abortion

'The matter is closed': NY county clerk shuts down Texas AG's attempt to punish doctor

A county clerk in New York once again rebuffed Texas’s efforts to enforce a six-figure civil judgment against a local physician, reinforcing New York’s protections for abortion providers.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton pushed New York courts to honor a roughly $100,000 civil judgment rendered in Texas against Dr. Margaret Carpenter, who is based in Ulster County and is accused of prescribing abortion-inducing medication via telemedicine to a Texas patient, according to the Associated Press.

New York is one of eight states with shield laws designed to block enforcement of out-of-state penalties against providers in jurisdictions that have abortion restrictions.

READ MORE: Trump’s base feels humiliated because they were played for suckers — and they know it

Acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck, who announced the decision Monday, had earlier declined to file the judgment in March, citing New York’s shield law.

Last week, Paxton’s team contended that New York civil procedure mandates the filing and insisted Bruck had no legal choice. Bruck upheld his position Monday, stating that the office’s refusal remains final.

“While I’m not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed,” Bruck wrote in a letter to Texas officials.

This legal standoff is one of two cases involving Carpenter that could challenge the boundaries of shield laws.

READ MORE: Stick a fork in him: Trump finally faces the threat of retribution — from MAGA

Earlier this year, New York Governor Kathy Hochul invoked the state’s shield protections to deny Texas’s request and a Louisiana extradition attempt related to separate allegations: Louisiana accuses Carpenter of prescribing abortion pills to a pregnant minor.

'Completely out of step': Mike Pence’s org comes out swinging against Trump Cabinet pick

Former Vice President Mike Pence may no longer be President-elect Donald Trump's right-hand man, but he's not quite done with politics yet.

That's according to a Wednesday article in Politico, which reported that Pence's organization, Advancing American Freedom (AAF), is waging a campaign aimed at Republican senators urging them to reject one of Trump's high-profile Cabinet picks. AAF is setting its sights on Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary-designate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over his previous positions in favor of abortion.

AAF wrote in a statement that Kennedy is "pro-abortion," which the group argues is "completely out of step with the strong, pro-life record of the first Trump Administration."

READ MORE: 'Karen Pence is all of us': Internet cheers former VP's wife for refusing to acknowledge Trump

"While RFK Jr. has made certain overtures to pro-life leaders that he would be mindful of their concerns at HHS, there is little reason for confidence at this time," AAF's letter continued.

AAF's letter advocating against Kennedy's confirmation comes on the heels of a remark Pence made in December, when he lamented that RFK Jr. was "the most pro-abortion Republican appointed secretary of HHS in modern history." And so far, the president-elect's team has remained relatively quiet regarding RFK Jr.'s past comments in favor of abortion.

When Kennedy was fielding his own presidential bid as an independent, he had conflicting positions on abortion. At first, he backed a 15-week ban on the procedure, but then did a one-eighty and said all pregnant individuals should have the right to an abortion, "even if it's full-term." He's since walked that statement back saying that he only supports abortion restrictions late into a pregnancy.

As Politico reported, HHS has significant sway over abortion in the United States as it provides funding for women's health nonprofit Planned Parenthood. HHS also has jurisdiction over abortion drug Mifepristone, which has been used for medication abortions with FDA approval for decades. The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 has called for the enforcement of the Comstock Act of 1873 as a means of restricting access to abortion drugs like Mifepristone.

READ MORE: Trump team dodging Republicans' concerns about RFK on key issue: report

Click here to read Politico's article in full.

Trump snaps at reporter to 'just stop talking about' key voter issue

The defining issue of the 2024 election could prove to be abortion, given the impressive turnout seen among women voters so far. But former President Donald Trump is apparently hesitant to talk about it.

The ex-president voted in his newly adopted home state of Florida on Tuesday, which is also voting on a critical U.S. Senate race and a ballot question that would enshrine abortion rights in the Sunshine State's constitution. The Associated Press (AP) recently reported that when a Florida reporter asked Trump his thoughts on the abortion question, Trump first dodged the question, and simply said he did "a great job bringing it back to the states." The second time, Trump quickly shut them down.

"[Y]ou should stop talking about it," the former president said.

READ MORE: 'Serious liability': Why Trump's efforts to dodge key issue are doomed to fail

Trump has had to walk a fine line when talking about abortion. While he appointed three of the Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn the Roe v. Wade decision in 2022, abortion rights have never lost in any state where the issue has been up to voters. This is true even in traditionally Republican states like Kansas, Kentucky and Montana in the 2022 midterms, and Ohio in 2023.

The decisive unpopularity of curtailing abortion rights has led Trump to be especially cagey about abortion. He initially said he would be voting in favor of protecting abortion rights in Florida, before abruptly doing an about-face and coming out against it after conservative evangelical voters revolted.

Trump has baselessly said without evidence that babies are being killed after being born (which is illegal in all 50 states). He repeated this claim at the September 10 debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, and was immediately fact-checked by ABC News moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir.

Question 4 – the Florida ballot measure that could protect abortion rights — would strike the Sunshine State's current six-week abortion ban and allow abortions up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy. Even though a majority of poll respondents consistently back the measure, a constitutional amendment in Florida needs to cross the 60% threshold in order to pass.

READ MORE: Trump's confused Florida abortion decision: Won't vote to 'execute the baby after birth'

Florida is one of 10 states with abortion-related ballot measures being decided today. Kelly Hall, who is executive director of the Fairness Project, told the BBC this week that the Sunshine State is "the hardest place in the country to win" given the sizable cost of groups pushing for statewide ballot questions have to take on in order to be successful in the third-most populous state.

“If we overcome that particular barrier, there’s absolutely nothing holding us back from passing ballot measures everywhere it’s legal," she said.

Click here to read the AP's full report.

READ MORE: 'He is not done': Harris responds to Trump's latest flip-flop on Florida ballot measure


'There’s very few people that are celebrating': Joe Rogan shuts down JD Vance’s Roe claim

Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) recently sat down with popular podcaster Joe Rogan, and one particular exchange is turning heads on social media.

While Rogan and Vance were discussing how the Supreme Court's 2022 overturning of the Roe v. Wade decision could impact next week's presidential election, the comedian and Ultimate Fighting Championship commentator observed that the "concept and the zeitgeist is that abortion had always been, you know, Roe v. Wade was the law of the land, and then all of a sudden that was taken away and you have these religious men trying to dictate what women can and can't do with their bodies."

Vance responded that he understood "the pushback against that," but countered that "you could go with so many other issues." He opined that "you can go way too far about it."

READ MORE: Vance reveals Trump's plan for abortion: reports

"It becomes trying to celebrate something that at the very best, if you grant, I think, every argument of the pro-choice side, it is a neutral thing, not something to be celebrated," Vance added.

"I think there's very few people that are celebrating, though," Rogan responded.

The exchange is somewhat surprising, given that Rogan's podcast is known for its long-winded, hours-long episodes in which Rogan allows his guests to speak at length and rarely challenges them. He's also a political wild card, having voted for neither former President Donald Trump nor President Joe Biden in 2020. Newsweek reported that Rogan voted for libertarian candidate Jo Jorgensen, though he admitted she "didn't have a shot" of winning in California, where he was registered at the time (Rogan now lives in Austin, Texas).

Despite his popularity among young men who are predominantly supporters of Trump and Vance, Rogan wasn't shy about expressing his admiration for Vice President Kamala Harris in a September episode of his podcast that aired after Harris and Trump's ABC News debate in September. While talking to comedian Tom Segura, Rogan opined that Harris was "nailing it."

READ MORE: 'Something is afoot': Joe Rogan joins pro-MAGA influencers in ditching Trump campaign

“They did an amazing job from the moment Biden drops out, forcing Biden to drop out, whatever they’re doing, whoever’s writing those speeches, getting her to deliver them, coaching her, she’s nailing it,” Rogan said. "The difference in that debate was not a difference in who’s going to have better policies, who’s going to be better for the country. The difference in the debate, in my opinion, was who was better prepared.”

Watch the video of Rogan's exchange with Vance below, or by clicking this link.

READ MORE: 'Huge problem for Trump': Joe Rogan gushes over Kamala Harris


Swing House district seen as a bellwether for 2024 will be decided by these 2 factors: expert

Control of the House of Representatives will likely come down to a handful of contested seats, and one military-heavy congressional district that could play a decisive role in determining the next House speaker is especially hard-fought.

The Washington Post reported that in Virginia's 2nd Congressional District, in which Democrat Missy Cotter Smasal is running against Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Virginia), the winner will likely be determined by a razor-thin margin at the very last minute. FiveThirtyEight's aggregated polling data shows that Cotter Smasal is within the margin of error, and the district is increasingly being seen as a bellwether for the 2024 election at large given that it will be among the first races to have a winner announced next Tuesday.

The district was previously represented by Democrat Elaine Luria after she defeated the Republican incumbent, before Kiggans unseated Luria in 2022. And while former Democratic Governor Ralph Northam won the district in 2017, Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin won a majority of the 2nd district's voters in 2021. It's also a swing district in presidential elections, as former President Donald Trump took the 2nd district in 2016, while President Joe Biden won it in 2020.

READ MORE: These 7 down-ballot races could determine control of Congress

Sojo Akomolafe, who is the chair of the political science department at Norfolk State University, said VA-2 is "the quintessential definition of a swing district." And he opined that the eventual winner would be determined by two factors: Voter enthusiasm and Black voter turnout.

"It’s not depending on the party but on who the candidate is, how vibrant that candidate is," Akomolafe said. "That means, until the very last minute, you’re not sure who’s going to win it."

Kiggans has sought to keep her reelection campaign focused on bread-and-butter issues, like local infrastructure projects and strengthening the Department of Veterans Affairs, given the strong military presence in the district. However, Cotter Smasal has painted her as a MAGA extremist, given Kiggans' appearance at a Trump rally in Virginia and her kind words for Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, whom she called "so kind" and saying that both she and Greene "want the same thing." Kiggans also recently campaigned with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), the far-right firebrand who chairs the House Judiciary Committee and scheduled multiple hearings concerning allegations about Biden and his son, Hunter, that ultimately failed to yield articles of impeachment or a criminal referral to the Department of Justice.

Like the presidential election, abortion could end up being a decisive issue in the VA-2 race. Cotter Smasal has campaigned hard on restoring the abortion rights that were gutted in 2022 when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Cindy Arnold, a Virginia Beach resident the Post identified as a "former Republican," supports Cotter Smasal largely due to that issue.

READ MORE: 'Just thirsty for a change': This deep-red state is poised to oust its two-term GOP senator

"Abortion is a big issue — I have granddaughters," Arnold said. "And just — character. Able to do the job and know about reality. If she can’t say who won the last presidential election, I’m sorry. Years ago I probably would have split tickets, but I don’t think that’s possible these days."

Meanwhile, Cotter Smasal sought to shore up Black turnout by campaigning alongside House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York). During their joint appearance, Cotter Smasal said that if Democrats took back the House, she would be eager to cast her vote for Jeffries as speaker, noting that he would be the first Black Speaker of the House in U.S. history.

Click here to read the Post's report in its entirety (subscription required).

READ MORE: Ted Cruz dodges key issue that's become major 'political liability' for GOP

FCC chair smacks down Ron DeSantis’ 'dangerous' attempt to censor pro-choice ad

Floridians are preparing to head to the polls to vote on Amendment 4 in just four weeks, which would enshrine abortion rights into the Florida state constitution. Republican Governor Ron DeSantis' attempted censorship of an ad supporting Amendment 4 just hit a wall, courtesy of Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Jessica Rosenworcel.

On Monday, Slate reported that DeSantis was contemplating taking media companies to court for airing the ad, which informs Floridians that the state's current six-week abortion ban endangers the lives of pregnant individuals. The DeSantis-controlled Florida Department of Health argues that the ad's claims are "false" and "dangerous," and violate the Sunshine State's "sanitary nuisance" law.

Under that law, any TV station that airs the ad could be prosecuted with a second-degree misdemeanor, and those stations' employees could face 60 days in jail if found guilty. But on Tuesday, Reuters reported that Rosenworcel stepped in to publicly remind Florida's two-term governor that actually following through on those threats would conflict with the U.S. Constitution.

READ MORE: FL law enforcement chief sues DeSantis, says he was forced out for refusing to break the law

"The right of broadcasters to speak freely is rooted in the First Amendment," Rosenworcel stated. "Threats against broadcast stations for airing content that conflicts with the government’s views are dangerous and undermine the fundamental principle of free speech."

Journalist Jason Garcia first reported on DeSantis' threats to prosecute TV stations, which was laid out in an October 3 letter from the Florida Department of Health. That letter — which was addressed to Tampa-based NBC affiliate WFLA — acknowledged the right to air political speech outlined in the First Amendment, but maintained that those rights do "not include free rein to disseminate false advertisements, which, if believed, would likely have a detrimental effect on the lives and health of pregnant women in Florida."

The ad in question is entitled "Caroline," and features the testimony of a woman who was diagnosed with a brain tumor while she was in the middle of pregnancy. She noted that the state's strict six-week abortion ban — which kicks in before many pregnant individuals even know they're pregnant — bans her from obtaining life-saving healthcare in her home state.

"The doctors knew if I did not end my pregnancy,” Caroline said in the ad, “I would lose my baby, I would lose my life, and my daughter would lose her mom. Florida has now banned abortion even in cases like mine.”

READ MORE: 'We didn't answer': DeSantis not taking VP Harris’ calls about storm because they 'seem political'

Outside of the letter from the state's health department, DeSantis is also using state resources in a full-court press aimed at stopping Amendment 4's passage. In late September, Mother Jones' Ari Berman reported that state police were "showing up at Florida voters' homes" to question them about signing petitions in favor of the measure, and the Florida Agency for Heath Care Administration launched a website with "politically charged language" in opposition to Amendment 4.

Amendment 4 is currently ahead in polls, with the Hill reporting in September that it had 55% support among likely Florida voters in a survey conducted by the outlet in coordination with Emerson College. That poll only found 26% of respondents were fully opposed to the measure, while another 20% said they were still unsure about how they would vote.

READ MORE: 'Game the system': DeSantis resorts to 'brazen' tactics to crush popular ballot measure

Click here to read Slate's report, and click here to read Rosenworcel's statement in Reuters.

'Biggest whopper of the night': Vance’s 'heap of lies' on abortion was 'jaw-dropping'

The first and only vice presidential debate of 2024 was effectively a tie, according to a poll from CBS News which hosted the event. The mainstream media remarked on the surprisingly “civil” tone and “policy-driven” answers. And although U.S. Senator JD Vance‘s refusal to say Donald Trump lost the 2020 election may become the most-recognized remarks of the night, the Ohio Republican’s comments—and lies—on abortion are being seen as damning.

“If there was a jaw-dropping moment of the night, it was Vance’s answer on abortion. Vance acknowledged that there are a lot of Americans who don’t agree with what he’s said on the issue,” Punchbowl News reported, appearing to praise the GOP vice presidential nominee. “Then Vance flatly declared that Americans don’t trust Republicans when it comes to abortion.”

“We’ve got to do so much better of a job at earning the American people’s trust back on this issue, where they frankly just don’t trust us,” Vance said.

What Vance did not say is why Americans don’t trust the Republican Party on abortion, and, as he said later during the debate, “don’t agree with” what’s he’s said on abortion.

Many said it’s his lies, one of which MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow later fact-checked.

“Vance lied so much about his record on abortion,” noted HuffPost’s Jennifer Bendery, with receipts (below).

“Holy Jesus,” remarked Esquire’s veteran liberal pundit Charles P. Pierce during the debate, “this abortion answer from Vance is such a heap of lies.”

RELATED: Harris Ad Showing Vance Refusing to Say Trump Lost Gets One Million Views in Just Hours

U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) observed, “Vance says his party’s support for abortion is really unpopular so they need [to] work harder to ‘win people’s trust’. In other words, they are DEFINITELY going to pass an abortion ban and just work harder to pull one over on you.”

PoliticusUSA’s Sarah Reese Jones remarked: “The abortion segment was by far the worst for JD Vance, who is already having a bad debate.”

Legal scholar and University Professor Emeritus at Harvard University Laurence Tribe remarked: “JD Vance told the biggest whopper of the night when he denied ever publicly supporting a national abortion ban. He’s on record having supported such a ban. Jaw-dropping.”

During the debate (full transcript via CBS News), Vance was asked point-blank: “Will you create a federal pregnancy monitoring agency?”

“No,” he told CBS News debate moderator Norah O’Donnell, “certainly we won’t.”

That was the extent of his response to that specific question—but he went on to talk extensively about abortion.

“I want to talk about this issue because I know a lot of Americans care about it, and I know a lot of Americans don’t agree with everything that I’ve ever said on this topic,” Vance acknowledged. “And, you know, I grew up in a working class family in a neighborhood where I knew a lot of young women who had unplanned pregnancies and decided to terminate those pregnancies because they feel like they didn’t have any other options. And, you know, one of them is actually very dear to me. And I know she’s watching tonight, and I love you. And she told me something a couple years ago that she felt like if she hadn’t had that abortion, that it would have destroyed her life because she was in an abusive relationship.”

“And I think that what I take from that, as a Republican who proudly wants to protect innocent life in this country, who proudly wants to protect the vulnerable is that my party, we’ve got to do so much better of a job at earning the American People’s trust back on this issue where they frankly just don’t trust us.”

READ MORE: ‘Recoiled in Fear’: Trump’s Former Officials Serve Up Damning Responses to His Iran Claims

Laura Chapin, a Democratic communications strategist, responded on social media: “A note to the male pundits opining on the #VPDebate2024 : every woman in America heard @JDVance say his friend in an abusive relationship should have had her abuser’s baby and remain tied to him for the rest of her life.”

“I take this very personally,” Chapin added, “because that’s what happened to one of MY friends: she was 19 years old, in an abusive relationship, and had an abortion so she could escape his control and not be tied to him forever.”

Jessica Valenti, who writes a daily Substack on abortion, observed, “Vance tells the story of a friend who said she needed an abortion in order to leave an abusive relationship, but doesn’t say that the law he supports would have forced her to stay.”

As some have noted, Vance has suggested people in abusive, “even violent” marriage should stay together. His remarks have been thoroughly analyzed and he has issued a statement that offers no definitive answer, but his remarks during Tuesday night’s debate would make it appear that is what he believes.

“I find myself wanting to believe Vance’s moments expressing empathy,” remarked “The View” co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin, who served as Trump White House Director of Strategic Communications and Assistant to the President. “Then I remember the entire persona he spent the last 5 years building as an internet bully who derides women, doesn’t care about war-torn Ukraine, & didn’t care about how his lies impacted Springfield.”

MSNBC Legal Analyst Kristy Greenberg, a former SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief, went even further in dissecting Vance’s remarks.

“At the VP debate, JD Vance said a woman he loves told him she was in an abusive relationship and had an abortion. His takeaway: shame that women don’t trust Republicans. And then he lied repeatedly,” she wrote, enumerating some of his lies and actions:

“1. He said he never supported a national abortion ban; he campaigned on eliminating abortion 2 years ago.

2. He said he supports fertility treatments; he and Republicans voted against Democrats’ bill establishing a nationwide right to IVF.

3. He said he supports affordable child care; he was a no show on Democrats’ bill to expand the child tax credit, which Republicans blocked.”

“My takeaway,” she concludes, “shame that women can’t trust Republicans because they lie. They say they support popular policies that help women when they don’t. We must call out their lies and expose the ugly truth every single time.”

CNN in July reported, “‘JD Vance said in 2022 he ‘would like abortion to be illegal nationally’.”

That same month HuffPost’s Jennifer Bendery reported: “JD Vance Said We Just Need To Reframe The Idea Of Forcing Women To Stay Pregnant.” Bendery also posted a screenshot from his official Senate website which reads: “End Abortion.” She says that was later scrubbed from the site.

Watch the video above or at this link.

READ MORE: Biden Calls Trump a ‘Liar’ as Administration Hits Back Over False Helene Response Attacks

'Depressed and unhappy': Trump posts late-night, all-caps rant directed at women

Editor's note: This article has been updated to clarify that Trump is up to 13 points behind Harris specifically among women voters.

Late on Friday night, former President Donald Trump hammered out a 181-word post on his Truth Social platform in his signature all-caps style, targeted at "DEPRESSED AND UNHAPPY" women who are "THINKING ABOUT ABORTION."

The 45th president of the United States — who is behind Vice President Kamala Harris by as much as 13 percentage points among women according to an August poll by Reuters/Ipsos — insisted that he was the better candidate for women in the lengthy post. He specifically argued that four years ago, when the country was fully in the grip of the Covid-19 pandemic and the global economy was in tatters, women were better off.

"WOMEN ARE POORER THAN THEY WERE FOUR YEARS AGO, ARE LESS HEALTHY THAN THEY WERE FOUR YEARS AGO, ARE LESS SAFE ON THE STREETS THAN THEY WERE FOUR YEARS AGO, ARE MORE DEPRESSED AND UNHAPPY THAN THEY WERE FOUR YEARS AGO, AND ARE LESS OPTIMISTIC AND CONFIDENT IN THE FUTURE THAN THEY WERE FOUR YEARS AGO," the former president wrote. "I WILL FIX ALL OF THAT, AND FAST, AND AT LONG LAST THIS NATIONAL NIGHTMARE WILL BE OVER. WOMEN WILL BE HAPPY, HEALTHY, CONFIDENT AND FREE!"

READ MORE: Trump's Truth Social stake down by $6.5 billion — on day he's allowed to start selling

Trump then insisted that women would no longer be preoccupied with abortion, arguing that the overturning of Roe v. Wade (assisted by three Supreme Court justices he appointed) made reproductive freedom a states' rights issue. However, he did notably double down on abortion restrictions in the third trimester — which account for less than 1% of all abortions nationwide — and repeat the baseless lie that Democrats are executing babies after birth.

" I WILL PROTECT WOMEN AT A LEVEL NEVER SEEN BEFORE. THEY WILL FINALLY BE HEALTHY, HOPEFUL, SAFE, AND SECURE," he continued. "THEIR LIVES WILL BE HAPPY, BEAUTIFUL, AND GREAT AGAIN!"

The ex-president's Friday night rant was posted as his opponent hosted rallies in the battleground states of Georgia and Wisconsin focused on abortion rights. During her Georgia event, the vice president spoke about the death of a pregnant woman who died of sepsis after more than 20 hours of doctors refusing to treat her for an infection. Because abortion is outlawed in Georgia, any physician who performs the procedure could face a lifelong prison sentence. Harris argued abortion bans have a chilling effect on doctors who are afraid to do anything to help pregnant patients out of fear of being prosecuted.

“One in three women in America lives in a state with a Trump abortion ban,” Harris said at the Atlanta rally. “This includes Georgia and every state in the south except Virginia."

READ MORE: Debate could make Trump's 'double-digit' deficit with women even worse — here's why

"Think about that when you also combine that with what we know has been long standing neglect around an issue like maternal mortality," she added. "Think about that when you compound that with what has been long standing neglect of women in communities with a lack of the adequate resources they need for health care: prenatal, during their pregnancy, postpartum."

While Trump argued that the question of abortion is now "WITH THE STATES, AND A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE," it's worth noting that since Roe's fall in 2022, every single state has voted in favor of abortion rights when it came up on the ballot. This includes deep-red states like Kansas, Kentucky and Montana in 2022, and Ohio in 2023. Voters will be deciding the issue this November in Trump's newly adopted home state of Florida.

Click here to read Trump's full Truth Social post.

READ MORE: 'Where you been?' Harris rips GOP 'hypocrites' on abortion in fiery speech

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

'Where you been?': Harris rips GOP 'hypocrites' over abortion in fiery speech

Vice President Kamala Harris blasted GOP “hypocrites” who are banning abortion while they suddenly start claiming they want to protect women and children.

In a fiery speech focused on reproductive rights and abortion in Atlanta, the Democratic presidential nominee was met with cheers and applause as she tore into Republicans, asking them where have they been.

“One in three women in America lives in a state with a Trump abortion ban,” Harris told the crowd. “This includes Georgia and every state in the south except Virginia,” she added, to which the audience started to grumble.

“Think about that when you also combine that with what we know has been long standing neglect around an issue like maternal mortality,” Harris continued, as the audience could be heard starting to agree and clap.

READ MORE: Vance Ducks Question on Trump-Endorsed ‘Black Nazi’ by ‘Throwing His Kid Under the Bus’

“Think about that when you compound that with what has been long standing neglect of women in communities with a lack of the adequate resources they need for health care: prenatal, during their pregnancy, postpartum.”

“Think about that, and these hypocrites,” Harris said loudly, “want to start talking about this is in the best interest of women and children?”

“Well, where you been? Where you been?” Harris demanded powerfully as the audience roared and clapped in support and agreement.

“When it comes to taking care of the women and children of America, where you been?” she continued to cheers.

“How dare they? How dare they?”

READ MORE: After Oprah, Harris Resolves Interview Issue by Answering ‘Most Searched Questions’

Harris also “invoked the name of a 28-year-old woman, Amber Nicole Thurman, who died of an infection after being unable to access abortion care at a Georgia hospital,” The Washington Post reports.

“We understand the impact of these bans and the horrific reality that women and families, their husbands, their partners, their parents, their children are facing as a consequence, every single day since Roe was overturned,” Harris said. “We will speak her name: Amber Nicole Thurman.”

Harris went on to say, “this is a healthcare crisis, and Donald Trump is the architect of this crisis.” She warned that if elected, Donald Trump will sign into law a national abortion ban.

Watch Harris below or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Straight Up Fascist Project’: Vance Slammed for Vowing to Call Legal Immigrants ‘Illegal’

'Trump is stuck': Columnist says ex-POTUS 'has no idea' how to stop growing revolt among base

Back in the early 1980s, the late conservative Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona) — a scathing critic of the Rev. Jerry Falwell Sr., the Moral Majority and televangelist Pat Robertson — warned fellow Republicans that they were opening a Pandora's box by embracing the Religious Right. And more than 40 years later, 2024 GOP presidential nominee is trying to please his far-right white evangelical supporters despite the backlash from voters who are still angry over anti-abortion laws and the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

The New York Times' Jamelle Bouie, in his September 6 column, stresses that although Christian nationalism is a liability for Trump, he doesn't want to alienate fundamentalist evangelicals who have been supporting him.

"Donald Trump is stuck," Bouie argues. "He is a brutally transactional politician who represents a coalition of ideologues. His instinct is to promise the moon, and he'll say anything to get a vote — or just to get out of a room. He also knows, however, that he has no choice but to dance with the date that brought him. He can't abandon the groups, interested parties and constituencies that put him in the White House to execute their agenda — to exercise their will."

READ MORE: 'Friendly crowd': Here are 5 takeaways from Fox News' Trump townhall

The liberal columnist continues, "The problem comes when most voters don't want what your partners hope to do with the power they helped you get. Such is the case for abortion."

Bouie stresses that "the movement to outlaw abortion, restrict contraception and severely limit the scope of reproductive health care" is "wildly unpopular" — a fact that Trump is well-aware of.

"This is why he has tried the two-step of celebrating his appointments to the (U.S. Supreme) Court but distancing himself from the consequences, both practical and political, of his anti-abortion accomplishments," Bouie explains. "Even the most gifted rhetoricians would struggle to sell this to the public. That, obviously, is not Trump. Unsurprisingly, he has floundered."

Bouie notes that Students for Life President Kristian Hawkins, a prominent anti-abortion activist, has accused Trump of selling out "pro-lifers" — yet many voters continue to deeply resent the High Court's ruling in Jackson v. Women's Health Organization.

READ MORE: Ex-Rep. Liz Cheney endorses Kamala Harris citing 'danger that Trump poses'

"So far in this campaign," Bouie observes, "the former president has not had to answer for his corruption in office, his two impeachments or his disastrous handling of most aspects of the pandemic. But he has had to answer for Dobbs, and it is clear that he has no idea how to deal with a problem he can't solve by talking out of both sides of his mouth."

READ MORE: 'The GOP doesn’t care': JD Vance lambasted for calling school shootings 'a fact of life'

Jamelle Bouie's full New York Times column is available at this link (subscription required).



'He is not done': Harris responds to Trump’s latest flip-flop on Florida ballot measure

In a matter of 24 hours, former President Donald Trump did a complete one-eighty on an issue that's at the top of the priorities list for some of the most passionate Republican voters. Now, he's doing damage control.

On Thursday, Trump told a reporter ahead of a Pottersville, Michigan rally that he would be voting in favor of Florida's Amendment 4 ballot initiative. That ballot question would enshrine abortion rights into the Sunshine State's constitution, and Trump told NBC that he would be "voting that we need more than six weeks," which is the current cutoff for abortions in Florida.

However, on Friday — notably after backlash from conservative evangelicals — he then told Fox News ahead of a Pennsylvania rally on Friday that he would not in fact be voting for Amendment 4. The former president baselessly asserted that the ballot initiative would allow doctors to kill human babies after they're born (which is illegal in all 50 states), saying "all of that stuff is unacceptable so I will be voting no for that reason."

READ MORE: 'The last thing we need': Core part of Trump's base threatens to walk away over key issue

Now, Vice President Kamala Harris is warning voters to not be confused by the ex-president's fluid positions on reproductive rights. In an official statement released by her campaign (and posted to the social media platform Bluesky by progressive organizer Murshed Zaheed), Harris said Trump's flip-flop ended up making his position on abortion "very clear."

"He will vote to uphold an abortion ban so extreme it applies before many women even know they are pregnant," Harris said of Florida's current six-week abortion ban. "Trump proudly brags about the role he played in overturning Roe v. Wade and said there should be punishment for women who have an abortion. So of course he thinks it's a 'beautiful thing' that women in Florida and across the country are being turned away from emergency rooms, face life-threatening situations, and are forced to travel hundreds of miles for the care they need."

"And understand, he is not done," she continued. "As a part of Donald Trump's Project 2025 agenda, he and his allies would limit access to birth control, threaten access to fertility treatments and ban abortion nationwide, with or without Congress."

Harris' reference to Trump banning abortion nationwide "with or without Congress" appears to be a reference to page 562 of Project 2025 (formally titled Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise), which calls on the next Republican administration to enforce the Comstock Act of 1873. That legislation — which the Washington Post referred to as a "long dormant law" — makes it illegal for abortion-related materials to be sent through the U.S. mail. And because the law is already on the books, Trump could simply choose to enforce the law as it stands without Congress having the opportunity to weigh in.

READ MORE: Trump's confused Florida abortion decision: Won't vote to 'execute the baby after birth'

As the Center for American Progress explained, enforcing the Comstock Act and thereby making it illegal for abortion pills to be sent through the mail would amount to a "de facto abortion ban," as medication is the most common method by which abortions are conducted. Trump has already indicated earlier this month that he would be open to revoking access to the abortion pill Mifepristone.

In 2023, a Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas revoked the FDA's approval of Mifepristone, despite it having FDA approval for more than two decades and frequently being the drug of choice for medication abortions across the country. Trump praised that decision, saying "I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it."

Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), who is Trump's 2024 running mate, has insisted that Trump would veto a national abortion ban if it reached his desk. However, as Harris noted, Trump has previously bragged: "I was able to kill Roe v. Wade," and frequently reminds voters that he was the president to have appointed the three Supreme Court justices who overturned 50 years of constitutionally protected abortion rights.

READ MORE: Trump biopic that shows him assaulting first wife will be released in US before election

@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.