death penalty for the mentally diabled

MAGA influencers turn on Kavanaugh: 'The death of America is on him'

When it seemed as if the Supreme Court would help President Donald Trump use the post office to deny mail-in ballots to Democratic voters, Republicans were pleased. Now that America's highest bench on Monday ruled 7 to 2 that Trump cannot in fact legally do this — only Republican Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented — many MAGA supporters feel betrayed by the same bench that has otherwise overwhelmingly sided with their president.

"Kavanaugh is a compromised --- and the death of America is on him, this is total -- and EVERYONE KNOWS IT," an account called Fed Up American posted on X on Monday. "We will never trust any judges or Supreme Court it's totally corrupt. How dare that loser try and destroy our country!!! We want lol find justice"

"BREAKING: The Supreme Court just BLOCKED President Trump from implementing his landmark US Postal Service mail-in ballot election security rules, a MAJOR LOSS ahead of the midterms," conservative journalist Eric Daugherty proclaimed.

"Kavanaugh says in the ruling IT'S TOO LATE FOR THE MIDTERMS. Absolute PATRIOTS Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito dissent." Posting an American flag, the influencer described the decision as "un-freaking-believable!! ROGUE JUDGES have succeeded in holding this policy up until last mintue. Looks like the USPS security attempts before the midterms are done, aside from DOJ surging monitors to make sure there is no foul play. SCOTUS: 'The Government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court's preliminary injunction. And the equitable factors applicable for obtaining emergency relief from this Court do not favor a stay.' KAVANAUGH: 'Applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections.'"

An account called The Patriot Oasis argued "Congress MUST PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT!"

"Lots of people have done damage to this country," Christian right-winger Jared Tenney argued. "But whoever Trump was listening to when he appointed Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett is certainly climbing to the top of the list."

Students for Trump founder Ryan Fournier complained that the decision was "UNBELIEVABLE. SCOTUS just blocked Trump's USPS election security rules right before the midterms!" He added that "Kavanaugh claims it's 'too late' to implement. Massive respect to Thomas and Alito for standing strong and dissenting." After posting an American flag, he concluded that "rogue judges delayed this on purpose. We need DOJ monitors now!" —

Trump supporter SarahAnnRhoades said that "it's crystal clear that SCOTUS justices Roberts, Barrett, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor all are trying to help the Dems in the midterms."

If Trump had prevailed with the Supreme Court, then the Justice Department would have been required to cross-reference mail-in ballots against a federal database of permitted voters and barred from sending ballots to anyone not on the list.

In their August filing, the White House argued that “the Postal Service has likewise relied on the same statutory authorities at issue here to adopt special handling and conditions on acceptance for other types of mail that are similarly sensitive yet non-dangerous, raising unique operational concerns—such as cremated remains or replica explosives. There is no material distinction between those prior actions and this one with respect to the legal authority of the Postal Service.”

Speaking with AlterNet in June, one election expert pointed out that even though Trump's attempt to throttle mail-in voting has failed, he still may succeed in discouraging many people from casting a ballot.

“I think there are two things to consider,” Pooja Chaudhuri, Senior Counsel/Deputy Legal Director at Democracy Defenders Fund who specializes in voting rights as well as election law litigation and advocacy, told AlterNet at the time. “One is that the election is made up of voters, and so the outcome depends on people turning out to the polls and voting. The problem is ... the chilling effect on voters.”

Chaudhuri continued, “When voters hear that ICE may be deployed to the polls, that mail-in voting rules are changing close to the election, a lot of voters might say, ‘I'm just not going to go out and vote.’ That could happen in many different ways. There are vulnerable communities — people may come from mixed-status families — they're US citizens, but they might decide, "I'm not going to vote." So one aspect is the chilling effect on voters that all of these actions would have.”

Trump seeks 'magic bullet' to cure one of his biggest problems: WH insider

President Donald Trump has struggled with rising oil prices since the start of his second term, although he frequently claims that gas costs are actually down. Yet according to a recent report, Trump privately knows that the energy crisis is quite real — and instead of trying to find a solution, he is hoping for a miracle.

"The mood inside the White House is 'frustration they can’t get this resolved,' said Stephen Moore, a former Trump economic adviser," reported Politico's Scott Waldman and James Bikales on Monday. "He said the high energy prices are a 'tax on the economy' that is overcoming some positive fundamentals such as the rise of retirement savings and the growth of the stock market."

He added, "'The problem is there’s not too much they can do about it,' he said. 'It’s a global market, it’s a global oil supply.' That’s causing 'anxiety' inside the White House, according to an outside energy adviser, granted anonymity to speak candidly. For one thing, there are few immediate mechanisms available to the administration to bring down prices."

The reporters added, "'They’re still looking for magic bullets,' the former adviser said."

Waldman and Bikales quoted Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in their various public statements attempting to assuage public anxiety over rising gas prices. They also cited Trump himself, who continues to deny Americans' economic reality.

"He wrote on Truth Social that 'Oil is flowing through the Hormuz Strait,'" Waldman and Bikales wrote. "He also wrote that “Iran wants to make a deal, quickly and badly,” which his administration was “open to.” He stated that Ukraine and Russia had agreed to stop striking energy infrastructure, because the “World’s Diesel price rise is mostly caused by the Russia/Ukraine War, not Iran.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy quickly noted that no such agreement had been made.

Despite Trump’s posts, oil prices hovered near four-month highs.

Speaking to AlterNet in April Dr. Robert Shapiro, a former top economic adviser to President Bill Clinton, claimed that it will take a long time for oil prices to return to the levels they were at before the Iran war.

He added, “Even if hostilities do not restart, the price of oil will not return to pre-Trump levels because there’s a new risk premium that they could restart at any time, increasing tanker insurance costs for example, and because oil infrastructure has been degraded, reducing supply for some time,. An Iran-controlled toll to use the Strait will produce big bucks for Iran, but its impact on world prices for oil, natural gas, helium, etc. should be minimal. Another source of economic friction will be the now-intense uncertainty about what the Trump administration will do next—in the Mideast and in scores of policies at home; and uncertainty dampens investment.”

Meanwhile Dr. Richard Wolff, an economist emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, told AlterNet in March that the Trump administration's claim the Iran War would ultimately lower gas prices was absurd.

Wolff continued, “Mr. Navarro's analysis depends entirely on linking rising oil prices to geopolitical and military risks.”

Trump and his allies are making billions off of exporting paranoia

President Donald Trump and his high-ranking officials are engaged in a simultaneous project of spreading far right ideologies worldwide — and raking in billions while doing so.

In an article by The Atlantic's Anne Applebaum on Monday, Americans learned the full extent of Trump's mixing of exporting paranoid politics and turning a profit from Brazil and the United Arab Emirates to threatening longtime democratic allies like Canada and Denmark. She added that the major industries helping Trump do this include oil and gas, rare earth minerals and cryptocurrency.

"American power is no longer deployed solely by trained diplomats and reliable officials, working through state channels. Informal envoys, private companies, online grifters, and hardened ideologues both inside and outside the government matter more," Applebaum wrote. "Unlike their predecessors, these people do not talk about spreading democracy, and don’t want to build long-term relationships. They don’t care about America’s reputation. They are deploying the tools of American diplomacy and government for their own purposes, to promote their own business interests or their own ideological goals, because, suddenly, they can."

She also added that "the clan of predators currently in charge of the U.S. federal government is no different. Wrongly described as 'isolationists,' many of its true believers don’t think of themselves as ordinary Republicans who won an election and will temporarily hold power until the next election. Nor are they mere appendages of Trump. They believe they represent something much greater: the vanguard of a movement that will alter not just America, but the world."

Applebaum contrasted the attitude of Trump supporters with that of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who famously said during the 2008 election that his opponent, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), was a decent man with whom he happened to disagree.

"Their enemies are existential, and they are international: super-spreaders of a 'wokeness' plague, or proponents of a fictitious 'censorship-industrial complex,' or advocates of 'regulation' that will hamper American business, or self-hating promoters of “mass migration” who want to drown Western civilization in a sea of brown-faced aliens," Applebaum explained. "To maintain their power and defeat these enemies, the predators, like their Bolshevik counterparts, cannot rely on traditional diplomacy, because they don’t trust its practitioners."

She concluded, "Nor do they trust many of the leaders of the democratic states that have long shared the same political and economic values as America. Although the U.S. military and intelligence services continue to cooperate closely with allied governments, the ideologues in and out of the administration are actively seeking to replace them with people and parties who share their disdain for liberal democracy and for what were once considered, at least aspirationally, to be American values. To do so, they need to expand their global influence, manipulate elections in former partner nations, and alter the flows of money and power, especially inside other democracies. Much of the world has always believed America’s defense of democracy to be hypocritical, and that American-led economic integration was self-serving. But now even the people who sincerely believed in the postwar American project are discovering that it no longer exists."

Trump himself has raked in billions since assuming office in his second term, while his sons have netted millions using their foreign policy connections to get involved in matters like investing in tungsten mines. Earlier this month, a Gallup poll found a historically high number of Americans are upset with government corruption, writing that "Americans’ perceptions of government corruption in the U.S. are at their highest level in 20 years, with 89 [percent] of U.S. adults saying it is widespread. That figure is up 10 percentage points from last year and well above readings in the 72 [percent] to 79 [percent] range between 2010 and 2025."

The poll added, "Democrats’ perceptions of government corruption have risen the most sharply since 2024 compared with other party groups. In former President Joe Biden’s final year in office, 57 [percent] of Democrats said corruption was widespread in government; that rose to 76 [percent] in 2025, the first year of President Donald Trump’s second term, and reached 91 [percent] this year. The figure among political independents (90 [percent]) aligns more closely with Democrats’ than with Republicans’ (83 [percent]) and is up 12 points since 2024."

CNN's Jake Tapper tears Trump apart over 'Terminator' comparison

In the classic sci-fi film series that began with James Cameron's 1984 masterpiece "The Terminator," insufficiently regulated artificial intelligence became self-aware and decided to destroy humanity. Despite real-life AI CEOs like Anthropic's Dario Amodei, Open AI's Sam Altman and xAI's Elon Musk warning that the world could actually arrive at a similar dark fate, President Donald Trump insisted on Monday that Americans have nothing to worry about because "the only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the USA has that, in spades!”

CNN anchor Jake Tapper had a scathing rundown of Trump's position.

"President Donald Trump this afternoon completely dismissed dire warnings from top tech leaders who say that without more guardrails, their own AI technology could lead to the end, theoretically, of humanity," Tapper said. "Throughout the day and even just in the past few minutes, the president has been on a Truth Social rant, writing, 'AI taking over the world, destroying humanity and all the things bad is a hoax. No different from Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, impeachment hoax number one, impeachment hoax number two, and all of the other hoaxes and scams.'"

He added, "Then came, just moments ago, 'I am the hoax buster and I'm right now breaking another hoax that AI is gonna take over, consume and destroy the world.' If the president is saying that the AI fears are a hoax the same way those other matters were, that is surely cause for concern, because none of them were hoaxes."

Tapper continued, "The Russians did try to interfere in the 2016 election. President Trump did pressure Volodymyr Zelenskyy to look for dirt on the Bidens. President Trump did encourage the assault on the Capitol on January 6th. By the way, climate change is not a hoax either, even though President Trump just called it so in another one of his posting rants."

Describing Trump as a president who lashed out at facts he does not like, Tapper observed that "even from some White House officials privately saying that they're worried about Trump's apparent lack of concern. The AI company Anthropic said it banned some accounts possibly tied to foreign governments or militaries conducting shady research that Anthropic was afraid could support the development of biological weapons. Then this weekend, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay saying AI advances are indeed moving too fast and that companies should deliberately slow the pace. That idea was then endorsed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and then by Elon Musk, who founded xAI and Grok."

Tapper then said, "It's hard to imagine more alarming, direct warnings, and from leaders who have historically worked closely with President Trump, given that AI has been a huge driver of economic growth — and that growth appears to be what President Trump is clinging to as his solution to any potential AI problems, as presented on Truth Social earlier today, a simple quote: 'the only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the USA has that, in spades!'" Trump also claimed the protests against AI and data center construction are part of a Chinese conspiracy.

He concluded by sarcastically describing Trump's position as being, "Everything will be fine, people. We've got an anti-terminator in chief."

Trump's administration is closely tied to the AI industry, from appointing Musk to slash social welfare programs to purchasing military technology from Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel. Musk has repeatedly expressed white supreamcist views and Thiel is obsessed with finding the Antichrist.

https://youtu.be/X1ZZzH87KaU

Mueller prosecutor stuns with theory on why Trump skipped his son’s wedding

A prosecutor who worked with special counsel Robert Mueller when he investigated President Donald Trump's ties to Russia has a theory about why the president did not attend his son's wedding — namely, that he may have known it was being bankrolled by Umar Kremlev, a Russian oligarch tied to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Speaking with Nicolle Wallace on MS NOW, lawyer Andrew Weissman responded to Wallace's question about why the same Republicans who blasted President Joe Biden's son Hunter for serving on the board of a Ukrainian company are conspicuously silent about the younger Trump's glaring conflict of interest. Weissman responded with his own opinion about why Trump refused to go to the wedding, a decision that raised eyebrows at the time.

"The father, the President of the United States, did not go to his son's wedding," Weissman began, and later added "are people looking at the connection here, which is one of the reasons he may not have gone is the optics of this — which is this group of Russians at this small wedding who paid for it — and he was not going to be a part of it given what a huge team of people I worked with in the Russia investigation looked at and his insistence on calling it a hoax."

In August Weissman argued that, despite Trump's attempts to dodge legal accountability, he will not be able to avoid facing corruption charges after he leaves the White House.

“The one thing I strongly suspect, if we get back to a normal rule of law administration, I think we’re going to learn about corruption,” Weissman said at the time. “We’re going to learn that it is off the charts, particularly regarding financial crime, and it’s going to be eye-popping.”

Financial prosecutions, Weissman added, have a very long shelf-life.

“That is the kind of thing that can be prosecuted, and it is not covered by immunity,” Weissmann explained to Washington Roundtable host Jane Mayer. “… The statute of limitations, which is the time period by which you’ve brought a case, will not have run on those things. This means it won’t be too late to prosecute. So, if Donald Trump is out of office in a couple of years and you have a normal administration, even at the shortest range it’s a five-year statute of limitations, which means you have five years to bring a case.”

Additionally, one can reset the timer on that deadline, telling Mayer that “I’m saying given the shortest amount of time is five years, but it could be much longer in effect.”

Side-by-side photo reveals stark 'visual metaphor' for Trump’s DC damage

On Monday, a side-by-side photo comparison revealed the level of damage President Donald Trump has inflicted on the Capitol with his vanity and construction projects. The images, shared by reporter Jamie Dupree, show the view of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool as seen from the Washington Monument.

“The '86 47' was painted over around June 14,” noted Dupree. This is a reference to the numbers shared on social media by former FBI Director James Comey, which Trump interpreted as a threat, and someone carved into the lawn beneath the Washington Monument in June. In the photo to the left, the lawn is lush and green. To the right, it’s a big, brown splotch. “Three months later, it looks like the feds have ripped up all the sod over towards the Washington Monument. Meanwhile, the Reflecting Pool is again empty.”

The Reflecting Pool debacle has haunted Trump for months now. It began when he hired a no-bid contractor who happened to also be a Mar-a-Lago neighbor and Republican donor to reline and paint the pool “American Flag blue.” When the pool liner began to come loose and float to the surface, however, the Trump administration launched a quixotic legal battle against alleged vandals, including former Olympian David Hearn, in a case that blew up in humiliating fashion when U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro was forced to admit the damage was due to botched workmanship. Trump continued to insist the damage was caused by vandals, but then last week, the contractor admitted that it was responsible for errors in liner application.

The Reflecting Pool and Washington Monument lawn are just two in a long list of casualties in Trump’s battle to impose his vanity projects on D.C. These have included his much-demanded White House ballroom, a 250-foot-tall triumphal arch, gold-coated horse statues, and more. Most Americans have been unimpressed by Trump’s flurry of projects, as evidenced by the response to Dupree’s photo comparison.

“Trump ordered the reflecting pool to be rushed and this is the result,” noted one commenter. “Trump has also ordered that stupid ballroom to be rushed. If it's flawed like the pool, it will have to be torn down for security reasons.” This was in reference to Trump’s shifting justification for the ballroom, which he initially said was necessary for hosting state functions before claiming it was for national security purposes after receiving a number of blows in court, though the Supreme Court ultimately gave him the ruling he needed to continue construction.

“President Trump genuinely loves creating visual metaphors for what he’s done to America,” came another reply.

“He’s destroying this city,” said another.

Capitol Police rush to Mitch McConnell’s home ahead of Senate vote

A right-wing influencer posted video of the Washington D.C. home of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) being surrounded by police while the former Senate Majority Leader continues to be a No Show in the Senate.

"Now: Capitol Police encircle Mitch McConnell’s house while he’s still nowhere to be found despite the senate convening over an hour ago," conservative journalist Nick Sortor posted on x on Monday. "The fact our senators have so much contempt for us that we’re not even allowed to know if they’re alive is insane. 95 days since he’s been seen."

McConnell's absence, which began when he was hospitalized in June, has been controversial as it has held up Senate business and left Kentucky with only one effective legislator in the top lawmaking chamber. Additionally, a recent report revealed that McConnell and his staff continued to earn substantial salaries despite McConnell doing no work during that period and remaining enigmatic about his health.

"McConnell, the former Senate majority leader who earns an annual salary of $174,000, made $43,500 in taxpayer-funded paychecks during his 92-day absence from the halls of Congress," The Daily Beast wrote on Monday. "The 84-year-old senator was taken to the hospital from his Washington D.C. home on June 14 and has not been seen in public since." What's more, his staff has also been raking it in during his time away. According to the Beast, "The Kentucky senator’s six highest-paid staffers earned a combined $318,688 pre-tax in the past 92 days that he has been missing from Capitol Hill. His Senate office is led by his camera-shy chief of staff, Terry Carmack, who earns $226,000 annually. The senator’s communications director, Stephanie Penn, earns about $214,000 per year, as she has presided over this PR disaster. When accounting for the rest of McConnell’s office, which has about 40 staffers including low-level employees, the Daily Beast calculated that his entire staff received around $893,872 pre-tax in the last 92 days that their boss has been missing."

CNN has elaborated on McConnell's history of health issues.

"McConnell, a childhood polio survivor, has faced a series of health issues in recent years, including multiple falls," CNN reported on Sunday. "In 2023, he froze mid-sentence during a news conference on Capitol Hill ... Along with his own statement, McConnell included a note from the attending physician of Congress, who described the injuries after the fall at his Washington, DC, home as 'minor.' The physician added that 'McConnell has experienced several falls throughout the year that have been attributed to his post-polio condition.'"

Whistleblower warns Trump’s secret voter program violated state laws

The New York Times reported Monday that federal agents may have broken state laws when the Department of Homeland Security ordered them to use private information to access voter records in state databases.

President Donald Trump's effort to find noncitizens on state voter rolls may be relying on questionable data, rushed reviews and even investigative practices that could have violated local state law.

The “Unlawful Voter Initiative” is a Trump administration operation that has reportedly deployed hundreds of federal agents to search voter-registration records for evidence that noncitizens are voting in mass numbers. It was exposed in a New York Times report last month, in which the whistleblower alleged that hundreds of federal agents have been ordered to sift through voter rolls in a widespread hunt to find voter fraud.

“This is just the latest example of how far Donald Trump will go to interfere in our elections,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (R-N.Y.) said in an interview.

“We’ve never seen anything quite like this. They come up with so many different ways to try and steal the election, to try and jaundice the election, but we’ve never seen anything quite like this. Department of Homeland Security is actually pulling away these law officers, these federal law enforcement officers, away from the work they’re supposed to do," he added.

Democratic senators sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin demanding that the operation be stopped while they seek answers. The whistleblower said that agents are required to complete at least 40 reviews in eight hours, giving them little time to search each voter's citizenship and voting history.

Former Homeland Security chief of staff Miles Taylor sounded the alarm Monday in a column, saying that the software used to control a national voter database hands any hacker the key to flip a switch and nullify voters' eligibility to cast a ballot and have it counted.

One of the pieces of information revealed by the whistleblower is that the federal agents are looking through personally identifiable information that comes from both internal government information as well as external sources, including things like birth dates and even partial Social Security numbers while they're searching through records.

The whistleblower questioned whether it's legal.

"The agents plugged those names and personal data into public-facing state websites to find a subject’s voter history," the report said. "Some states, such as Virginia, declare explicitly that only individual voters may use the search tool to look up their own records. Others, such as California, require specific information such as a driver’s license number or partial Social Security number in an effort to limit the use of the tool to individuals."

It's one of the reasons that the whistleblower said that they flagged it for those leading the investigation within Homeland Security's Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate. They were told that agents could use the database for operations in the voter search initiative. "Yet leadership appeared to acknowledge the potential for legal liability..." the report said.

The leadership told the whistleblower that agents “are not personally liable for conducting these searches when done as part of their official duties and properly documented.”

“This statement suggests that there may be legal implications for accessing these websites,” said a report produced by the government watchdog group Democracy Defenders Fund. They have been working with the whistleblower and providing them with legal representation. “Yet they are still requiring officers to engage in this illegal activity with promises of personal liability protection.”

'He can’t get his way': Family member warns Trump out to 'punish' US

On Monday, following news that the Kennedy Center may declare bankruptcy and close unless President Donald Trump’s name is added to the building, one of his family members took to social media to warn that the move is part of his effort to “punish” the United States. This is according to the president’s niece, psychologist Mary L. Trump, who asserted that her uncle is lashing out because "he can’t get his way.”

“He's still upset because he had to take his stupid name off the side of the building, and he's going to punish the rest of us simply because he can't get his way,” said Mary Trump. “That's what this is about, period, end of story.” According to Mary Trump, the board – which she characterizes as “a bunch of handpicked sycophants” – declared “without any sense of shame or self-awareness” that it “recognizes that Donald's efforts and prestige provide the sole hope for the center's financial survival and structural renewal.”

As the Washington Post elaborates, “Leaders of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, installed by President Donald Trump, say the center is on the brink of bankruptcy and argue that putting the president’s name on its facade — and thus ensuring his fundraising efforts — may be the only way to avoid imminent and ‘certain fiscal collapse.’” The Trump-led board is scheduled to consider two resolutions aimed at addressing twin crises confronting the national performing arts center: one financial, the other physical. As the Post explains, “Center officials say they could be unable to make payroll or pay routine maintenance contracts ‘within a matter of weeks’ and argue that publicly recognizing Trump could secure his help raising enough money to keep the institution afloat. Center officials are also recommending that the board close its main building immediately, warning that remaining open would endanger lives. Board approval, which seems likely, means the center could close as early as Tuesday.” What’s more, “The presentation makes clear that Trump’s support hinges on getting public credit for his involvement.”

The president’s niece wasn’t having it, saying, “Yes, yes, only Donald Trump can save the Kennedy Center from itself. The man who just so deeply loves and honors the arts. B——.”

The Post seems to agree, writing, “Together, the two proposals represent a remarkable new phase in Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center, which has been engulfed by financial turmoil, leadership upheaval and litigation since he installed himself as chairman last year. Trump and his allies have repeatedly portrayed his leadership — and his name — as essential to rescuing the institution, even as ticket sales and fundraising have plummeted under their stewardship.” Now, trustees are being asked to choose among 10 texts that could be placed on the building’s exterior beneath its name, including one reading, “Renovation Restoration and Endowment overseen by President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Kennedy Center Fund.”

Lawyers for Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), a Kennedy Center trustee who has sued to keep Trump’s name off the building, responded to the latest news with a statement declaring, “This constant effort to add Donald Trump’s name to the Kennedy Center facade is the definition of insanity. This is now the third attempt to deface this sacred memorial and turn it into a vanity project for one man’s ego. Worse still, now Trump is taking the Center hostage and threatening to in effect kill it unless he gets his way. This has to stop.”

MAGA election chief fires official who revealed his plan to fake threats

According to a recently-filed lawsuit, this includes, a supporter of President Donald Trump is firing officials who they view as insufficiently compliant to MAGA demands.

"A former Missouri election integrity director alleges Secretary of State Denny Hoskins fired him after he reported plans to manufacture a whistleblower complaint and threats against local election officials," reported The Kansas City Star's Ben Wheeler and Jack Harvel on Monday. "In a lawsuit filed Monday in Cole County Circuit Court, Nicholas La Strada accuses Hoskins of terminating him one week after he reported that senior officials had discussed fabricating an anonymous whistleblower complaint to use in a federal court hearing."

They added, "La Strada had served in the position for roughly 15 months."

The article continued, "The lawsuit details a series of allegations dating back to April 2025, shortly after Hoskins appointed La Strada, a Republican and former Pettis County Clerk, to the office. The complaint lists Hoskins, the State of Missouri and the Secretary of State office as the defendants."

Writing for The New York Times on Sunday, conservative commentator David French warned that Hoskins' various actions as Missouri Secretary of State foreshadow MAGA plans to rig the upcoming midterms.

"It’s only September, and America just barely averted the first constitutional crisis of this year’s midterm elections," The New York Times columnist David French wrote on Sunday. "Hang with me here because this gets a bit complicated. Last September, the Missouri Legislature passed a redistricting bill called H.B. 1. This bill was part of the wave of mid-decade census redistricting initiated after President Trump essentially ordered the state of Texas in July to redistrict to create more Republican-majority congressional districts and diminish Democratic voting power in the state."

A former judge, J. Michael Luttig, argued early in September that Trump plans on completing the coup attempt he initiated on January 6, 2021 during the midterm elections.

“Trump instigated a war against America’s democracy on January 6, 2021,” Luttig explained. “Today, almost six years later, Donald Trump and his Republican congressional allies are even more determined to prosecute the president’s war against American democracy to its catastrophic end than they were on January 6, 2021. That catastrophic end could well come on January 3, 2027, when Trump and his Republican congressional allies wage the final battle in Trump’s determined war to corrupt America’s democracy and deliver a lasting political victory over the Democrats for his MAGA Republican Party.”

Dan Vicuña, Senior Policy Director for Voting and Fair Representation at Common Cause, argued to AlterNet in June that Trump ultimately is afraid of being held accountable by voters.

“What they all add up to is a desire to avoid any accountability to the voters in the midterm elections — to ensure, to preordain the outcome of a midterm that he thinks is going to go badly for him,” Vicuña told AlterNet. “We know, from the Big Lie of the 2020 election to spurring on a violent revolt to overthrow a free and fair election, that he has no respect for democratic norms, for the voice of the people. This is entirely about his own power and his own ego. He will even invest in protecting that ego and protecting his power at the expense of the needs of the public. People are suffering with high gas prices and affordability issues, and he does not care. All that matters is protecting his power, and he has no interest in whether he does that through democratic means.”

He concluded, “I think this all adds up to a desire to ensure that his party stays in power and his ability to do what he wants — to attack vulnerable communities — remains intact.”

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.