Hunter

Trump Launches White House 'Witch Hunt' to Identify Aides Who Talked to Watergate Journalist Woodward

Well, we knew this was coming: Bob Woodward's new book featuring lots and lots of unflattering descriptions of Trump is resulting in yet another Trump meltdown.

Keep reading...Show less

North Korea Lashes Out After Trump's Latest Tantrum

On Friday, Donald Trump announced via Twitter that he was canceling the next meeting between Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and North Korean negotiators and, in fact, would be suspending negotiations with North Korea entirely for the time being. Because Trump is a liar, we don’t actually know if this is true or if it will remain true past, say, next Thursday, but his announcement seems largely due to Trump finally realizing that North Korea has been playing him for a chump, rebuffing even preliminary denuclearization discussions while insisting that the United States lift sanctions first if any progress is to be made.

Keep reading...Show less

'Please Don't': Republican Senator Jeff Flake Warns Trump Not to Fire Sessions Over Russia Probe

Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake was on Meet the Press this morning, in part to reminisce about his friend Sen. John McCain, and in smaller part to weigh in on the sitting President of the United States being marked as an unindicted co-conspirator in an illegal campaign finance scheme revolving around the payment of "hush money" to mistresses in order to keep their stories out of the press during the last critical weeks of the 2016 election. This is only tangentially related to the larger probe into whether or not the same candidate and campaign team sought and received the assistance of Russian government actors in order to procure damaging information about his campaign opponent, the accusation of “collusion” that has put President Co-Conspirator into an unending daily fit for two solid years now.

SEN. JEFF FLAKE: I don't know. There may be a few isolated voices saying that the president ought to fire him now. I can tell you as a body we're saying, "Please don't." He serves at the pleasure of the president. We all know that. But I think it would be a big mistake for the president to fire him now.

Look out, criminal co-conspirator now leading the Republican Party: Sen. Jeff Flake is countering with a bold public proclamation of please don't. Reconsider your attempts to do away with the rule of law in our great country or you will be further met with a well I never, followed by an aggrieved look of disappointment.

Mr. Flake, we will repeat, is one of the few Republican lawmakers willing to express any contrarian positions towards Donald Trump's acts at all. Spelunkers are still looking for the moral compass of a certain Sen. Mitch McConnell, who appears to have dropped it in a crevasse.

Keep reading...Show less

American Boatbuilders Are the Latest Casualty in Trump's Trade War

Add boatbuilders to the list of American industries taking a beating due to Trump's new tariffs and resulting trade war. A retaliatory European Union tariff of 25 percent is drying up sales overseas, and Trump's aluminum tariffs just happen to hit the thing that small recreational boats need a lot of: aluminum.

Keep reading...Show less

Don Lemon Reveals Trump Called Him 'Racist' for the Most Absurd Reason

CNN anchor Don Lemon has been a frequent target of Donald Trump's puffy wrath of late. Discussing the attacks on-air with his other CNN anchors, Lemon revealed that Trump's antipathy toward him has been both long-lasting and pointedly race-based; after a 2011 interview in which Trump was asked to defend his crackpot claims that President Barack Obama was not actually an American citizen, Trump fumed at him for the pointed questions.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Bizarrely Claims Harley-Davidson Lost Sales in 2017 Because of This Year's Feud With Him

In our latest episode of The Worldwide Adventures of Idiot Manchild, we learn that Donald Trump's former best friend now turned hated enemy Harley-Davidson suffered reduced sales in 2017 because of something they did a year later. That's right, attempting to keep your company afloat after Donald Trump screws you is such a grave injury to Idiot Manchild that it rips a hole in spacetime, causing you to lose business a year before any of it ever happened.

Keep reading...Show less

Will Trump Pull the United States out of NATO?

Will Donald Trump give Russian leader Vladimir Putin the best of all possible gifts: pulling the United States out of NATO? As insane as that sounds, Trump has been making noises to other world leaders threatening to do exactly that. After opining to G7 leaders during their summit a few weeks ago backing Russia's claim to the now-occupied Crimea because, well, the people there speak Russian so there, Trump reportedly complained about the upcoming NATO summit on July 11:

Donald is in a very foul mood of late, and he has been even more eager than usual to publicly repeat Russian talking points over the objections of his own aides. It is more likely than not, during the upcoming NATO summit, that it's going to a repeat of the G7 meeting in which Trump roundly attacked U.S. allies like Canada while suggesting Russia has been getting an unfair shake.

But we can't discount the possibility that he's going to come out of the meeting with an announcement that our nation will be abandoning the NATO treaty. He has been telegraphing that move, as he has with multiple other insane opinions that later became new presidential orders, for a very long time. Given that NATO's major role is to deter Russian military aggression, that would be the ultimate gift to Trump's would-be friend Putin—the one man in the world Donald never, ever, has a bad word for.

Keep reading...Show less

In Appalling Call for 'Civility,' Washington Post Compares Huckabee Sanders Restaurant Incident to Far-Right Terrorism

On Sunday the anonymous writers of the Washington Post editorial board lobbed a doozy of a stink grenade into the public discourse with an editorial demanding, per the title: "Let the Trump team eat in peace." It bemoaned that "strong political feelings have spilled into what used to be considered the private sphere." It grumbled that "social media have blurred the line between work hours and private time." It pouted, in an odd little aside, how ubiquitous cellphone cameras "make it ever easier to intrude."

Keep reading...Show less

This Republican Congressman Just Approvingly Retweeted a British Neo-Nazi

Whenever you see a headline reporting that a House Republican proudly retweeted a European neo-Nazi, the odds are nine in ten it will be Iowa Rep. Steve King. This time, King urgently retweeted the anti-immigrant panic of British neo-Nazi Mark Collett, adding his own two cents: “Europe is waking up...Will America...in time?”

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Plans to Ignore North Korea's Human Rights Abuses in Summit with Dictator

Well of course Trump isn't going to bring up human rights when meeting with the North Korean dictator. That'd be insulting to the nuclear rogue state, and Trump is only insulting to U.S. allies, not dictators.

Keep reading...Show less

This Republican Congressman Seriously Suggested Sea Levels Are Rising Because of Falling Rocks

One of the worst duties of being a top-level American scientist or researcher is that you get summoned before House Republicans so they can explain why, in their minds, the entire collected research that you and tens of thousands of others have participated in is probably wrong because of Shit They Just Made Up.

Rather than quibble with Mr. Brooks's genius, I say we go with it. Let's science the hell out of this thing. Here are some other things that scientists no doubt have overlooked, when calculating the level of sea level rise we can expect from DEFINITELY NOT THE MELTING OF ICE SHEETS WORLDWIDE unknown, mysterious sources.

Mo Brooks Theoretical Cause #2: Boats. We have a lot more boats these days. What if, like, us building all those boats is what's displacing water and causing Florida to gradually disappear. We should probably keep burning fossil fuels but stop building boats.

Mo Brooks Theoretical Cause #3: No, wait, not boats, whales. What if, and hear me out on this one, rising sea levels can be directly attributed to the international ban on whaling. What if the ban on whale hunting is leading whale populations to rebound so quickly that all the extra whales are causing sea levels to rise, and if we continue to let whales run amok soon we will all be flooded with whales. Whales in the flooded streets, whales in the subways, whales roaming freely through our larger sewer systems, hunting for krill. What if our 19th century shift away from a whale-based economy turns out to be the thing that doomed us all.

Mo Brooks Theoretical Cause #Q: That Chinese satellite that just fell. It fell into the ocean, right? I forget, but it seems like that was pretty big so that's maybe a thing.

Mo Brooks Theoretical Cause #ampersand: The damn kids today. Kids are always throwing rocks into the ocean. Scientists have determined that if all the world's kids gathered at the White Cliffs of Dover to throw rocks in, the White Cliffs of Dover would be reduced to the White Flat Plains of Dover within a single decade.

Mo Brooks Theoretical Cause #DoctorsDon’tWantYouToKnow:Wait, what if the oceans aren't rising at all ... what if the Earth is shrinking? So, like, it's the same amount of water but every year gravity is causing the planet to shrink a little. It could be that. Scientists are dumb and probably didn't think of that because of their dumbness.

Now see there? We could have mocked Mr. Brooks, but we did not. Instead we constructively engaged with him. We're meeting him halfway.

I would like to humbly suggest that if House Republicans set me up with an appropriate source of funding—say, a few billion dollars—I will science the heck out of all these possibilities, definitively answering them once and for all. I will do all the sciences. I will use calculators, and slide rules, and write down numbers and everything, and report back with a definitive header and choice of fonts.

It is, after all, the only way to be sure.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Is Using Parkland Victims in Speeches - Majority of Families Say He Hasn't Bothered to Call Them

After Donald Trump invoked the mass shooting at a Parkland, Florida, high school during last week’s speech to the nation's largest domestic terrorism lobby (aka the National Rifle Association), BuzzFeed sought out some of the families who lost loved ones in that shooting to ask whether they had, to this day, ever been contacted by Trump. The answer is no—most haven't.

Keep reading...Show less

Melania Trump Spokesperson Calls Journalists 'Opposition Media' for Reporting on Her 'Be Best' Campaign

Yes, yes, we're all having a good laugh at Melania Trump's expense.

None of this would be a big deal—the only reason it was in the first place is because it so handily reinforced an existing stereotype of the Trump family nicking other people's work and presenting it proudly with an "I made this" face. But then the Office of the First Lady sent out a statement reinforcing the other existing stereotype of the Trump family, the part where every slight injury to their egos are the result of a demon-led "opposition media" treating them unkindly:

After giving a strong speech that was met with a standing ovation and positive feedback, the focus from opposition media has been on an educational booklet, [...]

Despite providing countless outlets with ample background, information, and on-the-record comments from the FTC, some media have chosen to take a day meant to promote kindness and positive efforts on behalf of children, to instead lob baseless accusations towards the First Lady and her new initiatives.

Oh, so there you go: All the people who pointed out that the booklet was promoted as being "by" the first lady and the FTC are "opposition media," because a decent media wouldn't point out these things. Yep, that's the Trump family for you. Victims, every time.

Keep reading...Show less

McConnell Says He Won't Consider Calling Racist Ads Against His Own Family 'Racist' Until Election Is Over

If you're looking to pin the utter ethical collapse of the Republican Party on a single person, you could make a solid case that Sen. Mitch McConnell is patient zero.

Keep reading...Show less

American Traitor Oliver North Will Become the New NRA President

Imagine the thought process that went into the decision to elevate one of the most notorious criminal actors in modern Republicanism to a top spot in the National Rifle Association.

Keep reading...Show less

Donald Trump Wimps Out on Baseball's Opening Day Once Again

A long Washington Post piece about baseball's opening day and the century-old tradition of presidents attending the season's launch features this wonderfully blunt and cynical assessment, from the authors, on why Donald Trump has abandoned the practice.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Is Reportedly 'Struggling to Stay Calm' as the Russia Investigation Deepens

So are we as a nation still just going to not talk about how freaking nuts this is.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Reportedly Hates Being President, but 'Doesn't Want to Go Down in History' for Resigning

Buried in an alarming-all-by-itself Politico article pondering how far down the line of succession we'd have to get, in the Justice Department, before we found someone who would not either have to recuse themselves from the Russia-Trump investigation or who an enraged Trump wouldn't also summarily fire—oh, and by the way Trump might simply change the executive order setting the Justice Department's line of succession, thus speeding up the process of, say, eventually just giving that job to Jared Kushner as well:

Keep reading...Show less

Across the Heartland, Trump Voters Are a Bit Confused as to What the Hell They Voted For

The Washington Post decided to spare us a weeks-long series examining the minds of Trump voters by lumping a whole bunch of them together in a single story. Here's the union-member Iowa Democrat who voted for Trump as agent of disruption, but who now is alarmed at all the disruption.

Surprise: a bucketload of them involve racism. Surprise, a bunch of them think what Trump is doing is horrible and wrong—but are still angry that other Americans are resisting him because golly, that just seems so rude. People who didn't vote for either Clinton or Trump because they were both equally bad are now left contemplating things they would not be goddamn contemplating if the fascist manchild and his white nationalist subordinates weren't now in charge:

Her [Muslim] husband is in the process of becoming a citizen, and they have discussed what they might do if they need to flee the country.

Flee America, that is. The Iowa family is discussing what they need to do if their family needs to flee America.

Over in Illinois, the New York Times looks at a different community, one that's now stupefied after the arrest and detention of an undocumented immigrant who for a decade has been one of the best and most-liked damn people in the town. And now a bunch of not-racists who backed Trump's notions of rounding up millions of people by an overwhelming margin—because they were going to get the coal mines back in return, so screw all those millions—are all twitchy because they don't want this "good man" and "role model" included.

How one night last fall, when the Fire Department was battling a two-alarm blaze, Mr. Hernandez suddenly appeared with meals for the firefighters. How he hosted a Law Enforcement Appreciation Day at the restaurant last summer as police officers were facing criticism around the country. How he took part in just about every community committee or charity effort — the Rotary Club, cancer fund-raisers, cleanup days, even scholarships for the Redbirds, the high school sports teams, which are the pride of this city.

While it's not clear that the people who want Hernandez to stay represent a majority of the community—at least, not if local newspaper comment threads are any indication—the story is presented as a bit of a conundrum, a complexity that the community somehow never thought of and is now working through. This is an overly charitable interpretation. Of course the people who voted for the man promising to deport millions were aware that a great many among those millions would be "good people" and "role models," and they didn't give a flying damn back then.

Now that it's happening to someone they personally know, suddenly the empathy gene kicks back in because if someone they know and like gets detained, everyone gets a bad feeling in the pit of their stomach as they realize that yes indeed, this is exactly what they voted for and they bear personal responsibility.

Tim Grigsby, who owns a local printing shop and considers Mr. Hernandez one of his closest friends, has been helping to lead the efforts to bring Mr. Hernandez back to West Frankfort. [...]

Mr. Grigsby said he still would vote for Mr. Trump. One never agrees with everything a politician does, “but maybe this should all be more on a per-case basis,” he said. “It’s hard to be black and white on this because there may be people like Carlos.”

Sorry, closest friend. Your pal hasn't changed his mind about voting for the racist lout who promised to deport millions, but he'll help you out, personally, to make up for it. Everyone else had just better hope they made some white Illinois friends too, ones who will help get their stories in the New York Times after they get carted off to the detention centers. That's how we'll be doing things in the Trump era.

How are we all feeling, then? Do we all properly understand Trump voters yet? If not, don't worry. By tomorrow there will be another piece profiling still more of them. By the time Trump gets impeached or resigns to spend more time with his money we’ll have met every last one of them.

Keep reading...Show less

It's Been a Week, and Trump Is Well on His Way to Becoming Most Crooked President in History

It took one week. Within one week of becoming the nation's president-elect, Trump's newest hotel was already advertising itself as a way for foreign diplomats to curry favor with the newest president.

So Donald Trump will walk into the Oval Office having already committed an apparently impeachable offense. He also settled a case this week accusing his so-called "University" of being nothing but a massive scheme to defraud consumers, is meeting with foreign dignitaries alongside the very family members he supposedly will be handing “blind trust” business concerns over to, and is pausing his own preparations to become the next president to close still more foreign business deals as president-elect.

(Oh, and he wants to keep his current unsecured phone as president. Which also seems like it ought to be a scandal for recent news-related reasons we can't quite place our fingers on.)

Mind you, short of simply baking the president a cake with hundred dollar bills inside, foreign dignitaries putting cash money into Donald Trump's own corporate bank accounts for the explicit purpose of currying favor with him as president seems like just about the most transparent case of corruption in office one could plausibly imagine. It's so beyond the pale of whatever Trump accused other candidates of, with his Crooked Hillary or Lyin' Ted or take-your-pick that it seems the stuff of a cartoon.

Crooked Don is already setting up the very real, very public avenues through which he will be bribed. And he's essentially daring the government to do something about it; the only thing we know for sure is that Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and the rest of his now deeply crooked party will defend that crookery at every turn. What <i>principled Republican</i> exists that would dare complain?

So far, the political media that spent every election twist and turn obsessing about "emails" doesn't have much to say about Trump seemingly violating the Constitution itself. It was not mused-over on the Sunday shows; the headlines continue to be subdued. But they will act as check against Trump's misuse of power, they insist. Anytime now. They're just getting a drink of water first, then look out.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Plan to Prepare 'Whitewater' Attacks Hits Snag When Staff Accidentally Sends It to a Reporter

That the Donald Trump campaign is planning to attack presumed Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton over the so-called "Whitewater" scandal is not news. The exquisite Three Stooges-style execution of their plan, however, is worth our attention.

Keep reading...Show less

Supreme Court Nixes Challenge to Seattle's $15 Minimum Wage Law

For low-wage franchises fighting Seattle's new $15 minimum wage? No luck.

Keep reading...Show less

Texas Republicans Find Craziest Person in State, Aim to Put Her in Charge of School Textbooks

Texas Republicans' drive to find the stupidest people in the state and elect them to office seems, if anything, to be picking up steam.

Keep reading...Show less

The New York Times Botched the Terrorism Story that Was the Centerpiece of the GOP Debate

One of the recurring themes in the all-ISIS all-fear CNN/Republican "debate" on Tuesday was the premise that the San Bernardino terrorists, who we care about—as opposed to the Colorado Springs or Charleston terrorists, who we do not—were openly posting of their extremist plans and plots and associations on "social media", and yet government agents who were supposed to be in charge of these things were, because Obama, not "allowed" to look them up. Here's the Ted Cruz version:

The New York Times is taking a second look at its reporting on the Internet activities of the assailants in the San Bernardino, Calif., massacre, according to Executive Editor Dean Baquet. “We are reporting it out,” Baquet told the Erik Wemple Blog in an email.

Baquet is referring to the article U.S. Visa Process Missed San Bernardino Wife’s Zealotry on Social Media, reported by Matt Apuzzo, Michael Schmidt and Julia Preston. It was the original source for claims by other media outlets and by Republican candidates that one of the San Bernardino shooters "openly" talked of her plans for violence.

Tashfeen Malik, who with her husband carried out the massacre in San Bernardino, Calif., passed three background checks by American immigration officials as she moved to the United States from Pakistan. None uncovered what Ms. Malik had made little effort to hide — that she talked openly on social media about her views on violent jihad.

The entire premise of that claim, which was sourced in the New York Times story only to "American law enforcement officials", was false. There's no way the "U.S. visa process" could have caught the messages from Malik because she hid them under a pseudonym, and sent privately; they were only discovered through an exhaustive search after Malik was dead.

That didn't stop multiple news organizations from running with it—none of them had any further source for the claim. The HillNew York PostFox News each cited the New York Times story in their own versions, but used no other vetting. From there it took off in the usual far-right media outlets.

And, from there, to becoming a centerpiece of Republican rhetoric during the Tuesday Republican debate, even after multiple other news services had reported the correct version. In other words, the Times' botched story gained about as high a profile as a botched story could get.  More from Eric Wemple:

This is a gigantic deal. The New York Times, after all, didn’t merely report that Malik had made public Facebook postings about her feelings about jihad; it wrapped that contention into what reads as a condemnation of the U.S. anti-terrorism apparatus.

And in fact was used as just that by Republican contenders a few days later, as anyone would expect it would be.

Pushing false information from anonymous "sources" about a major terrorism story is indeed a "gigantic deal." Perhaps not as big a deal as parroting false information from anonymous "sources" to justify an American war in the Middle East, but still a "gigantic deal." Even more problematic, this isn't the first page one story with potentially huge implications for the political race that the Times has badly blown from two of these authors. Last July Matt Apuzzo and Michael Schmidt reported in a front-paged story that the Justice Department was opening a "criminal investigation" into Hillary Clinton over her email account. It turned into one of the worst Times debacles since the Iraq War.

In the end, virtually everything about the story turned out to be wrong. Clinton was not a target. The referral was not criminal. The emails in question had not been classified at the time Clinton saw them.

Which Times readers may or may not have ever learned, as the Times originally sought to correct each misleading element one-by-one in a series of unexplained and unnoted changes to the original article; the Times' public editor called the result "to put it mildly, a mess." After publishing a screaming lede on a supposed criminal investigation into "whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information", reporter Michael Schmidt was not terribly remorseful about the multiple changes to the story reflecting that lede to be completely wrong.

“It was a response to complaints we received from the Clinton camp that we thought were reasonable, and we made them,” Schmidt said.

A bit like a reporter publishing a story about a building burning down only to begrudgingly edit it down to man lights cigarette; no casualties.

Also of special note have been Schmidt's reliable ties to whatever scandalous-sounding revelations the Trey Gowdy-led committee on Benghazi sought to promote, a running joke even without that particular botched story. He appears to be the go-to New York Time reporter for anonymously sourced claims about Hillary Clinton wrongdoing that later turn out to be little more than Gowdy-tied posturing.

So again we have to ask the Times: We've got at least two frontpage stories by the same authors that (1) appear framed to promote a high-profile Republican political claim, (2) are not just anonymously source, but hyper-anonymously sourced, and (3) are based on a “scoop” that has turned out to be completely false. What's going on here?

We know what it looks like, of course. We just want to know if there's some other explanation other than that.

Keep reading...Show less

How Did CNN Just Happen to Find Two of the Nuttiest Donald Trump Supporters on the Planet?

The CNN interview with the crazy bug-eyed lunatic—sorry, with this patriotic and super-passionate Trump supporter—raises so many wonderful questions. For those that missed it, CNN conducted a group interview with Trump supporters to see what they fancied about the gerbil-topped menace, and the star of the show turned out to be the Jus' Folks woman who (ahem) rather emphatically explained that while politicians like our sitting president are all filthy liars, Donald Trump is a not-politician not-liar who "resonates" with people like her.

As "commander" during the Bundy Ranch standoff, he helped organize the militia effort to block government officials from enforcing grazing laws at gunpoint: "We are willing to give our lives," he opined at the time. He's also the Bundy militia chief who says he sent Las Vegas cop-killers Jerad and Amanda Miller home from the Bundy camp because the murderer was just too "excitable."

“Believe me, if I would have been in that restaurant, armed, and I’d have seen them shooting at those police, I’d have shot them myself,” Delemus said. “I’d have dropped them as sure as we’re sitting here.”

The plight of true heroes everywhere—they could have saved the day for sure, had they not been stuck pointing their guns at someone else at the time.

So here's the question: How exactly did CNN just happen to stumble on two of the most radical anti-government conspiracy peddlers in the nation for a "Real Voters, Real Choices"-themed panel about Donald Trump's down-home 'Merican supporters? I'm not saying they're not representative, mind you, but that's one amazing coincidence. Did they just take the first Trump supporters they could find who weren't currently punching immigrants?

And did nobody on CNN think to, you know, maybe run their panel participants through an ol' Google search?

Again, I am more than willing to believe that unhinged birther lunatic Susan DeLemus and her Bundy-loving gun-toting potentially gubbermint-murdering husband are the true face of the Donald Trump "movement." I just wonder if everyone involved recognizes the implications of that.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump Asks His Supporters to Report on Their Neighbors: 'Most Likely You'll Be Wrong, But That's OK'

There is no bad historical idea that Donald Trump will not embrace. Or pat on the back, or lick roughly across the face, from left ear to right eyeball, in front of the gathering crowds.

Keep reading...Show less

What Is the Jade Helm Conspiracy, Stupidest Thing to Come Out of Texas in 20 Years?

The supposed Jade Helm 15 conspiracy may be the single stupidest thing to come out of Texas in 20 years, and for a state that has reliably given us such treasures as Louie Gohmert, Steve Stockman, Ted Cruz, Rick Perry, and George W. Bush himself that is saying something.

Keep reading...Show less

Districts Most Endangered by Climate Change Still Represented by Science Deniers

An irony of climate change denial: Many of the places in America that will be most severely affected by climate change are represented by Republican science deniers.

Keep reading...Show less

More than Half of Americans Willing to Concede that Poverty Is Not a Result of Character Flaws

Hey look, according to a new poll 47 percent of us aren't monsters.

Keep reading...Show less

The 8 Most Absurd Things the Right Wing Did This Year

We did it! Sweet Jeebus, we actually did it, making it through our roundup of the stupidest and most ridiculous things to have happened in this year, a year the ancient calendars warned us would be the stupidest and most ridiculous of all possible years. I want to congratulate all of you who managed to look back over all this but who did not decide to just gouge out your own eyes and be done with it—on reflection, a better choice would have been a look back at all the cutest puppies born during the year, or an extended treatise on all the various flavors of ice cream that are out there and what popular winter songs they remind us of. Ah well, at least the memories provide us with a decent reason to finish up all that increasingly-iffy nog.

Keep reading...Show less
BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.