senator dianne feinstein

Fox pundit roasts 'bunch' of MAGA ‘betas’ ogling hot Dem nemesis

Mediaite reports Fox News liberal commentator Jessica Tarlov got a good dig in on MAGA enthusiasts who twice drooled over the photo of left-wing streamer Hasan Piker at the Republican midterm convention.

Piker in his underclothes appeared not once but twice on the convention jumbotron, which pressed Tarlov to quip that the gathering amounted to “a bunch of betas standing around looking at a half-naked socialist.”

The photo of the extremely underdressed Piker, pulled from the streamer’s Instagram, hit the arena’s massive jumbotron as part of a video montage targeting the political left on Wednesday, where it preceded Texas Attorney General and Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton. It was then shown again during the convention’s second night on Thursday, preceding speakers like Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), Rep. Lisa McClain (R-Mich.), Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., former White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Donald Trump Jr.

Piker’s photo showed him posing for a mirror selfie.

Tarlov’s swat followed a conversation about the RNC’s convention attendance with Fox News’ Jesse Watters confessing on Friday’s edition of The Five that “There was some concern, Jessica, even among Republicans, that they weren’t gonna be able to pull the convention off.”

“But it does seem they did a pretty good job,” Watters added.

“Yeah, well, they got all the best photos of Hasan Piker in a Speedo so — ” Tarlov said, drawing laughter from her co-hosts.

“I missed that,” Watters claimed.

“You missed the banana hammock situation?” Tarlov pressed.

“I missed that,” Watters repeated between giggles.

“But they used it both nights,” Tarlov prodded.

“Nope, I didn’t catch it,” Watters insisted.

Tarlov then implied that Watters may have missed the best part of the convention.

“That’s how ripped he is, for a bunch of betas standing around looking at a half-naked socialist,” she said.

Mediaite reports that even Piker reacted to The Five’s Friday discussion on his stream, remarking on the convention’s choice to use the photo.

“It doesn’t make any sense, ’cause like that doesn’t make us look bad, that doesn’t make the movement look bad. It kinda makes their criticisms look silly, because they’re like, ‘This is the guy.’ Like, ‘This is the … Islamic terrorist, by the way. Look at how hot he looks.'”

“The sheer lack of self-awareness on that panel is actually impressive at this point,” quipped one X under the post.

“Peanut butter and jealous I think he was,” posted another X heckler.

MAGA Senator gets ambushed by GOP comrades after siding with Trump

The Salt Lake Tribune reports that a Republican Trump supporter appears to have gotten himself bushwhacked by his GOP comrades for taking Trump’s side over that of state officials.

It was earlier this week that Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson ranted on social media about President Donald Trump’s investigation of her office for protecting Utah’s state rights.

“It would be nice if the good folks at the DOJ would focus on actual problems instead of baselessly harassing election officials,” Henderson posted along with a portion of a letter she received from the DOJ informing her that “she is currently under investigation” for refusing to give it unfettered access to Utah voters’ private data.

Republican Sen. Mike Lee, staunch Trump ally, pounced her post within hours, commenting “Election security is the ‘actual problem.’”

Utah is a Republican state, complete with an all-Republican delegation of U.S. House members and senators, so Lee might have been surprised when a coalition of GOP representatives essentially did a pile-on, bushwhacking Lee for siding with Trump over state’s rights.

On Thursday, both Gov. Spencer Cox and former Gov. Gary Herbert came to Henderson’s defense.

“Legal disagreements between Utah and the federal government should be resolved in court. It is wrong for the DOJ to investigate or threaten the lieutenant governor for carrying out her responsibilities under Utah law,” said Cox, who had largely remained quiet about the DOJ’s threats up until this week.

In July, Trump’s DOJ issued letters to election officials in all 50 states, warning of “criminal penalties” if noncitizens cast ballots in the upcoming election. But Herbert wrote that Henderson was correct to “defend her constitutional role as Utah’s elections leader.”

“Elections are the responsibility of the states, and Utah conducts them with integrity. Lt. Gov. and her office are doing a terrific job protecting that tradition,” Herbert added, according to the Tribune.

It is likely no coincidence that both Cox and Herbert previously served as lieutenant governor, the post that oversees Utah’s elections—similar to other state’s secretaries of state. It may also be no coincidence, reports the Tribune, that Lee has “previously come under fire for texts advising Trump on how to overturn the president’s 2020 electoral loss.

Utah officials argue that Trump’s federal government has not “provided a legal basis” for needing voter data, and Henderson says if she were to comply, she would be violating Utah privacy laws.

Meanwhile, the Tribune reports Utah’s federal district court has not yet scheduled a hearing in the DOJ’s case against Henderson.

Trump dials up the panic as judge closes in on his Jan. 6 records

New transcriptions from President Donald Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against BBC reveal how dangerously close the president is to having potentially hurtful information about his January 6 antics made public.

The BBC has already admitted the piece incorrectly claimed Trump “made a direct call for violent action” during the January 6 riots. But the tax-funded company, which must be a good steward of British funding, is contesting the $10 billion that Trump is demanding.

Additionally, new transcripts received by Law & Crime reports the judge over the case appears to be completely prepared to make Trump hand it over some potentially damning information.

“The transcript of the proceedings revealed that [Chief U.S. District Judge James] Boasberg thought the BBC ‘made convincing arguments’ and has a ‘decent chance’ of getting what it seeks if those documents turn out to be ‘necessary,’” Law and Crime reports.

To buttress its defense, BBC lawyer Maxwell Mishkin is leaning on the hard work of investigators who came before him. He have asked Boasberg to unseal to the "greatest extent possible" various executive privilege rulings that went against Trump during special counsel Jack Smith's grand jury probe.

The BBC’s biggest targets appear to be six of Trump’s most intimate witnesses and getting them under oath. This includes Ivanka Trump, Donald Trump Jr., former White House lawyers Eric Herschmann and Pat Cipollone. BBC lawyers also want to have an under-oath conversation with former Vice President Mike Pence’s counsel Greg Jacob and Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aid to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who testified she saw Meadows burning documents in the White House fireplace.

Mishkin added that the BBC has "been unable to serve" subpoenas on Trump's eldest son and daughter.

“To turn the tables on Trump's lawsuit, the BBC has sought discovery that it anticipates will show Trump can't ‘prove that he did not foment or incite the January 6 Capitol riot’” reports Law and Crime, and he can't recycle "already-rejected privilege claims."

And Boasberg signaled he was already game for handing it all over, but was waiting for the executive privilege issue to be "crystallized" in a Florida court.

"And I think there's a decent chance you do [get these opinions and orders] because I think you've made convincing arguments, but it's got to be teed up properly," Boasberg said. “… I think you have made a solid case for such release if they are necessary."

Boasberg added that the "standard requires a need to avoid a possible injustice in another judicial proceeding."

Trump biographer says sun-downing Trump is really hating his 'long goodbye'

A journalist and author with multiple inside sources into President Donald Trump's White House says Trump is unquestioningly fading into the background — and he must be furious.

“It’s all about attention because A: he can’t resist the idea of it, and B: because the idea of someone else getting the attention is anathema to him,” said Trump biographer Michael Wolff, speaking to co-host Joanna Coles about Trump’s desperate bid to launch a “Trump-a-Palooza” in Dallas, as Wolff described it.

“But I think there’s a longer-term strategy [behind the festival],” Wolff added. “Trump does not want the Republican Party to ever imagine life without him.”

“Remember we are going into this other phase,” Wolff explained. “In a president’s second term, after the midterms, the president begins the ‘long goodbye.’ His possible successors come to the forefront. Okay, that’s not going to happen here, and you can see this convention’s announcement of that. ‘I am not going away. I am going to play this in the total opposite of that.’”

In another "Inside Trump's Head" podcast episode, Wolff and co-host Joanna Coles had discussed the shadow of death Trump must feel creeping closer after the spate of recent celebrity deaths.

“Eighty is a seriously mortal moment,” said Wolff, who is best known for his extensive coverage of Trump's political career, including several books about his first term based on purported insider sources. “You’re in your 80s. This is your 9th decade.”

Wolff described Trump as a morbidly overweight octogenarian who is now also being faced with a recent slate of celebrity deaths, making him question his own mortality even harder.

“When I see people who are my age who go down, I register it. I think everybody does,” said Wolff. “Everybody does, but in particular a 300lb pound man who stuffs himself with poison and who hasn’t done a lick of exercise ever might have an even more immediate reaction to other people’s mortality at his age.”

But Trump’s reaction to his rapidly encroaching end appears to be to deny it at the top of his lungs.

“The cult of personality is going to go into hyperdrive now,” warned Wolff.

“Ugh,” Coles groaned.

“He’s saying ‘I’m not going to allow the party, the country or the world to get me, Donald Trump, out of its head,’” Wolff continued, adding that Trump understands “that his talent is getting inside other people’s heads and staying there.”

Coles suggested a personality like Trump would even be offended with having to compete — even for a day — with the deaths of thousands of Americans on the 25th anniversary of 9-11.

“How is he going to react when the 9-11 event on Friday, because he’s a New Yorker, and he’s not going to be there,” said Coles. “The other presidents are going to be there, so George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, the Clintons will all be there, and he won’t be there. They’ve automatically upstaged his RNC-palooza.”

“Oh, he’s hoping his Trump-a-Palooza will upstage 9-11,” assured Wolff. “That’s what this whole Trump-a-palooza is all about. I’m sure he’s been stewing about that, saying ‘I should’ve been there. I should’ve gone down there. I should’ve gotten some pictures of me there [at the tower collapse].

“Exactly,” laughed Coles. “Where are the pictures? There would have been pictures had he been there, but there aren’t. There are just hilarious fake AI videos of firemen carting him out. … and tweets of him as a heroic figure, when people were literally jumping from the buildings.”

“It’s unspeakable. It’s unconscionable,” said Wolff. “But Trump sees this and he’s triangulating it. It’s not just happenstance. This whole idea of a mini convention. He demanded this. He ordered this into place [to upstage it].

Trump's going to choose his heir - and it's not Vance or Rubio: GOP insider

On Friday, a longtime Republican insider alleged not only that President Donald Trump will be the one to choose his heir to run for the Oval Office in 2028, but that he already has names in mind – they don’t, however, include Vice President JD Vance. This is according to Bill Kristol, a Republican strategist and veteran of a number of presidential administrations, who explained on the Bulwark why Vance’s bid for power is destined to fail in the face of more devoted Trump loyalists.

Kristol begins by discussing the Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas, noting that “Vance got a mediocre reception,” ineffectively attempting to hype up the crowd before being “ushered off the stage.” Then, says Kristol, “Trump shows up, hooplah, the whole thing closes with Trump and music, and JD Vance is nowhere to be seen. That’s kind of amusing, and I think, incidentally, confirms… it is not clear at all that Donald Trump wants JD Vance to be his successor, or that JD Vance can be his successor.”

Bulwark contributor Tim Miller asked Kristol about Donald Trump Jr., saying he was an “obvious alternative” to Vance, as the former offers more authentic MAGA identity than Vance. “JD Vance,” said Miller, “is a product of venture capital, Peter Thiel world. He is not a genuine populist. It’s all fake.”

“Are we so sure Trump’s not going to run again?” wondered Kristol. “A: I’m not sure of that. B: I’m not sure that he doesn’t try to anoint Trump Jr. And C: Someone like Hegseth. Right now I don’t know who I’d bet on to be the nominee, but this idea that Rubio is second to Vance is ludicrous. I think Hegseth is more likely to be the Republican nominee than Rubio. Hegseth is more like Trump. He’s an unbelievably shameless demagogue, but all the idiotic manosphere stuff resonates, I suppose. I mean, he’s losing a war, so who knows. But in Trumpworld, they’re so far removed from reality at this point that who knows.”

“Vance is playing politics from 15 years ago,” Kristol added. “‘I’m subtly leaking that I was getting briefings that things were going well and weighing in privately with Trump, and then I’ll give a speech and say, well, people will differ on the war, but we need to work together.’ He thinks that that’s enough?”

In the end, says Kristol, Trump will choose his successor with one thing in mind: “Who can he be sure will sustain the grift and not go after him and all of his allies? It’s not just Trump now. We’re now dealing with hundreds, maybe thousands of people in this administration who are unbelievably determined to keep power in 2028. That’s why the election subversion stuff is so serious. Somewhat serious in 2026 but mostly serious as a predicate for ‘28. And who would actually take power? They can’t let the Democrats win, and they don’t trust anyone much outside their own circle to keep it going. Put those two things together, and the idea that we’re going to have a normal ‘democratic’ republican primary is ridiculous. Trump is going to have massive thumbs on the scale.”

Republicans’ 'unity tour' bus in Georgia flies off a cliff: report

The Atlanta Journal Constitution says the Republican Party is all over the ‘unity tour’ bus in Dallas this week, with lots of smiles, back slaps and posing for cameras. But the party back home in Georgia appears to be more a war party than the fun kind.

“Georgia GOP Chair Josh McKoon led the state Republican contingent at the party’s first midterm convention in Dallas, a gathering aimed at showcasing unity. Back home, though, McKoon keeps getting reminders of the fissures inside his own party,” reports the AJC. “First came Vernon Jones, the party-switching former Democrat who lost his Republican bid for secretary of state in June. Jones spread a false rumor that McKoon planned to step down as state party chair.”

“This is a lie,” said McKoon. “It is also a statement from Vernon Jones. But I repeat myself.”

But then came the Georgia Republican Assembly, a far-right MAGA-styled faction of the Georgia GOP that has been feuding with McKoon and his slightly more establishment enclave for years. The activist GRA appears to be storming ahead with a lawsuit over the state party’s decision to let Brad Raffensperger qualify for the governor’s race in opposition to a 2025 convention resolution from the state party barring Raffensperger from running as a Republican.

Raffensperger, according to the GRA, “does not have the faith and confidence of the Georgia Republican Party,” and they pronounced him “repugnant to its brand [and] to the principles of the United States of America.”

Raffensperger, as Georgia secretary of state in charge of elections, became President Donald Trump’s target after he lost Georgia in 2020 — when Trump mounted a pressure campaign to ensure that a follow-up manual vote recount overturned his loss.

“Georgia Secretary of State, a so-called Republican (RINO), won’t let the people checking the ballots see the signatures for fraud,” Trump posted on X at the time. “Why? Without this the whole process is very unfair and close to meaningless. Everyone knows that we won the state.”

Regardless, Raffensperger qualified — but then went on to lose the May primary to a more Trumpy opponent. The Georgia GOP is trying to get the GRA suit dismissed, arguing in part that Raffensperger’s defeat rendered the dispute moot. But in a Thursday filing, the GRA argued the case is bigger than Raffensperger, reports AJC. They now want a judge to decide whether resolutions passed by state convention delegates should be applied to future elections.

McKoon did not hide his contempt for the move: “There probably are things that could be done eight weeks before Election Day that are dumber than this, but none come to mind at the moment.”

McKoon then threatened to seek attorneys’ fees and sanctions if the party prevails in court. He’s also asked the State Ethics Commission to hit the GRA and its affiliated PAC nearly $150K for alleged campaign finance violations.

“None of the ‘plaintiffs’ can pretend they have any interest in winning this year when they pull this sort of absurd stunt,” McKoon wrote, “but I guess they need a gimmick to raise money to pay the fines assessed by the Ethics Commission against the GRA.”

Trump judge shuts down admin's effort to stave off retribution lawsuit

Politico reporter Josh Gerstein reports a lawsuit filed by Coast Guard contractor fired over Charlie Kirk posts survived the Trump administration's motion to dismiss, allowing the First Amendment retaliation claim to proceed.

Former Coast Guard contract worker Peter Souders says he was fired "in retaliation for his private speech on a matter of significant national interest and attention," which he claims violated his First Amendment rights.

Souders sued the Department of Defense and Homeland Security, and officials in charge of those agencies, claiming he was fired for making comments on Facebook about Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The 35-year-old engineer and project manager for government contractor Advanced Concepts Enterprises Inc. (ACES) had been working at the Coast Guard’s headquarters when members of the Charlie Kirk retribution campaign circulated his Facebook comments on X. One comment stated that Kirk opposed civil rights and abortion, and he called him a “noted Islamophobe,” a “Putin operative” and a “Nazi.” He also wrote: “You can’t be pro-punching Nazis and then pretend it’s a bad thing when someone actually does.”

The Kirk critic was terminated on in 2025, according to the lawsuit. He was allegedly told by the chief financial officer of ACES that they “received an email from the federal government directing that Mr. Souders’s work for the Coast Guard be terminated,” and that they would have to fire him completely because he was employed as a Coast Guard contractor.

Souders asserted that defendants retaliated against him for protected speech, among other relief, but the federal government moved to dismiss the complaint in its entirety arguing that the claim belongs in a different court because Souders is a contract employee.

But Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee, said he disagreed with defendants that Souders’s First Amendment claim so belongs in the Court of Federal Claims, rather than the US District Court for the District of Columbia where it was filed.

“The contract at issue is between the Coast Guard and Souders’s employer — ACES — not between the Coast Guard and Souders himself,” said Judge Kelly.

If Souders is victorious, he would not be the first individual nabbing a win over First Amendment protections concerning a Charlie Kirk diss.

This year, solid Republican Oglethorpe County, GA., agreed to settle with a school teacher who it removed after she accurately posted that assassinated MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk was a gun enthusiast. And plaintiffs in similar cases alleging First Amendment violations have struck back, receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in settlement agreements.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports “a professor at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville was awarded $1.9 million; an employee at Indiana University will receive $225,000; and an Iowa teacher won more than $200,000.”

Trump admin takes revenge on firm leading ballroom lawsuit

On Friday, new reporting by Politico revealed that the Trump administration has taken action against a law firm helming several multimillion-dollar lawsuits against President Donald Trump, including suits involving the White House ballroom and Kennedy Center. According to Politico, the Department of Health and Human Services cancelled two contracts it gave this year to Foley Hoag.

"In June," writes Politico, "HHS awarded a contract worth up to $12 million to Foley Hoag for legal services for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, according to USASpending.gov. Contracting data shows that $5.9 million of that contract has already been 'obligated,' or legally promised, to the firm. In May, HHS also awarded a contract worth up to $9.1 million to the firm for 'legal support for CMS drug pricing initiatives' and $4.4 million has already been obligated. HHS is the only Cabinet agency that has had contracts with the firm during the Trump administration during the Trump administration."

Politico asked HHS about the contracts, and a spokesperson said simply, “HHS does not have any existing contracts with Foley Hoag.”

According to Politico, "Foley Hoag is representing the National Trust for Historic Preservation as it sues the Trump administration over the White House ballroom and for a group of cultural organizations that is suing to prevent the Kennedy Center from being physically altered without a required public review. It also has represented Power Forward Communities to sue the EPA about canceling a $2 billion clean energy grant, worked to get bond hearings for immigrants arrested by ICE, and helped Human Rights Watch and other groups in suing the Trump administration over its efforts against the International Criminal Court."

This would not be the first time Trump has taken revenge on law firms that crossed him. Early in his second term, he signed a series of executive orders punishing firms he accused of “weaponizing” the legal system against him and promoting DEI. These orders barred several prominent law firms from entering federal buildings, revoked their security clearances, and terminated government contracts held by their clients. These firms then sued the Trump administration, arguing that the orders violated the First Amendment and the separation of powers. Federal judges blocked the orders, deeming them unconstitutional, and the DOJ eventually dropped most of its cases. A handful of firms, however, settled by agreeing to provide pro bono work.

Trump has plowed ahead with his ballroom construction and attempts to put his name on the Kennedy Center despite a number of legal setbacks. While his efforts regarding the Kennedy Center have largely been blocked by the courts -- prompting him to threaten to demolish it -- the Supreme Court has allowed him to continue moving forward with the ballroom. Both projects are wildly unpopular, with only 33 percent of Americans supporting the ballroom construction and 24 percent supporting the addition of Trump's name to the Kennedy Center.

They told us to evacuate on 9/11—and we locked the doors instead

AUTHOR’S NOTE: Today, on the 25th anniversary of this terrible attack, freedom of the press, the troops’ newspaper and Democracy itself are under siege by a Trump Administration that views truth as the enemy, and lying a virtue. The 2,977 people who lost their lives that day, and the men and women who fell on the battlefield avenging that attack, deserve far better.

It was just another Tuesday morning in the Stars & Stripes newsroom located on the third floor of the National Press Building in Washington, D.C., 25 years years ago today.

I had just grabbed a second cup of coffee, and was a bit bleary-eyed after staying up late the night before watching my beloved N.Y. Giants lose again on Monday Night Football. I cracked open my computer to begin getting a pulse of the world, and a sense of the news we would dish out to our readers around the world that day.

As I shuffled out of my office, which looked out over a windowless sea of cubicles, one of our junior editors, a daughter of Nebraska, said something that was uncommonly negative, as she openly challenged the print gods to a duel.

“Man, I am sick and tired of these slow darn news days!”

Now just about anybody else who worked in that newsroom would have chosen spicier language, but that’s about as frustrated and angry as Stephanie ever got.

Five minutes later, another editor who was watching the bank of TVs on the starboard side of the newsroom screamed. A passenger jet had just slammed into one of the towers of the World Trade Center.

All those slow news days began their descent into hell …

Another plane blasted into the other Trade Center tower, another slammed into the Pentagon, and still another that we later learned was headed for the White House and/or Capitol Building just a few blocks away from us, went down in a Pennsylvania field.

How many damn planes were there????

We had two reporters in the Pentagon, and spent what seemed like forever getting (please, God) confirmation they had survived the blast. When we finally learned they were OK, we also learned they were going to be busy pulling bodies from the wreckage.

There were more important jobs to do than being a newspaper person on that terrible day.

Sandra and Lisa were two of the finest reporters I’ve ever worked with, and were even better people.

Sandra, a trained EMT, literally helped save lives.

“I treated one guy, he had second-and third-degree burns over 80 percent of his body, and another guy with less [burns],” Sandra old me on the phone. “At first, triage was [chaos], too many people were trying to call the shots, but things have settled a bit.”

“It’s basically a body-recovery operation; nobody has come out for hours … I see them bringing in dogs, I think body-sniffing dogs,” Lisa said.

They both filed a helluva story many hours later that described that dark, deadly day in their workplace. I could go on all day gushing about them and their incredible work on what might have been the grimmest Tuesday in American history.

For this report, however, they will be part of the larger point that needs underlining.

Back in the newsroom a few miles away from the burning Pentagon, we were sorting out the biggest news day of our professional lives.

Stars & Stripes is an editorially independent daily newspaper which serves the troops and their families overseas. It has news bureaus all over the world, and two main hubs in Germany and Japan with remote printing operations in several other countries.

At the time, the Central Office in D.C., collected all the news coming out of the those news bureaus which were based with our troops and built six editions of the paper each day, supplemented with wire copy targeted at the areas in which those troops served.

Once the pages of these editions had been laid out and blessed by many discerning eyes in the Central Office, they were beamed via satellite to those remote printing locations overseas, and distributed to the troops and their families stationed around the world.

No paper has a more expansive distribution route than Stripes. When it delivered to war zones, which it was about to do following the attack on 9/11, things really got sporty.

It was one helluva an irony then, that the journalists who were putting the papers together for our troops and their families overseas that gruesome day, were the ones who were currently under attack in Washington.

As the hours passed, and we were slowly coming to grips with this terrible, terrible event, I called a meeting in our large conference room with all the editorial staff.

I reckon there were about 35 folks in that meeting — mothers, fathers, daughters, sons, boyfriends, girlfriends … journalists.

I wanted them to know that because they were mothers, fathers, daughters, sons, boyfriends, and girlfriends there might be more important places to be than where they were, making sense of hell, and getting the paper out that day.

It looked like we were safe for now, and there would be no more incoming planes aimed at our city. But nobody knew for sure. This kind of attack wasn’t supposed to happen on American soil, a country protected by our two largest oceans.

And another quick anecdote about the city itself that day:

I remember shortly after the attack, making a point of taking a few minutes to head out of the building and into the street to get a sense of things.

As I stood on 3rd Street facing in the direction of the White House, it reminded me of a scene out of a Godzilla movie. People were running this way and that. Some were screaming, most were in despair, all were bewildered. There were loudspeakers imploring people to remain calm, and directing them out of the city.

I knocked back a third cup of coffee, wished I had a cigarette, shook my head, and went back upstairs.

When I had climbed the stairs back to the third floor, I was told by security personnel outside the glass doors to the newsroom, that they were ordering an evacuation of the building. I told them that we weren’t going anywhere. I told them that we had a newspaper to get out to the most important readers in the world.

I pushed past them and through those doors, locked them behind me, and never heard from them again.

Back in the meeting of the mothers and fathers … daughters and sons … I made it clear that anybody who wanted to go home to loved ones should leave right away. Nobody would think any differently if they did. We all could have used a hug at this point.

It got quiet.

Nobody moved.

Not one.

I learned a couple of people had even walked across the 14th Street Bridge from Virginia to GET INTO the office, so they could help get the paper out to our readers, who as it turns out, were about to put their lives on the line in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Our reporters were about to do the same, because Stars & Stripes goes with the troops to report on the troops.

Look, journalists get a lot of crap. It comes with the job. Readers should know the best of us hold ourselves to a higher standard than the people who give us all that crap ever could. The people I worked with in that newsroom and in the Pentagon on that hellish day didn’t blink.

So we all left the conference room, and got to work cobbling together six editions of the paper, including an extra bulldog edition targeted to our readers in Europe.

There were no more planes.

Sandra and Lisa filed their stories, and we checked in with our staffers around the world to begin planning for coverage of the most serious attack on America’s mainland in history.

When the paper was finally put to bed, people quietly starting shuffling out of the newsroom. The slow news day wouldn’t visit that newsroom for another decade.

We went with the slammer AMERICA ATTACKED on the front page.

I got the last train out of the city shortly past midnight.

It was now 9/12.

As the Blue Line train of the D.C. Metro system slowly rumbled through the Pentagon Station toward my home in Virginia, you could smell the smoke and death. There would be no stopping there that night. The adrenaline of the day had quit pumping and I finally allowed myself to open the door a crack for some reflection.

And then it hit me.

Things would never be the same.

That’s when I cried.

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here.

White House panic skyrockets as Trump triggers death spiral economy

President Donald Trump and the GOP may be in celebration mode, but any festivity over the economy may feel forced, reports Bloomberg.

“[F]raming the economy as humming along is a risky gamble,” said Bloomberg writer Josh Wingrove. “While the Internal Revenue Service issued roughly 99 million refunds this year, which, at $3,276, averaged about 12 percent higher than last year, the savings weren’t evenly distributed.”

Meanwhile, economists and analysts say rising energy costs resulting from Trump’s unilateral war on Iran have erased any cushion provided by the tax cuts in Trump and Republicans’ Big Beautiful Bill, which passed under a cloud of controversy last year and still afflicts state legislatures today. Even then, critics called the tax cuts unbalanced and disproportionately serving upper income brackets

“Gasoline prices, at about $4.30 a gallon on average, are at their highest ever for September — though Washburne said Sunoco has seen no dip in demand. Diesel costs are at record highs and still climbing. And major food retailers like Conagra Brands Inc. and Campbell’s Co. say they plan to increase prices,” reports Bloomberg

And now Trump and Republicans must put on a happy face and assure voters that the economy is still coming together if only voters will give Republicans another opportunity to dominate the House and Senate and rubberstamp the president’s policies as they have done for his first two years.

“Still, a latent anxiety hung over [the RNC midterm celebration in] Dallas,” reports Wingrove. “The reality — that polls suggest voters are in fact quite anxious about the state of the economy, and preparing to punish Republicans in November’s midterm elections — has become hard for even President Donald Trump to ignore. Ultimately, the way voters feel about an economy that is a mess of contradictions — growing and stable but expensive and inequitable — seems likely to dictate the results of the vote, and, consequently, how much longer Trump can single-handedly reshape the federal government.”

Fuel prices are surging up, reports Bloomberg, even though the end of the summer travel season is done with. And data out Friday showed little progress on inflation last month, which investors and economists say will likely spur the Federal Reserve to hike rates next week—no matter how mightily Trump may publicly object.

“Consumer sentiment slid below estimates in September, with consumers expecting prices will continue to rise. Just 35 percent of Republicans in the University of Michigan survey believe the government is doing a good job with the economy, the lowest reading since Trump returned to the White House last year,” said Wingrove.

This, added Wingrove, might explain why Trump peppered his speeches this week with tacit admissions of “needing to do more to reassure voters: by acknowledging some victories could take time to manifest, and by dangling the prospect of a $5,000 ‘Trump Dividend.’” Vice President JD Vance spoke of outrage over housing costs in his Thursday speech, and begged Republican voters to “stick with the party even if they don’t agree on everything,” said Wingrove.

Your loans are getting way more expensive —and Trump just made it worse

U.S. government bond yields have jumped to new multiyear highs — which will result in higher costs for mortgages, car loans, student loans, and all other borrowing.

In other words, the affordability crisis is growing even worse.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent isn’t the cause (I’ll get to that in a moment), but he’s making a colossal mess of it.

At 11 a.m. ET yesterday, his Treasury Department announced that it would repurchase $6 billion worth of 10- to 20-year government bonds, hoping that fewer bonds on the market would drive up demand, pushing down rates (yields) that have soared to levels not seen in decades.

Instead most Treasury yields sharply jumped on the announcement. The 10-year bond yield surged to as high as 4.85 percent, its highest since November 2023. The 20- and 30-year bond yields surged to as high as 5.3 percent. (Note: When Treasuries fall, their yields rise.)

Bessent can’t beat the bond market. To the contrary, his interventions are causing traders to worry all the more about the stability and intelligence of the United States when it comes to economic policy.

Bonds are being driven upward mainly by concerns about inflation. Where are these concerns coming from? First and foremost, from Trump’s war in Iran, which is driving up oil prices. Brent crude futures are trading above $107 a barrel, while the 10-year Treasury yield climbed above 4.9 percent — its highest intraday level since October 2023.

Following a flare-up in attacks by both sides, Trump advisers are now privately suggesting the conflict could drag on through the end of his term in 2029.

Reacting to the same inflation concerns, the European Central Bank raised interest rates Thursday, saying it expected inflation to remain above target for an extended period.

And then there’s Trump’s vow yesterday to pay each of America’s 270 million adults a $5,000 check if Republicans keep control of Congress in November, which would cost $1.3 trillion — making such a plan prohibitively costly for a country with a $40 trillion national debt. (By the way, it’s illegal to pay people to vote your way.)

It won’t happen, of course, but the mere possibility is fueling further inflation fears.

Why didn’t Bessent try to dissuade Trump from making this incredibly stupid vow?

Global inflation fears are also being driven by Trump’s inane tariffs, including his trade war with Canada.

Why hasn’t Bessent tried to dissuade Trump from entering this trade war?

And what is Bessent saying in public about any of this? Is he using the bully pulpit to reassure world markets?

Just the opposite. He’s sounding as looney as his boss.

In Bessent’s speech at yesterday’s Republican event, he warned that the progressive left is relentless in trying to turn America into a “socialist hellscape.”

“The radical left is relentless in their pursuit to remake America in the image of every socialist hellscape of the last century, to import the misery of failed workers’ paradises like the Soviet Bloc, Caracas and Havana.”

Bessent added that their “version of equality would drag everyone down instead of lift everyone up” and urged attendees to continue the political fight to push back against socialism.

Bad enough that this is just demented Cold War communist witch-hunt crap. Worse, it’s coming from the mouth of the U.S. secretary of the treasury, who’s supposed to be the adult in the room.

The credibility of a treasury secretary is critical to soothing markets and maintaining worldwide faith in the dollar. Bessent seems to be doing everything possible to lose credibility.

I’ve worked with several treasury secretaries and closely watched others, and I can honestly say that Scott Bessent is the worst I’ve ever witnessed.

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.