Kelly Macias

Sexism rages in the 2020 presidential race as reporters ask if Gillibrand is 'likable'

It’s been only 24 hours since New York Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand announced her candidacy for president, and already she’s facing sexism. At her campaign announcement on Wednesday morning, a reporter asked about her likability (after calling her pretty) and inquired as to whether or not that could benefit her in the race.

Keep reading...Show less

Stacey Abrams isn't disappearing any time soon

Just in case there was any doubt, Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams definitely plans to run for office again. She confirmed her plans to do so Tuesday in front of a crowd in Laguna Niguel, Calif. at Fortune’s Most Powerful Women Next Gen Summit. Though Abrams didn’t say what office she plans to run for, she highlighted the success of her campaign and how she was able to engage a diverse coalition of voters around the state—ultimately getting more votes than any other Democratic candidate for governor in Georgia’s history.

Keep reading...Show less

Democrats Are Missing the Big Picture by Failing to Get Behind Black Women

Though she won a major upset in the race for a House seat in Massachusetts on Tuesday night, Ayanna Pressley was not endorsed by the Democratic establishment. Nor was she endorsed by members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Now, it’s not entirely unusual for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) or heavy hitters from the party to fail to endorse in a primary—preferring instead to wait until the general election. But this was a particularly interesting set of circumstances. 

Dr. Melanye Price writes in The New York Times that this change in black politics is the most significant political shift in decades. She sites Pressley’s win as an example, along with the rise of Black Lives Matter, as evidence that the black political left is mobilizing young people and progressives and doesn’t necessarily need centrist Democrats to win. Currently, there are three states right now where black candidates are the Democratic nominee for governor—Ben Jealous in Maryland, Stacey Abrams in Georgia, and Andrew Gillum in Florida. These are historic firsts which can be pointed to as representing a new era in black politics. In each case, all three candidates are running far left of their opponents and have progressive stances on issues like health care, criminal justice reform, and immigration.

Beyond historic firsts, this new class of candidates is pushing the Democratic Party farther left. They also represent the new political power of black progressives who defy stereotypes of black politicians as wedded to respectability politics and unwilling to take on issues of people who live on the margins of the black community. 

Some think this is bad for the Democratic Party—that it just fosters division and that Democrats should be concentrating on winning. They are failing to embrace where we are as a country today and are not seeing the big picture. Things change, political parties evolve and voters priorities shift over time. The black electorate is growing in its diversity, age and issues of concern. The status quo is no longer acceptable—particularly because things are anything but normal right now. As Price aptly points out, “The black electorate is outraged at the perceived impotence of black politicians to ensure basic justice for black people who are killed by the police.” Thus, progressive and young black voters are sick of more of the same. In the Trump era, change is what people want and this is why they are looking to replace the establishment with fresh voices and new, innovative ideas and perspectives. 

At the end of the day, all of this is actually really good for the Democratic Party. There is room for lots of opinions and ideas but it’s impossible to have a discussion when black progressive voices are not included in the dialogue. Gone are the days of trying to water down the black political agenda to make it more palatable to moderate white Democrats and conservatives. Black progressives are serious about taking on issues of civil rights, policing, poverty, and racial and criminal justice and want results. And since they aren’t seeing improved outcomes, they are running for office themselves and organizing to elect other black progressives.

The Democratic Party may be failing to get behind these candidates in primaries (or altogether). And that is a huge mistake. If anything, these folks have spent several years organizing, doing grassroots political work, turning out the vote and learning from their mistakes and the mistakes of others. They’ll be a significant part of Democratic politics moving forward. And they’ll be led by black women. It’s long overdue for them to have some seats at the table—with the proper respect, funding, and attention given to others in the party. 

Keep reading...Show less

These Cops Are Trying to Ban Books Exposing Police Brutality at a South Carolina School

Police outside of Charleston, South Carolina, don’t believe that high school students should read about police brutality. So even though two books on the subject were assigned on a summer reading list for a high school freshman class, local police made sure to express their objectionsThe Hate U Give is a book about a teenage girl dealing with the shooting of her unarmed best friend at the hands of police. All American Boys chronicles the experience of a teenage boy who is wrongly accused of stealing and then is beaten by a police officer. Both are award-winning books that made it on to the New York Times bestseller list. Neither book is required—they are two on a list of eight and students are only asked to choose one to read.

Keep reading...Show less

Stealing Children from Their Parents Is Actually Very American - But We Can Change This

Late Wednesday afternoon, Donald Trump signed an executive order to end the separation of immigrant families at the border—a practice that has received widespread condemnation and outrage across the country. Trump’s actions were met with praise by many who claimed that forcibly removing children from their asylum seeking parents or guardians and locking them in detention camps is fundamentally un-American. On social media and television, in conversations among friends, colleagues and family members and across media platforms, Americans proclaimed in horror that this behavior is simply “not who we are.” Moreover, a number of them concluded that our political climate has gotten so toxic that the country has become unrecognizable under Trump’s leadership. 

Now, as easy as it is to blame Donald Trump for the loss of America’s morality and values, it is questionable whether or not they’ve ever really been present in the first place. If we look back at history, it’s demonstrable that America is a country that is built, quite literally, on the backs of others. From the time that the first Europeans touched these shores, leaving slaughtered Indigenous bodies and cultures in their wake, our history has been one of enslavement, marginalization, white supremacy and, yes, the kidnapping of children. 

Many black people in America know this all too well.  We are the descendants of stolen children. This is why, for so many of us, watching what’s happening at the border recalls a deeply buried trauma that rests in our DNA. Stealing black bodies from West Africa, selling them into bondage, forcing them to work the land was how this country became wealthy. We are often at odds about how to discuss the full extent of the cruelty of slavery. Yes, this is the result of our desire to whitewash history. But in a way, it also makes sense. It is beyond comprehension to imagine the depths of the suffering that enslaved Africans must have felt—not only being kidnapped from their homes, shoved into cargo ships where many died and were subsequently tossed overboard like dead fish and forced into servitude into a new land.

But we so rarely remember that enslaved peoples were resilient enough to make families. They loved, got married, built communities and had children, in spite of the grotesque treatment they were made to endure. Sometimes those children were born of love. Sometimes those children were the product of rape, yet another reminder that black women’s bodies were never fully their own. But black people loved their children. They also saw their children ripped away, when slave owners decided it was profitable to sell them. It was also the ultimate way to punish their parents and exert control. The Washington Post details the story of a mother whose baby was stolen from her during a slave auction. Even as this mother was being beaten and pleading for God’s mercy, she refused to let go of her child. A former slave, Henry Bibb, told of this story in 1849. 

“But the child was torn from the arms of its mother amid the most heart-rending shrieks from the mother and child on the one hand, and the bitter oaths and cruel lashes from the tyrants on the other.”

This is why so many enslaved people lived in terror. Of course, they were frightened about what could happen to them at any moment per the whims of a cruel master. But they were also living with constant fear that they would lose their children.

“Night and day, you could hear men and women screaming … ma, pa, sister or brother … taken without any warning,” Susan Hamilton, another witness to a slave auction, recalled in a 1938 interview. “People was always dying from a broken heart.”

So this is not new. And this emotional trauma and fear can be felt in many black families today and is only exacerbated by the centuries of systemic racism experienced by black people in America. This still happens today when thousands of black children are needlessly funneled into child services and criminal justice systems. You cannot actively work to separate and tear families apart for generations and not expect that they will have different forms of intergenerational trauma. Memories are shared and passed down between people. One need not experience an event directly to have it become part of who they are—especially as a member of a culture where the past experiences of its people inform who they are in the present. In the words of Rainer Maria Rilke, “Memories, many of them not my own, are passing shyly and vividly through my chamber.”

Native Americans also know this experience. For almost a century, it was United States policy to forcibly take Native American children away from their families and send them to “Indian schools.” School is not an appropriate word to describe these facilities. Native children were held hostage in an attempt to re-educate them in the ways of white men, because it was apparently offensive for them to actually have their own language, culture and history. As Daily Kos’s Meteor Blades writes, this is a painful past in American Indian history that is absolutely still felt today. Hundreds of children died in these brutal institutions which were the result of partnerships between the government and religious organizations. It was state sanctioned violence against Native bodies and culture which lasted for at least 100 years. 

In the words of the founder of the most famous such schools, the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Pennsylvania, these institutions had as their primary purpose to “kill the Indian, and save the man.” In other words, to engage in a form of ethnic cleansing, a forced acculturation that left behind the wholesale slaughter of the previous era, but was as lethal at destroying culture, religion, and language as any massacre or scalp bounty. They dared call it civilizing.   

It’s easy for those who have been unaffected to claim this as ancient history. But like many black Americans, Native Americans living in the U.S. today are also the descendants of stolen children. The pain, horror, sense of displacement, anxiety and also the incredible resilience, among those children and their descendants is powerfully felt among Native communities. Again, this is who we are. This is part of our history. It cannot be erased or swept under the rug, especially because so many millions of us today bear the scars, and also the burden, of what this country has done and continues to do in the name of white supremacy.

Americans pride ourselves on being exceptional. We are taught to believe that we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world—a nation which commands respect, inspires hope and awe and is the envy of everyone around the world. And indeed it is true that the idea of the American project is exceptional. A land of many cultures, diversity, differences in ideas and thoughts where anyone can become anything if they work hard, is the ultimate human utopia. And there are examples that can be pointed to in our history where this has been the case. But we have to live in the reality of who we are and not a bedtime story or fairy tale. We are a nation that strives for judging people by who they are and not what they are. It is essentially enshrined in our founding documents. But it is not the totality of who we are.

We are also a nation that has a history of separating brown and black children from their families. It has been done in order to preserve whiteness and keep white people in control. That history is almost as old as our country itself. It is a history that cannot be erased. It cannot be undone. It lives in the DNA of many Americans living today. The evil and, more importantly, the complacency of people who did nothing while those atrocities occurred, also lives in the DNA of some Americans. What is currently happening at the border is actually history repeating itself. And in order to change history, we have to be willing to admit that we aren’t who we think we are. But we should want and strive to become better. It begins with refusing to accept another generation of black and brown children being stolen from their parents in our name. America is this—like it or not. It has always been this. It has also been that aspirational place we’d like it to be. Let’s choose to be the latter rather than the former. 

Keep reading...Show less

Democratic Operatives Are Working to Elect More Black Candidates in Congressional and Governor Races

Though the Democratic Party is considerably more inclusive and diverse than other political parties in the country, it has not traditionally done well in recruiting black candidates for elected office or putting significant amounts of money behind them. With midterms approaching and the potential for big Democratic wins, the party has been grappling with the tension between going after white working-class voters and mobilizing its faithful black base. Clearly, this isn’t an either/or proposition. But some see it as such. This has meant that local and national Democratic groups have questioned the viability of black candidates and have not invested money into races that could be historic—and increase black voter turnout in November.

At a fundraiser for Collective PAC, a political action committee for black candidates, former DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile spoke about the challenges faced by candidates and party operatives in supporting black candidates. According to Politico, she reminded the crowd “that young black politicians seeking office have been viewed as disruptive rather than encouraged in the past.”

“The fact that you are going to support, raise money, try to build a bench, and put more people in the pipeline to run for governor and lieutenant governor — you’re going to get in trouble,” Brazile said [...] “Barack Obama, when he first ran for United States Senate — we got in trouble because we raised money for him.”

Disruption and trouble aren’t always bad things. Many times, shaking things up can be exactly what an organization or system needs in order to reset. And the Democratic Party, while making gains in special elections and key races across the country, is badly in need of new tactics and a comprehensive strategy that will yield wins in November and in 2020.

Of course, the Party and donors want to get behind the candidate that they believe can actually win. The problem is that black candidates have often been ignored or deemed not viable. This is the time to test those assumptions—especially since a candidate cannot be viable without the money needed to campaign. 

There are some incredible black candidates across the country right now who could use the benefit of big-money. They include Stacey Abrams of Georgia and Andrew Gillum of Florida, who are both running for governor of their respective states. And as Politico writes, there are other high-profile races involving black candidates, apart from gubernatorial ones, that need funding. 

Several federal races have also become marquee attractions: Lauren Underwood, who is working to flip a predominantly white Illinois House district, is gaining national interest. So is Colin Allred, a former NFL player and HUD attorney who is in a primary runoff in the Dallas suburbs on Tuesday. Others are hoping to muster resources for Mississippi Senate candidate Mike Espy, who is aiming to follow in Alabama Sen. Doug Jones' footsteps as the next Democrat to win a Senate seat in the Deep South.

The small groups of donors and PACs who are behind these candidates are making headway, but they shouldn’t have to do it on their own. This is where super PACs, other progressive groups, and organizations with innovative approaches can come in. 

BlackPAC, a super PAC that draws money from Democratic heavyweights such as the SEIU and Priorities USA, has spent $3 million so far this cycle, which is the same amount that it spent in total during the 2016 elections.

Then there is a highly anticipated new entry: the not-yet-unveiled Black Economic Alliance, a coalition of black business executives who have been formalizing plans for a political organization over the last year. The group is spearheaded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Director N. Anthony Coles, executive Gerald S. Adolph and Infor CEO Charles Phillips, according to documents filed with the IRS and the Federal Election Commission.

In some ways, the way that black candidates are often forced to organize within and get funding from black communities and black-led organizations mirrors the intense segregation in our society. Black candidates remain overlooked and underfunded by the Democratic Party establishment and have to go it alone. But that should not and cannot be the case in 2018.

Democrats know better and can be the political party that does better. There are governorships and Congressional seats at stake in the upcoming midterms. There is voter turnout to consider. It is also a decisive time for Democrats to crystallize the kind of open, inclusive party we want to be. We cannot do that if we aren’t willing to put our money where our rhetoric is. Supporting black candidates is not only the right thing to do, it’s the politically smart thing to do as well. 

Keep reading...Show less

Police Officer Caught on Video Saying Man 'Didn't Do Anything' Before Arresting Him

When it comes to police misconduct, we are often told that it’s just “a few bad apples” and that the profession of policing is still an honest and trustworthy one. Yet, it’s getting harder to believe that with so many instances of police brutality and misconduct repeatedly being caught on camera. From abusing unarmed, handcuffed suspects, to making up arrest charges, to actually murdering innocent people, there are many reasons for us to feel unsafe around police and to question how they are doing their jobs. One recent incident occurred in Maryland after body camera footage showed one officer telling another officer that a man “didn’t do anything” only to arrest him later anyway. As written by The Baltimore Sun:

This is our first clue that something here isn’t legitimate. Or that Davis is just really scared of certain people who are gathered in a crowd. Either way, it doesn’t make for good or trustworthy policing. Once things have simmered down and Richardson (the actual person involved in the fight) is arrested, Davis tells another officer that Greenstreet isn’t in trouble because he hasn’t done anything wrong. But apparently, not doing anything wrong isn’t good enough for the other officer. He wants Greenstreet charged for something. And he basically keeps digging until they can come up with a reason to arrest him. As The Sun explains:

In other footage, Davis says that he’s “not really comfortable charging him (Greenstreet)” and maintains that Greenstreet is innocent when another officer asks. [...]

Later, Davis and the other officers agree on a hindrance charge, despite Davis’ initial reluctance.

On Tuesday, in a district court, the Anne Arundel County State’s Attorney’s Office dropped the charges against Greenstreet. Why? Because as Davis said the first time he was asked, he didn’t do anything. And there was video to prove it. While there is an investigation underway about the discrepancy between the video footage and Davis’s written statement charging Greenstreet, there is more to be concerned about than just this case. Body camera and cellphone footage continue to show us that there is a culture of lying and misconduct that is rampant in the profession of policing—and it’s not limited to one city or town in America. It’s a problem that police can admit that someone is innocent but still charge folks for crimes anyway. This time it was caught on film. But what about the next time? Ryan Greenstreet could have ended up with a criminal record. He already had to spend time in court and lawyers fees. If this kind of misconduct and abuse isn’t stopped, it could be so much worse for the next person. 

Keep reading...Show less

Trump FCC Tries to Cut Telecommunications Service Access for 369,000 Puerto Ricans

While it was it a natural disaster in the form of Hurricane Maria that devastated Puerto Rico, it is the Trump administration that is unnecessarily making the situation into a catastrophe. For nearly eight months after the storm, the island has experienced one setback after another—many of which have been the result of gross negligence, incompetence, and downright malice. And while they should be trying to make life better for residents of Puerto Rico, the administration is actively trying to make it worse, this time by cutting off access to telecommunications services.

Telecommunications are also critical to communities devastated by natural and other disasters. With the 2018 hurricane season around the corner, the last thing residents of Puerto Rico and other hurricane ravaged areas need, are measures that would disconnect them from lifesaving networks.

The FCC claims that making changes to the program will “stimulate investment in broadband networks” but experts note that there is no evidence to prove these claims. Amazing how our some in our government consistently demonstrate a willingness to make life good for the wealthy and business owners at all costs, while simultaneously screwing over the poor every chance they get. Too bad so many people continue to fall for it and vote for them.

Though changes to the Lifeline program will have a major impact on Puerto Ricans, it doesn’t stop there. This has the potential to harm Texans and Floridians who experienced a brutal hurricane season in 2017, and poor and marginalized communities across the country—the majority of whom are people of color. 

The FCC is proposing to:

  • artificially cap the program with a "self-enforcing budget" that ranks need based on location, deepening the urban versus rural digital divide
  • limit the availability of the modest subsidy by imposing a copay and a lifetime benefit
  • eliminate resellers, which provide services for 70 percent of current Lifeline subscribers.

All together the proposals would cut off over 8 million Lifeline customers, exacerbate the challenges faced by needy Americans and, ultimately, widen the digital divide.

This is beyond cruelty. And for sure, it’s strategic and intentional. This government under Donald Trump will cut millions of poor and needy people off from vital communication and information. That is the exact opposite of making America great. But it is yet another step toward lining the pockets of Trump’s wealthy friends. Sadly, this will result in one more disaster for the rest of us—and especially for Puerto Ricans.  

Keep reading...Show less

Media Outlets Are Having Trouble Keeping Up with Hate Crime Reports in Trump Era

It’s been well-documented that hate crimes are on the rise since Donald Trump brought his particular brand of racism and xenophobia to American politics. Though it is typically advocacy groups that do the work of documenting these crimes, there are some media outlets also covering these stories, with ProPublica leading the way. 

Keep reading...Show less

Police Were Called on Black Filmmakers Leaving Airbnb - Apparently Just Because They Were Black

The last few weeks have proven that black people can’t do anything while black without scaring or provoking the ire of some very fragile white people. We can’t get coffee, we can’t golf, and we most certainly can’t rent from Airbnb and ignore white people we don’t know. Failing to wave at an elderly white woman in a residential neighborhood became the most recent reason that the police were called on three black women who were simply leaving their Airbnb rental in Rialto, California.

“It was based on their rudeness and lack of good nature that caused her to call the police,” [Marie Rodriguez, owner of the Airbnb rental] said of the neighbor. “It had nothing to do with being black.”

Apparently the Rialto police pull out all the stops when they get calls about strange people with luggage who don’t wave to neighbors. As The Sun reports, they came ready to confront these criminals  travelers in a major way. Seven police cars showed up and a helicopter was dispatched to track the women.

Police initially called a helicopter, but it never arrived on scene. It was canceled before arriving, Hardin said. Officers also never displayed their firearms.

“However, during initial contact, the people that we stopped were in a car, and so when the officer made a frontal approach, he asked to see their hands,” Hardin explained. Their hands were below his eyesight, so he asked to see them.

While no one was injured, the entire encounter lasted for nearly an hour. The women were asked to establish their reason for being in the driveway. According to CNN, the police sergeant who arrived on the scene had no idea what Airbnb was. CNN writes: 

A police sergeant showed up, [Kelly] Fyffe-Marshall says in her account, and said he didn't know what Airbnb was. The group showed the police their booking confirmations and phoned the home's landlord to convince police they were telling the truth.
The entire episode lasted a frustratingly long 45 minutes, she said.
"We have been dealing with different emotions and you want to laugh about this but it's not funny," she wrote. "The trauma is real. I've been angry, frustrated and sad. I was later detained at the airport. This is insanity."

One of the women is the granddaughter of reggae singer Bob Marley. Her name is Donisha Prendergast and she and her friends are filing legal action against the Rialto Police Department. Who knows if they will win. Whether they do or not won’t change that it’s all too common for black people to have the police called on them for being black in white spaces. And apparently, not waving to white people can get the police called on you as well.

This is not just a police problem. It’s a problem that white people get scared so easily at the sight of black people. Oh, and just a reminder: this kind of thing rarely happens to white folks. 

Keep reading...Show less

Puerto Rico's Recovery Continues to Be Slow Due to Negligence and Poor Infrastructure

Nearly eight months after Hurricane Maria, Puerto Rico is still plagued with issues related to its power. Of course, we know that much of this is related to the condition of the electric grid before the storm. Still, a major reason why parts of the island remain in darkness today is because of the trifecta of major storms, negligence on the part of government officials and an aging grid that has been long in need of repair.

But nothing about this disaster can be discussed without understanding that the economy and state of the island was in disarray long before the 2017 hurricane season. In other words, a decade of steady economic decline and steady migration off the island has meant that funding for the most basic of services, like power, has gone ignored. To be clear, it’s not that money hasn’t been coming to the island. There are steady streams of tourism and business that have contributed to the economy. Yet, PREPA remains bankrupt, people still face economic uncertainty and joblessness and the government struggles with massive, crippling debt that the U.S. government is unwilling to forgive.

Compounding those problems, the grid was decrepit, corroded and poorly maintained, and PREPA — which, like Puerto Rico as a whole, is effectively bankrupt — had failed to keep sufficient stocks of replacement parts and other critical supplies. Shipments of parts from the mainland were slow to arrive and languished in the battered ports. The terrain is so forbidding that replacing a single power pole can require a helicopter and a team of line workers. The effort seemed to go impossibly awry.

“I’ve never seen anything like that — not in a developed nation,” said Ed Muller, a former energy executive whose generation and transmission equipment suffered flooding by Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey, severe storm damage in Jamaica and earthquakes in California. In the Caribbean, he said, “hurricanes come through regularly, and have forever. You move people in and you get it done. And we haven’t done it.”

Much of the island has had power restored at this point but the situation remains precarious. Mistakes by PREPA have resulted in continued blackouts and workers are still continuing to make mistakes that set progress back. Puerto Ricans are resilient and determined to move forward. But with the next hurricane season less than a month away along with an electrical grid still in tatters, it is certain that the islands residents will continue to face difficulty in the months, and even years, ahead. 

Keep reading...Show less

Video Shows Miami Cop Kicking Handcuffed Man in Head - Officer Is Still Being Paid

In a speech last year, Donald Trump said he thinks the police should be rougher with people during arrests. But we know that they are plenty rough already—and very often without cause. It seems like every day a new video emerges of police misconduct and brutality toward the people they are supposed to protect, especially when they are people of color. And because today is a day that ends in “y”,  yet another video showing police abuse toward a black person has come out, this time in Miami. 

Keep reading...Show less

Principal Disgustingly Jokes About Calling Police on Black Student with Special Needs

Day after day, more evidence emerges that confirms something that should be common knowledge by now: America has a serious problem with police violence. Not only is that painfully obvious, but we have a plethora of data which confirms that it poses a specific threat to people of color, and blacks, in particular. This is no laughing matter. Yet, for some reason, an elementary school principal in Houston thinks it is. That’s why she joked about calling the police on a black student, who also has special needs, and telling them that he brought a gun to school. Here’s what happened, according to The Huffington Post

Keep reading...Show less

Report Says Charlottesville Police 'Failed Miserably' to Protect Public at White Supremacist Rally

Its been almost four months since the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia that killed Heather Heyer and injured many others. In that time, there has been a lot of national conversation about the administration’s response to what happened, especially Donald Trump’s notion that there are “very fine” people on both sides. Since then, there have been more questions than answers—particularly about what could have been done by law enforcement to ensure the safety of the counter protestors at the event. 

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Administration Offers Obscene Explanation for Limiting Access to Birth Control

In its ongoing War on Women, the Trump administration has decided to roll back the Obama-era policy which mandated employers to cover birth control in health insurance plans they offer to employees. This is not a shocking move for the man who has demonstrated such contempt and hatred toward women his entire life. But it is cruel and has the potential to impact millions of women who rely on their employer-provided health insurance for contraception.

This is not a joke. The administration is actually trying to keep birth control away from folks because birth control may promote promiscuity. What is this 1950s nonsense they are spouting? This is the equivalent to arguing that birth control pills turn women into sluts. Seriously. Also note that they would never, ever do anything like this to condoms or Viagra or anything involving the sexual health of men—whatsoever. 

Besides these angry, creepy misogynistic white men who are determined to ruin lives, no one thinks this is a good idea. Doctors and reproductive health advocates know that this would be disastrous for women and take us back decades.

The new rules, drafted mainly by political appointees at the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services, seek “to better balance the interests” of women with those of employers and insurers that have conscientious objections to contraceptive coverage. [...]

But Dr. Haywood L. Brown, the president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said the rules would turn back the clock on women’s health.

“Affordable contraception for women saves lives,” he said. “It prevents pregnancies. It improves maternal mortality. It prevents adolescent pregnancies.”

And there we have it. Not only does this president think it’s more than appropriate to grab ladies by their private parts and expect us to take it, he’s also determined to grab our right to freedom and reproductive health, too. 

Keep reading...Show less
BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.