NUVO

Vonnegut at 80

Asked how he's doing, Kurt Vonnegut says, "I'm mad about being old and I'm mad about being American. Apart from that, OK."

VonnegutVonnegut has just turned 80. Although he claims he's retired from writing, he has just finished an introduction for a book of anti-war posters by artist Micah Ian Wright. Vonnegut continues to be a cultural presence, speaking out against war with Iraq to 10,000 protestors at a rally in New York's Central Park and making a spoken-word contribution to the new multimedia world music production, One Giant Leap.

While Vonnegut has always owned his Indianapolis sense of place, he has seemed less interested in grounding himself to a particular locale than in using place as a portal to some greater, universal understanding of life. Vonnegut has long argued that we are, ultimately, planetary citizens -- whether we realize it or not.

As extraordinarily popular as Vonnegut's work has proved to be -- virtually everything he's written is still in print -- he's hardly a bringer of reassuring tidings. History, he seems to suggest, is important not, as per Santyana, so that we can avoid past mistakes, but as a predictor of what we corrupt souls are likely to do to one another.

Vonnegut, after all, is an avant-garde artist, whose "aggressively unconventional" (his words) approach to storytelling would likely put readers off if it weren't for the wryly aphoristic, conversational tone of his voice. He has said he learned to effectively write the way he talked by having to phone in stories during his days as a reporter for the Chicago News Bureau.

Kurt Vonnegut recently took some time to talk from his home in New York City about how he thinks things are going these days:

VonnegutIn 1991, you spoke to the Wordstruck Festival in Indianapolis right after the end of the Gulf War against Iraq. During your speech you remarked on television footage you'd seen of Iraqi soldiers who'd been taken prisoner and said, "Those men are my brothers."

Vonnegut: All soldiers are.

And here we are on the brink of another war with Iraq.

I don't want to belong to a country that attacks little countries. I don't want to belong to that kind of a country. I wrote a piece for 7 Stories Press here in New York. They're about to publish a book of anti-war posters by a guy nobody's heard of before -- he's a pretty good artist and so I was asked to write a piece for it. Would you like me to read it?

Please.

(Reading) "These anti-war posters by Micah Ian Wright are reminiscent in spirit of works by artists like Kathe Kollwitz and Georg Grosz and on and on during the 1920s, when it was becoming ever more evident that the infant German democracy was about to be murdered by psychopathic personalities -- hereinafter P.P.s -- the medical term for smart, personable people who have no conscience. P.P.s are fully aware of how much suffering their actions will inflict on others but do not care. They cannot care.

"The classic medical text about how such attractive leaders bring us into unspeakable calamities is The Mask of Sanity by Dr. Hervey Cleckley. An American P.P. at the head of a corporation, for example, could enrich himself by ruining his employees and investors and still feel as pure as the driven snow. A P.P., should he attain a post near the top of our federal government, might feel that taking the country into an endless war with casualties in the millions was simply something decisive to do today. So to bed.

"With a P.P., decisiveness is all. Or, to put it another way, we now have a Reichstag fire of our own."

What's become of conscience?

Again, as Cleckley says, these people are around and do rise. Women are attracted to them. I mean, this is a defect, but women are attracted to them because they are so confident. They really don't give a fuck what happens -- not even to themselves. But this is a serious defect and, no, we haven't been invaded and conquered by Martians. We have been conquered by psychopathic personalities who are attractive.

Has television played a part in this?

We have no idea what technology has done to us. Last night I went to a party for Gordon Parks, a black genius. Walter Cronkite was there. Cronkite's an old friend. I said to him, "You know, the country you did so much to shape seems so shapeless now." One thing about TV is you don't have to do anything ...

We become spectators.

Yes. And that's enough. We're thanked for that: "Thank You For Watching ..." (laughs)

Ratings are becoming more important than votes.

Well, technology has fucked us up in many ways. What I've said about the computer revolution is that it's allowed white collar criminals to do what the Mob would have loved to do -- put a pawn shop and a loan shark in every home!

Technology changes us, yet it's very difficult for us to recognize the changes because we're in their midst.

Of course it does. Life asks us for this and asks us for that: Go get yourself some food. You have tasks, it turns out, in order to get satisfied. But you don't have to do them now. You can sit at home and it's simply done to you. So we're not terribly interesting animals anymore.

You've talked about how the Bush Administration seems driven by revenge.

It's a story to tell. He's in the same business I'm in. He's telling stories. It turns out this is the simplest of all stories to tell. I mean, I want to hold attention when I write something. What he wants to be is interesting. And revenge is interesting. I've said there are two radical ideas that have been introduced into human thought. One of them is that energy and matter are pretty much the same sort of stuff. That's Einstein. The other is that revenge is a bad idea. It's an enormously popular idea but, of course, Jesus came along with the radical idea of forgiveness. That was radical. If you're insulted, you have to square accounts. So this invention by Jesus is as radical as Einstein's.

You've placed a high premium on what you call decency.

One kid said he had the key to all my books and he put it in a sentence. He said, "Love may fail but courtesy will prevail." Love does fail all the time, you know, and it makes people vicious.

That's interesting because it seems that psychopathic personalities tend to give courtesy a bad rap. They find it weak.

They are decisive. They are gonna do something every fuckin' day and they are not afraid.

You've used satire as a tool to defend against the world's insanity. Can it also work to change things?

I guess it works some. Just telling people, "You are not alone. There are a lot of others who feel as you do." We're a terribly lonesome society. For all I know, all societies are. You can make a few new friends, that's all. You can't change history. History is happening to us now. George Bush has hydrogen bombs if he needs them. It really matters who's around and who's holding attention. I don't think television will let anybody else hold attention.

Why is that?

During the Vietnam War, which lasted longer than any war we've ever been in -- and which we lost -- every respectable artist in this country was against the war. It was like a laser beam. We were all aimed in the same direction. The power of this weapon turns out to be that of a custard pie dropped from a stepladder six feet high. (laughs)

Powers Hapgood was an internationally known Indianapolis radical and socialist. You met him didn't you?

Oh, yes. He was an official of the CIO then. He was a typical Hoosier idealist. Socialism is idealistic. Think of Eugene Debs from Terre Haute. What Debs said echoes the Sermon on the Mount: "As long as there's a lower class I am in it. As long as there is a criminal element, I am of it. As long as there is a soul in prison, I am not free."

Now why can't the religious right recognize that as a paraphrase of the Sermon on the Mount? Hapgood and Debs were both middle-class people who thought there could be more economic justice in this country. They wanted a better country, that's all. Hapgood's family owned a successful cannery in Indianapolis and Hapgood turned it over to the employees, who ruined it. He led the pickets against the execution of Sacco and Vanzetti. Hapgood was testifying in court in Indianapolis about some picket-line dust-up connected with the CIO and the judge stops everything. He says, "Mr. Hapgood, here you are, you're a graduate of Harvard and you own a successful business. Why would anyone with your advantages choose to live as you have?" Powers Hapgood actually became a coal miner for a while. His answer to the judge was great: "The Sermon on the Mount, sir."

My God, the religious right will not acknowledge what a merciful person Jesus was.

Why are they so intent on making god a punisher?

Because they enjoy punishment. It's a form of entertainment. The reason we still have the death penalty in this country is because it's a major form of entertainment -- a way of holding attention.

You left Indianapolis for the East Coast. But you've also said there's good reason for staying put.

You leave home because of lonesomeness, no spiritual reason. You're not going to be able to have shop talk. So you're going to be terribly lonesome. So yes, you go to Greenwich Village or somewhere else where people are talking all the time. The turning point in my life, even though I was an established writer, was when I went to the Writer's Workshop at the University of Iowa. We were talking about literature all the time! On Cape Cod there was nobody for me to talk to. It's a very simple social reason. Of course, I've also said the more provincial a story is, the more universal it becomes. That just happens to be true.

Why is that? Attention to detail?

Yes. It's going to be a totally human story which people are going to recognize as such and so they'll resonate with it. I mean: Madame Bovary -- how provincial can you get?

Your work moves people across generations. How do you account for that?

I don't have to. All I know is it happened.

David Hoppe is associate/arts editor of Nuvo, a weekly newspaper in Indianapolis.

The New Battle Lines of Abortion

The battle lines in the Thirty Year War over abortion are girding for what conventional wisdom says will be a huge change in the paradigm. The French abortion pill RU-486 is on the verge of approval by the Food and Drug Administration.

Within the first seven weeks of a pregnancy, American women -- including 13,000 to 16,000 in Indiana each year -- will soon have access to RU-486, a combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol. Mifepristone blocks progesterone, the key hormone that establishes and maintains a pregnancy. A spontaneous miscarriage results when Mifepristone is followed by Misoprostol, which prompts the uterine lining with the embedded embryo to slip away.

Pope John Paul II has called RU-486 the "pill of Cain." But both sides of the abortion struggle come together on one point: RU-486 will make the procedure more accessible.

"Women will likely gain access to early abortion from their neighborhood physicians in privacy -- the way all medical decisions should be carried out," says Sandra Anderson, a medical services employee for Planned Parenthood. "No longer will religious political extremists be able to use violence and intimidation to block women's access to abortion clinics."

Right to Life activist Mike Fichter agrees on one limited point: "It will broaden access to abortion by making it available other than at a clinic or hospital. That will increase the abortion rate in the United States," Fichter predicts. "It also says something about our culture. By ingesting a pill, ending a life becomes morally acceptable."

The FDA approval of RU-486 has serious implications for the American presidential election in November. President Clinton stated last January, "There is absolutely no question in my mind that whether Roe vs. Wade is preserved or scrapped depends on what happens in the presidential election and to pretend otherwise is naive."

The supreme irony in this situation is that few people realize that medicinal abortions are already here.

It's Already Here

Sandra Anderson's voice cannot hide an inner pride when she notes that she "predates" the legalization of abortion. One of her first jobs back in the 1960s was as operating room nurse. "I saw one of my classmates come in after a coat hanger abortion," she says. "I'll never forget it. If it happened in towns of 500 people, you know it's happening in many other places." But when the conversation turns to RU-486, Anderson states, "You know we've been offering medical abortion for years. It's just going to be another drug."

With almost none of the fanfare surrounding RU-486, the FDA in 1998 approved five pilot projects for another medicinal abortion procedure: the antimetabolite Methotrexate, taken in tandem with Misoprostol, the drug manufactured by G.D. Searle. Methotrexate stops embryonic growth by blocking cell divisions, while Misoprostol induces the miscarriage. Methotrexate has almost identical attributes as RU-486. It is used during the first seven weeks of a pregnancy.

While Mifepristone is said to be 95 to 97 percent effective, Methotrexate is 90 to 95 percent effective. If either drug fails, the surgical abortion -- vacuum aspiration -- is available to terminate the fetus.A pregnant woman can go to a Planned Parenthood clinic and receive an injection of Methotrexate. She then goes home and vaginally inserts the Misoprostol pills five to seven days later. She returns to the clinic for a follow-up visit.

With Mifepristone, the woman receives the drug orally. Two days later she returns to the clinic where she takes Misoprostol orally and then stays for observation for up to four hours. A third follow-up visit may be needed.

Once the pilot program ended, the FDA approved Methotrexate for pregnancy termination in 1999 -- with almost no controversy. "We're quite happy with Methotrexate," Anderson says. "But very few women are opting for it. We've had 3,343 women who have come to one of our facilities, and only 28 opted for the medical abortion. You can see that it is not as popular as surgical abortion."

The Pill of Cain

So why has Mifepristone become a lightning rod in the abortion debate while Methotrexate has silently slipped into the picture?

Answers lie partly in industrial European history, partly in the medical research and decisions by the French government, and partly because of a notion that American women were being denied a treatment available to their sisters across the Atlantic.

Mifepristone was developed by the French company Groupe Roussel Uclaf and announced in 1982. It created an immediate sensation. For the first time women could terminate a pregnancy prior to the sixth week required for a surgical abortion. This would be prior to the embryo taking on human features, an element that often adds to a woman's emotional burden.Pregnancies could be ended in local clinics, hospitals or doctors offices.

Predictably, pro-life groups across the globe reacted negatively, fearing that RU-486 was just one more facet of the so-called "fast food society" that would make abortion easy, even routine. They threatened worldwide boycotts.

There was an added burden to bear with RU-486. Roussel Uclaf is a majority owner in Hoechst AG. Hoechst is the German firm with roots in IG Farben, the company that manufactured Zyklon-B, the so-called "human pesticide" the Nazis used in their Holocaust gas chambers during World War II. What's more, then-Hoechst CEO Wolfgang Hilger has been described as a devout Catholic.

Bowing to these pressures, Roussel Uclaf announced in 1988 that it would not manufacture the drug. After several days of outrage from women's and reproductive rights advocacy groups, the French government stepped in and ordered Roussel to manufacture and distribute RU-486 or sell the patent. French Health Minister Claude Evin claimed that the drug was the "moral property of women, not just the drug company."

Methotrexate has less controversial industrial origins. Manufactured by Lederle, it was originally approved by the FDA as a treatment for arthritis and some forms of cancer. In 1993, the University of California at San Francisco announced it had conducted a USDA-approved pilot study."It's been around a long time," Sandra Anderson says, "but nobody had done the research."

Critics say that MTX is extremely toxic and unpredictable. The RU-486 Report by the Life Issues Institute quotes Dr. Hakim Elahi, medical director of Planned Parenthood in New York City, as saying, "I don't believe many physicians in this country would use it. It's a highly toxic drug."

Greater Distribution

What pro-choice advocates are hoping is that once the FDA approves Mifepristone, it will open up the floodgates of access. A number of national studies suggest that is exactly what will happen.

A 1998 New York Times/CBS News poll revealed that 61 percent of Americans favor first trimester abortions (15 percent for second trimester and only 7 percent for third or partial birth abortions).

A 1998 Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation survey of family practitioners revealed that 45 percent of doctors said they were "very" or "somewhat likely" to prescribe Mifepristone. The same study showed that 54 percent of nurse-practitioners would be inclined to prescribe it. The survey revealed that only 3 percent of doctors and 2 percent of nurse practitioners would or had performed surgical abortions.

A 1996 study by the Society for Adolescent Medicine revealed 42 percent of doctors would prescribe medicinal abortions, compared to 2 percent who currently offer surgical procedures.

But for Right to Lifers, the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision that allows for legal abortions is tantamount to the 1857 Dred Scott decision that denied African-Americans human status. "This is a long-term battle, just as abolition was," Fichter observes. "It will be in the American forefront for decades."

Anderson responds: "I acknowledge their belief and I hope those people don't have an abortion. It's a choice. If you don't want one, don't have one. If you do, you should be able to choose from several different options. For many women this is a long, agonizing decision. We have people who change their minds when they get to the table. The positive thing here is these women won't have to go through the hassles to attain the right they have. You should be able to go into any physician's office in any town and get a medicinal abortion."

The Abortion

The author of this first-person account of an abortion wishes to remain anonymous.

The summer after my sophomore year of college I got pregnant.I had recently become engaged to my high school sweetheart and was in the process of transferring schools when I found out that my fiance had slept with someone else. I promptly canceled the wedding and enrolled in the university located in my hometown.During that summer I dated a guy named Shane. He lived a somewhat bohemian lifestyle that I loved. I reveled in the freedom, but most of all I craved the change from my own, buttoned-down existence, and the fact that he had a motorcycle didn't hurt.Well, Shane let me down, too. He had an affair while visiting some friends out of town. About that time, my ex and I reconciled and re-set the wedding date.Shortly after, I found out I was pregnant.I had always been pro-choice, but I thought if I ever got pregnant I would go through with it. I was afraid, though, that if I told my soon-to-be husband that I was pregnant with someone else's child, he would leave me -- not only out of anger, but out of doubt over my loyalties. Our relationship road had always been rocky, but down deep I knew I loved him, and was meant to be with him. I saw this pregnancy as my transgression, and I decided to mend it.The town I lived in didn't provide abortion services, so in the wee morning hours Shane drove me to a neighboring city several hours away for my 8 a.m. appointment.I was terrified. I had no idea what to expect; but the overriding feelings I had weren't of the baby, but of the man I loved. I felt guilty for getting pregnant, I felt guilty over having to do this without his knowledge.The procedure itself was quick, but it felt like centuries. After changing into a hospital gown, I was taken into a room. The thing I remember most was the noise of the sucking machine and the face of the kind nurse who stood next to me and held my hand during the five minute procedure. It wasn't very painful; worse than a pap smear but not unbearable. After it was over they took me into a recovery room with big padded chairs and other women who had just been through the same thing. They put my panties back on me and gave me a maxi pad to absorb the light flow of blood. I had to eat some cookies and drink some Sprite, as you can't eat anything the day of the abortion, and they don't want you passing out from low blood sugar.I sat and cried in that room, not because of the thought of having lost my baby, but because I was scared and traumatized by the entire episode -- from the car ride at dawn, to being denied the support of Shane during and after the procedure, to not really knowing how this was going to effect my body, to the overriding feelings of guilt for what I had done to my fiance. These feelings stayed with me, from collapsing in the bathroom while trying to get dressed to leave, to the entire car ride home, to the sleep that consumed me the rest of the day.I think daily about the fact that I've had an abortion. But I know that what I did at the time, when I was only 20 years old, was the right thing for me. My husband and I eventually got divorced, but I finished college and went to England. I have the job I always dreamed of and am a valued and productive member of society, instead of a single mother working at a low-paying job in my hometown. Having an abortion is a traumatic experience, but so is giving birth before you are ready. I'm glad I had the opportunity to make that choice.

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.