Cody Cain

Our Constitution is amazing — but it won't save us from Trump

The United States Constitution does not guarantee democracy.

Keep reading...Show less

The Republican Party's big problem: Its only path to political success is rooted in profound deception

The Republican Party has a problem. A big problem.

Keep reading...Show less

Pardon-Palooza: Trump Could Wreak Havoc by Abusing the Presidential Pardon

So how is President Donald Trump spending his time these days on behalf of the American people? It turns out that he is huddling with his high-priced lawyers to devise strategies for deploying his presidential pardon power to thwart the Russia investigation.

Keep reading...Show less

Chip Off the Old Block: Donald Trump Jr. Tells Lies Nearly as Well as His Dad

President Donald Trump has exceeded all expectations with his astonishing volume of lies.

Keep reading...Show less

Does Vladimir Putin Really Own Donald Trump? It’s More Likely than You Think

Imagine the moment when Vladimir Putin first learned that his Russian hackers had struck gold by obtaining the emails of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Keep reading...Show less

It Takes a Village Idiot: Thanks to Donald Trump, the President May Be Chosen by a Fourth-Grade Mentality

Imagine if the president of the United States were chosen for us by the nation’s fourth-graders.

Trump “dumbs down” his messages in order to appeal to low-information voters, or, as Trump calls them, the “poorly educated.” The language and content of one of Trump’s debates during the Republican primary election was scientifically analyzed and determined to be at the fourth-grade level.

This is consistent with what we’ve seen and heard. Just think of the central Trump campaign message: “Let’s build a wall to keep out the bad guys.” To a fourth-grader, this makes a lot of sense. It is clear and simple, and it seems very logical. No need for any further thought.

But to anyone beyond the fourth-grade level who thinks just a step or two beneath the surface, building a massive wall on the Mexican border is utterly ridiculous.

Take another example of a Trump campaign message: “Let’s ban all Muslims from entering America.” To a fourth-grader, this may make sense. Muslims have conducted a number of high-profile terrorist attacks, so let’s just ban them all. Problem solved.

But anyone with a fully-formed adult brain knows that this proposal is preposterous and much worse.

Examples of Trump’s childish simplicities go on and on. Think about his statements like, “We should have taken the oil in Iraq,” or “We should impose a 45 percent tariff on China,” or “We should default on the U.S. debt and renegotiate it.” These would all make sense to a fourth-grader on a very surface level, but of course in real life, they would all lead to disastrous consequences for the nation.

Trump’s statements about himself and how he would govern are also shockingly simplistic. He says things like, “I’m a winner so we’re going to start winning,” “We must get tough,” “What the hell do you have to lose by voting for me?” “We need law and order,” and, of course, the granddaddy of them all, “Make America great again.”

All of these things sound wonderful to a fourth-grader, but Trump has nothing more to offer. This is as deep as he gets. He has no substantive explanations or proposals as to how he would actually go about governing. His messages are completely rudimentary.

And as we know all too well, Trump is fond of a highly debased form of communication that is riddled with profanity and insults, including calling people “loser,” “stupid,” “fat pig,” “moron” and the like, all to the titillating delight of juveniles.

So what is Trump up to here in being so overly simplistic? Well, the conventional wisdom is that Trump is a demagogue who intentionally seeks to exploit the “poorly educated” by appealing to them with simplistic messages that in truth carry no substance.

Based on pure demographic statistics, and leaving aside the deplorable lack of ethics of exploiting others, Trump’s approach is grounded in a rational basis. The vast majority of Americans, approximately 70 percent, possess the intelligence level of only average or below, which is roughly at or below a high-school level. Only 10 percent of the population is regarded as superior or above. So Trump’s strategy seems apparent: Aim low to capture more people.

This is exactly what our Founding Fathers feared when they created this new system of democracy. They were concerned that an abominable candidate would come along and charm the masses of uneducated voters, and then the intellectual minority would be forced to suffer the imposition of an imbecile as their president.

It is scary enough to think that a presidential candidate of today would conduct a campaign specifically targeted at the millions of voters with fourth-grade mentalities.

It is even scarier to think that such a candidate is only one step away from occupying the White House.

Keep reading...Show less

What If Donald Is Not 'Dumbing Down' and Actually Is This Dumb?

The conventional wisdom is that Donald Trump is intentionally “dumbing down” his rhetoric in order to appeal to low-information voters, or, as Trump calls them, the “poorly educated.”

Trump’s messages are indeed aimed quite low. The language and content of one of Trump’s debates during the Republican primary season was scientifically analyzed and determined to be at the fourth-grade level. One of his public news conferences was determined to be at the third-grade level.

Not that we needed scientific confirmation — Trump’s over-simplicity is obvious. Just consider his signature issue: “Let’s build a wall to keep out the bad guys.” While this may make sense to some fourth-graders, it makes no sense to sophisticated adults.

Or consider another Trump doozy: “Let’s ban all Muslims from entering America.” Some fourth-graders might think this is logical, but serious adults know it is ludicrous.

The examples of Trump’s childish simplicities and outright idiocy go on and on. Think about his statements like, “We should have taken the oil in Iraq,” or “We should impose a 45 percent tariff on China,” or “We should default on the U.S. debt and renegotiate it.” These might all make sense to a fourth-grader on a very surface level, but in real life they would all lead to disastrous consequences for the nation.

And as we know all too well, Trump is fond of a highly juvenile form of communication that is riddled with profanity and insults, including calling people “loser,” “stupid,” “fat pig,” “moron” and the like.

So what is Trump up to here in dumbing down his messages? Well, the conventional wisdom holds that there is method in his madness. And indeed, exploiting the “poorly educated” may be a rational political strategy because of how many of them there are. That is, of course, if you have no problem ignoring the deplorable lack of ethics in exploiting other people.

The vast majority of Americans, approximately 70 percent, possess an intelligence level of only average or below, which is roughly at or below a high-school level. Only 10 percent of the population is regarded as superior or above. So Trump’s strategy seems apparent: Aim low to capture more people.

But perhaps the conventional wisdom about Trump is wrong. Perhaps Trump is not in fact exploiting people of low intelligence, but rather a single person of low intelligence: himself. Perhaps Trump is, in fact, one of them. Perhaps Trump possesses a very low level of intelligence himself.

Actually, this makes a lot of sense. If Trump were a person of high intelligence who was only playacting to appeal to voters of low intelligence, he would still be able to communicate at a higher level as well. But Trump has never been able to communicate at a sophisticated level.

Trump’s inadequacies were on full display during his first presidential debate against Hillary Clinton. Trump was a disaster. He failed to articulate coherent answers to many of the most obvious questions. He was unable to defend against Clinton’s anticipated assertions. And he simply could not execute the most basic debating skills of quickly answering questions about his weaknesses and then pivoting to strengths. Plus, he was like a child who could not control himself from fidgeting, making silly faces, shouting, and constantly interrupting.

Keep reading...Show less

Trump's Liar-In-Chief: Since Joining His Staff, Kellyanne Conway Has Been Living in a World of Make-Believe

When Kellyanne Conway became the new campaign manager two weeks ago for Donald Trump, she established her hallmark right out of the gate: lying. It began with the circumstances of her hiring. Everyone knew that her appointment meant that Trump’s existing campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was out. This sort of reshuffling generates bad publicity for a campaign because such a major shake-up only two months before an election indicates turmoil within the organization. Conway’s solution to the problem was simple: to just lie. This is really not a shake-up, she insisted. Instead, she characterized it as an “expansion.” She claimed that Manafort would remain in his job and she would merely join Manafort along with Stephen Bannon, the new campaign CEO who was also brought in at the same time as Conway. She painted a lovely picture that the three of them would work together in perfect harmony to run the campaign all the way through until the election. Two days later, Manafort was gone.

This, of course, is absurd. Trump is the king of hurling personal insults. Even Megyn Kelly on her Fox News program scolded Conway for this doozy. “Now, you know that’s not true,” Kelly said.

When pushed on this, Conway has shamelessly tried to seek a moral high ground. “I don’t like when people hurl personal insults,” she said. “I’m the mother of four small children. That would be a terrible example for me to feel otherwise.” But yet there she is, stumping as the campaign manager for someone who should never become a role model for children.

After Trump flip-flopped on his immigration position by saying he could “soften” by not immediately deporting all of the 11 million undocumented immigrants who are already in America, Conway took to the airwaves to insist that Trump had not changed his position at all. This was stunning because, of course, shifting from a proposal to deport them to a plan to not deport them sure seems like a change. “I assure you,” Conway said. “Nothing has changed.” Once again, her statements simply bear no resemblance to reality.

Sometimes Conway’s statements are the exact opposite of reality. For example, Conway maintains that Trump desires to focus on substance and policy, whereas Clinton just wishes to pursue attacks and insults.

The world is upside down. Conway has it precisely backward. It is Trump who lacks substance and policies. He even said himself that voters don’t care about policies, and he mocked Clinton for producing policies. Trump’s campaign is hardly based upon substance and policies; rather it is based upon instilling fear without any regard for the truth. A recent fact-checking report determined that Trump’s claims are false or mostly false a whopping 78 percent of the time. Conway reinforces this cult of egregious lying.

Clinton, on the other hand, is a decided policy wonk who has offered a healthy abundance of facts and policy proposals during the course of her campaign.

It is obvious to see that Trump’s forte is casting insults whereas Clinton’s forte is substance and policy.

Conway’s utter lack of regard for honesty is simply breathtaking. She seems to feel completely free to say anything whatsoever, regardless of whether it has any basis in truth. She appears to have absolutely no concern that lying is morally wrong. It’s like she is missing the morality gene. She will say whatever portrays Trump in the most favorable light at a particular moment, regardless of whether it is accurate.

In fact, the overall message about Trump that Conway presented to the public when she took over as  campaign manager seems to have been based upon deceit as well. She announced that her new strategy would be to let Trump be Trump. This was clearly designed to reassure Trump’s core supporters that they could count on the candidate remaining true to the principles that had attracted them in the first place.

But in practice, Conway has done the exact opposite. If Trump were being his true self, he would be giving unscripted speeches off the top of his head and insulting all sorts of people. But Conway now has Trump chained to a teleprompter. This is hardly letting Trump be Trump. His “softening” on immigration is not Trump being Trump but clearly is aimed at attempting to attract Latino voters. And scaling back Trump’s insults is certainly not letting Trump be Trump.

Instead, Conway is attempting to change Trump’s behavior and positions in order to attract more voters, while simultaneously reassuring his base of supporters that Trump is not changing at all. She is speaking out of two sides of her mouth, and these two opposing positions cannot both be true.

Considering that she’s been on the job only two weeks, that sure is a whole lot of lying.

Clearly, Conway has no regard for the principle of conducting oneself with honor and integrity. As a result of her actions, she now has zero credibility. Not a single word that passes through her teeth can be trusted. If Trump were to win the election, all the lying and deception would be rewarded. This would be horrendous. For one thing, it would be morally unjust.
In fact, the lying alone provides sufficient justification for not voting for Trump. Furthermore, a win by Trump would lead to a proliferation of more and more deceitful campaigns and candidates, and thus politics in general would undergo a disastrous downward spiral.
If, on the other hand, Trump were to lose the election in an enormous landslide, this would send a very clear message that voters will not tolerate egregious lying. Subsequent candidates would be on notice that they will pay a price for waging campaigns of deceit. Voters possess the power to fix this problem at the polls by rejecting candidates who lie and casting ballots in favor of the virtue of telling the truth.
Keep reading...Show less

Marketer-In-Chief: Is Donald Trump Only Running for President to Exploit the Business Opportunities?

Could it be possible that Donald Trump’s entire presidential candidacy was cooked up out of a grand marketing scheme?

Keep reading...Show less

This Week, Donald Trump Reminded Us of Something Very Important: His Disdain for Women Oozes From His Pores

Donald Trump claims that he “loves” women, “cherishes” women, and that as president he will be great for women.

Keep reading...Show less

WATCH: The Trump Interview That Should Have Ended His Candidacy Once and for All

Donald Trump gave an interview this week all of his potential supporters should watch. In his own words, Trump lays bare the very reasons why he would be such a disastrous choice for president.

Keep reading...Show less
BRAND NEW STORIES
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.