trump ballroom

Trump looted nearly $1 billion from 'struggling' National Parks to pay for vanity projects

In March, President Donald Trump claimed that a series of flippant White House renovations costing $1.3 million were “paid for by me,” but new reporting in the Atlantic has revealed that, in fact, American taxpayers footed the bill in the form of funding looted from the already struggling National Parks Service. What's more, Trump has diverted a total of nearly $1 billion to cover his D.C. vanity projects, forcing the Parks Service to cancel hundreds of badly needed improvements.

As reporter Michael Scherer explains, “The pathway that connects the White House residence to the Oval Office has long been paved in Tennessee flagstone. Every president since Harry Truman made the 45-second commute, and made it without complaint, until Donald Trump. The dun rock would not do. Instead, Trump wanted polished African granite, carved in Italy, with a flamed-finish stripe — slightly raised, to prevent slips — running down the middle. As workers tore up the flagstone last March, a reporter asked Trump who was paying for the enhancements. ‘Paid for by me,’ he replied. But that wasn’t true.”

According to budget documents from the National Park Service obtained by Scherer, “the walkway replacement cost taxpayers $689,232, and is part of a $1.3 million project that included repairing adjacent stone and masonry and providing new hardware for nearby doors. A year earlier, in a separate ‘Rush project at request of POTUS,’ the Park Service spent $347,503 to remove and replace the stucco on the colonnade wall, a project that cleared the way for Trump to affix gold frames and plaques mocking some of his predecessors.”

This, notes Scherer, is a massive shift of taxpayer funds away from National Parks across the country, and as a result, “parks have had to cancel needed repairs, slash their budgets and operate with fewer employees. Taxpayer spending on projects in the National Capital Region has increased 92 percent over the past year… The windfall draws on revolving maintenance accounts and more than $100 million in fees collected almost entirely from National Parks elsewhere.”

Instead of National Parks, the money has gone to Trump’s disastrous Reflecting Pool debacle, the refurbishment of fountains, coating statues with gold and his $1.6 million Fourth of July fireworks display — which he has vowed will be the largest in history — among other efforts in D.C. According to Scherer, Trump’s requests for billions more have been rejected by Congress.

“As Trump attempts to adorn his immediate surroundings with taxpayer-funded improvements, other parks are going without,” explains Scherer. “Park Service employees I spoke with describe a quiet crisis unfolding as the Interior Department’s regular budget shrinks and political appointees redirect the dwindling funds. More than 900 Park Service projects that were expected to be funded this year never received the money, according to internal records. They include a $1.5 million roof-replacement project at the Yellowstone Center for Resources to halt pest invasions and water leaks, more than $3 million to continue operating the free-bus system in Acadia National Park and a roughly $424,000 guardrail replacement on the cliff edge of Black Canyon in Colorado’s Gunnison National Park, a project needed to rectify a ‘significant safety hazard for visitors.’”

“The president is prioritizing D.C. at the expense of parks throughout the country,” said Emily Douce, a lobbyist for the National Parks Conservation Association. “There is $24 billion of maintenance needs throughout the National Park Service system, and adding these new vanity projects just adds to the need.”

The numbers that Scherer lays out are shocking. According to “dozens of pages of budgetary documentation,” there has been “an $854 million, or 68 percent, decrease in spending on projects in park regions outside the Washington area in the first eight and a half months of fiscal year 2026, compared with the full prior fiscal year. That includes a $235 million decrease in spending in Pacific West parks such as Yosemite, a $254 million decrease in the Intermountain Region parks such as Yellowstone, and a $33 million decrease in Alaska. During that same period, spending around Washington increased by about $100 million, not counting about $310 million in donations that the Park Service received from allies of the president, most of which is going to fund a new White House ballroom.”

A Park Service employee who was not authorized to speak with the media told Scherer that some parks and projects have had “nearly 70 percent of their approved anticipated project funds pulled back,” forcing them to delay making crucial repairs to historic structures, hiring interns, and ensuring that trails are wheelchair accessible. “It means that signage and exhibits won’t be improved,youth programs can’t be offered, that a trail is not improved,” said the employee.

Judge reveals Trump’s strategy: 'Break things' so fast no one can stop him

Over the course of both Trump terms, he and his allies have used a “flood the zone” approach where they attempt to overwhelm opponents with controversial actions and statements so quickly that response becomes impossible. Now, the court wrangling over President Donald Trump’s controversial ballroom reveals that he applies a similar strategy to his vanity and construction projects: “move fast and break things and nobody has standing.”

This is according to Lawfare senior editor Molly Roberts, who was directly quoting the judge overseeing the case — a characterization with which Trump’s lawyers openly agreed.

Roberts was on hand for the oral arguments between attorneys representing the White House and those for the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the latter of which had filed for an injunction barring construction while the case was heard. That injunction was granted while allowing only construction “strictly necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House and its grounds” to continue pending appeal. The White House then tried to argue that the ruling actually allowed for the construction of the ballroom, arguing that the whole thing was vital for security, which the judge did not buy, reaffirming that aboveground construction must halt until approved by Congress. The president’s ‘break things’ approach was revealed in the subsequent appeal.

According to Roberts, these latest appeal proceedings are “simultaneously more like and more unlike your typical litigation than those following the matter might have expected. More like, because the lawyer presenting for the government sounds like a lawyer and not the president on a Truth Social spree… Less like, because what this lawyer is saying is that neither these judges nor any can stop the administration from building what it wants to build once it has started building them. Not now, not ever.”

During oral arguments, after much back and forth, the White House lawyers essentially argued that once the president had already taken certain actions on the basis of security — such as, say, bulldozing the White House East Wing — there was no legal mechanism allowing a lawsuit to be brought against the government. The judge then raised a specific example: what if the White House were gone? Say an administration decides that security justifies an entirely new building, tears down the White House, and then someone decides to sue. Would such a suit be legal?

According to Roberts, White House lawyers argued that it would not be if the destruction of the original White House had already occurred.

“So move fast and break things and nobody has standing?” asked the judge. “Bulldoze the Statue of Liberty, and as long as the government does it fast enough, too bad, nothing to be done?”

“I think that’s right,” said the White House attorney.

What’s more, the judge had an important question about what would happen were construction allowed to proceed while the case was heard. If the government lost a year or so down the line and the ballroom was declared illegal, would the White House tear it down, or would its argument, “for the same safety and security reasons, be we can’t take it down?” The White agreed with the latter.

“So your position is this can’t be stopped by a court?” the judge asked. “That court, this court, the Supreme Court, no court could stop the building of this?”

The White House agreed.

“If this were complete lawlessness by the government,” the judge pressed, “it couldn’t be stopped?”

“Yes,” Roberts explained. According to the Trump administration, “even if the ballroom construction were complete lawlessness by the government, only Congress — not the courts — would have any independent role in stopping it.”

Rubio 'unaware' his own agency sent Trump ballroom chief to Russia

This week, far-right figures from around the world have gathered in Russia for an economic forum nicknamed “Putin’s Davos.” Among the attendees is Rodney Mims Cook Jr., the commissioner tasked with overseeing President Donald Trump’s highly contested White House ballroom project. While Cook has gotten much attention from Russian media as he’s shown off Trump’s ballroom, there seems to be some confusion within the U.S. government as to what he’s doing there, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying he is “unaware” of an American delegation to the event while Cook himself claims he was sent by Trump and urged to go by the State Department, which Rubio oversees.

“According to Russian media, Trump's ballroom commissioner, Rodney Mims Cook, told Russian press that Trump and the State Department permitted him to travel to Russia for the economic forum in St Petersburg,” reports Olga Lautman, senior Russian intelligence expert at the Center for European Policy Analysis. “He also said the [State Dept.] thought his travel to Russia was a good idea.”

Said Cook to Russian media, "The President and the State Department allowed me to come over to say hello and see what could come out of this in the long term. … The President's allowing me to come over could open up new avenues. This is purely an observation to see where this might lead.”

Cook’s assertion is interesting in the context of a statement from Rubio, who said he was “unaware” that a U.S. delegation was at the forum. Rubio oversees the State Department and works closely with Trump, raising questions about the daylight between his and Cook’s claims. According to Financial Times Moscow Bureau chief Max Seddon, Cook “is an ardent Russophile. He has been involved in restoring medieval Russian churches for decades. His own house in Georgia is designed in the Russian style. He says he is friends with many senior Russian elite figures. He seems absolutely thrilled to be there.”

Said government affairs expert Alex Goldenberg, Senior Fellow at the Rutgers Miller Center, “The Kremlin courts the people it assesses as useful for widening America’s divisions, the specific issue is incidental. They’ll stoke whatever fracture is available.” Interestingly enough, Goldenberg was speaking about Candace Owens, a far-right influencer and former Trump ally who is also appearing at the event. “Moscow extended the platform and that tells you how they see her, as someone whose reach can be turned into division or political capital. The Soviets had a term for Western sympathizers like Candace Owens. It translates roughly to useful idiot.”

“Maybe that’s why Trump’s ballroom commissioner is in St Petersburg,” suggested Lautman, pointing to recent news that funding for the president’s controversial ballroom had just been scrapped.

Cook and Owens aren’t the only figures from Trump’s orbit to attend. Also there is the Trump-supporting actor Steven Seagal, an ardent fan of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who spoke at the event of a Hollywood that has been taken over by “one mafia that is controlling all of the movies,” as well as the misogynist manosphere influencers Andrew and Christian Tate, who face numerous charges in Romania and the UK.

As these and other attendees gathered in St. Petersburg, the skies above were thick with smoke from a Ukrainian drone attack.

Republican details why 'arsonist' Trump revels in his DC destruction

In recent weeks, photos of the White House marred by construction have sparked widespread debate over President Donald Trump’s expansive efforts to reshape its appearance and use. According to lifetime Republican and co-founder of the Lincoln Project Steve Schmidt, “A healthy nation would recoil in disgust.”

“The White House isn’t Donald Trump’s house,” Schmidt reminds. “It doesn’t belong to him. It never did. It’s the People’s House. It’s the symbolic center of the American Republic… where presidents have stood in moments of triumph and agony to speak to the conscience of a nation. It’s where Abraham Lincoln walked the halls while the Republic bled. It’s where Franklin Roosevelt steadied a frightened people during depression and war. It’s where John F. Kennedy summoned Americans to service, where Ronald Reagan spoke of freedom, where Barack Obama represented the long arc of American history bending, painfully and imperfectly, toward justice.”

Now, it’s the site of Trump’s vanity projects and effort to construct a ballroom bunker, and, as before-and-after photos shared by Schmidt show, what was once a lushly manicured grounds is now a gaping eyesore.

“The desecration of the White House grounds isn’t cosmetic,” asserts Schmidt. “It isn’t harmless. It isn’t some eccentric decorating choice by a vulgar and tasteless man. It’s an act of contempt. It’s an act of arrogance. It’s an act of historical vandalism committed by a man who believes himself greater than the nation he was temporarily entrusted to lead. Trump has substantially wrecked the White House because destruction excites him. He’s an arsonist at heart.”

While Trump has referred to himself as a “builder president,” Schmidt argues that this is not the case. Instead, Trump is a “taker” and a “destroyer” — the type of man who looks at beauty and feels “resentment.”

“They look at history and feel excluded by it,” says Schmidt. “Their instinct isn’t stewardship. It’s domination. Their impulse isn’t reverence. It’s desecration. The arsonist isn’t satisfied until everyone else smells the smoke. That’s Trump. He’s America’s Nero.”

As Schmidt notes, “Nero didn’t merely govern badly. He degraded Rome itself. He transformed power into spectacle. Vanity into governance. Cruelty into entertainment. He reduced public life into an endless pageant celebrating his appetites, his grievances and his compulsions.”

“Trump has done the same,” Schmidt argues. “The White House now bears the fingerprints of a man incapable of understanding restraint, dignity or civic reverence. Every grotesque alteration is an expression of his diseased ego. Every debased image is another reminder that the American presidency has been occupied by a man who confuses ownership with stewardship.”

Polling suggests that Americans overwhelmingly agree with Schmidt’s assessment, with voters who oppose Trump’s ballroom project outnumbering those who support it by a ratio of 2-to-1. Even so, as Schmidt notes, there has been a lack of public outcry over the president’s efforts.

“A healthy nation would recoil in disgust,” says Schmidt. “Instead, there is indifference. Shrugs. Exhaustion. The normalization of desecration. That indifference is dangerous. It’s a signal fire to Trump. It tells him there are no limits. It encourages the next outrage. The next assault. The next act of constitutional vandalism.”

He argues that “the American people must rise in defiance and disgust — not merely against Trump the politician, but against Trumpism itself — this diseased celebration of vulgarity, cruelty, ignorance, corruption and destruction. The answer to the arsonist can’t be passivity. The answer to the taker can’t be surrender. What’s required is moral clarity. Civic courage. Public outrage. Patriotic defiance.”

In the end, he suggests, “The White House matters because symbols matter. A nation without reverence for its civic inheritance is a nation already in decline.”

Trump triggers 'rare and dramatic GOP revolt': Fox News analyst

According to Fox News analyst Howard Kurtz, a change has come over congressional Republicans in recent days. Instead of rubberstamping President Donald Trump’s every demand and whim, a new dynamic has emerged. This time, and for the first time in his second term, “Trump did something beyond the pale and the brave Republicans are standing up to him.”

“It's a revolt,” writes Kurtz. “Practically a revolution,” as Republicans are finally pushed to a point that “seems to be breaking, or at least loosening, Trump's iron grip on power.”

Kurtz says that the key issue driving this change was “Trump's decision to use $1.8 billion largely for those convicted of crimes on Jan. 6,” which the Fox contributor argues was “the culmination of a five-year effort by the president to recast the protestors, who he had summoned to Washington and directed to march to the Capitol, as patriots, not lawbreakers. That is inconveniently contradicted by the relentless violence we all saw on our television screens as the riot unfolded. It was one of the darkest days in American history.”

Many Republicans expressed disgust at what has been criticized as a “slush fund” immediately after it was announced, but according to Kurtz, things really “exploded” after Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Senate Republicans.

"My guess is there’re probably 45 senators in the room, at least half of them were blasting the attorney general… They were screaming at the acting attorney general," said Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), calling it a "full-on revolt."

And Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) put it like this: "So the nation’s top law enforcement official is asking for a slush fund to pay people who assault cops? Utterly stupid, morally wrong – Take your pick."

Following the “fiery session” with Blanche, Republican leaders killed a vote that was scheduled the same day on one of their key priorities — funding immigration and border enforcement — rather than risk the possibility of having to vote on the slush fund, which would force them to give a public “yay” to the widely criticized idea or a “nay” to the president. At the same time, they also failed to approve $1 billion for Trump’s ballroom obsession.

What’s more, for the first time, Republicans are broadly criticizing Trump’s plans regarding Iran. "Doesn’t make too much sense to me," said Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC). And said Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) — arguably the staunchest Iran war hawk in Congress — the current situation "makes one wonder why the war started to begin with."

“Maybe the previously unthinkable idea of Republicans openly challenging Trump is catching on,” Kurtz concludes. “They're mad as hell, and they're not going to take it anymore.”

Photos show White House ruined by 'construction chaos' as Trump ignores voter concerns

New photos of the White House show it immersed in what the Daily Beast calls “construction chaos” as President Donald Trump continues to prioritize his vanity projects over voter concerns. The grounds were already swamped with construction as Trump’s controversial ballroom project progresses regardless of vocal opposition, and now “the People’s House” is being further blighted by renovations as the president prepares to mark his 80th birthday with UFC cage matches in front of the White House this June.

According to Republican operatives who spoke with the Daily Beast, the construction projects don’t just look ugly, but are sending a negative message to Americans struggling with skyrocketing prices and a spiraling economy due to Trump’s war with Iran.

“For voters, the message that is coming from the White House is Trump is focused on vanity projects and foreign policy,” said one operative. “And those are things that voters don’t care about.”

“Trump continues to talk about things that no one cares about,” agreed another.

With 90 percent of Americans reporting an affordability crisis, Trump is persistent in his denial. When asked about the economic downturn, he claimed, “This is peanuts. I appreciate everybody putting up with it for a little while. It won’t be much longer.” He made the statement while standing in front of his ballroom construction “eyesore.”

In early May, Trump was even more blunt about where he places the American pocketbook on his list of priorities. When asked how much the finances of Americans factored into his war considerations, he declared, “Not even a little bit… I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation.”

At the same time, Trump is asking for big money to pay for his vanity projects, which continue to grow in number. For the ballroom alone, he’s demanding that Congress provide as much as $1 billion, even though he began the project saying its $400 million price tag would be paid by private donors. On top of that, he wants an estimated $100 million to build a 250-foot arch that will loom over DC, has allocated $40 million for a statuary garden, is pouring over $13 million into repainting the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool (a project that has already been botched), has spent untold sums renovating the White House to align with his taste for golden trim, and the list goes on.

While the White House UFC event will supposedly be paid for by the fighting organization, Trump’s decision to hold it at all has been criticized as unpresidential, even by some in the MMA community. Star fighter Brandon Royval, for example, has referred to it as “some kind of Hunger Games type f—— s——.”

Republicans finally see the writing on the wall: DC insider

While President Donald Trump’s approval ratings have been in freefall since January, according to former Jimmy Carter speechwriter James Fallows, the “real milestone” has only come in recent days as the very Republicans who enabled Trump have begun turning against him, having realized that “he won’t be here forever.” The public was way ahead of GOP lawmakers when it came to bailing on the president over war, the melting economy, and other issues, and now conservative lawmakers are beginning to respond to their angry constituents. Says Fallows, this is the dawn of the “post-Trump era.”

“As everyone except Trump himself seems to realize,” writes Fallows, “the primary-election results of this past week make his impending lame-duck-hood seem more real. He keeps showing tighter and tighter control, over a smaller and smaller pure-MAGA cult base. He can still rally his loyalists to knock off any Republican who has displeased him. But the obvious cost is smoothing the path for Democrats in the fall.”

A clear sign that Republicans are finally seeing the writing on the wall came earlier this week, when conservative lawmakers put up a halfhearted, failed fight for his ballroom funding, then broadly rejected his attempt to establish a “slush fund” for J6ers. While Trump may cajole them into a deal yet, Fallows says that “this little crack in previously solid GOP support is like the first mocking laugh in The Emperor’s New Clothes, or the peek behind the curtain in The Wizard of Oz. The magic cloak of invincibility has slipped off, revealing the enfeebled man inside.”

Republicans who dare to dream beyond the Trump era, says Fallows, must have come to the understanding that what is good for the president, like a ballroom or slush fund, is looking “less and less good for them” every day. Trump managed to defeat his in-party adversaries in a number of primaries recently, “but the primary season is almost over and that leverage will be gone.”

As a result, a growing number of Republicans are splitting with the president, having recognized that “something will come after Trump.” One of those “somethings,” warns Fallows, is the enormous effort that will be required to fix the mess he’s made, which won’t be easy. “The work of recovery when he is gone will take many decades, and may be impossible in some areas,” explains Fallows. “For instance: How will Europe, Canada, Mexico, Japan ever ‘trust’ US ‘leadership’ again?”

But “as the end of Trump’s era begins to come into view,” Fallows asserts that Republican voters disillusioned by the president need to ask “why their representatives turned a blind eye to these abuses for so long."

'President under siege': Trump revelation proves he’s retreating to his 'bunker phase'

Authoritarians and their bunkers have a long and storied history. Probably the most well-known was Adolf Hitler, who spent his ignominious final hours holed up in a bunker in Berlin. And in recent weeks, Russian strongman Vladimir Putin has been hiding out from a rumored incipient coup in a palatial bunker of his own. Now, wonders i Paper contributor Sarah Baxter, has President Donald Trump “entered the bunker phase of his presidency?” Maybe or maybe not, but two things are certain: he is building a bunker, and he “knows” his presidency is failing.

According to Baxter, evidence of Trump’s inclination to hunker in his bunker came earlier this week, when he expressed hesitancy at leaving the White House to attend his son’s wedding, saying, “Uhhhh. He’d like me to go. I’m gonna try and make it. But it’s going to be just a small, little private affair… I said, ‘This is not good timing for me. I have a thing called Iran and other things.’”

As others have pointed out, his desire to remain on and fortify the White House campus has grown over the course of his second term, particularly since the attempted assassination at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in April. And while he’d already been pushing for his ballroom for a year at that point, his brush with death spurred him to make it a key priority and crank up the security costs.

Writes Baxter, “For an estimated cost of $1 billion, a bill taxpayers would foot, the ballroom will extend six floors underground, with its own command and communications center, military hospital, and a hardened roof of ‘impenetrable steel’ with a base ‘for unlimited numbers of drones,’ Trump said excitedly on a tour of the site. There can be no more powerful symbol of a president under siege.”

But Trump’s project has hit a roadblock as Congress has balked at his billion-dollar request, with Democrats using parliamentary procedure to kill the funding and Republicans panicking in the face of growing midterm headwinds. The president’s tendency to attack those in his own party by endorsing primary challengers has only entrenched resistance, as “the finely-balanced Senate and House now harbor several seriously disaffected Republican lawmakers who have suddenly found a spine now they have been deselected and have nothing left to lose. They are bent on scuttling Trump’s plans.”

What’s more, writes Baxter, “Indulging the President — whose approval rating stands at just 35 percent, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll — risks alienating the substantial slice of voters outside the Trump bunker who are furious about inflation, fuel prices and the Iran war.” But, “Trump usually gets what Trump wants, so I wouldn’t set too much store by these stirrings of rebellion. He is more disinhibited than ever and less inclined to care what anybody thinks.” And with the ballroom construction already underway with a projected completion date of late 2028 — right before Trump is supposed to leave office — some have suggested that he might follow Putin’s example and attempt to stay put.

It’s not such a far-fetched assertion. Following his loss in 2020, Trump reportedly told an aide, “I’m just not going to leave,” telling another, “We’re never leaving — how can you leave when you won an election?” And while on the campaign trail in 2024, he himself said, “I shouldn’t have left.”

So with that in mind, “What are the odds that, come January 2029, Trump will be holed up in his bunker, refusing to leave the White House?” Baxter wonders. “If I were a gambler, I’d place a bet in the prediction markets on this.”

John Cleese worries all Americans have been 'tarred by the MAGA brush'

John Cleese may be a famed funnyman, but on Wednesday, the Englishman delivered a not-so-hilarious assessment of his neighbors across the Atlantic, tweeting, "I'm afraid that all Americans are becoming tarred by the MAGA brush."

The co-founder of the renowned comedy troupe Monty Python made this assertion above a retweet of Gavin Newsom, in which the California governor decried, "The slush fund. The ballroom. The IRS get-out-of-jail-free card. Donald Trump isn’t serving the American people — he’s serving himself. And he thinks you’re dumb enough to fall for it."

This is in reference to President Donald Trump's billion-dollar ballroom project, as well as his recent settlement with the IRS, which established what critics have called a "slush fund" for January 6 rioters.

In the case of his ballroom, opposition to the effort has risen along with its projected costs. At the beginning of the project, Trump assured Americans that its $400 million price tag would be paid by donors, but recently, that number has leapt up to $1 billion, with the president now demanding it be paid using tax dollars. Americans overwhelmingly oppose it.

Then announced on Monday, the creation of a so-called "anti-weaponization" fund has prompted bipartisan outrage. Police officers injured in the January 6th attack on the Capitol have sued to stop payouts, and House Republicans have signaled their intention to "kill it."

Regardless of this pushback, Cleese doesn't seem optimistic about how it will impact the global perception of Americans.

"All my American friends — of whom there are many," he warned, "are going to experience hostility that they do not deserve."

Cleese's comments reflect growing international concern about America's political trajectory.

Across Europe and beyond, observers have expressed alarm at what they perceive as institutional erosion and the prioritization of personal interests over democratic principles. The comedian's warning suggests that the reputational damage extends beyond partisan divides—it threatens to taint America's global standing and the experiences of ordinary citizens abroad. International allies have grown increasingly skeptical of American leadership, and figures like Cleese worry that everyday Americans will bear the consequences of their government's actions through diminished soft power and goodwill.

His remarks underscore a broader sentiment: that the world is watching, and America's democratic institutions face a credibility crisis that may take years to repair. For Americans traveling or living internationally, Cleese implies, the political dysfunction at home translates into real-world prejudice they must navigate, regardless of their personal political beliefs or involvement in current events.

Inside the Dem maneuver that just blew up Trump's ballroom

There has been much debate lately over President Donald Trump’s ballroom construction project, which he started under the assertion that its $400 million price tag would be covered by private donors, only to more recently up the cost to $1 billion, which would be paid by taxpayers. Then on Monday, Senate Republicans lost their bid to approve a security spending package for the ballroom in the face of Democratic opposition. On Wednesday, one Democratic Senator revealed how they did it.

In a video posted to X with the text, “Bye-Bye Billionaire Ballroom,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (R-RI) explained how the reconciliation process that tanked the funding package unfolded.

“In order to get the funding through the reconciliation process, the Republicans had to give reconciliation instructions to all the relevant committees,” he explained. “Well, I’m the top Democrat on the Environment and Public Works Committee. Martin Heinrich is the top Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. And guess what? The White House is a public building under the jurisdiction of the Environment and Public Works Committee, and it’s in a national park under the jurisdiction of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. And the Republicans managed not to give reconciliation instructions to either committee.”

This allowed Democratic lawyers to argue that the reconciliation was “defective” and that money couldn’t be allocated to the project because there was “no proper instruction allowing money to go to the ballroom.”

“We won that argument. It was well prepared and well delivered, and it took only one day for the parliamentarian to decide that in fact, the ballroom being added to the reconciliation bill was defective, and it had to fall. So bye-bye billionaire ballroom.”

Trump was not happy with this outcome. On Wednesday, he demanded that Senate Republicans fire the nonpartisan Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough in retaliation for her decision.

“Shockingly, Republicans have kept the very important position of ‘Parliamentarian’ in the hands of a woman, Elizabeth MacDonough, who was appointed, long ago, by Barack Hussein Obama and a vicious Lunatic known as Senator Harry Reid, who ran the Senate for the Dumocrats with an ‘iron fist,’” posted the president in a lengthy Truth Social tirade. “Over the years, she has been brutal to Republicans, but not so to the Dumocrats — So why has she not been replaced?”

As Politico notes, “Obama did not have a say in MacDonough’s appointment in 2012.”

“That’s, I guess, his opinion,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) when asked about Trump’s demand.

According to Politico, “The decision was a significant setback for Republicans, who had hoped to pass the funding with a simple majority vote as part of a broader immigration and border security package. MacDonough determined that the provision requires 60 votes in the Senate, all but dooming the idea.”

In related news, efforts appear to be ramping up to kill funding for another of Trump’s highly criticized projects: the creation of a $1.8 billion “slush fund” that critics say will give taxpayer dollars to those convicted of crimes during the January 6 insurrection, as well as other Trump loyalists.

Even Republicans — who rarely oppose the president’s actions — have been troubled by the fund. Speaking on the matter on Wednesday, Republican Representative Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) was blunt about the next step: “We’re gonna kill it.”

Insider: Anger mounting as Trump obsesses on decorating projects as nation burns

As the economy flounders and the war with Iran remains an open-ended question, President Donald Trump is firmly dedicated to what one former staffer suggests may be his top priority: overseeing the finer points of his construction projects. In addition to his billion-dollar ballroom, the 250-foot arch that will loom over Washington, the repainting of the reflective pool, and other endeavors, it was announced on Monday that he was adding a new White House helipad to the list.

While some might wonder why he’s not paying as much attention to issues that impact everyday Americans, like the economy, as Politico executive editor Anne McElvoy notes, Trump “has a burning desire to leave his mark on everything he touches.” Accordingly, he is “committing huge amounts of time and resources to recreating the White House in his own image.” And while a White House spokesman has asserted that the renovations will “benefit future presidents and Americans,” “underlying this frenetic domestic improvement push by a second-term President is a telling statement of where Trumpian priorities lie, and how often they appear to be distractions from the more testing matters of dealing with world affairs."

For example, as McElvoy explains, “Trump is now veering between war room meetings with huge implications for the global economy to sessions on the minutiae of the ballroom complex, as well as decisions over the helipad and whether granite features should be black or grey.” According to one former Trump staffer, the president has “a phenomenal attention to detail — even down to the lettering on a building or a door handle — when it is a passion project, and none at all if it isn’t.”

So while it might seem like he should be attending to matters like whether or not he’ll continue strikes against Iran, or handling the rise of Chinese power, or attempting to mitigate the inflation crisis, Trump is busy decorating because that’s what he really cares about.

With so many crises looming, says McElvoy, “Not many occupants of the West Wing would combine them with near-daily attention to what is happening on a pet building project… But such is life in the zig-zag attention world of the current US President. All of this leaves even some exhausted Republicans worrying that the chief White House resident might be more concerned with the decor than global security — or indeed, that having done all the fixtures and fittings, he may be loathed to leave the place when his term is up.”

In the meantime, Trump will continue to focus on what matters to him most: the finer points of his vanity projects. And as McElvoy warns, “The President’s attention is being subsumed by such details at arguably one of the most critical periods in recent US foreign policy.”

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.