Salon Staff

Welcome to the age of Modern Monetary Theory: It's turning conventional economics upside down

Congress has authorized $6 trillion in deficit spending to defeat the coronavirus. That's more than the United States spent fighting World War II, when $4 trillion of government spending released the country from the clutches of the Great Depression.

Naturally, politicians and pundits debate whether the amount is excessive. But implicit in their seemingly routine deficit debate is a remarkable shift: Inflation has replaced debt — the old stalking horse for defeating progressive legislation — as the primary concern with deficit spending.

It's a subtle change, with profound consequences. And it augurs the rise of a revolutionary approach to political economy, Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), as the dominant paradigm in the politics of money.

Like Keynesians of yesteryear, Modern Monetary Theorists urge government to achieve full employment through fiscal policy, even when it requires deficit spending. Their comfort with large deficits emerges from an understanding that an obsession with national debt is a relic of another time, the age of gold standards and fixed currency arrangements. Today, in the age of national monetary sovereignty and free-floating currencies, countries like the United States can fulfill all financial obligations with a simple keystroke.

Still, MMT economists don't exactly scoff at deficits. Their point is that inflation, rather than rising national debt, is the best indicator of whether deficits are too large. Short of extreme inflation, MMT encourages policymakers to juice the economy through government spending. Seen through MMT goggles, a tenet of economic orthodoxy is flipped on its head: Deficits appear as virtuous public investments, while surpluses become scourges, condemned for sucking money out of the economy.

In this brave new world, the refusal of monetary sovereigns to run substantial deficits seems cruel and inefficient. According to MMT economist Stephanie Kelton, deficit spending can and should continue while additional spending can be absorbed by an economy's productive resources. When overspending does cause inflation, the MMT remedy is to remove money from circulation through progressive taxation, rather than by reducing spending and sacrificing the poor to unemployment.

To be clear, there are legitimate critiques of MMT, even among left-leaning economists. Yet judging by the ascent of previous economic paradigms, consensus among economists is not prerequisite in the rise to power of new theories. Historically, the critical requirement for an economic theory to become paradigmatic — meaning, to leap from the ivory tower to the halls of power — is that it simultaneously responds to economic crises and meets urgent political needs.

The work of John Maynard Keynes entered amid the economic crisis of the Great Depression and met the political demands of Roosevelt's New Deal. Later, as Keynesianism faltered in the 1970s, the monetarism of Milton Friedman and the fiscal policy of Arthur Laffer met the crisis of runaway inflation and provided economic legitimacy to the political agenda of the Reagan era.

Good policy or not, MMT enters during a similar moment of economic crisis and political need. It legitimizes large deficits that soften the economic disaster wrought by COVID-19 and it meets the ambitious political agenda of the Biden administration.

Ironically, the path to MMT was opened during the Trump administration. The terrain of deficit debates shifted when — in response to Congressional Budget Office projections of trillion-dollar deficits from Trump's tax plan — conservatives began to hint that maybe concern over debt was overblown.

Then the global pandemic hit. Trump spent trillions. Biden spent trillions. The national debt surpassed $28 trillion. And last week the Congressional Budget Office projected a doubling of the debt before 2051.

All this as the Biden administration prepares its multi-trillion-dollar infrastructure proposal and its plans to make various anti-poverty stipulations of the stimulus bill into permanent programs.

President Biden's economic team may not have arrived in D.C. as MMT acolytes, but they will leave as its greatest practitioners. They don't have a choice.

Deficits will not disappear by repealing Trump's tax cuts. Neither will a path to budget surplus be blazed by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's proposed global minimum tax. Even a wealth tax is not certain to rid the country of deficits, much less retire the debt.

Deficit spending is here to stay. Passing transformative legislation requires that Democrats finally become unafraid of debt. For 40 years, conservatives have raised the specter of national debt to stifle progressive ambitions. Milton Friedman famously advised that President Reagan's 1981 tax cut couldn't fail. After all, if the cuts didn't pay for themselves, they would create a national debt so large that expanding liberal government programs would become politically impossible.

Friedman was right — and an entire generation of Democrats were caught in his trap, unable to expand safety net programs, and often failing even to maintain them. Modern Monetary Theory gives Biden an opportunity to break free from the Reagan-era debt trap. You can bet he'll take it.

Donald Trump's Despicably Callous Response to Paris Terror Attack

Leave it to blowhard presidential contender Donald Trump to deliver one of the most vile responses to yesterday’s horrific terror attacks in Paris, which killed 129 people and injured hundreds more.

Keep reading... Show less

This Rachel Maddow Interview Is Bernie Sanders' Best Moment in Weeks

It has been a rough couple weeks for Bernie Sanders as Hillary Clinton found her footing and re-established herself as the Democratic front-runner after impressive performances in the first Democratic debate and before a House panel investigating Benghazi.

Keep reading... Show less

The One Perfect Tweet Which Put Megyn Kelly's Duggar Daughter Interview in Context

Top Duggar headlines from Fox's Megyn Kelly.  

Keep reading... Show less

7 Crucial Exchanges from Megyn Kelly’s Fox News Interview with the Duggar Sisters

Two of the Duggar sisters who were molested by brother Josh Duggar told their stories to Megyn Kelly last night, in an interview that was often heartbreaking, but also filled with forgiveness and a strong defense of their brother and the way their parents handled the situation in the home.

Keep reading... Show less

I Also Left My Kid in the Car: Mothers Share Stories of Their Own Public Shamings

In June of last year,  I wrote an essay about my experience of having been filmed by a stranger after I left my four-year-old son in the car to run a brief errand. At the time, I wanted simply to tell the story of what I’d experienced, to process what had seemed a strange and jarring moment in my life as a parent. Last week I wrote about three other mothers who wanted to share similar stories. Since then, many more mothers have contacted me with equally upsetting stories of judgment by strangers for what these mothers saw as rational and reasonable parenting decisions. These episodes have taken place all over the country; some are years old, some very recent. They all raise questions of risk and fear and the burdens of being a mother in this age; they press beneath the surface of many popular philosophies of parenting today. Ultimately, though, these stories are demonstrations of a new or underreported variety of harassment and shaming that, for the women involved, has legal, financial, moral and psychological repercussions. The letters below are being published with their permission. Their names have been omitted. — Kim Brooks

Keep reading... Show less

Jon Stewart Unloads on Fox News in Exclusive: “Watching These Channels All Day is Incredibly Depressing"

Jon Stewart opens up in a terrific new interview with The Guardian, conducted before and after the announcement that he’ll leave “The Daily Show” this year. It’s the most wide-ranging conversation he’s had since then and gets into his mindset about the 2016 election, his “heartbreak” over a tough Barack Obama interview, and what he’s thinking about for his future.

Keep reading... Show less

FBI Had Counterterrorism Agents Investigate Occupy Movement

The New York Times reports that the FBI had counterterrorism agents to investigateOccupy Wall Street, and that “F.B.I. personnel around the country were routinely involved in exchanging information about the movement with businesses, local law-enforcement agencies and universities.”

Keep reading... Show less

Paul Ryan: The Lyin' King -- 10 of His Worst Campaign Fabrications

Mitt Romney pollster Neil Newhouse recently said that the Romney campaign is “not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.” If the past few weeks are any indication, Paul Ryan is sticking pretty close to that strategy. Here are his most recent lies, going back to his universally fact-checked Republican National Convention speech. Come back: We’ll update throughout the rest of the campaign.

Keep reading... Show less

Mitt's 41 Worst Gaffes of His Political Career

Mitt Romney’s official coronation goes down this week at the Republican National Convention in Tampa. Can he get by without slipping up? Unlikely. From his energetic rendition of “Who Let the Dogs Out” to last week’s tasteless crack about birth certificates, Romney has had more gaffes over the years than your average politician. Sometimes they’re unintentionally revealing (“I have some great friends who are NASCAR team owners”); other times they’re just plain weird (“Lemon. Wet. Good”). Introducing Salon’s running list of Romney-isms, from today all the way back to 1994.

Keep reading... Show less

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.