enormous vulnerability': NYT reporter

When Reps. Ro Khanna (D-California) and Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky) held a bipartisan Wednesday, September 3 press conference on Capitol Hill that featured Jeffrey Epstein survivors, they were joined by MAGA Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) — who called for transparency from the Trump administration and GOP lawmakers about U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) files on Epstein's crimes.

The following day, New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush discussed Greene's possible motivations during an appearance on MSNBC's "Deadline: White House." And he argued that the far-right GOP congresswoman is thinking strategically and fears that the Epstein scandal could damage the MAGA movement.

Thrush told host Nicolle Wallace — a Never Trump conservative who served as White House communications director in the George W. Bush administration — "This is a political crisis that has just expanded and has just broken through every containment that the White House has put up around it. Right? This looked initially, when we were first writing about this, as if it was a pretty big embarrassment but a survivable embarrassment for Trump's law enforcement appointees, because they had pushed all these Epstein conspiracy theories."

READ MORE: 'Never been this bad': Young MAGA influencers say their income is 'tanking' due to Trump

The Times reporter argued that Greene is not only thinking about MAGA in 2025, but also, looking ahead to the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

"Now, what's going on?," Thrush told Wallace. "And it's happening at a point in time where Democrats are being pulled by the momentum of the midterms, as opposed to the gravitational pull of the last election and Republicans. And I think the Marjorie Taylor Greene position on this is extremely noteworthy, because she is clearly looking towards a life after Donald Trump and a position in the party after Donald Trump — maybe the biggest position in the party after Donald Trump. So, they are acting within their own post-Trump interests."

Thrush added, "And they are, from a political perspective, I think, seizing on an opportunity, you know, in addition to their to their heartfelt feelings about this particular issue and their own personal experiences with this sort of trauma. But they are also, I think, seeing what Democrats have seen for years, which is Trump’s enormous vulnerability with female voters and women in general in this country.""

READ MORE: Economist Paul Krugman says Trump 'telling the truth' on this issue — but there's a catch

Watch the full video below or at this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Significant unease': 4 GOP senators losing confidence in top Trump Cabinet official

On Thursday, September 4, health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was questioned by GOP and Democratic senators on Capitol Hill. Democrats, overall, were much more aggressive in their questioning, expressing major concerns about his vaccination policies. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Washington State) was downright scathing in her attacks, telling RFK Jr., "You are a charlatan."

Never Trump conservative and ex-GOP strategist Tim Miller, discussing the hearing during an MSNBC appearance, told host Katy Tur that RFK Jr. was an "absurd choice" for the position but lamented that he was confirmed anyway because most GOP senators are terrified of President Donald Trump. Meanwhile, on CNN, congressional correspondent Manu Raju reported that some Senate Republicans are expressing "significant unease" with Kennedy.

When CNN's Kasie Hunt asked Raju what GOP senators were feeling about "how well RFK performed today," he responded that there was "a lot of unease."

READ MORE: Economist Paul Krugman says Trump 'telling the truth' on this issue — but there's a catch

Raju noted that when he asked retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina) if he regretted voting to confirm RFK Jr., he responded, "Not yet."

Raju told Hunt, "He said he wants some key information from RFK Jr. about how he's ... making some of his decisions. And he also said the information that's coming out, the rhetoric that's coming out of HHS, is, quote, 'dangerous' to voters, to Americans who may not have access to quality information about vaccines. But he's hardly the only one who is raising some concerns or showing some significant unease."

Raju continued, "The top Republican in the Senate, the Senate majority leader, John Thune — I asked him directly: Do you have confidence in RFK Jr. as HHS secretary? And he just simply would not say. He said, 'it's not exactly what I think; it's what the president ultimately thinks.'"

READ MORE: 'Sound familiar?' Mitch McConnell lobs parting shot at 'America First' Republicans

The CNN reporter went on to note that Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana) told him he will let his "exchange" with Kennedy during the hearing "speak for itself."

"That exchange today was quite fiery between Cassidy and RFK, Jr. about Kennedy's rolling back of vaccines for COVID-19," adding that Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) "would not answer questions about Kennedy."

READ MORE: Trump’s weekend of 'humiliation' may be sign of things to come: analysis

Watch the full video below or at this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'This is crazy': National Guardsmen say morale is 'falling fast' during Trump deployment

Last month, President Donald Trump assumed federal control over all law enforcement in Washington D.C., and deployed National Guard troops to the nation's capital city, claiming the city's violent crime (which is at a 30-year low) necessitated such measures.

Now, some of those guardsmen are speaking out against the deployment, telling CNN that morale among troops is "falling fast" due to a lack of purpose. CNN reporter Jeff Zeleny spoke with several guardsmen and their family members about what troops really think of their mission after several weeks on the ground.

"We have seen these National Guardsmen and airmen around the city, but they are largely spending most of their time in areas where tourists populate on the National Mall, on the wharf and other things," Zeleny said. "... Of course, these members of the National Guard are used to being deployed to emergencies and things across the country, but they're not exactly sure in some cases, what they're doing here."

READ MORE: 'Proudly ignorant': Trump blasted for rewriting a history he doesn't understand

"One father of a guardsman in Tennessee told our reporters this. He said, 'I don't know what he thought he would be doing, but I really don't think he thought he would just be walking around for 12 hours every day. When I talked to him, he was just like, yeah, this is crazy,'" Zeleny recounted.

"One other wife of a guardsman who was deployed here to Washington — again, everyone says that they are willing to serve — but the question is, what exactly is the deployment?" Zeleny continued. "And this wife was very interesting as she told our team this: 'It's a little unusual in terms of what the National Guard is usually deployed for. But I mean, I guess i would say I'm open to it. I feel like maybe they would get a little boost in morale if they could just get a little bit more detail.'"

CNN host Boris Sanchez went on to ask about the financial cost of keeping guardsmen in Washington D.C. despite their apparent lack of mission. Zeleny said the deployment is costing taxpayers roughly $1 million per day, with additional costs like $5 million for 18 weeks of laundry service, $5 million for a tent city, and several million more for air conditioning rental, land use, mobile radio equipment and other costs.

"The bottom line is, no one is complaining about serving. Obviously, they're just wondering exactly what the mission is, and that is sometimes unclear," Zeleny said.

READ MORE: 'They're going to eat you alive': Mom describes her painful escape from MAGA

Watch the segment below, or by clicking this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Your gold lame throne is melting': Rosie O’Donnell hits back at Trump jab

The Hill reports the feud between President Donald Trump and actress Rosie O’Donnell has gone nowhere, according to reactions on Instagram.

Trump planted his most recent threat against the actress on a Wednesday Truth Social post.

“As previously mentioned, we are giving serious thought to taking away Rosie O’Donnell’s Citizenship,” Trump claimed over a distorted photo of O’Donnell. “She is not a Great American and is, in my opinion, incapable of being so!”

READ MORE: Trump just accidentally revealed a dirty secret — and it has America's CEOs panicking

Trump had piled on O’Donnell after she apologized for alleging that the Minneapolis Catholic school shooter was a “MAGA person.”

The Hill reports this to be Trump’s second threat to strip O’Donnell of her citizenship since July. Legal experts say is impossible for a U.S. president to strip a U.S. citizen of their citizenship, despite O’Donnell residing in Ireland.

O’Donnell reposted Trump’s Truth Social message Wednesday on Instagram, and invoked a Wednesday press conference of trafficked victims pushing Congress to compel the Justice Department to release files related to convicted sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump and his defendants oppose the release of the entirety of the case, however, which O’Donnell suggested implicated Trump, who was Epstein’s longtime friend.

READ MORE: 'Trump knows it': Expert fears judge's new smackdown could send case to 'enabling' SCOTUS

“Banishing me again? Logan Roy would be proud,” said O’Donnell, in a reference to the fictional, media mogul on HBO’s “Succession.”

“EPSTEIN SURVIVORS are the reckoning and your gold lamé throne is melting,” O’Donnell wrote, concluding the statement with a heart emoji.

The Hill reports Trump’s public war with O’Donnell “dates back nearly two decades,” triggered by comments O’Donnell made as co-host of “The View,” where she described Trump as a “snake oil salesman.”

Read the full Hill report at this link.

Watch: Trump official's 'lies' shredded in fiery exchange

U.S. Senator Michael Bennet dismantled Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s testimony in a blistering Senate Finance Committee hearing Thursday, accusing him of peddling “lies.”

In the heated debate, Senator Bennet, saying he quoted manufacturers on vaccine safety, blasted Kennedy.

"I quoted them today. What I said was accurate. What you said were lies," Bennet charged.

The conversation got more heated, with Kennedy demanding Bennet answer his questions, a tactic the HHS chief has used before.

"You're evading the question," Kennedy said.

READ MORE: Judges Slam SCOTUS as Trump Demands High Court Reverse His Tariff Defeats

"No, I'm asking the questions here," Bennet declared.

"You're evading that question," Kennedy repeated. "I asked you a question."

"I'm asking the questions, Mr. Kennedy, on behalf of parents and schools and teachers all over the United States of America who deserve so much better than your leadership," Bennet said, blasting Kennedy.

"That's what this conversation is about," he added.

Watch the video below or at this link.

Bennet runs out of patience with RFK Jr and yells at him that "I'm asking the questions on behalf of parents and schools and teachers all over the United States of America who deserve so much better than your leadership! That's what this conversation is about." pic.twitter.com/bW0xtBE261
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 4, 2025

READ MORE: Rubio Says US Blew Up Alleged Drug Boat ‘On the President’s Orders’ — Legality Questioned

Trump keeps losing in court — but does it matter?

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, recaps and responds to the latest legal news on the Trump administration’s ongoing immigration crackdown. We cover judicial decisions that the Trump administration cannot deport alleged Venezuelan gang members without due process, that it broke the law by sending National Guard troops to put down protests in Los Angeles, as well as its attempts to deport hundreds of Guatemalan children currently in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement and deputize military lawyers with no experience in immigration law to serve as immigration judges, and more.



This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González.

We look now at a slew of legal developments with the Trump administration’s deployment of National Guard troops to U.S. cities and his broader immigration crackdown. On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, the brother of the retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, ruled Trump broke the law when he deployed the National Guard to L.A. to quell protests against immigration raids. Breyer expressed concern [that] the deployments are, quote, “creating a national police force with the President as its chief,” unquote.

Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized up to 600 military lawyers to serve as temporary immigration judges.

And in more immigration news, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a two-to-one ruling that blocks President Trump from using the 18th-century wartime Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans accused of being gang members, because, quote, “We find no invasion or predatory incursion had occurred.” The 5th Circuit is considered to be one of the most conservative appeals courts in the United States. The case is expected to head to the Supreme Court.

For more, we go to Washington, D.C., where we’re joined by Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council.

Aaron, welcome back to Democracy Now! Let’s start with that last overnight court decision. If you can talk about this very conservative court ruling against Trump using the Alien Enemies Act, the AEA, and then just go through these latest decisions in the last two days?

AARON REICHLIN-MELNICK: Yeah, well, first, starting with the Alien Enemies Act, we saw the 5th Circuit, in a two-one decision, rule that the Alien Enemies Act is a wartime authority, which is what everyone has been saying so far. The judges’ panel’s rule, it was a two-one decision. They joined over a dozen other federal judges to rule that this law, adopted in 1798 during the quasi-war with France, and that has only ever previously been invoked during declared wars, is in fact a wartime authority and not something that can be used to deport Venezuelan alleged gang members without any due process whatsoever. So this is yet another blow for the Trump administration in their efforts to use the Alien Enemies Act. And though we know that this case will eventually make it to the Supreme Court, at the Supreme Court, as well, the Trump administration is zero for two in their efforts to use the law without any due process.

Beyond that, of course, we had Judge Breyer’s decision in California finding that the President violated the Posse Comitatus Act when the military was used for domestic law enforcement, things like riot control or crowd control in Los Angeles.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And for those who are not aware, what is the Posse Comitatus Act?

AARON REICHLIN-MELNICK: The Posse Comitatus Act is a 150-year-old law, adopted after the Civil War, that says extremely clearly that the U.S. military may not be used for domestic law enforcement unless explicitly authorized to do so by Congress. And here, Congress has never authorized the military to be used for basic law enforcement tasks like crowd control.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Also, if you could comment on the federal judge’s decision over the weekend stopping the Trump administration from illegally deporting as many as 700 Guatemalan children in the middle of the night back to Guatemala?

AARON REICHLIN-MELNICK: Yeah, that’s another case that looks very suspiciously similar to the kinds of things the Trump administration did in the Alien Enemies Act case. They adopted a very out-there, bizarre legal interpretation that had never been for — been put forward, and then tried to execute mass removals in the middle of the night, or very early in the morning, before a judge could stop them. In this case, a judge acted at 2 a.m. to put forward an order to block the Trump administration, and continued forward that order and her actions throughout the day, so they did, in fact, prevent the planes from taking off.

But at its heart, this resulted from — this was a result of the Trump administration’s bizarre claim that the Office of Refugee Resettlement has an authority to effectively run its own shadow repatriation system and has the ability to send children home outside of the normal constraints of immigration law, which include things like the right to seek asylum. So, those flights have been blocked. This case will now continue forward in the courts. But unlike what happened with the Alien Enemies Act and the deportations to El Salvador, the planes did not manage to take off and deplane their passengers.

AMY GOODMAN: Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized up to 600 military lawyers to serve as temporary immigration judges. The head of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, Ben Johnson, warned the decision will gut due process and undermine the immigration court. He said to the Associated Press, “It makes as much sense as having a cardiologist do a hip replacement.” Talk about the meaning of Army lawyers becoming immigration judges.

AARON REICHLIN-MELNICK: Yeah, Ben Johnson is right here. The reality is that immigration law is extraordinarily complex, and it’s often been described as second in complexity only to the tax system. And immigration court has often been described as death penalty cases in traffic court procedures. So, what we have here are 600 lawyers, who may very well be good lawyers and conscientious, but have absolutely no experience in immigration law whatsoever, and they’re being assigned to take cases that could lead to someone’s death if they’re decided wrong. While undoubtedly they could eventually become experts in immigration law with months and months of training, these deployments are supposed to last only 179 days. So, you have people who have been or are going to be ordered to take on these incredibly weighty, difficult, complex cases, without any of the relevant experience they need, which is only going to strain the immigration court system. And indeed, the purpose of this is clear. Corey Lewandowski, who is a senior adviser to Secretary Noem, and, of course, a longtime member of Trump world, said on X yesterday that the goal of this is to increase deportations. And I think that really gives away the game.

AMY GOODMAN: So much for being with us —

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Yeah, I wanted to —

AMY GOODMAN: Oh, go ahead, Juan.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: No, no, I just wanted to ask him about the pending invasion of Chicago by both federal agents and the military, especially this idea that Trump has of bringing National Guard troops from, essentially, Republican states to occupy largely minority cities in Democratic states.

AARON REICHLIN-MELNICK: Yeah, I think, as Governor Pritzker has stated, this is particularly disturbing. You know, when you look at the statistics, Chicago is not even in the top 20 most violent cities, which is not to say, of course, that there are not issues with gun violence, but not ones that would justify deploying the National Guard.

But I want to emphasize that, you know, beyond the National Guard, this is in many ways also about immigration. Here in Washington, D.C., the National Guard has mostly been standing around the Mall or doing tasks like spreading mulch and picking up trash. But what’s actually been happening, most significantly, is the invasion of the city by federal law enforcement officers to carry out immigration enforcement. You have ICE and the Metropolitan Police Department setting up checkpoints in major thoroughfares in the city. You have a major increase in ICE raids across the city and people being afraid to take their children to school. So, while a lot of the attention in Chicago is going to be on the National Guard deployment, keep an eye out for what ICE is doing, because this could be yet another Los Angeles, where we see huge increase in immigration enforcement throughout the city and immigrant communities forced to shrink back in fear.

AMY GOODMAN: Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, thanks so much.

NOW READ: Here's why we really don’t trust Donald Trump

'You knew who these people were': Strategist predicts Dems will have the presidency by 2028

Democratic strategist James Carville said Republicans have nailed their own coffins for 2028, judging by the popularity of their actions within just the last few months.

“You’re gonna win the presidency in 2028 and it’s a pretty good chance you control both the House and Senate,” Carville said of Democrats on the Thursday edition of Carville’s “Politics War Room” with co-host Al Hunt.

“In 2026, we’re gonna have a successful year,” he added, laying blame on President Donald Trump and what he’s been able to accomplish with his Republican Congressional majority. He said Republicans wrought much of their undoing within the first few months of Trump’s presidency with his highly unpopular “Big Beautiful” budget bill.

READ MORE: Trump just accidentally revealed a dirty secret — and it has America's CEOs panicking

“You knew who these people were. Every time they get into power, they try to cut taxes for rich people and cut healthcare access to middle class people. They’ve done what you thought they were going to do,” Carville said. “… They can call that bill anything they want, it was still the most negatively viewed piece of domestic legislation in this century I think.”

And it’s not doing anything but getting worse, Carville added. “These guys can’t go anywhere in their district. [U.S. Sen.] Dan Sullivan is all over Alaska hiding from as many people as he can,” he said. “… They’re dying not to have to confront anybody and they’re just not going to get away with it in the election.”

“They said over the August recess that they could sell this thing, and it was so bad not only did they run from their constituents they’ve decided they’re gonna rename [the bill],” said Hunt. “Maybe the August experience wasn’t very good for them.”

“These guys are going back [home] and saying ‘Oh s——!’” Carville said amid laughter. “I love that congressional Republican leadership sent out a memo saying they don’t recommend going to town halls.”

READ MORE: 'Trump knows it': Expert fears judge's new smackdown could send case to 'enabling' SCOTUS

“Don’t talk to voters. Go on Fox News,” said Hunt.

Carville and Hunt both agreed that Democrats would likely not have a “unified message” until the party united behind a candidate in the primaries, but Carville said one message is already laid out thanks to predictable Republican favoritism for the wealthy.

“Nothing works better in politics than to confirm a pre-existing suspicion about your opponent’,” Carville said.

Watch the full podcast below or at this link.

- YouTube youtu.be

'We have a problem': CNN data guru sounds alarm as 70% of Americans abandon core value

CNN data analyst Harry Enten crunched the numbers and discovered a large swathe of U.S. residents no longer believe in the American dream.

“America, we have a problem,” said Enten, describing a growing nation of economic pessimists.

“If you work hard, you'll get ahead: that is the American dream,” said Enten. “[Respondents answering] ‘Never/Not true now’, in 2010 to 2011, 15 years ago, it was 51 percent who said it wasn't true. Now look at this number! Whooo! Through the roof: 70 percent.”

READ MORE: We ignore this psychologist's warning at our peril

Conversely, Enten discovered the percentage of Americans who still believed the American dream to be true “falling through the floor.”

“It was 47 percent 15 years ago. Now it is just 29 percent, so we basically had a 50/50 nation on whether the American dream was still true 15 years ago, but now it's over two thirds of Americans who say it's never or no longer true,” Enten said.

Enten reported the group experiencing the most pessimism or loss in faith of the American dream was younger Americans between the age of 18 and 29, with optimism dropping from 56 percent in 2010 to just 21 percent in 2024.

“Look at where that number has absolutely tumbled to. It has dropped … 35 points to just 21 percent,” said Enten, adding that faith in the American dream also appeared to have dropped with some senior citizens, with those 65 or older experiencing a drop from 53 percent to 41 percent.

READ MORE: 'Ten Commandments for thee but not for me': GOP senator mocks Texas' MAGA attorney general

“What is essentially going on here is the American youth have lost faith pretty much completely in the idea of an American dream,” Enten said. “And that, of course, goes back to the idea of why there's poll after poll after poll that shows that younger people, more so than any other part of our nation at this point, have seen deepening pessimism in their personal lives as well.”

Another “scary” percentage that came up in polling was the falling number of friends that Americans appear to have, said Enten, with the percentage of Americans reporting “no close friends” jumping up from just 3 percent in 1990 to 17 percent now.

“No wonder pessimism is really taking a hold in the American public” Enten said.

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube youtu.be

'Why do you need Donald Trump?' Michael Steele explodes at 'incompetent' GOP governor

President Donald Trump recently floated the idea of sending National Guard troops to New Orleans, Louisiana, after Gov. Jeff Landry (R) sent the president a formal request. MSNBC host Michael Steele — who is the former Republican lieutenant governor of Maryland — said that Landry's request should be seen as an admission of failure.

Trump's proposal to deploy the military to the Big Easy comes after the president's repeated threats of a troop deployment to Chicago, Illinois. However, because a president's Title 32 authority — which he's used to circumvent the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 that prohibits the military from being used as domestic law enforcement personnel — requires a governor's consent, sending troops to a state with a Republican governor would be a lighter lift than doing so in a state with a Democratic governor. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) has so far refused Trump's call to request assistance, stymieing the administration's efforts to send troops.

In a Wednesday segment on his show "The Weeknight," Steele called Landry's request — in which he welcomed federal assistance "from New Orleans to Shreveport" — "a load of crock" that proves his "incompetency" as governor of the Bayou State.

READ MORE: 'Trump takes this snub personally': Conservative mocks 'saddest little dictator'

"If the good Governor Landry had such a problem in New Orleans or Shreveport, what the hell have you been doing all this time as governor? The National Guard is under his purview. So why do you need Donald Trump to come into your state to get the National Guard to deal with your crime problem?" Steele asked.

"And if that's the case, then why the hell are you governor? Because you haven't done the job," he continued. "You've allowed this to fester under your watch. And you're so incompetent at this point that you need the help of the president of the United States to validate your incompetency."

Trump's stated reason for the deployment is to deal with crime in Louisiana. However, Steele's co-host, Alicia Melendez, observed earlier in the segment that in New Orleans, firearm-related homicides are down by 38 percent compared to September of 2024, while overall crime in the Crescent City is down by more than 21 percent over the same time period. Steele said that in his experience as a former statewide elected official, the buck stops with him, and begging the federal government for help would be seen as a lack of effective state leadership.

"I don't understand. Help me understand what I'm missing," Steele said. "Because as the former lieutenant governor of a state, I know damn well that if it's happening on my watch in Baltimore or Prince George's County, Anne Arundel County, that's on us. And if we're calling the president to come in? Then we really messed some stuff up."

READ MORE: 'Sound familiar?' Mitch McConnell lobs parting shot at 'America First' Republicans

Watch the segment below, or by clicking this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Get those names out there': Massie says he'll read full Epstein list on House floor

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) — one of the two lawmakers behind legislation to compel the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release all remaining documents pertaining to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein — is announcing an idea to both protect Epstein's victims and shed light on his associates.

During an interview with CNN host Kaitlan Collins, Massie stood alongside Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is his chief co-sponsor on the Epstein Files Transparency Act, and reiterated his call for President Donald Trump's administration to publish all of the DOJ's unreleased Epstein materials. When Collins asked Khanna and Massie why Trump seemed to be unmoved by the testimonies of Epstein's victims after their Wednesday press conference on Capitol Hill, the Kentucky Republican retorted that the testimonies resonated "with the public in my district and all across the country,"

"In fact, they were resonating in the White House nine months ago when the attorney general said they would release the files, when the vice president said they would release the files, when the FBI director said they would release the files, when Trump's own children said that these files needed to be released," Massie said.

READ MORE: 'Sound familiar?' Mitch McConnell lobs parting shot at 'America First' Republicans

"Why the 180-degree turn here from the administration? I think there are rich and powerful people who've always been beyond the reach of the law — or thought that they were — who want to remain there," he continued. "... And we need to tell them, I'm sorry, you are going to be accountable to the law."

Collins pressed Massie on the latter point. She acknowledged that while some of the women who spoke at the press conference hinted that they had been assembling their own list of Epstein's co-conspirators should the Trump administration continue to quash efforts at transparency, they had so far refused to disclose that supposed list to the public. Massie then revealed his plan to both protect Epstein's survivors while providing the information the American public has been asking for.

"The reality is, if they try to release that list, they're going to be sued into homelessness. They will be attacked. They will have death threats," he said. "And so what my colleague Marjorie Taylor Greene volunteered to do, and I volunteered to do as well, is to read that list on the floor of the House of Representatives, because our founders put into the Constitution a speech or debate immunity [clause], which says that we can't be prosecuted for what we say on the floor of the House."

"We're willing to help those survivors get those names out there," he added.

READ MORE: 'Trump takes this snub personally': Conservative mocks 'saddest little dictator'

Watch the segment below, or by clicking this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Whitewash': Scarborough slams Trump fight against the full release of Epstein files

“Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough slammed President Donald Trump and his supporters for letting Trump “whitewash” convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his own personal connection to Epstein after years of selling pedophile conspiracies involving Democrats.

Scarborough and guest Anand Giridharadas, publisher of “The Ink”, criticized Trump following a Wednesday press conference with Epstein survivors on the day of a bipartisan effort by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pushing to compel the Justice Department to release files related to convicted sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

But Trump and his defendants oppose the release of the entirety of the case, drawing suspicion from critics and some of his own supporters.

READ MORE: Economist Paul Krugman says Trump 'telling the truth' on this issue — but there's a catch

“[Trump] is blaming it on Obama. It all happened during his administration. He's blaming it on Biden. It all happened during his first administration,” Scarborough said. “… Again, the irony — the irony — that that this [MAGA] movement, that would find rando Hollywood stars and just call them pedophiles because they voted for Democrats, … they've spent 20 years calling these people pedophiles, and now you've got a group of people in that same movement trying to whitewash probably the greatest pedophile of the 21st century, the 20th and the 21st century.”

“And now they're saying, ‘oh, everything's out there’ or ‘this is a hoax’ again,” Scarborough groused, speaking of Republican and Trump administration defenders claiming all of the relevant Epstein related documents are already publicly circulating. “How rich.”

Giridharadas told Scarborough the Epstein scandal is “the story … Donald Trump is most afraid of.”

“[T]his is revealing, the fact that [Trump] won't simply release these files, bring transparency, honor these [Epstein] survivors. It reveals his entire project to be a con to his base,” said Giridharadas. “… He ran on saying, ‘look, there's a group of wealthy, powerful people who are colluding. They're all in on it: Democrats, Republicans — they're all in on this thing — and I am outside of this system. I don't care. I say what I think, and I'm going to expose the system. I'm going to drain the swamp.’”

READ MORE: Trump just accidentally revealed a dirty secret — and it has America's CEOs panicking

“And now, in what is the ultimate … almost caricature example of the wealthy and powerful colluding and doing harm, [Trump] has revealed that he is not a serious person. … He's revealing that his supporters are chow for his, for his own enrichment and the enrichment of his friends. He doesn't care about them. He doesn't respect them, and he doesn't think they're smart enough to see through this, Giridharadas said, adding, “and I think actually they are smart enough.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube youtu.be

'They hate this': GOP strategist reveals why Trump's new issue 'works against Republicans'

One longtime Republican political operative is cautioning that President Donald Trump's latest pet issue may end up hurting Republicans in the long run.

During a Wednesday interview with MSNBC host Chris Jansing, GOP strategist Stuart Stevens – who was a top advisor to 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney's campaign — slammed Trump's focus on mail-in voting. He observed that Trump's decision to relocate U.S. Space Command from Colorado to Alabama specifically due to mail-in voting in the Centennial State not only hurt national security, but jeopardized Republicans' chances of winning future close elections if GOP voters who typically vote by mail no longer do so.

"What Trump is saying about mail-in voting is just crazy. Can we just be clear about this? That means Mike Lee — senator from Utah, where they have all mail-in voting — he should resign today," Stevens said. "It's a weird sort of obsession he has that really works against Republicans."

READ MORE: 'Trump takes this snub personally': Conservative mocks 'saddest little dictator'

"And when you start picking winners and losing in government by which states ... voted for you and which states have laws which increase participation of voting — which is all mail in voting does — there's no voter fraud," he added. "It's a terrible way to make national security decisions."

Stevens reminded MSNBC viewers that Republicans used to run the table on mail-in voting, and mentioned former Sen. Connie Mack's (R-Fla.) election as one example of the GOP succeeding in a close election thanks to voters who submitted ballots by mail. And he suggested that Sens. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) likely gave Georgia's two Senate seats to Democrats in 2021 as a result of Trump discouraging Republicans against mail-in voting.

"He's very childlike in this sense — like his obsession with tariffs — and someone has put in his head this obsession about mail-in voting," Stevens said. "... So I can promise you if those who are executive directors and running the state Republican parties, they hate this because you're basically telling everybody who's working for you, who's focused on absentee ballots, that they're involved in illegal activity, which is not very encouraging. So it's like, why bother?"

Watch Stevens' segment below, or by clicking this link.

READ MORE: 'We have a problem': CNN data guru sounds alarm as 70% of Americans abandon core value

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Choosing the side of evil': Epstein victims' attorney rips Trump for  'hoax' comment

Lisa Phillips, a survivor of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, said she was shocked to hear President Donald Trump call the push to release the Epstein files a "hoax."

"For me personally, it was shocking and upsetting. I just couldn't believe that he said that. Just for so many years, he acknowledged that there were thousands of files, and he was going to release them. and so hearing that today, I was just confused by it," she said during an appearance on CNN Wednesday evening.

"I think he thought that we were targeting targeting him, and we weren't. I don't believe there's any evidence that he abused any of the survivors, so it wasn't a target against him. It was just a cry for us being fed up and wanting answers," Phillips added.

READ MORE: 'Textbook white nationalism': GOP senator blasted for declaring America is 'only ours'

She continued: "The only person that's been held accountable is a woman, and we were abused by a man who sex trafficked a lot of us. And so, we are aware there are many other men out there and we just don't understand, or we are nearing the end of our fight, pushing us to make other decisions to see if we can get some accountability."

Survivors of Epstein delivered powerful testimony on Capitol Hill on Wednesday morning, urging Congress and the White House to declassify every shred of investigative material tied to Epstein’s crimes.

Eight women, some speaking for the first time, recounted enduring trauma and demanded transparency from institutions that have long shielded the powerful in Epstein’s orbit.

In the Oval Office, Trump reiterated dismissive remarks to reporters Wednesday.

READ MORE: 'Trump takes this snub personally': Conservative mocks 'saddest little dictator'

“It’s really a Democrat hoax, because they’re trying to get people to talk about something that’s totally irrelevant to the success we’ve had as a nation since I’ve been President," he said.

Brad Edwards, attorney for Epstein survivors, told CNN that, based on Trump’s remarks, he believes the president may not understand what the word “hoax” actually means.

"I'm not sure that he knows what the word hoax means, to tell you the truth, because I've talked to President Trump years ago about this case on this topic," he said. "He provided information he knew back then the type of creep that Jeffrey Epstein was. I can't imagine that he's saying that these hundreds of women are lying about this."

Edwards added he has represented 200 women, "so all I can think is that he has now seen the files or has been advised of things in the files that he didn't know was in the files, and that I currently don't know that are in the files, because otherwise it makes absolutely no sense."

READ MORE: 'Disgrace': Fox sparks outrage by cutting off Epstein presser to run 'counter-programming'

"This about turn he's done. You're either on the side of the victims or you're on the side of evil. There is not another side to this, and he's choosing the side of evil. The side of Jeffrey Epstein. It really makes no sense."

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Textbook white nationalism': GOP senator blasted for declaring America is 'only ours'

U.S. Senator Eric Schmitt (R-MO) is under fire after telling the National Conservatism Conference that America “belongs to us, and only us,” drawing accusations of racism and historical ignorance.

Senator Schmitt, a freshman dubbed a “key White House ally” by Fox News, told attendees that the Pilgrims and George Washington’s Continental Army, “believed they were fighting for a nation, a homeland for themselves and their descendants,” and not “for a proposition.”

“They fought, they bled, they struggled, they died for us,” he declared. “They built this country for us. America, in all its glory is their gift to us, handed down across the generations. It belongs to us. It’s our birthright, it’s our heritage, our destiny. If America is everything and everyone, then it is nothing and no one at all.”

He denounced what he called “a new people” who “believe they can build a new America” by “changing the stories we tell about ourselves.”

READ MORE: ‘Monsters’: The Five Trump Cabinet Secretaries a Top Political Scientist Wants Impeached

“But America doesn’t belong to them,” he alleged. “It belongs to us. It’s our home. It’s a heritage entrusted to us by our ancestors. It’s a way of life that is ours and only ours. If we disappear, then America, too, will cease to exist.”

Schmitt’s full remarks were published at the right-wing Daily Signal. In them, he declares, “it should be clear that the fact that something is sanctioned by our government does not mean it’s good for our country. That much is obvious with various forms of legal immigration today.”

Schmitt also said:

“We Americans are the sons and daughters of the Christian pilgrims that poured out from Europe’s shores to baptize a new world in their ancient faith. Our ancestors were driven here by destiny, possessed by urgent and fiery conviction, by burning belief, devoted to their cause and their God.”

In an opinion piece in Missouri’s Kansas City Star, David Mastio calls out Schmitt for giving “a speech about American history in which the only brown person mentioned was George Floyd, a Black man murdered when a police officer kneeled on his neck for nine minutes over a $20 counterfeit bill.”

Mastio wrote: “Imagine American history without Italians and Irish and Jews. Imagine America without Frank Sinatra. Imagine invading the beaches of Normandy with just the pilgrims’ kids.”

“Imagine American history without Blacks,” Mastio continued. “Imagine fighting the battles of America’s Cold War triumph from Korea and Vietnam and on with just the pilgrims’ kids. Imagine America without Rosa Parks. Imagine our culture with just the pilgrims’ kids.”

READ MORE: ‘Nakedly Political’: Trump Accused of Axing Intel Meeting to Appease Conspiracy Theorist

“Imagine American history without Asians,” he added. “Imagine America’s economy today without the silicone-inspired contributions of the tech immigrants. Imagine America without Jensen Huang, the founder of the most valuable company in our history. Imagine tackling the future with just the pilgrims’ kids.”

Other critics slammed Schmitt as well.

“This is ignorant. This is also textbook white nationalism. . . And by the way, fun fact, [your] ancestors weren’t the only ones who built this country so f– off,” wrote pollster Cornell Belcher, an MSNBC/NBC News political analyst.

“This is 100% RACIST. No shock that a member of the @SenateGOP would say this. And not one mainstream network will call this trash out,” declared journalist Roland Martin.

“Who’s ‘us’ Senator?” asked Third Way co-founder Matt Bennett. “Does it include my ancestors, who were still in Polish shtetls in the late 19th c? Does it include people who came here chained to the floor of slave ships? The Chinese who helped build the railroads? I’m guessing that’s a no on all three.”

Tennessee Democratic state Senator Jeff Yarbro called Schmitt’s remarks “Legitimately one of the most unpatriotic, most un-American speeches ever given by a United States senator.”

“By his own account,” wrote Freethink editor-at-large Robert Chapman-Smith, “Schmitt’s ancestors arrived in America from Germany in the 1840s. They arrived in an America steeped in the question of who is American. In 1858, Abraham Lincoln spoke about the ‘electric cord’ of liberty that rebukes this idea of blood and soil nationalism.”

Michigan Democratic state Representative Phil Skaggs added, “What makes America great, why we are a shining city on a hill, is because, at our best, we are a beacon for those in search of freedom and opportunity. We’re not some old European ethno-state. Republicans are veering quickly to a dark Aryan Master Race place. It’s un-American.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Public Health Disaster’: Florida Ripped for Move to Scrap All School Vaccine Mandates

'Poor way to manage the government': CEO unleashes on Trump over his handling of economy

President Donald Trump's style of bypassing traditional checks and balances to unilaterally manage the economy is alarming one prominent investor.

During a Wednesday interview with CNN host Jake Tapper, Ross Gerber — who is the CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management — expressed hope that the federal judiciary would rule Trump's tariffs illegal. He opined that the previous ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which struck down the tariffs Trump imposed by claiming a state of emergency, would be a "much bigger blow to Trump than the economy."

"I think it's actually good for the economy," Gerber said of the potential for the Supreme Court to uphold the appellate court's ruling. "This idea that it's somehow bad for the economy to take away this huge tax on American consumers is actually false."

READ MORE: 'Trump takes this snub personally': Conservative mocks 'saddest little dictator'

"The refunds would all go back to U.S. companies that are paying this. So I don't see how that's a negative, when the tariffs are the problem," he continued. "I think really where the negative is, is it's a huge blow to Trump's belief system that executive orders are the way to put his policies in place versus doing it the correct way — the way our Constitution states — that Congress has the right to make these tariffs and laws."

Gerber went on to scoff that the various tariff exceptions Trump put in place for various countries were due to "national security issues," and that the president was simply hunting for a pretext to rule by executive fiat. And he added that Trump's firing of former Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner Erika McEntarfer was further evidence that the president "fundamentally doesn't understand the separation of powers of the United States."

"I think the idea that somebody might lose their job because of a bad number is a very, very poor way to manage the government," Gerber said. "Once again, these are not political people. These are statisticians that work for our government and they don't care who's president. You know, when you work at the State Department or you work in a lot of these places, you work for the U.S. government, and it's not about politics."

Watch Gerber's segment below, or by clicking this link.

READ MORE: 'Fire her': Trump AG slammed as 'compulsive liar' after 'missing' Epstein footage emerges

- YouTube www.youtube.com


GOPer slams 'disgusting' Trump admin for treatment of female Republicans on Epstein efforts

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) pushed back against Speaker Mike Johnson urging Republicans not to sign on an effort to circumvent Republican leadership and force a vote on a bill to compel the release of additional files from the Jeffrey Epstein case. Massie also slammed the White House for calling that effort to force a vote “a hostile act.”

“I do find it interesting that the three co-sponsors are women. Maybe they have, immunity from the threats from the White House,” Massie told reporters. “I do think it's disgusting that the White House has called their co-sponsorship a hostile act. So, you have the White House telling women — who are trying to help women — who've been sexually exploited that that's somehow a hostile act now.”

The three Republican women signing onto to Massie’s bill so far include Reps. Marjorie Taylor Green (Ga.) Lauren Boebert (Colo.) and Nancy Mace (S.C.).

READ MORE: We ignore this psychologist's warning at our peril

CNN reporter Manu Raju reports an escalating clash within the House Republican conference about how to proceed in the aftermath of the release by the House Oversight Committee of roughly 33,000 pages from the Justice Department — which the House had to subpoena.

Massie claims this is simply public information that doesn't initially reveal much, and he believes there is much more information to be released, which is why he is urging Republicans to side with the effort to force a vote to compel the release of additional files.

“The question is going to be, ultimately, … will that change the dynamic here on Capitol Hill or will it simply lead to what we're seeing now, this stalemate, this internal battle that's happening within the GOP that the White House hopes will end sometime soon?”

Massie later defended his bill, arguing that “They’re withholding who is on [Epstein’s] plane. … They are redacting things to prevent embarrassment. They’re not redacting things to protect victims. And in the process, they’re hiding some criminals.”

READ MORE: 'We've been compiling lists of our own': Epstein victims give Trump an ultimatum

When asked if he believes Republicans are protecting Trump, Massie said they were likely trying to prevent “the embarrassment to rich and powerful individuals who are connected to the president.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube youtu.be

'RELEASE. THE. FILES': Critics say 'no real bombshells' in House GOP's new Epstein dump

CNN contributor and "The Spider" author Barry Levine warned Tuesday evening that the newly released files related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein contain little in the way of surprises.

During an appearance on CNN, Levine said, “I’m seeing the same stuff that’s already been out in the public domain… We don’t have any of the juicy stuff that might tell us something and might give some of these victims closure."

He mentioned the absence of materials such as autopsy reports or a 60-count FBI indictment, saying he anticipated “no real bombshells tonight from the new material.”

"Where's the autopsy report on Epstein? Where's the 60 count indictment that was drawn up by the FBI that never came to pass?" he asked.

READ MORE: 'A joke': Trump pummeled over potential new emergency on issue he's 'done nothing about'

Levine's remarks came as the Republican-led U.S. House Oversight Committee released over 33,000 pages of documents related to Epstein, most of which appear to have been previously available in court filings and public records.

The files notably include eight videos and several audio recordings from investigations dating to 2005 and 2006, featuring interviews with victims whose identities remain redacted.

This disclosure appears timed to undercut a bipartisan initiative by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who are pushing legislation to force the Justice Department to release all unclassified Epstein records.

Despite Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) labeling their petition “moot” given the release, Massie and Khanna plan to continue their push and will hold a press conference with survivors Wednesday morning.

READ MORE: 'Utterly absurd': Experts alarmed over Trump 'admitting' big change driven by retribution

Democrats and survivors have questioned the value of the documents released so far, with some pointing out that upwards of 97 percent of the material was already in the public domain.

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) wrote on the social platform X: "Fact check: nearly everything Republicans just supposedly 'released'… …has already been released. They are doing everything in their power to muddy the waters. RELEASE. THE. FILES."

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

'Disgusting and gross': Dems slammed for 'wish-casting' for Trump’s death

Republican strategist Scott Jennings slammed Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for playfully alluding to a viral rumor that President Donald Trump had died over Labor Day Weekend, telling a crowd at a festival on Monday that he understood why they were furiously checking their phones for deathwatch updates.

“Look, I get it. You get up in the morning and you doom scroll through things. And although I will say this, the last few days, you woke up thinking there might be news. —Just saying, just saying. There will be news, sometime. Just so you know, there will be news.”

READ MORE: We ignore this psychologist's warning at our peril

The small crowd at the Labor Day picnic in Duluth giggled and clapped at the comment, before Walz went on to urged the crowd to stand up for democracy.

“Don’t let them take our kindness as weakness,” Walz told the crowd. “We can be kind and still kick the living s—— out of them.”

Earlier this year, Trump told reporters he was refusing to call Walz after a mass shooting in his state, saying: “I think the governor of Minnesota is so whacked out, I'm not calling him. Why would I call him?”

Jennings made no mention of that, however.

READ MORE: 'We've been compiling lists of our own': Epstein victims give Trump an ultimatum

“What I'm worried about are people making irresponsible statements and wish-casting about the president's health,” Scott told CNN anchor Kate Bolduan. “… that is the governor of Minnesota, the Democratic candidate for vice president, wishing for — wishcasting — the death of the president of the United States. I don't care how much you hate your political opponent ,wishing death upon them and joking about it means you're a broken brained s——, and that's what he is.”

Bolduan pointed out that Trump often made light of former president Joe Biden’s age on the campaign trail, and CNN commentator S.E. Cupp called it “disgusting and gross” when political leaders “foment that among the electorate.”

“Now, Donald Trump foments it all the time, okay — so he is not, like, removed from this conversation, but that doesn't mean that Democrats need to join in,” said Cupp. “It's gross.”

Watch the video below or at this link.

- YouTube youtu.be

'We've been compiling lists of our own': Epstein victims give Trump an ultimatum

Several women who were victimized by convicted serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein say they're prepared to take legal matters into their own hands if Congress and President Donald Trump's administration fail to provide appropriate transparency on the remaining unreleased Epstein evidence.

That's according to a Tuesday article from NBC News, which reported that several of Epstein's accusers and family members of another prominent victim are now threatening an escalation in their efforts to compel the government to release all of its remaining documents pertaining to Epstein's two federal investigations. The network recently spoke with six women who said they were assaulted by both Epstein and his chief accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, in their teens and early twenties.

Accusers Wendy Avis, Marijke Chartouni, Jena-Lisa Jones, Lisa Phillips and Liz Stein told NBC that they simply wanted Trump to follow through on his campaign promise to release the full files — which, according to the New York Times, numbers approximately 100,000 pages. Jones said Epstein abused her during a massage session when she was just 14 years old.

READ MORE: (Opinion) The last straw for the Supreme Court could spell trouble for Trump

"A lot of these powerful people think they’re in the clear, and they’re probably still doing it now," Jones said.

"There were many, many adults around [Epstein’s] properties that may not have participated but very clearly knew what was going on," she continued. "And they’re not saying anything, and why are they still not saying anything and speaking up on our behalf?"

Phillips, who said she was groomed and exploited at Epstein's private island when she was 21, appeared to suggest that if Congress and the Trump administration's Department of Justice failed to act, more names could emerge. While she didn't allude to who may be named should they escalate in their efforts, she hinted that there were "lists" of names the victims had been assembling that may be eventually made public.

"A lot of us survivors know we’ve been compiling lists of our own, and we have so many other survivors," Phillips told NBC. "Please come forward, and we’ll compile our own list and seek justice on our own. I mean, I think that’s what’s going to happen next."

READ MORE: 'Utterly absurd': Experts alarmed over Trump 'admitting' big change driven by retribution

Click here to read NBC's full report.

'Truly lost all sense of sanity': Top Democrat blasts Trump's 'violent and unhinged' plans

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker blasted President Donald Trump’s latest remarks as “unhinged,” warning that the president’s threat to deploy federal troops to Chicago under the guise of fighting crime would only backfire. Pritzker also condemned what he called the “groveling yes-men” surrounding Trump and charged that he is “tearing this country apart.”

“We’re going in,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday from the Oval Office, confirming what he had only previously threatened. He did not say when Chicago could expect federal troops, but his remarks sent the Governor reeling.

“As a governor who cares about the well-being of my people, I can’t live in a fantasyland where I pretend Trump is not tearing this country apart for personal greed and power,” Governor Pritzker told reporters. “He has surrounded himself with groveling yes men, who are too weak to restrain his most violent and unhinged impulses, or who share those impulses.”

“He has no idea what he’s talking about,” Pritzker declared. “There is no emergency that warrants deployment of troops.”

READ MORE: ‘A Joke’: Trump’s Possible National Housing Emergency Sparks Fierce Backlash

Delivering facts to counter Trump’s threat, Pritzker declared, “Crime is down in Chicago. Murders are down by almost 50% in the last four years. Shootings are down 57%. Robberies down 34%. Burglaries, down 21%. Motor vehicle thefts down 26%.”

Pritzker added that “we have made important progress on safety that Trump is now jeopardizing.”

The Illinois governor also denounced Trump’s claim that he should be urging Trump to send in federal troops.

“If the governor of Illinois would call up, call me up, I would love to do it. Now, we’re going to do it anyway,” Trump said. “We have the right to do it because I have an obligation to protect this country.”

READ MORE: ‘Monsters’: The Five Trump Cabinet Secretaries a Top Political Scientist Wants Impeached

Pritzker responded.

“When did we become a country where it’s okay for the U.S. president to insist on national television that a state should call him to beg for anything, especially something we don’t want? Have we truly lost all sense of sanity in this nation, that we treat this as normal?” the governor asked.

Watch the videos above or at this link.

READ MORE: Judge Rules LA Troop Use Illegal as Trump Rants Chicago Is ‘Murder Capital of the World’

@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.