SpeakOut.com

Free Cars and Barbies

Sunday, July 30 -- For the 2,066 actual delegates at this week's Republican National Convention, the pilgrimage to Philadelphia is about much more than politics -- it's about booty. Upon their arrival, delegates, alternates and GOP bigwigs were presented with a suitcase worth of loot, including a tin of Altoids, a package of elephant-shaped Kraft Macaroni & Cheese, and a genuine Convention Barbie.

Convention Barbie -- a limited edition of the popular plastic doll by Mattel -- sports high heels, a convention badge and a Nancy-Reagan-red suit with pearl buttons and matching earrings. She comes in African American, Asian American, Latina and Caucasian versions; all feature the traditional Barbie shape and stance.

Democratic National Committee spokespeople would neither confirm nor deny allegations that Barbie's absurdly stiff posture was inspired by Al Gore. But the Philadelphia Direct Action Group, a protest organization, issued a press release claiming Convention Barbie represents everything the Republican party wants a woman to be: "undernourished, dressed to kill, and inanimate."

THE BIRTHPLACE OF LIBERTY, AND TELEVISED CONVENTIONS

The conventional wisdom among TV pundits is that this time around the GOP fete has been stage-managed to the point of becoming one long infomercial. (They are shocked. Shocked!) Nevermind that this is a bit like the pot calling the kettle a George Foreman fat-reducing grille -- the fact remains that Philly is the birthplace of the televised political convention.

This is the sixth time the Republicans have met in Philadelphia. After hosting three relatively unspectacular gatherings in 1856, 1872 and 1900 -- at which the GOP nominated the memorable John C. Fremont, Ulysses S. Grant and William McKinley -- Philadelphia provided the stage for the nation's first televised convention in 1940.

Unfortunately for Wendell Lewis Willkie, almost no one owned a television set in 1940. So almost no one watched his nomination, or the passage of a Republican platform that both opposed America's participation in World War II and deplored then-President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "explosive utterances."

Both the GOP and the Democrats held their 1948 conventions in Philadelphia, because the live TV equipment was too cumbersome to move from city to city. And by 1952, the conventions had begun the transformation from working meetings where parties chose a nominee to beauty pageants where parties began the arduous job of peddling their designated nominees to a suspicious public.

On Sunday, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, a Republican and runner-up in this year's veep-stakes contest, begged forgiveness for his party's role in creating this quadrennial television event. "We were the first party 52 years ago to invite television cameras to cover our convention," Ridge told a reception of arriving GOP faithful. Ridge quickly added: "I apologize for that."

COME AGAIN?

The official GOP band on the convention floor has assembled an interesting repertoire of songs to entertain the delegates this week. Among them: John Lennon's "Come Together," which would seem aimed at the politically myopic Baby Boomers who George W. Bush is trying to lure into the GOP.

Liner note: Lennon originally wrote the song as a rallying anthem for his friend Timothy Leary, who was at the time mulling a run for Governor of California against Ronald Reagan. As he was writing the tune, President Richard Nixon's administration was working to deport the Beatle.

(No word at press time as to whether Ridge will be issuing any further apologies; Lennon and Leary were unavailable for comment.)

BIRDS OF PREY

In the unlikely event that Convention Barbie is unable to satisfy their passions, GOP insiders also had the chance to paw the latest military hardware. At taxpayer expense, the Pentagon has billeted an invitation-only arms show at the former Philadelphia Naval Shipyard.

On display are an unmanned surveillance aircraft called the Predator, the latest amphibious vehicles designed for use during chemical- and biological-warfare, and the V-22 Osprey, a hybrid aircraft with rotors that swivel so it can take off like a helicopter but cruise like a turboprop commuter plane.

At least one convention attendee is likely to skip the weapons show, however. Throughout his tenure as secretary of defense, vice-presidential nominee Dick Cheney tried to kill the Osprey, an expensive aircraft that crashed repeatedly during testing.

THE BUICK AND SUV PARTY

In case you were wondering who pays the bills for distributing Convention Barbie and otherwise subsidizing the television industry's biggest game show of the year, you might be shocked to learn that after a small taxpayer subsidy, the Republican and Democratic conventions are sponsored by the same big businesses that fund everything else done by the major parties. Among the corporations donating a million dollars or more to this week's GOP convention include: AT&T, Bell Atlantic, Comcast and General Motors.

In a tradition that dates to the same era as the introduction of television (shocked?), General Motors loans a fleet of vehicles to each major convention. The GOP has received the use of about 400 cars, including Buick LeSabres and Chevy Suburbans. The Democrats, however, will receive Cadillacs. Maybe this was what George W. is referring to when he derides "limousine liberals."

Police Use Limited Force as Protesters Perturb IMF Meetings

April 17 -- With the constant buzz of police helicopters overhead, the alternating scents of irritant gas, pepper spray and vinegar, police barricades at intersection after intersection and throngs of protesters expressing themselves in every way -- from chants to banners to puppets to spray-painted graffiti and even partial nudity -- normally catatonic-on-Sunday downtown D.C. was anything but on Sunday.

The events of the day were largely peaceful, and some of them could be considered street theater at its best: elaborate and effective floats depicting the World Bank and IMF as a merciless machine or a bloated, roasting pig; protesters marching with giant head puppets making a mockery of world leaders; shirts adorned with the likes of "My country's getting rich off the policies of the IMF and World Bank, and all I get is this lousy T-shirt"; the beat of makeshift drums; strangers sharing food, water, and in some cases, links of chain to hamper their removal from intersections. "It's gratifying to see something like this come together, especially in downtown Washington," a bandanaed protester from New Hampshire said. "I'm proud to be here."

On Saturday about 600 people were arrested here for parading without a permit, according to police. There were 20 protest-related arrests on Sunday out of an estimated 10,000 to 35,000 people who turned out to demonstrate. Although the scene was hardly comparable to last year's riotous Seattle melee, in several cases police and protesters alike dispensed with restraint and rhetoric, instead opting for bottles, blows and batons. At about 10 a.m. Sunday, a large procession of protesters with black-clad anarchists at their vanguard strode up 14th Street NW, bearing -- in addition to placards and puppets -- fencing and other construction material, some apparently taken from a nearby construction site. As the procession neared the intersection of 14th and I streets, dozens of Metropolitan Police Department officers in squad cars and on motorcycles tore down 14th from the opposite direction. As both forces approached each other, each began to surge; upon reaching the southeast corner of 14th and I, some protesters picked up and kicked or hurled two newspaper boxes. Police entered the intersection and for a moment time seemed to stop, but quickly the police continued to aggressively advance in the face of angry rebukes from demonstrators, at least one of whom hurled a small object at the officers. Then, with no apparent provocation, the police turned and retreated to the middle of 14th Street between I and K, and some protesters scurried in hot pursuit. Others merely wandered or tentatively stood, not quite sure what to expect. Seconds later, at least half a dozen police motorcycles entered the fray, officers using their machines to literally herd protesters toward Franklin Square Park. Right behind them were more billy-club wielding officers, hands on either end of their weapons.

Despite the overall restraint they had displayed earlier, here several officers took a distinctly "hit first, ask questions later" approach, checking anyone in their path. Several reporters narrowly escaped contact. Some protesters remained passive and took the blows -- indeed, some came so quickly they had little chance to respond -- while several others (who apparently did not attend the Mobilization for Global Justice nonviolence training sessions) opted for active resistance. Still others took glancing blows while trying to drag fellow protesters to safety. Officers semipushed, semichased demonstrators well into the park, facilitating the destruction of tulip beds in the process. One protester was hit so hard he literally flew over a park bench. A girl with Day-Glo red hair was checked and flew what appeared to be several yards in a matter of seconds by one officer, who ended his onslaught with a baton blow to her face, leaving her stunned and crying on the sidewalk as she wailed, "I wasn't fighting back!"

Then the police fired irritant gas into the crowd. While Police Chief Ramsey said, "smoke dragons," a sort of tear gas light was used; all touched by it showed signs that it hurt like hell. The gas cartridges landed in the street near the northeast corner of the intersection, and the acrid smoke wafted mostly to the east but also to the south. Protesters with gas masks were remarkably quick about getting them on; those with only vinegar-soaked bandanas secured them over their faces but hotfooted it back from the expanding cloud of gas as police -- save a few skirmishing stragglersÑfell back to the middle of 14th St. and formed a static line. One gas-mask clad anarchist stalked the street bearing the black flag; others dragged the uprooted newspaper boxes (Employment Today and Washington Jobs -- perhaps apropos for an anti-world financial institution protest). Protest medics quickly deployed and tended to the baton or gas-afflicted. The anarchists seethed. Then several women in red T-shirts came right up to the police line and began chanting, "To the police, we come in peace. To the banks, we say no thanks." Others began to gently shower the gas-mask visaged police with recently uprooted tulips, most of which were hostilely batted away by officers as their commander walked behind them encouraging them to "stand fast, stand fast." Another young woman in a red T-shirt stood in front of the cops facing other protesters, making the peace sign with both hands. A red-haired young woman actually began presenting each of the officers with tulips, most of which were angrily pushed away with batons. Then Ananda Daas, a 19-year-old man from Humboldt County, Calif., took a small American flag and laid it on the ground, adorning it with tulip pedals. The black flag-carrying crew seemed to hate this, and began to leave. The growing collection of photographers loved it, and by the time they were done shooting Daas' creation, the street had all but cleared.

Protesters and police chief seem to find common ground: Gas sucks

There were other odious incidents like this that took place during the day, but in contrast to Seattle, they hardly constituted -- individually or in aggregate Ñ- a riot. Around noon at 19th and K, for example, a burgeoning throng of protesters gathered around a huge anti-World Bank puppet, directly across from a police barricade. As the hour grew later, the crowd grew larger; three rows of young protesters plunked down about 10 feet from the police line. The more they chanted ("More World, Less Bank," "Depleted Forests, Who Do We Thank? / The World Bank,"), the more additional protesters came. So, too, did the media, with photographers turning their cameras on the protesters with the same relentless interest a scientist brings to examining a specimen through a microscope.

"Film the cops!" came the repeated chant, followed by several variations. Some reporters silently exchanged glances. As the cops were doing little more than stoically standing there while the temperature climbed, turning the cameras on the constabulary seemed a bit of a stretch. But eventually -- to the chanted strains of "Corporate media, we don't need ya," the bulk of TV and still cameras did turn towards the police line. Not long afterwards, the police put on their gas masks, and bottles of vinegar were quickly passed around. Cries of "The whole world is watching" and "Take off the masks" began. Remarkably, within moments, they did. The reason for the sudden change quickly became clear when D.C. Police Chief Charles Ramsey sauntered out, and -- apparently drawing on Chicago political style -- coolly worked the barricade, talking with reporters and protesters alike. Angry queries about the gas masks and the use of tear gas were met with cool responses. "You don't see no gas mask on me," Ramsey said, later asking, "You think I wanna get gassed?"

"We don't want to deploy gas. We ain't gonna use gas," he said, and went on to tell protesters that as far as he was concerned, they could stay the night in the intersection. While it was his job to get delegates in and out and he wouldn't hesitate to clear necessary intersections, this, he said, was not one of them. "You can protest all you want," he said. "You got my word on that."

Dumpster de-escalation

While the chief was clear on a no-tear gas policy (at least for the 19th and I intersection), he did not say anything about the use of pepper spray, which made one of several appearances of the day a bit later one street over. Around 12:30 p.m., the anarchists under the black flag -- many of whom dressed to look like either subcommandante Marcos or Taliban women -- rallied around a wheel-borne dumpster at 20th and Pennsylvania, and began rolling it east on I Street. Turning the receptacle south on I Street, the crowd moved towards a police barricade not far from the corner of H Street. About three-fourths of the way down, police suddenly let fly streams of pepper spray, sending many scrambling back up the street and causing more than a few to collapse in pain. The anarchist-led throng renewed its advance, however, gradually moving closer, accompanied by a phalanx of media. A squad of police motorcycles rounded the corner behind the barricade, ratcheting up the tension. Once again, Ananda Daas from Humbolt County was on hand, tulip petals tucked in his waistband, but he seemed more than a little cautious about putting his mellow vibe between twitchy cops and strident anarchists. But then, Executive Assistant Police Chief Terrance Gainer -- he who on Saturday had speciously held that the presence of culinary pepper at the Mobilization for Global Justice's now-forcibly demobilized headquarters was a potential ingredient for homemade pepper spray -- appeared on the scene, pleading for "de-escalation."

"Lower the gas guns," he ordered his officers, asking "everybody just chill out." After being called "the biggest [expletive deleted] hypocrite I've ever seen" and other sundry epithets, the District's number two police officer engaged protesters in what very well may be the longest discussion ever held on the protocol of Metropolitan Police Department badges. The absence of badges on the shirts or jackets of a few officers drew the ire of the anarchists, who vitriolically characterized the officers as everything from lawbreakers to intelligence agents. Gainer tried to explain that as the day had started out with intermittent rain and was currently sunny, the officers had changed jackets and shirts several times and hadn't always had the time to transfer their badges. The protesters were having none of it. But by early afternoon, most had drifted away -- not just at 18th and I, but elsewhere, too. The meetings of the IMF and the World Bank had not, as the day's organizers intended, been shut down. Nonetheless, numerous delegates were inconvenienced, and all involved in the attempt could feel proud at having helped necessitate the shutdown of 50 downtown blocks. As of Sunday night, protesters were updating their plans, strategizing for another round of direct actions on Monday.

The DC Cop Crackdown

WASHINGTON -- In all the years he's run the homeless shelter at 11th and M streets in Northwest Washington, Harold Moss has never had the fire marshal show up demanding to inspect the premises.Never, that is, until last week. Moss opened his doors to the Midnight Special Legal Collective, a handful of progressive activist lawyers from Seattle in town for the massive protests against the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Suddenly, the fire marshal was interested in going over the place with a fine-tooth comb. "I couldn't prove it one way or another, but in all probability, he showed up because of [the protesters]being here," said Moss, who has managed to stave off the inspector inspection.While at first blush any sort of alliance between homeless activists and anti-IMF protesters might seem incongruous, Moss is excited at the prospect; as taxed-but-not-represented DC residents have a well-documented history of suffering at the hands of the same Congress that subsidizes the IMF and World Bank. It's only natural, he says, that "we'd want to link the presence of the activists coming down to protest the actions of oppression of the third world with the oppression people get in Washington, D.C."But, he adds, this is a concept he expects people in power might find more than a little threatening.Surveillance and Implicit Threats by PoliceA number of incidents in the past week seem to support Moss's view.Since late March, a number of activists and organizers (as well as a few journalists) have been subjected to measures ranging from surveillance, implicit threats and bureaucratic intransigence apparently designed to marginalize the effectiveness of their mission.What makes the situation all the more maddening is that such actions are apparently being taken based on the ridiculous view that every protester or activist is an anarchist time bomb waiting to go off -- a view apparently buttressed by unspecified police "intelligence" that may or may not be true.Nader Panel: In League with Starbucks-Smashing Anarchists?At American University, for example, student activists were anticipating an enthusiastic turnout for a Wednesday night "globalization panel" featuring an array of activists and scholars from left to right.Last weekend, AU suddenly pulled the plug on the event.Carrie Ferrence, an AU student activist, says she asked David Taylor, chief of staff to AU's president, for the rationale behind the cancellation. According to Ferrence, Taylor replied that Washington's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) told him that "they had information from both on and off campus sources that this event would be targeted for some kind of disruption," but that "they said they wouldn't provide any security for the event."When Ferrence began to ask questions in an effort to gauge the reliability of the "information," Taylor, she said, "wouldn't reveal his sources." (Taylor did not return this reporter's calls.)Ferrence says she (and no one else she knows) was aware of any plans for protests: "This was not going to be a biased forum, but a forum designed to show all sides of the issue," she says.And, says another AU activist who declined to be identified, "I have a hard time believing that property-bashing anarchists -- who are hardly representative of protesters in Seattle or here -- would make a Ralph Nader panel at AU a target for destruction. How reliable is the police's intelligence? Have they actually analyzed it, or are they treating a rumour as real?"AU Knuckles Under, Georgetown and GW Crack DownWhile AU did cancel the panel, the university is still granting out-of-town student protesters sleeping space in open lounges.But across town at George Washington University -- which owns the World Bank building, as well as one of the IMF's buildings -- the scene seems to invite comparison to the totalitarian nightmare which so many people fear awaits little Elian upon his return to Cuba."We know they're reading our emails, and I'm fairly convinced my phone is tapped too," says GW student activist Dan Calamuci over a phone line replete with loud, regular clicking noises that he swears weren't there until about a week ago."Last week, we did a speakout -- just seven of us with a bullhorn -- at the corner of 21st and H. Within a few minutes, five cops showed up, three of whom were undercover, or trying to be -- talking into cell phones saying, 'We have three guys and four girls on the corner and this is what they're saying.'" It was not, says Calamuci, the height of surreptitious behavior.And then there is the matter of postering. "Apparently you can leave theater posters up for weeks, but political messages, forget it," says Calamuci. "At the academic center on the corner of 22nd and H is a big plate glass window where we put flyers up Sunday night around ten o'clock. There were others posters there, too -- nothing had been cleared from that area in a week. Monday morning they were all gone." Calamuci suspects the police paid the bulletin board a visit.And while AU at least offers a place for some protesters to sleep, GW has opted for the siege mentality: starting on Friday, the university will be in state of virtual lockdown; out of town students are not welcome, even for those whose visits are unrelated to the protests."We were hoping to house people in the dorms, and we offered to meet with the administration many times-while there was a meeting scheduled for Wednesday, they made the decision without consulting one 'a16' person," says Calamuci, referring to one of the coalitions sponsoring this week's protests. "This is totally undemocratic bullshit they're pulling with us." (GWU officials did not return this reporter's calls.)Cops to Activist: No Roots of Dissent on Your FarmElsewhere, even property owners aren't immune from unnecessarily watchful, if not intimidating, eyes. Last Tuesday, Bettie Hoover, the head of the DC chapter of the American Friends Service Committee and a veteran social justice activist, was surprised to learn that two Howard Country police detectives were casing her Maryland farm."One of my family found these detectives walking around my property," says Hoover, who had listed her farm on the a16 organizing Web site as a camping haven for protesters. "I said, 'Excuse me, who told you to come by,' but they never really did tell me. But they did threaten me with zoning violations if I let people camp."This guy didn't know diddly -- he didn't know what the regulations were and I did -- and I said to him,' I don't appreciate this harassment.' He said, 'Oh, no, ma'am, we're not harassing you, we're just here to help.'"Hoover's tone does not indicate a belief in the obliging verbal gestures of the constabulary. "I've had the FBI out there before taking pictures, being very direct," she says, recalling her work with the perennially-harassed CISPES in the 80s, "but I've never had anything like this happen."Even surrounding school systems are on alert. Last week the Montgomery County School System issued a circular advising educators to "be observant for any material referring to the upcoming International Monetary Fund rallies".In the circular, the easily-contactable Mobilization for Global Justice becomes an enigmatic object of "concern" by Washington, DC Police because the group might "attempt to recruit high school students to join in a planned rally." From here, it goes over the top: "The police reported the following: 'Splinter groups, possibly associated with this group, took part in the recent demonstration in Seattle that turned violent.'""It is egregious," seethes Mobilization for Global Justice's Adam Eidinger. "The Mobilization and its organizers did not engage in property destruction in Seattle. What the police are doing is generalizing a non-violent peaceful movement based on the efforts of a few dozen people in Seattle who were looking for an opportunity to smash stuff in the first place. And I don't believe even that justifies this level of investigation, harassment or intimidation. I do believe if the police succeed in convincing the public that there will be violence, it actually increases the likelihood."Indeed, the mere mention of "IMF" seems to inspire a law enforcement response that automatically presumes violence.Several DC community activists and organizers, for example, have been fighting a new city initiative aimed at forcing slumlords to tend to their properties, because they say it could use some amending. In particular, the document allows the city to evict tenants for the sins of the slumlords -- that is, if a building is in bad shape.In a show of solidarity with those efforts, several dozen anti-IMF protesters joined housing activists and tenants from the Columbia Heights neighborhood for a trip to Judiciary Square, where DC Mayor Anthony Williams' office is. Upon arrival, the group beheld a stoic-looking squadron of approximately 50 police officers lined up by the one open door. When the group tried to enter, police blocked the doorway.According to Martin Thomas, a DC resident and IMF protester, the police eventually let Griffith and his group inside for a scheduled appointment with the mayor. But everyone, was taken aback by the shrill level of police activity. "I talked to my council member about it and asked what the hell was going on," Thomas said. "He said it was because of the IMF and World Bank protests. They're really being repressive and trying to squash all solidarity efforts.""I actually talked to some of the cops," Thomas continued, and "I said, 'We've done demonstrations here all the time, and there aren't ever this many of you here. Why are you all here?' And the cop I was talking too replied, 'This isn't like any other demonstration.'"A former staffer for US News & World Report and the Village Voice, Jason Vest is a national correspondent for Speakout.com and In These Times.

Police Crack Down on IMF/World Bank Activists

WASHINGTON -- It was around 8 o'clock last Thursday evening when the buzzer rang in activist Adam Eidinger's apartment. Thinking that some of his fellow activists had arrived a bit early for a postering party, Eidinger buzzed the door open and stepped out into the hall.As one of the organizers of protests against the World Bank and International Monetary Fund scheduled for April 16, Eidinger is used to people dropping by in the evenings.But upon glimpsing the police badges hanging around the necks of his two visitors, Eidinger quickly realized they weren't looking for a bucket of adhesive wheat paste and reams of posters that read "Mobilization for Global Justice."Instead, the visit was part of an effort by Washington's Metropolitan Police Department to intimidate protest organizers -- even though District of Columbia municipal code makes it clear that their activities aren't criminal.According to Eidinger, the detectives said that "they were monitoring our e-mails," had read one about a "poster night" at his house, and wanted to know "what that was all about.""Since we've been doing a lot of organizing on the net, many of our e-mail lists are public," said Eidinger, whose day job is doing public relations work for Rabinowitz Communications."We know the police are looking at our e-mails, which isn't surprising, since they've been coming to meetings since day one."But, Eidinger adds, he was taken aback by what one of the officers, Detective Neil Trugman of the Gang Intelligence Unit, told him, that the postering activities of his group were illegal and must cease immediately, and any further activity would likely be cause for arrest."He said, 'I was against the war in Vietnam, I protested, we don't want to cause any problems for you, but you can't hang up posters, because it's a violation of the law,'" Eidinger says.The discussion went on for about a half-hour, and inevitably veered toward police concerns about violence."I told them if I knew of any violent people coming to town, if I knew of anyone coming here to trash anything, I would tell them, because I don't want that," Eidinger recalled."I think I calmed them down, yet they insisted that hanging posters was illegal, and that if anyone was caught, they would be arrested and charged with destruction of public property, and that they were looking out for us on the street."Lori Wallach of Global Trade Watch, one of the organizers of Seattle's anti-World Trade Organization protests last November, was appalled."There seems to be an undue amount of zeal in stifling debate as compared to focusing on the substance of World Bank/IMF policies, which need to change," Wallach said. "If the police have all this spare time to crack down on people exercising their First Amendment rights, maybe they ought to check into corporate criminality of the WTO and IMF, too."What the Law SaysAccording to Fritz Mulhauser, legal program administrator of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Capital Area chapter, the police explanation was at best a stretch. Although commercial posters on lampposts are illegal, Section 108 of Title 24 of DC's municipal regulations protects political postering, with certain caveats."They can't be up for more than sixty days, they have to have on them a date when put up, they should be put securely to the lamppost to avoid be torn or disengaged by weather, and may not be fastened by adhesives that prohibit complete removal, and you can't put up more than three copies within one block," Mulhauser explained.Detective Trugman wouldn't comment on the matter without permission from D.C. police spokesman Sgt. Joe Gentile, who declined to meet our deadline request for a conversation.Activists and others are supposed to provide copies of the posters, along with a name, address and phone number, to the mayor's office. But it doesn't take but a short walk through some DC neighborhoods to discover that this regulation isn't the police department's -- or anyone else's -- highest priority. Multiple posters of a commercial bent can be found all over town."I've never heard of anything like this before," said Sam Smith, a lifelong DC resident and veteran activist on causes ranging from the Vietnam War to the environment and D.C. statehood. "The only times political posters have been an issue in DC is after campaigns, when all the anal compulsives want the politicians to take posters down as quickly as possible."Eidinger's case is not entirely unprecedented, however. In 1998, when a number of DC residents mounted a campaign to stop the building of a convention center, their leader, Debbie Hanrahan, received scores of tickets from the D.C. Department of Public Works for hanging anti-convention center posters. After brandishing Title 24, Section 108, Jim Drew, a longtime Washington attorney, got the city to withdraw the tickets. But the incident was, he says, chilling."I got a sense this was being directed by a higher authority -- my strong assumption was that the individual enforcement officer wasn't acting on his own, in the same way I don't think the individual police officers in this case decided to do that," he says."These regulations are extremely selectively enforced. They're only enforced when they're in opposition to a huge economic force, like the convention center or the World Bank. You don't have them enforced for anything else -- the circus, a rock concert, a yard sale."What Price Postering?The meeting with the cops left Eidinger shaky. When his postering crew arrived Thursday night, "I explained that we'd been told we'd be arrested, and I was really spooked."Even though I think I'm doing the right thing, I really don't want to get arrested and fight this out in court," says Eidinger, whose worry was understandable. Last year, he was arrested for manipulating a Bill Clinton head puppet at an anti-NATO bombing protest."As I was explaining this [situation], we noticed a police officer in his car outside my house. People were thinking, 'Are we going to walk out of here and get arrested?'""After about 20 minutes of this, we started yelling at the cop, and eventually he drove off, but I felt like I was in China, or somewhere they don't protect freedom of speech."While Eidinger and a handful of others hung back, over a dozen others went forth and postered -- with no interference from the police.A former associate editor on US News & World Report's business and investigative staffs and former Village Voice writer, Jason Vest is a national correspondent for Speakout.com and In These Times. He is also a 2000 Project Censored award-winner.

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.