The Thom Hartmann Show

How All of Us Are Paying a Heavy Price for Corporate Greed

There’s a new epidemic spreading across America.

It’s absurd that We the People have to foot the bills for corporations that are making millions and millions of dollars each and every day – and it’s time for the absurdity to stop.
Keep reading...Show less

How the Mainstream Media Is Propagating GOP Myths

The Caucus Room Conspiracy is alive and well, and it’s getting a big time boost from the mainstream media.

Keep reading...Show less

The Best Thing America Can Do to Help Iraq Is to Do Nothing at All

Editor's note: As Obama's "favorite" think tank, the Center for American Progress announced in a new report on Tuesday that the US should “prepare for limited counterterrorism operations against ISIS, including possible air strikes,” Thom Hartmann points to the folly of another US intervention in Iraq.

Keep reading...Show less

The Koch Brothers Are Now Worth an Obscene $100 Billion -- And They Are Using That Fortune to Destroy Our Society

On Wednesday, Charles and David Koch - the Koch Brothers - reached a new personal milestone.

That means that if the Kochs were counted as a single person, they would be the single richest person in the entire world. It also means that they control two million times the amount of wealth that the average American takes home every year.

That, of course raises the question: Just what exactly do the Kochs do with all that money?

Well, for one, they spend a lot of it trying to help Republicans win elections. The Koch-backed group Americans for Prosperity, for example, has already spent $22 million on television ads this election cycle, outpacing all other Republican groups combined.

The fact that super-rich tycoons like the Kochs could have such a huge role in our political system would have terrified our most famous Founding Father, Thomas Jefferson. He laid out his thoughts about the dangerous role of money in politics in an 1816 letter to Samuel Kercheval, nothing that,

Those seeking profits, were they given total freedom, would not be the ones to trust to keep government pure and our rights secure. Indeed, it has always been those seeking wealth who were the source of corruption in government.

But the problem with the Koch Brothers isn’t just that they use their money to corrupt the political system. Ultimately, the biggest problem with the Koch Brothers and every other billionaire in the United States and around the world is that they’re billionaires and thus, by definition, have more money than they can ever hope to use.

This has devastating consequences for the economy.

Think of it this way. The average person making, say, $50,000 a year (the median income in the U.S.) puts almost their entire salary back into the economy by spending it on things like groceries, consumer goods, food, and transportation. This creates demand, which, in turn, stimulates the economy and helps it grow.

Billionaires like the Koch Brothers, however, don’t behave the same way as everyday people do with all the money they make.

Because it’s so easy for billionaires to make ends meet, they end up having millions of dollars leftover every day after buying their groceries and paying their mortgage (if they even have one). And instead of spending all that extra money on productive things that stimulate the economy, they throw it into the Wall Street casino or stash it in Swiss bank accounts. This robs the productive economy of trillions of dollars worth of demand that could be building a vibranteconomyand stabilizingthe lives of working people and small business owners.

We’ve seen over the past 30-plus years what kind of impact this can have on an economy. Since the Reagan Revolution, even as workers have become far more productive, they’ve received less and less compensation for what they create. Meanwhile, income levels for the top one percent have ballooned.

Why has this happened? Easy - the billionaires have used low marginal tax rates, lax labor laws, and so-called free trade deals to suck an ever increasing amount of money out of the productive economy and into their Swiss bank accounts. They’re hoarders - not job creators, and as result, our country now looks more like a banana republic than the land of opportunity.

The problem of what to do with the excess wealth of the super-rich has perplexed lawmakers and policy makers since the very founding of our Republic.

One solution that many countries use is a wealth tax. A wealth tax takes the wildly excessive money out of the hands of the unproductive super-rich and puts it back into the hands of the productive middle and working classes. The same is true of the estate tax.

Thomas Jefferson proposed such an idea in an 1816 letter to Joseph Milligan, writing that, "If the overgrown wealth of an individual be deemed dangerous to the State, the best corrective is the law of equal inheritance to all in equal degree.”

And it’s not like a wealth tax is some wildly radical idea, either. Economist Ronald McKinnon made the “conservative case” for a wealth tax in a 2012 Wall Street Journal editorial.

Even Donald Trump has, in the past, spoken out in favor of some form of national wealth tax. In 1999, he proposed a 14.25 percent tax on the wealth of all people holding $10 million or more that could be used to pay off the national debt.

I’m not as worried about the debt as the Donald is, but I do think a national wealth tax is a great idea. I think we should impose a 100 percent tax on all wealth over $1 billion. The money made from that tax could then be redistributed to average working people. Those working people would then spend that money and stimulate demand, which would help grow the economy.

And at the same time, taxing the billionaires would also go a long way towards breaking up big monopolies. This would, in turn make room for small, local businesses to grow and prosper. It’s all part of one big virtuous cycle.

Of course, right-wingers would probably say that such a wealth tax would “hurt job creators” and “kill innovation.” But those arguments don’t really meet much scrutiny. After all, we’ve been letting the billionaires hoard their wealth for three decades now and they’ve used that opportunity to bleed the middle class dry.

On the other hand, during the time of America's highest income and inheritance taxes, we also had the strongest economy in our history. And when trust-busters from Teddy Roosevelt to Nixon and Carter broke up Standard Oil and AT&T, the result was an explosion of innovation, competition, and an actual increase in shareholder wealth.

It’s time to give the real job creators - working and middle class Americans - a chance to invest in the economy. And the only way to do that is by banning billionaires. You can find more information at www.nobillionaires.com.
Keep reading...Show less

Nevada Ranch Stand-Off Was One Big Promo for Rustic Right-Wing Millionaires

Now that the Bureau of Land Management has started returning millionaire rancher Cliven Bundy’s cows, some in the media are saying that the so-called “Nevada range war” is over.

But they’re wrong.                                                                  

Keep reading...Show less

Outsourcing and Privatization are Killing America

With devastating austerity measures being imposed nationwide — state and local governments are facing a lot of budget crunches.

Keep reading...Show less

Cruel Politics: How Republicans Are Literally Shutting Down Hospitals

Republicans are literally forcing hospitals to close down.

Keep reading...Show less

One American City Enjoys a Hyperfast Internet -- Any Surprise Corporations Don't Control It?

It’s time for high-speed internet access for all!

Keep reading...Show less

Latest Major Chemical Spill Exposes Flaws of Libertarian Approach to Govt.

Not too long ago - the last “do not use” water ban was lifted in West Virginia - more than a few weeks after the devastating chemical spill in Charleston. Theoretically - that means that West Virginians should be able to drink their water without any concerns that it’s still contaminated.
 
But if West Virginians are still concerned about their drinking water being contaminated - they’re not going to get any help from their governor. At a press conference on Monday - when asked by a reporter if the water was actually safe to drink and to use - Democratic Governor Earl Ray Tomblin said that, “It’s your decision. If you do not feel comfortable drinking or cooking with this water then use bottled water.” Tomblin added that, “I’m not going to say absolutely, 100 percent that everything is safe.  But what I can say is if you do not feel comfortable, don’t use it.” He finished by saying that, “I’m not a scientist, you know. I have to rely on the best information that I have.”
 
This week - the company that owns the factory - Freedom Industries -  the one's who caused the leak admitted that a second chemical spilled into the Elk River. But Governor Tomblin doesn’t seem too concerned about that - and isn’t in any rush to hire more scientists to ensure that the water is safe.
 
He’s saying that the people of West Virginia should play scientist - and decide for themselves if the water is safe to drink. While Tomblin might be a Democrat - in this instance - he's taking a very libertarian approach - and that comes with a lot of flaws. Libertarianism assumes that we are all capable of making those complex kinds of decisions - and assessing risks for ourselves.
 
But we aren’t all scientists. We can’t decide for ourselves whether drinking water does or doesn’t have dangerous chemicals in it. We need regulations to keep us safe - before chemical spills and other disasters happen.
 
In Europe - governments and lawmakers proactively address problems and potential disasters - to prevent harm to their people. As the E.U. government describes it - “The precautionary principle enables rapid response in the face of a possible danger to human, animal or plant health, or to protect the environment. In particular, where scientific data do not permit a complete evaluation of the risk, recourse to this principle may, for example, be used to stop distribution or order withdrawal from the market of products likely to be hazardous.”
 
While the very mention of the “precautionary principle” is enough to scare libertarians straight - it’s essential that we address problems before they happen - not aft.
 
What’s going on in West Virginia right now a classic example of how libertarianism is a flawed system.

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.