Naomi LaChance

'Not what she said': CNN host fact-checks GOP analyst Scott Jennings over Trump cuts

CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins defended Democratic strategist Alencia Johnson when GOP analyst Scott Jennings twisted her words on a panel Wednesday.

They were discussing cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency.

“These are, again, people’s livelihoods, and also the health of this country, right?” Johnson asked. “Some of these mistakes that people keep talking about are gutting our agencies that are taking care of, I don’t know, paying attention to the bird flu, Ebola, these things that actually can have detrimental impacts on the American people.”

READ MORE: Social Security head: I’m 'receiving decisions' from DOGE 'outsiders' that 'are made without my input'

“We have Ebola in the United States?” Jennings asked.

“Well, we are helping the world be a safer place as well, Scott," Johnson replied. "And we know that."

Cuts at USAID have included work fighting Ebola.

“I mean, on the bird flu, we did — Biden slaughtered all the chickens," Jennings said. "I don’t know if there’s any left to kill."

READ MORE: 'Make the VA fail': DOGE puts PTSD research and veterans’ cancer care on the chopping block

“Oh my goodness," Johnson said. "Oh my goodness. Come on."

“It was a bloodbath. You all love that word,” Jennings retorted.

READ MORE: Announced layoffs have 'jumped to levels not seen since the last two recessions': report

“You can laugh about this, but these are things that people are actually scared about," Johnson said. "I mean, measles is coming back. There’s so many things that are happening that our federal government makes sure—”

“You’re saying Elon Musk caused the measles?” Jennings asked.

“I am saying what is happening in this government, right now, with Donald Trump appointing—” Johnson began before Jennings cut her off.

“You’re saying Donald Trump caused the measles?” Jennings asked.

READ MORE: 'Stunned': Justice Alito melts down as colleagues buck Trump

“I am saying that what is happening in this federal government, under Donald Trump, allow Elon Musk, and allow all these people that he appointed, to run this government like this, is actually making us unsafe for the American people,” Johnson said.

Collins moved to cut off the conversation.

“Thank you both, for being here,” she said.

“Elon caused the measles," Jennings said. "You heard it here first."

READ MORE: 'Delusional' or 'crazy reckless' Trump 'sleepwalking toward political loss': ex-Bush speechwriter

“Not what I said!” Johnson said.

“Not what she said,” Collins said.

Measles, a contagious virus, recently killed a young child. The response from vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services, to an outbreak in Texas has worried doctors.

Watch the video below or at this link.

'Make the VA fail': DOGE puts PTSD research and veterans’ cancer care on the chopping block

The Department of Government Efficiency cancelled and then reinstated almost 300 contracts at the Department of Veterans Affairs earlier this week. But there are more contracts that are on the chopping block, including ones that are “central to patient safety,” NBC News reported Thursday.

“What had been a list of 875 VA contracts scheduled for termination a little over a week ago has now become 585 canceled contracts, the VA said Monday," Gretchen Morgenson and Laura Strickler report. "The about-face is a rare public retreat by the so-called efficiency operation known as DOGE, which has come under fire for moving to ax crucial government services and overstating the value of some of its savings to taxpayers.”

On Wednesday, the VA announced that they would be laying off 80,000 workers, after dismissing 2,400 last month.

READ MORE: 'Republicans are lying': Top Dem says government report confirms fears about Medicaid cuts

The VA said the remaining cuts “will not negatively affect Veteran care, benefits or services” and “were identified through a deliberative, multi-level review.”

But these moves could lead to the privatization of healthcare for veterans. “They’re trying to push veterans into community care,” one VA official said, meaning services provided outside of the VA. “And to do that, they’re doing everything they can to make the VA mission fail.”

“The revised list of killed contracts,” Morgenson and Strickler write, “includes those covering sterility certification for VA hospital pharmacy operations, facility air quality and safety testing to prevent transmission of infections, and sterile processing services to decontaminate equipment and medical instruments. Also on the list: contracts providing required certification and accreditation for stroke centers and follow-up care for cancer patients.”

Another cancelled contract pertains to monitoring the safety of radiation equipment used for cancer treatment. “The documents reviewed by NBC News show the termination of multiple contracts for radiation safety officers,” Morgenson and Strickler write.

READ MORE: Oklahoma subcommittee rejects MAGA Republican’s $3 million request for Bibles in classrooms

If this equipment is in violation, hospitals would likely have to shut down, according to a VA official. “You cannot have a hospital that does not have a radiology department,” the official told NBC News.

“Another contract that remains scheduled for cancellation,” Morgenson and Strickler write, “supports the National Center for PTSD, a VA entity that is the world’s leading research and educational center on post-traumatic stress disorder.” This has apparently been deemed "non-mission critical."

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, (D-Conn.) who is the ranking member on the Veteran Affairs Committee, said Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins was being “reckless” to cancel contracts.

“Make no mistake, cancelling these contracts will cause harm to veterans and VA care and benefits,” Blumenthal said in a statement. “And it is completely unacceptable there has been no transparency, accountability, or consultation surrounding these contracts. By intentionally concealing from Congress the full list of contracts cancelled, Collins makes clear his intentions to use these terminated services as numbers for his press release, with zero regard for veterans.”

READ MORE: 'Disaster Capitalism': Critics ask if Trump is 'intentionally crashing the economy'

'Break down in big ways': Trump’s 'dark money' transition team bucks promise to disclose donors

Editor's Note: This head has been updated.

The Trump transition team made a promise last year to disclose the names of their donors to the public. That still has not happened, the New York Times reported on Thursday.

The transition team said in November, “donors to the transition will be disclosed to the public.”

“Preparing to take power and fill thousands of federal jobs is a monthslong project that can cost tens of millions of dollars,” writes reporter Ken Bensinger. “Previous presidents, including Mr. Trump himself in 2017, used private contributions as well as federal money to foot the bill.”

READ MORE: 'Disaster Capitalism': Critics ask if Trump is 'intentionally crashing the economy'

In the past, presidents have made good on agreements to disclose donors within 30 days of taking office. The agreements were made in exchange for millions in federal funding. But Trump refused public funds, so he never made that exact promise. The transition team said it wanted to avoid public funds in order to “save taxpayers’ hard-earned money.” They promised to “not accept foreign donations.” It was unclear whether it would continue the $5,000 contribution limit.

"Trump Vance 2025 Transition Inc., as the transition is formally known, was registered in Florida as a 'dark money' nonprofit that does not have to disclose its donors to the Internal Revenue Service," Bensinger writes.

A spokesperson for the General Services Administration, which is involved with the transitions, told the Times, “the Trump-Vance Transition Team is not required to publicly disclose transition-related donations since they did not accept the services and funds outlined in” the commitment that previous presidents have made.

Experts said that this lack of accountability leaves the public in the dark as to who is trying to curry favor with the president.

READ MORE: Red state GOP lawmakers advance bill letting Christian doctors deny care to patients

“Transparency on the question of private interests influencing public power is really fundamental to the health of our system, and we’re seeing that break down in very big ways,” Max Stier, the president of the nonpartisan nonprofit Partnership for Public Service, told the Times. “They made a promise. They owe it to the public to fulfill that.”

In Trump’s transition following the 2016 election, the transition team said they received $2.4 million in federal funds. They also said they received $6.5 million from 3,000 private donors. The contributions were limited to $5,000.

“Far less is known about the financing of the most recent Trump transition,” Bensinger writes. “Operating largely out of private offices in West Palm Beach, Fla., and eschewing government servers, the transition appears to have heavily involved the billionaire Elon Musk — who spent at least $288 million to help elect Mr. Trump and now leads the so-called Department of Government Efficiency — as well as a number of other technology industry executives.”

Trump’s inaugural committee did disclose its private donations, which totaled a record, more than $170 million as of January. It has not yet filed with the Federal Election Commission, but some donors have revealed that they contributed.

READ MORE: 'Stunned': Justice Alito melts down as colleagues buck Trump

“Many of those entities have government contracts or are engaged in legal cases involving federal agencies,” Bensinger writes.

“Among them are the technology companies Amazon, Meta, Google and Microsoft, each of which donated $1 million,” he continues. “Kraken, a cryptocurrency exchange that was sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2023, put in $1 million as well. On Monday, the S.E.C. said it was dropping the case voluntarily. Last week, it dismissed a suit against another cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase, which also donated $1 million to Mr. Trump’s inauguration.”

'Delusional' or 'crazy reckless' Trump 'sleepwalking toward political loss': ex-Bush speechwriter

Trump’s Tuesday night speech before Congress lacked political tact, but that might not matter to Trump, commentator and former speechwriter for George W. Bush David Frum writes at the Atlantic. In fact, his style, which marks a departure from his rhetoric at the beginning of his first round in office, could indicate he has a power grab planned for the 2026 midterm elections, Frum speculates.

“He mocked, he insulted, he called names, he appealed only to a MAGA base that does not add up to even half the electorate,” Frum writes. “But in 2025, the big question hanging over the nation’s head is not one about oratory, but about democracy. In 2017, Americans did not yet know how far Trump might go,” he writes, referring to the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol. “Now they do. They only flinch from believing it.”

Frum points out that Trump’s second time in office has been marked by likely “drastically unpopular” moves like tariffs and budget cuts. “Prices are rising, measles is spreading, airplanes are falling out of the sky,” he writes.

READ MORE: Analysis demolishes Trump’s 'mandate' claims as poll numbers collapse

Trump, Frum argues, is aware that he is headed for “political trouble.” Republicans have a narrow majority in the House of Representatives, “yet he’s governing without the slightest concession to majority opinion, even to a majority sense of decency.”

“He talks of the Democrats as remorseless enemies.” he writes.” At the same time, he is making political choices that would normally seem certain to deliver those enemies a big majority in the House after the midterms. Is he delusional? Crazy reckless? Or is this a signal that the man who tried to overturn the election of 2020 has some scheme in mind for the 2026 midterms?”

In Trump’s speech, one example of his attitude was his discussion about claiming Greenland. “We’ll get it one way or another,” he said.

“Trump’s acting in ways that seem certain to throw power away in the next round of elections—if those elections proceed as usual,” Frum continues. “If they are free and fair. If every legal voter is allowed to participate. If every legal vote is counted, whether cast in person or by mail. Those did not use to be hazardous ‘if’s. But they may be hazardous in 2026.”

READ MORE: 'Stunned': Justice Alito melts down as colleagues buck Trump

If Trump had not been elected, he would likely be facing criminal and civil trials.

“Trump is keenly alert to his legal danger, deeply committed to keeping power by any means necessary,” Frum writes. “He also seems to be sleepwalking toward a stinging political loss that will expose him to all kinds of personal risk. He’s not trying to expand his coalition, to win any votes he does not already have. So what is his plan to preserve his immunity and his impunity? Trump’s behavior in 2021 showed that there were no limits to what he would do to keep power. What will 2026 show?”

'Stunned': Justice Alito melts down as colleagues buck Trump

The Supreme Court refused to let President Donald Trump freeze billions in foreign aid. In his dissent, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that he was “stunned” that the court would not allow Trump’s order to stand, Law & Crime reported Wednesday.

The court issued a 5-4 ruling denying the Trump administration’s request to stop an order from a federal judge to pay almost $2 million in foreign aid funding on work that is already done. Alito called the judge’s decision “an act of judicial hubris.”

“Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars?” Alito wrote. “The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.”

READ MORE: 'They hate America': MAGA is freaking out over Democrats’ response to Trump speech

Trump froze the funds, which are from USAID and the State Department, as he seeks to shrink the federal government. Nonprofit groups sued, arguing that the move went above Congress’ authority. Trump has since dismantled USAID.

Alito, along with Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh argued that U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali stepped beyond his authority in his decision. Chief Justice John Roberts, as well as Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Amy Coney Barrett comprised the majority.

Experts have been keeping an eye on whether the Supreme Court will align with Trump during his second administration.

“The unsigned order does not actually require the Trump administration to immediately make up to $2 billion in foreign aid payments; it merely clears the way for the district court to compel those payments, presumably if it is more specific about the contracts that have to be honored,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

READ MORE: The Commerce Department is about to give billions to Elon Musk as part of internet program: report

“The fact that four justices nevertheless dissented – vigorously – from such a decision is a sign that the Court is going to be divided, perhaps along these exact lines, in many of the more impactful Trump-related cases that are already on their way,” he added.

Alito said that the Supreme Court failed in its responsibility to make sure the Constitution “is not abused.”

“Today, the Court makes a most unfortunate misstep that rewards an act of judicial hubris and imposes a $2 billion penalty on American taxpayers,” he wrote. “The District Court has made plain its frustration with the Government, and respondents raise serious concerns about nonpayment for completed work. But the relief ordered is, quite simply, too extreme a response. A federal court has many tools to address a party’s supposed nonfeasance. Self-aggrandizement of its jurisdiction is not one of them. I would chart a different path than the Court does today, so I must respectfully dissent.”

'They hate America': MAGA is freaking out over Democrats’ response to Trump speech

The Democrats showed their disapproval of Trump’s Tuesday night speech to Congress, and MAGA is having a “full-blown meltdown,” the Daily Beast reported on Wednesday.

Democrats held up signs, declined to clap and wore pink in protest. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) wrote notes on a white board. Rep. Al Green (D-Tex.) was removed after he stood up and yelled.

“Has there ever been a more disgraceful and pitiful and malicious display in politics than Congressional Democrats refusing to stand for heartbroken families and courageous heroes?” White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller asked on X.

READ MORE: 'This is not normal': How Trump’s 'bitter' SOTU resembled a 'sordid campaign rally'

“Democrats showed whose side they’re on — and it’s not the American people,” the White House said in a statement.

The White House statement quoted Dana Perino on Fox News. “The Democratic Party still has no common sense. They have no ideas and they have no heart. They couldn’t even stand for the most inspiring moments of the speech,” she said. Perino was White House press secretary under George W. Bush.

The statement then listed 35 bullet points of points where the Democrats did not applaud. They included “declaring America’s youth are perfect as God made them,” “removing illegal alien killers, rapists, and drug dealers from our streets” and simply “The United States of America.”

Some members of Trump world were incensed that Democrats did not cheer for Trump making 13-year-old cancer survivor DJ Daniel an honorary Secret Service agent.

READ MORE: 'I almost choked': Economist highlights gobsmacking moment of Trump’s speech

“Democrats reminded us they are the party of insanity and hate — they could not even clap for a child battling cancer, or mothers who lost their children,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X.

Donald Trump Jr. wrote a similar sentiment on X. “If you can’t stand up and cheer for a kid with brain cancer being made an honorary member of the Secret Service, then you might be a deeply disturbed and f---ed up person!!!” he wrote.

“If you didn’t stand up and applaud this young cancer survivor and his amazing father, there’s something really sick and messed up about you,” conservative commentator Charlie Kirk posted on X early Wednesday, echoing Trump Jr. and Leavitt.

Trump advisor Elon Musk took issue with one moment where the Democrats did applaud — when the president said that the U.S. has sent hundreds of billions of dollars to support Ukraine.

READ MORE: 'Bet big, move fast, and never settle': Are the 'bros' 'abandoning Trump?

“The only flag being waved and the ONLY cheer by Democrats was for another country, he posted on his website. “They hate America,” he added.

Some Democrats addressed the lack of applause.

“Mr. President, we would all applaud if you found cures to horrific diseases.” Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.) wrote on X. “But how do you expect to accomplish that when you're cutting funding from the NIH?”

“There’s no standing ovation for cutting funding for cancer research, stripping Medicaid, and raising costs for working people,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) posted on X.

READ MORE: Courts won't 'rescue us' from draconian Trump/DOGE Cuts — here's why

The Commerce Department is about to give billions to Elon Musk as part of internet program: report

Changes to a program expanding internet access could “drastically increase” opportunities for Elon Musk, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday. The Commerce Department is looking to change a Biden era program that intends to make the internet more widely available across the country as soon as this week, meaning his satellite internet system, Starlink, will stand to profit.

Reporter Patience Haggin writes, “Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has told staff he plans to make the grant program ‘technology-neutral,’ the people said. That change will free up states to award more funds to satellite-internet providers like Starlink, rather than mainly to companies that lay fiber-optic cables, to connect the millions of U.S. households that lack high-speed internet service.”

Starlink is part of SpaceX, Musk’s space technology company. The $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment Program placed rules around the usage of satellites — they could only be used where it wasn’t a good idea to lay fiber cables, because they thought cables were more reliable and durable. Republicans say the program moves too slowly.

READ MORE: Courts won't 'rescue us' from draconian Trump/DOGE Cuts — here's why

“The potential new rules could drastically increase the share of funding available to Starlink,” Haggin writes. “Under the BEAD program’s original rules, Starlink was expected to get up to $4.1 billion, said people familiar with the matter. With Lutnick’s overhaul, Starlink... could receive $10 billion to $20 billion, they said.”

According to sources, Starlink lobbied the Commerce Department about the program. But they stopped these efforts when Trump took office.

Lutnick is looking to change other rules to BEAD as well. He is reportedly considering reducing rules that stipulate internet providers to offer plans for low-income customers. Starlink costs hundreds of dollars and has a $120 monthly service fee. However, “Starlink has gained a loyal following because it works in areas where fiber service isn’t available,” Haggin writes.

Lutnick reportedly said he is planning on getting rid of BEAD rules about sustainability, “as well as provisions that encouraged states to fund companies with a racially diverse workforce or union participation, the people said,” Haggin writes.

READ MORE: 'Bet big, move fast, and never settle': Are the 'bros' 'abandoning Trump?

Arielle Roth, whom Trump nominated to lead the bureau at the Commerce Department that oversees BEAD, said the bureau “imposed extreme tech bias in favor of fiber.” It also had a “woke social agenda," she added.

'Bet big, move fast and never settle': Are the 'bros' 'abandoning Trump?

“Bros” may be souring on President Donald Trump’s presidency, journalist Peter Hamby writes at Puck on Tuesday.

Media company Barstool Sports founder and “professional attention magnet” Dave Portnoy represents a mindset that may be common among younger men as well, Hamby argues. Portnoy supported Trump during his presidential campaign, but recently, he has been critical.

In a recent post on X, Portnoy, who told Fox News he was asked to be part of Trump's Commerce Department, raised issue with an anticlimactic release of documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the arrival to the U.S. of two brothers who were charged with rape and trafficking minors in Romania, and issues with the economy.

READ MORE: 'This is not normal': How Trump’s 'bitter' SOTU resembled a 'sordid campaign rally'

“If I’m gonna be fair, these questions need to be asked today,” Portnoy posted. “Why is the release of the Epstein list always a shit show? What’s the point of booting out illegals and criminals while somehow becoming a safe haven for the Tate brothers? Why is Crypto in the toilet if Trump is crypto king? How far does Tesla stock have to crash before Elon goes back to work?”

The key question, according to Hamby, is “does this mean the bros are abandoning Trump?”

“Yes, Portnoy is contemptuous of political correctness and the identity politics of the left,” Hamby writes. “And yes, he’s a sports freak and unapologetic bro. But he represents something a little bit more specific and relevant to many of the younger men who abandoned the Democratic Party in the pandemic years and voted for Trump last year. Portnoy is a business role model, a self-made multimillionaire (centimillionaire, perhaps) who took Barstool from a local Boston rag to a massive multimedia empire with a blue-collar grind mentality, an enthusiasm for risk-taking, and an unfathomable lack of shame.”

Pollster John Della Volpe, head of the youth research firm SocialSphere, would be likely to call Portnoy’s disciples “High Risk Hustlers.” They like sports, investing, and crypto. They are also likely to support Trump — and Elon Musk.

READ MORE: 'Not something that the Democrats can score points on': Historian critiques response to Trump speech

“For this group, the hustle isn’t just about ambition—it’s a survival strategy,” Della Volpe wrote in his newsletter last month. “Their financial mindset is shaped by the belief that playing it safe leads to economic stagnation.”

“Their preference for bold, disruptive leaders mirrors their financial ethos—bet big, move fast, and never settle,” he added.

According to his data, Trump’s support from younger voters has taken an “unambiguous hit, as expectations about a shiny new economy collide with our current reality,” Hamby writes.

Trump’s favorability rating for this group is 43 percent, dropping seven points since a poll held shortly before inauguration.

READ MORE: This deep-red state is expected to suffer the biggest blow from Trump’s tariffs

Still, Portnoy types probably aren’t going far.

“Trump’s favorability among young men remains relatively steady, masking their growing skepticism about his economic policies and handling of inflation just a month into his presidency,” Della Volpe told Puck. “Women have already broken with him. If life doesn’t become more affordable as Trump promised, and quickly, even his strongest backers may conclude he can’t deliver.”

'Not something that the Democrats can score points on': Historian critiques response to Trump speech

Democrats’ varied response to President Donald Trump’s 99-minute speech to Congress left something to be desired, presidential historian Douglas Brinkley told CNN on Tuesday.

“President Trump did what he needed to do,” Brinkley said. “But… the economic issues weren’t really talked about.”

Brinkley mentioned the possibility of Congress cutting Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security as well as Trump’s tariffs as key concerns.

“Trump seemed relaxed. He had, I think, a better night than the Democrats. They were just, I guess, everybody left to their own.”

READ MORE: 'Lies, lies and more lies – but no plan to lower costs': Dems blast Trump's State of the Union

Democrats responded in varying ways, but the most memorable response was from Rep. Al Green, (D-Tex.) who was removed after he stood up, shouted and waved his cane. Republicans cheered as he was escorted out. CNN’s Erin Burnett called the moment “chaotic” and “extremely awkward.”

Brinkley pointed out that interruptions from MAGA happened during former President Joe Biden's speeches.

“The difference is… he fights for poverty and social justice, he’s been sick, he’s called for the impeachment of Donald Trump long ago," Brinkley said.

“It was a fiery moment for [Green],” Brinkley noted, adding that it reminded him of Reverend Hosea Williams, a civil rights leader who worked with Martin Luther King, Jr., but Green’s move did not “help the Democratic party.”

READ MORE: This deep-red state is expected to suffer the biggest blow from Trump’s tariffs

“It might create a university press biography about Al Green that never would have been written, because it is a moment in history, but it’s not something that the Democrats can score points on,” he said.

"It's worth it to let people know that there are some of us who are going to stand up against this president's desire to cut Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security,” Green told reporters.

Other Democrats held signs that said “Musk steals” and “save Medicaid.” Some turned their backs on Trump. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) wrote different responses on a white board. Some stayed in their districts and hosted town halls.

Brinkley did approve of Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s (D-Mich) official response to the speech.

READ MORE: 'The litany of lies is endless': Internet rips Trump apart over 'utterly bonkers' speech

“Slotkin pulled a rabbit out of her hat,” he said. “That was a very brilliant, relaxed response. Andy Beshear [the Governor of Kentucky] and her should be the [party] voices, I think, coming from the heartland of America.”

'Potheads all over this country': Trump supporter flees CNN interview when asked about Musk

A supporter of President Donald Trump walked out of an interview with CNN when he was pressed about Elon Musk in a segment that aired Tuesday. CNN’s Elle Reeve was visiting a pro-Trump Georgia county to ask residents about their satisfaction with the president. She sat down with three men at a restaurant to discuss.

“Do you trust Elon Musk?” Reeve asked. “He’s a government contractor, he’s got business interests, whether in defense, internet, that kind of thing. He’s also admitted to drug use, smoked pot on Joe Rogan’s show. Do you trust him as a stable, rational, and reasonable person to be doing this job?”

“Yes,” said Trump voter David Herrin.

READ MORE: 'Propagandized' him 'back into' power: GOP strategists slam Fox host complaining about Trump policy

Musk smoked cannabis on Joe Rogan's podcast in 2018.

“There’s potheads all over this country,” he continued. “Y’all sitting here trying to bash one man for what 99 percent of this country, Republican or Democrat [does]. This whole dadgum town smokes pot.”

He turned to Reeve. “You’re part of the Democratic party in my book,” he said.

“No, I’m not,” Reeve responded.

READ MORE: 'Lack of ethical guardrails': People are paying millions to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago

“The conversation devolved quickly,” Reeve said in a voiceover. “We had not anticipated the emotional connection we already felt with Musk.”

Herrin stood up from the table.

“This is over with,” he said.

Reeve asked if he wanted to see the video of Musk smoking cannabis.

READ MORE: Auto Association president says plants 'will close within a week' thanks to Trump tariffs

“I don’t care. I’m saying it don’t matter that that makes him unqualified to do a job,” he said.

“She’s coming in here with ignorant arguments,” he continued. “I can prove you’re a Democrat by the level of ignorance that you portray.”

“Donald Trump and Elon Musk please drain the swamp. Why are you there? Get the job done. Please,” he said before he walked out the door.

“They’ll probably go down the drain with it,” another person who had been sitting at the table said.

READ MORE: GOP lawmaker says he’ll nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize — but missed one glaring issue

'Lack of ethical guardrails': People are paying millions to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago

A pro-Trump Super PAC is selling lucrative tickets to dine and meet with President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago, WIRED reported Tuesday.

“Business leaders can secure a one-on-one meeting with the president at Mar-a-Lago for $5,000,000, according to sources with direct knowledge of the meetings. At a so-called Candlelight Dinner held as recently as this past Saturday, prospective Mar-a-Lago guests were asked to spend $1,000,000 to reserve a seat, according to an invitation obtained by WIRED,” write Leah Feiger, Louise Matsakis and Jake Lahut.

"So-called candlelight dinners offering access to the president are known to have been held prior to Trump’s inauguration, but have not previously been reported to have occurred while he is in office," they add.

READ MORE: Arizona Republican could lose office after pulling a gun in road-rage incident

The $5 million meetings have become a “hot ticket” among businesspeople, a source told WIRED.

The invitation is on MAGA Inc. stationary and reads, “You are invited to a candlelight dinner featuring special guest President Donald J. Trump.” MAGA Inc. is a super PAC that supported Trump in his 2024 run for president.

“Donald J. Trump is appearing at this event only as a featured speaker, and is not asking for funds or donations,” the invitation states.

People were asked to contact Meredith O’Rourke to RSVP. O’Rourke was national finance director and senior advisor at Donald J. Trump for President 2024. They were also told to email Abby Mathis, who is the finance coordinator at MAGA Inc.

READ MORE: Auto Association president says plants 'will close within a week' thanks to Trump tariffs

“Michael Solakiewicz, a pro-Trump digital creator, posted photographs of the event on Instagram,” write Feiger, Matsakis and Lahut. “WIRED has also viewed photographs and videos of Elon Musk with his son X at Mar-a-Lago the following day during a charity event hosted by a group called Wine Women & Shoes that also featured Trump.”

These tickets are unprecedented, according to one expert.

“I can’t recall a sitting president in the first weeks of his administration asking for millions of dollars in fundraising,” Don Moynihan, a professor of public policy at the University of Michigan, told WIRED. “The concern is less about fundraising, and more about access and influence … People hoping to get favorable treatment view it in their interest to donate money to Trump.”

“Part of what is worrying is the lack of ethical guardrails in the current Trump administration, where there doesn’t seem to be a clear line between Trump’s businesses and the presidency,” Moynihan added.

READ MORE: 'Concerned' Republican rep. still supports Trump as federal layoffs hit his district

A source told WIRED that the money was going toward Trump’s presidential library.

'Concerned' Republican rep. still supports Trump as federal layoffs hit his district

Republican Rep. McKay Erickson, who serves in the Wyoming House of Representatives, knows that federal layoffs are hurting his community, but he is still loyal to President Donald Trump, the Guardian reported Tuesday.

His district includes national lands where workers have been fired as part of the Department of Government Efficiency’s effort to shrink the federal government. Bridger-Teton National Forest and Grand Teton National Park employ — or employed — his constituents.

“These people have a face to me,” Erickson told the Guardian. “They have a face and a place in either Star Valley or Jackson that I know quite well.”

Erickson believes that there needs to be cuts to the federal government, “but in his district, he foresees a lack of trail maintenance hurting local outfitting companies and understaffed parks with closed gates,” writes the Guardian’s Cy Neff.

READ MORE: 'Only in a dictatorship': Trump slammed for latest effort to 'chill free speech'

“This way is so indiscriminate, and it doesn’t really drill down on the real issue as to where those cuts need to be,” Erickson said. “I’m afraid that probably all we’re going to lose is services.”

Still, Erickson maintains his support of the president. “It hasn’t really shaken me. It’s concerned me, but not shaken me in my support,” he said.

Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis shared Erickson’s sentiments. “I fully support President Trump’s effort to ferret out the reckless and wasteful spending that has infected our government,” she told KHOL/Jackson Hole Community Radio.

For the past three presidential elections, Wyoming voted for Trump by a wider margin than any other state.

READ MORE: 'Windfall profits': How corporations are exploiting bird flu to raise prices

Out of 17 supervisors at Grand Teton National Park, 16 were fired, according to the Associated Press. That leaves one person to oversee dozens of seasonal workers. “They’re basically knee-capping the very people who need to train seasonal” employees, Kristen Brengel, senior vice president of government affairs at the National Parks Conservation Association, told the AP. “It puts the park in an untenable position. You’re going to hurt tourism.″

About 40 out of 220 workers were fired at Bridger-Teton National Forest, which is close to the size of Connecticut, according to Jackson Hole News & Guide.

The head of the U.S. Forest Service, Randy Moore, resigned following layoffs at the agency.


“Our agency’s work supports the nation’s wellbeing and its economy by providing community protection, jobs, goods and services, and a place to retreat and enjoy nature’s beauty,” he wrote in a letter to employees. “Many small businesses generate their livelihoods through permits to operate on national forests and grasslands. We provide drinking water to over 80 million Americans. We also help provide energy independence to the nation, issuing nearly 3,000 oil and gas leases. I say that to say this: You and the work you do are vital to the American way of life, and you are a valued employee who has performed admirably.”

'Windfall profits': How corporations are exploiting bird flu to raise prices

New research suggests corporations are using bird flu as an excuse to jack up prices — and their profits rose before the disease even reached their flocks, the Guardian reported Tuesday.

The cost of a dozen large eggs reached a record high of almost $5 in January. Bird flu has certainly contributed to rising prices; about 12.7 million birds are affected by the disease, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 166 million poultry have been culled since 2022. But bird flu is not the only reason for skyrocketing prices.

“Bird flu does not fully explain the sticker shock consumers experience in the egg aisle … corporate consolidation is a key culprit behind egg price spikes,” Amanda Starbuck told the Guardian. She is the lead author on a new report from Food and Water Watch.

READ MORE: 'Highly inappropriate': Concerns surround Joni Ernst’s relationships with top military officials

“Powerful corporations that control every step of the supply chain – from breeding hens to hatching eggs to processing and distributing eggs – are making windfall profits off this crisis, raising their prices above and beyond what is necessary to cover any rising costs,” she added.

“The egg production industry – like the retailer sector that producers mostly sell to – is highly concentrated," writes the Guardian’s Nina Lakhani. "This gives a handful of big corporations the opportunity to influence prices outside the impact of shocks like avian flu and the Covid 19 pandemic on supply and demand."

Cal-Maine, the largest egg producer in the U.S., saw gross profits increase by 7 between 2021 and 2023, shooting up to 1.2 billion. During this time, their flocks had not been hit by bird flu and their sales only increased by a small amount. They “issued shareholder dividends totaling $250m in fiscal year 2023 — 40 times more than the previous fiscal year. The Mississippi-based company sold 7% more eggs in 2024 compared to 2021 and tripled its profits over the same period, according to company filings,” Lakhani writes.

In some geographic areas, prices went up before bird flu reached them as well. For example, in the South, prices followed national increases, even though egg production rose and bird flu didn’t reach flocks until January.

READ MORE: 'Unusual media diet': Trump boosts karate instructor’s Facebook post in 'fresh declaration of US policy'

There were more eggs, but higher prices, in 2023. “Between April and December 2023, national retail inventories of eggs each month exceeded the five-year average by as much as almost 13%. Yet the average egg price for consumers was higher than the five-year average each month,” Lakhani writes.

According to a study from the University of Arkansas, bird flu accounts for a 12-24 percent increase in prices.

Angela Huffman, co-founder of the nonpartisan group Farm Action, thinks the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice should investigate egg prices. “Based on publicly available data, we’ve observed that egg price increases far exceed what would be expected based on hen losses and the industry has not increased the number of laying hens as expected during a period of high prices. This strongly suggests potential antitrust violations,” she said. “The FTC and DOJ have the authority to investigate beyond what is publicly available… we urge them to exercise this authority.”

“The working class is struggling to afford groceries while companies like Cal-Maine are raking in huge profits and rewarding their shareholders,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told the Guardian. “The Trump administration has the power to lower grocery bills, but instead they are imposing blanket tariffs on allies, firing federal workers who are trying to prevent the bird flu, and putting billionaires over ordinary Americans.”

READ MORE: 'Horror movie': German tourist remains in ICE detention center after over a month

Meanwhile, the conditions at factory farms are ideal for the flu to spread. “These same companies exacerbate the bird flu outbreak by raising their birds on factory farms, crammed together in hundreds of thousands or millions, creating the perfect breeding ground for disease,” Starbuck said.

'Unusual media diet': Trump boosts karate instructor’s Facebook post in 'fresh declaration of US policy'

The latest person to gain President Donald Trump’s attention on foreign policy would be an unlikely character for any other president. Michael McCune, a 62-year-old DJ and karate teacher in Arizona, made a social media post that caught Trump’s eye, the Washington Post reported Tuesday.

On Sunday, Trump shared McCune’s 586-word Facebook post — which is about his contentious meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy — on Truth Social, where he has 9 million followers. In doing so, Trump made something of a “fresh declaration of U.S. policy,” according to the Post.

“Trump’s elevation of the Facebook post showed just how easy it can be for someone like McCune to become part of the president’s unusual media diet — and appear to influence U.S. policy,” write Yvonne Wingett Sanchez and Michael Birnbaum.

READ MORE: 'Horror movie': German tourist remains in ICE detention center after over a month

“Trump played both sides like a master chess player,” McCune wrote in a local Facebook group. “In the end, Zelenskyy will have no choice but to concede, because without U.S. support, Ukraine cannot win a prolonged war against Russia. And once U.S. companies have mining operations in Ukraine, Putin will be unable to attack without triggering massive international consequences.”

The post quickly began going viral, and then Trump found it.

Experts had been unsure as to whether Trump was still interested in negotiating a deal to gain access to minerals in Ukraine. “Continuing to pursue the deal… would suggest a continued interest in salvaging relations with Kyiv — and, potentially, continued support for the country in its war against Russia,” Sanchez and Birnbaum write.

“McCune was clearly on board with the plan, and Trump’s decision to quote him hinted that he still was, too," they ad. "By endorsing McCune’s viewpoint, Trump was essentially making a fresh declaration of U.S. policy — in the voice of a small-town karate instructor.”

READ MORE: 'He gave the game away': Deep cutbacks in Social Security staff blasted by Senate Democrats

Trump is “connected with the minds and the hearts of the American people,” McCune told the Post. “Instead of looking at me like, ‘Hey, this guy’s a nobody,’ or whatever, he took it for what it was and said, ‘Hey, I like the words here.’ Maybe he felt like it captured the strategy.”

McCune was previously a Democrat, and he voted for former President Barack Obama. It was Trump’s first campaign that convinced him to switch parties. He said his experience as a “lifelong practitioner of martial arts, strategy, and philosophy” informed his Facebook post.

“It’s overwhelming,” he said. “I feel honored, actually, that he would share some of the philosophies and what I saw… I can’t tell you what it is he saw or how he resonated with it, but obviously he felt it was something and worthy enough to share. And so, I’m honored.”

Republican cites 2 states where Medicaid work requirements failed as examples of why they work

Editor's note: This headline has been updated.

As Republicans debate a way to cut spending in order to implement President Donald Trump’s tax cuts, they are considering adding work requirements to Medicaid. In order to support the idea, one GOP lawmaker cited two examples: However, those were instances in which Medicaid work requirements actually went wrong.

“There are already tens of millions of Americans who are subject to work requirements. This is not a new concept,” Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) told NOTUS in a piece published Monday. “[Work requirements] are fantastically effective in helping people… The evidence suggests that overwhelmingly, the impact, on average, is positive.”

He listed Maine and Arkansas as examples of where work requirements went well. But in Maine, NOTUS’ Emily Kennard pointed out the potential work requirements were actually rejected. Republican Governor Paul LePage had requested them, and then-President Trump approved them. Later, Democratic Governor Janet Mills, put a stop to the plan. And in Arkansas, a judge ended up blocking the program.

READ MORE: 'Hail Mary mode': Industries brace for 'consequences' of Trump tariffs

“Maine’s low unemployment rate, its widely dispersed population, and our lowest per capita income in New England make mandates – without appropriate supports like vocational training and specific exemptions for groups like people undergoing treatment – problematic,” Mills wrote a 2019 letter to U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. “We believe that the likely result of this [requirement] would leave more Maine people uninsured without improving their participation in the workforce.”

In Arkansas, data “tells a much different story than the case Johnson made,” Kennard writes. The only state to implement such requirements, Medicaid recipients age 30 to 49 were notified in 2018 that they were required to work 80 hours per month. Almost 17,000 people lost their coverage as a result. However, a study published by the New England Journal of Medicine found that 97 percent of respondents were eligible under these new requirements.

“Studies found that beneficiaries were confused by the policy, and some lacked internet access to report their work hours,” Kennard adds.

By 2019, a federal judge had stopped the Arkansas program. An appeals court struck down the requirements in 2020. “Failure to consider whether the project will result in coverage loss is arbitrary and capricious,” the 2020 ruling said.

READ MORE: 'These are not savings': The 5 largest DOGE cuts actually saved 99% less than Musk claimed

Kennard writes: “While it did not increase beneficiaries’ workforce participation, it did increase medical debt, and delay care for more than half of those disenrolled: 64% of people affected delayed taking medication because they couldn’t afford it. The CBO [Congressional Budget Office] concluded in 2023 that “the employment status of and hours worked by Medicaid recipients would be unchanged” by work requirements, but it would lead to more uninsured Americans. The CBO came to that conclusion in part thanks to data from Arkansas.”

But when presented with that information, Johnson said the CBO should not “draw conclusions on the basis of one state’s experience.”

'Hail Mary mode': Industries brace for 'consequences' of Trump tariffs

Companies are feeling pressure as they prepare for Trump to implement tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, the New York Times reported Monday.

“Company executives and foreign officials are scrambling to avert the consequences of another tight deadline from Mr. Trump, who has threatened to put stiff tariffs on goods coming in from China, Canada and Mexico starting just after midnight Tuesday,” write Ana Swanson, Danielle Kaye, Jack Ewing and Rebecca F. Elliott.

“I’m basically in Hail Mary mode,” Logan Vanghele told the Times. He is the head of a small company that sells products for aquariums that are made in China. Last week, he begged for his shipment to be unloaded at its Friday stop in Virginia. “While it is possible that Mr. Trump’s new tariffs will include an exemption for goods that are already on the water, there is no guarantee,” the Times reported. Vanghele is looking at potentially paying about $25,000 in tariffs.

READ MORE: Investigation launched into Trump admin use of artificial intelligence on workers

Trump has threatened a 25 percent tariff on Canada and Mexico as well as a 10 percent tariff on China. He also implemented a 10 percent tariff on China earlier.

“There are going to be tariffs on Tuesday on Mexico and Canada,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview on Fox News over the weekend. “Exactly what they are, we’re going to leave that for the president and his team to negotiate.”

“Canada and Mexico are both deeply dependent on exports to the United States, and Mr. Trump’s threats have whipped their governments into action,” the Times reported. “Delegations of officials have made trips to Washington in recent weeks, including to meet with Mr. Lutnick.”

“Although tariffs do not go into force until mid-March, spot commodity prices have already risen about 20 percent,” Timothy Fiore of the Institute for Supply Management told the Washington Post.

READ MORE: 'Worried' Moody’s economist predicts Trump’s economic policies will 'do a lot of damage'

Experts predict the automotive industry will be hit the hardest. “Our American automakers, who invested billions in the U.S. to meet these requirements, should not have their competitiveness undermined by tariffs that will raise the cost of building vehicles in the United States and stymie investment in the American work force,” Matt Blunt, the president of the American Automotive Policy Council, told the Times.

“You don’t have to be an expert in autos to see how detrimental this would be,” said John Helveston, an assistant professor at George Washington University.

Still, some people are waiting to see what happens, like Ron Baumgarten, who was a trade official in Trump’s first term. “If the signals we are seeing are correct, there could be a further postponement, or potentially a reduction from the proposed level of 25 percent. As is usual with President Trump, we will be kept guessing until the last minute,” he told the Post.

'A real shame': Former Marine says DOGE cuts tell veterans they’re 'dead weight or a burden' on US

Former and current federal employees are still reeling from dramatic layoffs by the Department of Government Efficiency. Doug Jackson, a veteran of the Marines, lost his probationary job doing public affairs at the Internal Revenue Service. The firings of thousands of workers at the IRS could potentially put tax filings in jeopardy. Jackson shared his experience with CNN’s Brianna Keilar on Monday.

“Federal government is a natural fit for a lot of veterans,” he said. “One of the first things you do when you become a civil servant is you raise your right hand and take the oath to support and defend the Constitution, and that's something that we all did when we wore the uniform. And I think it's an extension of our military service to continue serving in the federal government and looking out for the public interest.”

The firings, he said, are “not good on a personal level."

"It puts people's livelihood in jeopardy," Jackson said. "It turns their lives upside down. And so now they have to figure out how they're going to pay their bills, and now they have a new job, which is applying and networking. And so on an individual level, it's turning lives upside down with uncertainty.”

READ MORE: 'Worried' Moody’s economist predicts Trump’s economic policies will 'do a lot of damage'

“But also on a larger scale, for an agency like the IRS, they need public affairs officers,” he added. “They need people who are expert communicators, who can reach the public in a meaningful way and explain new policies and even speak to the workforce. And so… it's going to have a negative effect. I can't imagine cutting people like me or anyone really across the IRS or the federal government is going to help the mission.”

Johnson mentioned that his coworker, a disabled veteran, was also fired. “What message does that send firing folks like that to the veteran community?” Keilar asked.

“I think the mass wave of fire of federal employees who have been fired by DOGE… sends two messages,” he said. “One, you know, it's telling veterans, ‘thank you for your service, but that's not enough. The government is in debt, and we also need to take your job.’ So that's one. And the second thing that I think it's telling veterans is that you are part of the problem, not the solution. And it suggests that as veterans working for the federal government, that we are somehow dead weight or a burden on the government. And I think that's a real shame.”

Keilar asked whether firings of workers at the IRS could have an impact on tax returns.

READ MORE: 'Considering what we are facing’: US cyber defense halt against Russia stuns Republican

“I'm not sure,” Johnson said. “I mean, I wasn't an agent. I worked with others who were. I can't imagine that this is going to have a positive effect on turnaround time for returns. But like you said, there are other agencies affected, and the federal government already has a difficult time recruiting, retaining their workers, and so this is going to have a discouraging effect across the workforce.”

Watch the video below or at this link:

'Sycophants': Expert slams politicians for backing Trump’s 'egregious' and 'shocking' behavior

President Donald Trump’s contentious meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was “egregious,” an international relations expert said Monday. Alexander Vindman, who was previously the National Security Council's top Ukraine expert, explained Zelenskyy's position following antagonism from Trump.

CNN host Dana Bash began the interview by asking Vindman about “another escalation by President Trump when it comes to Zelenskyy,” which he posted on Truth Social in response to Zelenskyy saying they could be far away from a ceasefire deal. “This is the worst statement that could have been made by Zelenskyy, and this is the key and America will not put up with it for much longer!” Trump posted.

“I think Trump is doubling down on regime change, not talking about [Russian President Vladimir] Putin,” Vindman said. “The Biden Administration, right or wrong, day late dollar short, called Putin a dictator. They're now talking about regime change in Ukraine, our ally, and not the inveterate enemy that has threatened us with nuclear weapons, that has been aggressively attacking us internally here.”

READ MORE: 'Worried' Moody’s economist predicts Trump’s economic policies will 'do a lot of damage'

“And it's a shocking turn of events that this is an administration that is in line, according to the Russians, and according to the Kremlin's own statements, with their policies, their views of the world, are converging and breaking burning bridges as soon as they get to them, with our allies,” he added.

Vindman was referring to pressure the U.S. has been putting on Zelenskyy to resign from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-N.C.), Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Michael Waltz.

“Lindsey Graham mentioned it almost immediately afterwards, then that it got picked up by the White House. Marco Rubio kind of alluded to something similar. Mike Waltz, these are supposed to be the adults in the second administration. They're all… sycophants to a certain extent.”

“They knew when they were signing up, they would have to bend over backwards to not just do what the President wants, but… suck up to him. So in order to do that, they need to go ahead and damn the person that somehow slighted him, Zelenskyy, who was in that room to sign a deal, a deal that both he and President Trump wanted, but was not in a position to look weak. Why? Because he's a leader of a nation at war.”

READ MORE: 'Poison' — and Trump’s favorite bev: HHS secretary faces resistance in push to 'Make America Healthy'

“So you don’t think he had any choice but to push back,” Bash said.

“He had no choice [but] to push back on the most egregious developments that occurred in that meeting,” Vindman said. "It wasn't just the fact that President Trump was looking for a thank you… The reason he pushed back is because Trump was saying, or just said, that Zelenskyy was a dictator, he was saying that Russia was not the aggressor. And Zelenskyy had just finished showing him pictures of troops that were being abused, the POWs, and talked about 20,000 children that were kidnapped. He could not accept a situation in which the narrative was completely changing, and he's the leader of a country that's the subject of those attacks. He had no choice.”

“The only lasting peace for Ukraine is one in which there are some sort of security guarantees on the back end that the Europeans that the US is going to be there to ensure that Russia doesn't take a pause and reinvade,” he added. “Mainly, [Zelenskyy] was holding his ground defending the narrative that Russians are their aggressors. Ukraine is defending itself, which shouldn't be up for discussion, but it is.”

Watch the video below or at this link:

'Worried' Moody’s economist predicts Trump’s economic policies will 'do a lot of damage'

President Donald Trump’s economic policies are causing serious problems, an economist said Monday. Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics chief economist, told CNN that Americans would see a rise in prices due to tariffs that Trump is planning to impose on China, Mexico and Canada on Tuesday, the Daily Beast reported.

Zandi was responding to comments Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made over the weekend.

“We have the experience of President Trump’s first term, where the tariffs did not affect prices,” Bessent told CBS News. “And it’s a holistic approach, that there will be tariffs, there will be cuts in regulation, there will be cheaper energy. So I would expect that very quickly we will be down to the Fed’s 2 percent [inflation] target. So I’m expecting inflation to continue dropping over the year.”

READ MORE: Mike Johnson has 'little room to maneuver' as GOP lawmakers fight over spending

Zandi disagreed with Bessent’s prediction. “I think they’re going to raise prices,” he said. “They’re a tax on American consumers. If you add up all of the tariffs that are now in play, those that have already been imposed—like the 10 percent on China—and those that are being discussed, like the 25 percent on Canadian and Mexican imports… That’ll add about $1,250 to the typical American’s bill over a period of a year.”

This prediction mirrors findings from the Peterson Institute, a nonpartisan research organization, that tariffs would “cost the typical US household over $1,200 a year.” Bessent called these findings “alarmist.”

Zandi said tariffs would first cause “higher inflation” and then “weaker economic growth.”

He added that the tariffs would cause some Americans to lose their jobs. “At some point the tariffs will do economic damage because they’ll cost American jobs,” Zandi said. “Especially if other countries respond and retaliate and raise their own tariffs and impose their own trade restrictions — which is what they did, certainly what China did, back in President Trump’s first term.”

READ MORE: 'Strong eugenic connotation': Here’s the hateful slur the alt-right is bringing back

“Consumer confidence is down,” said CNN host Kate Bolduan. “Consumer spending dropping. Layoffs ticking up. GDP forecast turning negative. Do you see this as a momentary blip, or could this really be the beginning of something bigger?”

“Well, I’m worried,” Zandi said. He added that there is “uncertainty around economic policy.”

He listed factors leading to the uncertainty: tariffs, cuts to the federal government by the Department of Government Efficiency, immigration policy, Congress’ tax cut legislation, a possible government shutdown and Treasury debt.

He added that business and consumers would become more “cautious” with their finances. “It feels like the economy’s gagging on the uncertainty and, you know, the longer the uncertainty hangs around, the more likely the economy’s going to start choking,” he said. “And yeah, I think it’s going to do a lot of damage.”

READ MORE: Reporter obtains 'alarming' third memo from USAID official put on leave for revealing foreign aid cuts

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

Reporter obtains 'alarming' third memo from USAID official put on leave for revealing foreign aid cuts

An executive at USAID, the foreign aid agency in the process of being dismantled, was placed on administrative leave after sending memos criticizing the Trump administration’s cuts, Sam Stein writes Monday at the Bulwark. Nicholas Enrich, the acting assistant administrator for global health at USAID, was showing the consequences of the Trump administration was not honoring its promise to exclude life saving foreign aid.

“Enrich had authored two memos, both dated February 28, 2025,” Stein writes. “One noted the dramatic staff reductions that had taken place at the Bureau for Global Health, whose workforce had gone from 783 ‘encumbered’ positions to 69 personnel ‘that received Essential Personnel Designations, of which 15 received RIF letters.’ In the other, Enrich identified ‘72 activities across 31 awards’ that had been approved for waivers by Secretary of State Marco Rubio but for which no payments had been released. He said the death toll from this was ‘not known.’”

In a third unfinished memo, which Stein called, "more alarming than the other two," Enrich outlined consequences of a stop to $7.7 billion in global health aid. This could lead to “12.5–17.9 million cases of malaria with an additional 71,000–166,000 deaths annually, a 28 to 32 percent increase in tuberculosis globally, an additional 200,000 paralytic polio cases a year, and potentially more than 28,000 cases of Ebola, Marburg, or related diseases.” In addition, nearly 17 million pregnant women would lose out on lifesaving programs.

READ MORE: 'Strong eugenic connotation': Here’s the hateful slur the alt-right is bringing back

He noted that these cuts could affect global trade. They could also cause job losses for American farmers providing food to send overseas. Finally, he pointed out that risk of preventable diseases would reach the U.S.

Ending these programs, he said, could pose risks for national security. “Weakened disease surveillance doesn’t only jeopardize natural outbreak detection — it also creates openings for malicious actors,” Enrich wrote. “Global health monitoring systems serve as the ‘smoke alarm’ for unusual disease patterns that could signal a bioterrorism event. If those alarms are switched off or muted due to lack of funding, a deliberate release of a pathogen could spread for weeks under the guise of a normal outbreak.”

Enrich was aware that the memos would have repercussions for his own career. “He knew sending those would result in discipline and the end of his career (at USAID), but also sending those ‘for the record’ ensured that the world had a light on what was really going on,” a source told the Bulwark.

“How much good will come of this is the larger question,” Stein writes. “It’s fair to be skeptical. That said, there is some precedent for people using public pressure to compel DOGE and Trump to reverse their decisions to shutter critical programs. Over the weekend, Elon Musk took to Twitter to try and shame folks for insisting that 400,000 boxes of USAID-branded nutrient-rich, peanut-based paste were languishing in a warehouse because of the aid pause. But he also pledged to look into it. And then he reported back that the payments for those shipments had been restored — which, by late Sunday night, they had been.”

READ MORE: Alarm sounded as Trump’s recent moves threaten to upend the Constitution

'Strong eugenic connotation': Here’s the hateful slur the alt-right is bringing back

The alt-right is reintroducing a dehumanizing slur that has its roots in 100-year-old eugenics, Justin Kirkland writes in the Guardian Monday.

“The R-word is in a new era of prominence in rightwing, chronically online circles – especially on 4chan and X,” he writes. “A favorite of those who currently hold power or stand to gain power under Donald Trump’s second administration, the slur is being used with gleeful relish to belittle and mock ideological enemies.”

One adopter of the word is none other than the Trump administration’s Elon Musk, who owns X.

READ MORE: Revealed: 'Promoters of race science' and eugenics featured at TX far-right conference

“In the past year, Elon Musk has used the R-word at least 16 times on X,” Kirkland writes. “He thought Ben Stiller was one for endorsing Kamala Harris; so was the Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz for comparing Tesla to Enron.”

There was a 200 percent spike in use of the word on X in January, according to a recent study from Montclair State University.

Last year, Trump reportedly used the word to insult Joe Biden and Harris.

“I feel liberated,” an anonymous banker told the Financial Times when Trump was elected. We can say ‘r-----’ and ‘p----’ without the fear of getting cancelled.”

READ MORE: 'This guy is a leech': AOC rips Elon Musk over attack on Social Security

The slur has particular weight coming from Musk. “Musk, a man who launched a Nazi salute at Trump’s inauguration festivities, has aligned himself dangerously closely with eugenicist thinking,” Kirkland writes. “Musk, who has said he is on the autism spectrum himself, also wields oligarchic power as he attempts to eliminate “unnecessary spending” in the federal government with Trump’s blessing. Early on, Musk set his sights on Medicaid, which was created in part to ensure people with disabilities had access to affordable healthcare. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers are looking to slash Medicaid spending to support Trump’s tax cuts.”

The word has its roots in a “diagnosis” tracing back to 1910 that meant, according to some doctors, a "feeble-minded" person was “incurable.” Leaders at this time also believed that people with disabilities, people of color, and queer people could be eliminated through selective breeding. People with disabilities, proponents of eugenics argued, should be institutionalized.

“[The use of the R-word] is absolutely historically linked to the understanding that ‘r-------’ children are defective children and that we can eliminate defective children for the good of society,” Topher Endress, a reverend in Missouri who holds a doctorate in philosophy, told the Guardian. “I mean, that’s the basis of eugenics. I’m a little fearful of seeing this word pop back up because it does have such a strong eugenic connotation."

“I see the rise of the R-word as a gauge for how far society is willing to let people like Musk and Trump go," Kirkland writes. "And while I believe that in most reasonable environments, it’s still very much taboo to say the word aloud, the fact that it’s being said by some of the most powerful people in the world, with no recourse, says enough."

READ MORE: Alarm sounded as Trump’s recent moves threaten to upend the Constitution

‘Pessimistic’: Economists warn Trump’s policies are raising prices 'quite substantially'

Looming tariffs and sweeping firings of federal workers are “chilling” the economy, ABC News reported Thursday. Thousands of government employees have been laid off as President Donald Trump and South African centibillionaire Elon Musk seek to shrink the federal government.

“It’s a very difficult business environment, because they can’t plan for what their cost structure is going to be,” Rachel Ziemba, an adjunct senior fellow at the think tank the Center for a New American Security, told ABC News. “It’s adding to investment uncertainty, and some people are holding back on investments.”

Trump said that he will impose 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada on March 4. He also plans to impose a 10 percent tariff on China on top of the 10 percent tariff he already put in place. He says that the tariffs are in response to the drug trade.

READ MORE: This GOP plan is 'key to unlocking' Trump’s agenda — and a 'tacit admission' they won’t pay for it

“Drugs are still pouring into our Country from Mexico and Canada at very high and unacceptable levels,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “A large percentage of these Drugs, much of them in the form of Fentanyl, are made in, and supplied by, China.”

“Every time a car part crosses the border, 25% tariffs could be very onerous,” Ziemba said. “We could see the cost of building a house go up quite substantially.”

These tariffs could also lead to layoffs. “If one of the inputs of your factory goes up by 25%, you might cut your production and say maybe we’ll have to fire some people,” she added.

And Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency “also impacts consumption, because people are losing their jobs or are afraid of losing their jobs, so that might cause them to save more money,“ Ziemba said.

READ MORE: 'Who’s subverting POTUS?' MAGA rages after AG Bondi alleges FBI failed to follow her order

A survey from the Conference Board, a business membership and research nonprofit, found this week that consumer sentiment is the lowest it’s been since August 2021.

“Views of current labor market conditions weakened,” said Stephanie Guichard, senior economist for global indicators at The Conference Board. “Consumers became pessimistic about future business conditions and less optimistic about future income. Pessimism about future employment prospects worsened and reached a 10-month high.”

Inflation is also hurting buyers. “Average 12-month inflation expectations surged from 5.2% to 6% in February. This increase likely reflected a mix of factors, including sticky inflation but also the recent jump in prices of key household staples like eggs and the expected impact of tariffs,” Guichard said.

Click here to read ABC's full report.

READ MORE: 'Soaring': Price of grocery staple Trump promised to make cheaper hits record high

'Which side of the war is he on?' Analyst details 'central question' in Trump’s Russia approach

As President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy meet to discuss an economic agreement, a key question is whether Trump is on Ukraine or Russia’s side, according to CNN Political & National Security Analyst David Sanger.

“I think the central question that Zelenskyy has to go resolve as he walks into the Oval Office right now with the president is which side of this war is Donald Trump on?” he said on CNN Friday.

“The past few weeks, the president has suggested that his sympathies really lie with the Russians," he continued "You saw that in his refusal to say that it was Russian aggression that began the war. You saw it in the discussions that they had in Saudi Arabia, where there was talk about a broader economic relationship with Russia, which would mean undoing the sanctions that were imposed here.”

READ MORE: 'Who’s subverting POTUS?' MAGA rages after AG Bondi alleges FBI failed to follow her order

Trump recently called Zelenskyy a “dictator,” although he later backpedaled.

“Did I say that?" Trump said to a reporter. "I can’t believe I said that. Next question."

“So if you're President Zelenskyy you've got to think, 'Gee, my biggest ally is about to go over to the other side here,' and that's what he's trying to pull him back from," Sanger said.

“It's also what President [Emmanuel] Macron of France and Prime Minister [Keir] Starmer of Britain were trying to figure out and to prevent in their meetings in recent days,” he said. “And I'm not sure at the end of this whether we'll know the answer to that question. I think what we will know is that this deal has been signed… There's nothing very specific in it."

“It does enable President Trump to stand up and say, 'I've achieved what I need to achieve, and I can now back the Ukrainians.' But I'm not sure President Zelenskyy will actually trust that,” he added.

READ MORE: 'Unvarnished thoughts' and millennial messaging: Why Vance’s online habit gives 'consultants heartburn'

Watch the video below or at this link:

'Who’s subverting POTUS?' MAGA rages after AG Bondi alleges FBI failed to follow her order

Attorney General Pam Bondi alleges an FBI field office is withholding thousands of documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, The Independent reports. Bondi released documents on the case Thursday, but they did not contain any major revelations — and right-wing Donald Trump supporters allege the “evil deep state” is responsible for purportedly concealing information.

The documents that were released included flight logs, which had been made available previously in court cases, and his book of contacts, which has been in circulation for years. Epstein died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges. He was previously convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor.

“I repeatedly questioned whether this was the full set of documents responsive to my request and was repeatedly assured by the FBI that we had received the full set of documents," Bondi wrote in a letter to FBI director Kash Patel. "Late yesterday, I learned from a source that the FBI Field Office in New York was in possession of thousands of pages of documents related to the investigation and indictment of Epstein. Despite my repeated requests, the FBI never disclosed the existence of these files…There will be no withholdings or limitations to my or your access."

READ MORE: 'Unvarnished thoughts' and millennial messaging: Why Vance’s online habit gives 'consultants heartburn'

“If there are gaps, we will find them,” Patel said in a statement Thursday. “If records have been hidden, we will uncover them.”

“I nor the task force were given or reviewed the Epstein documents being released today” Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), a member of the House Oversight Committee, posted on X. “A NY Post story just revealed that the documents will simply be Epstein's phonebook. THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a complete disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!”

“We’re talking recordings, evidence, etc," conservative commentator Liz Wheeler posted on X. "The juicy stuff. Names. These swamp creatures at SDNY deceived Bondi, Kash, and YOU. Be outraged that the binder is boring. You should be. Because the evil deep state LIED TO YOUR FACE."

“Be very, very angry that deep state agents in the swamp at the [Southern District of New York] are at this very moment defying President Trump & AG Bondi & you who voted him into office, lying, and hiding the truth about Jeffrey Epstein because they don’t want their own corruption & weaponization of govt exposed,” she added.

READ MORE: 'America’s collapse into autocracy': Here are 'helpful day-to-day' tips for surviving Trump’s second term

Conservative commentator Glenn Beck called the files a joke. “Who is subverting POTUS?" he posted on X. "The #Epsteinfiles are a total joke. I know Kash, Pam B and The President. This is not the file. WH tells me that they believe the usual suspects FBI/SDNY has the actual #EpsteinClientList and are refusing to turn it over. THIS IS AN INTERNAL CIVIL WAR if true."

'Unvarnished thoughts' and millennial messaging: Why Vance’s online habit gives 'consultants heartburn'

Like President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance has an X “habit,” Philip Wegmann writes at Real Clear Politics. The website just so happens to be owned by another prolific poster, Trump advisor Elon Musk.

Vance “tweeted, and tweeted, and tweeted, pressing send no less than 74 times in his first 30 days in office. Of course, those are rookie numbers compared to his boss, who reshaped the presidency with his tens-of-thousands of social media posts... Trump supporters have been hooked for a decade. They like their politicians unfiltered and expect the same kind of direct-to-consumer stream of consciousness from the president’s new Hillbilly Apprentice. There is no learning curve here for the vice president though. When it comes to social media, said Alex Bruesewitz, a top Trump advisor, the two men are ‘cut from the same cloth,” writes Wegmann.

“JD is giving you his unvarnished thoughts on Twitter,” a friend told Real Clear Politics. “If he sees something interesting, political or non-political, he might reply.”

READ MORE: 'Backlash': Trump policies could cost US $3 billion in Quebec tourism

Second Lady Usha Vance even encouraged her husband to be nicer in his posts. “I don’t know that I’ll take that advice,” he said at CPAC last week, adding, “The best advice she gave me is don’t let them filter you.” He, not his communications staff, reportedly writes the posts.

Vance recently called former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan a “dummy.”

He also drew attention recently for a post dismissing the power of the courts. “If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that's also illegal. Judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power,” he said.

“Anytime a politician writes their own tweets it can give their consultants heartburn,” said Ryan Girdusky. Girdusky met Vance over X, then Twitter, and ran a super PAC supporting his Senate bid.

READ MORE: 'America’s collapse into autocracy': Here are 'helpful day-to-day' tips for surviving Trump’s second term

“It is very easy when you’re in Congress to fall into the habit of only talking to TV bookers, reporters, or donors,” he said. The vice president “is deliberately using social media to try to connect with people outside the beltway.”

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) told RCP that he is a fan of Vance's posts. “In a constitutional republic like ours, the democratic process itself benefits materially from people having direct access to elected officials."

As a millennial, Vance grew up alongside the development of social media. He is “the first of his generation to serve as vice president, and Vance, 40, recognizes that the medium itself is the message,” writes Wegmann.

“JD is setting the new standard for politics, and voters will demand even more authenticity from their leaders,” said political operative and podcaster John Ashbrook.

READ MORE: 'The damage' is 'immense': Attorneys for man accused by Mace demand evidence — or an apology

“Vance doesn’t seem like he will log off anytime soon,” Wegmann writes.

AOC slams 'reckless' Trump for 'taking a wrecking ball' to Americans’ 'lifelines'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and the Democratic party remain “resolved” during the Trump administration so far, she told NPR host Steve Inskeep in an interview that aired Friday.

As a vocal critic of the Trump administration’s immigration policies, Ocasio-Cortez recently ran into a controversy with Trump Border Czar Tom Homan after she held an online forum informing constituents of their rights. “I was informing all of my constituents of their constitutional protections, and in particular, their constitutional protections against illegal search and seizure in the United States,” she said.

Homan threatened to report her to the Department of Justice, which is headed by Trump loyalist Pam Bondi. Ocasio-Cortez said she had not heard from the DOJ, but after the interview, she sent a letter asking Bondi “yielded to political pressure trying to weaponize the agency against elected officials whose speech they disagree with.”

READ MORE: Historian calls out Trump’s Ukraine 'protection racket': 'Not a lot of diplomatic thought here'

Inskeep asked Ocasio-Cortez whether she or fellow Democrats are feeling “intimidated or silenced.”

“I’m not,” she said. “I think it's important to call this administration's bluff. I think that this is what authoritarians do. I think this is what kleptocracies do. They rely on the illusion of power.”

She also said voters are growing frustrated with the government because "everything feels increasingly like a scam, that not only are grocery prices going up, but it's like everything has a fee and a surcharge. And I think that anger is put out at government."

Inskeep asked whether she would like a president who went in to “break some china and mess things up,” but differently.

READ MORE: 'The damage' is 'immense': Attorneys for man accused by Mace demand evidence — or an apology

“No, I don't want someone being reckless. I actually don't want someone taking a wrecking ball to someone's chemotherapy to just see what happens,” she said.

“Now, I do think that we can examine certain things, like Medicare Advantage, that I think is a scam, that in the name of so-called efficiency, ironically enough, we have handed over huge amounts of healthcare disbursements to private insurers who are pocketing it. Sure, yeah, let's go after that. But I don't think we just destroy everything that we have worked so hard for as a country to become innovative, to become just, to have some of the only lifelines that people have in this country to a roof over their head or food in their children's stomach. No, I don't think that we gamble with that,” she said.

Historian calls out Trump’s Ukraine 'protection racket': 'Not a lot of diplomatic thought here'

President Donald Trump is slated to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, whom he called a “dictator.” They are expected to finalize an agreement giving the U.S. rights to rare minerals in Ukraine. Historian Jon Meacham told MSNBC on Friday that Trump's approach was reminiscent of the Sopranos.

“Take us back. Is this more like a Teddy Roosevelt imperialist approach? Is this William McKinley? Who does this remind you of [Trump’s] world view when it comes to power politics?” asked MSNBC host Joe Scarborough.

“It's older than that even, it's almost medieval and Renaissance… This is a royal house with a kingdom who bases relations on personal connection, personal feeling… and basically the transfer of assets. It's very autocratic, very straightforward. I mean, let's be honest. It's kind of, I don't want to say refreshing, but the president is being very clear here,” Meacham said.

READ MORE: Trump and Kushner working a new golf deal with Saudis — while no one is looking: report

“So one of the things that I think is really important here is to remember that we are now living — to shift from a historical metaphor to a cultural one — we're now living in the Sopranos, right? This is a protection racket. Basically, President Zelenskyy is being asked to come to Washington to pay for our protection,” he continued.

“ And one of the most revealing moments I think, of the last couple of weeks was and some comments the president made. It was about the Associated Press situation in the White House.” The Associated Press had their White House access revoked after they refused to follow Trump’s executive order to call the “Gulf of Mexico” the “Gulf of America.”

“And I believe I have this almost, almost exactly right, but it's certainly the essence of it, ‘the AP doesn't do me any favors, so I'm not going to do them any favors.’ That's the way the world works. That's the way the world works. That's where we are. And it's a there's not a lot of diplomatic thought here.”

“Now, the Associated Press, as you know,” Trump said earlier this month, “has been very, very wrong on the election, on Trump, and the treatment of Trump, and other things having to do with Trump and Republicans and conservatives. And they’re doing us no favors, and I guess I’m not doing them any favors. That’s the way life works.”

READ MORE: This 'isn't a joke': Critics say Trump's threat of third term no laughing matter

“It's a protection racket, except, as we've been pointing out so far, no protection, just the racket. So that's why Zelenskyy will be at the White House today seeking a little bit of that protection,” Scarborough quipped.

Watch the video below or at this link:

'Klutzy': Body language expert pinpoints a change in Trump's nonverbal behavior

President Donald Trump’s body language was far from dominant when he met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer this week, according to analysis from the Guardian published Friday. Starmer placed his hand on Trump’s shoulder as he gave him a second state visit from King Charles.

Keir said the invitation was “"truly historic" and "unprecedented."

“Starmer was skating a tricky line,” with his body language, “between matey familiarity and patronising reassurance, which must have been tutored, as he’s not a tactile man. Trump’s body language looked completely untaught, because nobody could teach this. The man has always been incredibly idiosyncratic,” writes Guardian columnist Zoe Williams.

READ MORE: This 'isn't a joke': Critics say Trump's threat of third term no laughing matter

“Trump, famously, loves trying to dominate with his body language,” Williams adds.

But during the meeting with Starmer, Trump had his hands in something body experts call the “steeple,” where his fingers were together and his palms apart. “This is not uncommon, Elon Musk does it, Angela Merkel did it – but they tend to put them very high, utterly confident. Here you have the president’s, which is a modified steeple, where he loses its strength by pointing it downward,” Joe Navarro, former FBI agent and author of The Dictionary of Body Language told the Guardian.

“It's far from the only cue that he’s unsure or uncomfortable,” Williams writes.

His body language at the White House is often self soothing. “In pictures in the White House, or when he’s surrounded by people, he crosses his arms very tight around himself, and that is a comforting behavior. It’s literally a self-hug. And yet when we see him on The Apprentice, he never did that. You normally don’t expect leaders to be self-hugging. You expect them to have expansive behaviors,” Navarro said.

READ MORE: Revealed: Device to stop bleeding among scientific research Ted Cruz calls 'woke'

Trump usually tries to appear dominant with his body language, like when he exchanged a “tight handshake,” Navarro said,” with former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe during his first time in office. They had some “awkward exchanges.”

“It reminds me of some of the garbage that was being peddled about establishing dominance in the 1980s. You’ll be superior if you squeeze tight, or if your hand is on top, or if you bring them closer to your chest. There is nothing either empirical or scientific that says that playing hand jiu-jitsu makes the other person respect you more. What it does do, particularly in cultures that are context rich, it makes you look amateurish,” he said.

Another example include when he held then-British Prime Minister Theresa May’s hand and when he walked in front of the Queen. ““That’s not a little faux pas, that’s a major faux pas,” Navarro said, calling the moves “klutzy.”

Trump looks “demure” in a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. “Look at the arm swing on Putin versus the very stoic, demure, arms at the side, head low behaviors of Trump,” Navarro said. “I could hardly believe my eyes. It matters. We are primates. We evolved from primates. You don’t have to be told who the leader is. If you’re the silverback, you stand proud, you stand tall, you have the behaviors of confidence. That is nowhere to be seen with Trump,” Navarro said.

READ MORE: 'Willingly lied to Congress': Critics warn 'flatly illegal' firings will 'cost lives'

'Nobody is really in charge': DOGE leaves the Pentagon guessing as staff awaits firings

Leadership at the Pentagon is being “left in the dark” as the Department of Government Accountability makes sweeping changes — including firing federal employees — throughout the federal government, NOTUS reported Thursday. Centered around a strict hierarchy, the Defense Department is having to quickly adjust to DOGE’s chaotic style as employees wait for the firings to hit their agency.

The DOD said last week that they would be cutting 5,400 probationary workers and implementing a hiring freeze.

“Looking forward to working with you on this @elonmusk. Need to cut the fat," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted on X earlier this month.

READ MORE: 'Disturbing': Trump’s 'seemingly trivial' move that signals growing repression

“Five sources at varying levels across the department told NOTUS that their leadership is still not informed on DOGE’s plan for civilian personnel,” NOTUS reporter John T. Seward writes. “The possible impacts and second-order effects of the anticipated firings could strain department tactical training, logistics, procurement and other activities that civilian DOD employees largely execute, sources said.”

Employees and leaders are keeping up to date on Musk and DOGE through the news and Musk’s website, X.

“Chain of command doesn’t think they’ll get a heads up when someone gets fired,” a Department of Defense employee told NOTUS. “On internal channels, they’ll tell you they don’t know what’s going on.”

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, told NOTUS that Congress was having trouble getting answers from the Pentagon. “We have, through our staff, been contacting [the Pentagon] and asking them for all the details, but they’re not forthcoming,” he said. “Some of this, I think, is: Nobody is really in charge.”

READ MORE: Trump’s DHS can now spy more easily on LGBTQ Americans

Sen. Thom Tillis told NOTUS (R-N.C.) said DOGE needed to defer to heads of departments. “There’s just got to be a rational basis for ‘the anticipated firings,’” he said. “Anytime you do things on a broad basis, and I’ve done things similar to this in my business experience, you’ve always got to be ready to do remediation.”

One tactical-level officer said that daily functioning has not changed, but there is a “sense of ambiguity,” Seward writes.

An officer working at one of the military service academies said that civilian instructors are feeling afraid due to Musk’s power.

“These folks gravitate towards the mission that we have, and I think a lot of them gravitate towards the stability of government jobs, at least to some degree,” the officer said. “And when you throw that stability out the window, and the mission sort of comes into question — because we’re supposed to be a non-partisan organization and it seems like certain mandates are very politically charged — it causes these folks to say ‘None of this is the reason I came here.’”

READ MORE: Trump tariffs worrying Wall St. and putting US economy in 'precarious' position: financial expert

'Disturbing': Trump’s 'seemingly trivial' move that signals growing repression

President Donald Trump’s executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America might not seem like a top issue compared to, say, trying to end birthright citizenship or carrying out mass firings of the federal workforce, but events surrounding it have serious implications, authors Jeffrey Abramson and Jack E. Davis argue in a piece published at the Guardian Wednesday.

When the Associated Press continued to use the term "Gulf of Mexico," the Trump administration revoked their press access to White House events. The news organization sued last week, but on Monday, a federal judge refused to order the White House to restore access. On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced that they would choose who had access to events.

“Granting access to the White House on the suppressive conditions set by the Trump administration is a blow to the first amendment and the free press. If the retaliation against the AP is allowed to stand, more restrictions on the press are certain to follow, creating Kremlin-like conditions that will affect all Americans who might question, or be suspected of questioning, the Trump party line,” Abramson and Davis write.

READ MORE: 'Open for corruption': Conservative slams MAGA policies as recipe for 'fraud, bribery and graft'

“This is why a seemingly trivial issue – what to call the Gulf – is freighted with importance. Trump’s renaming of the Gulf unmistakably delivers his 'America first' message. He has every right to his message. But he doesn’t have the right to turn the press into his messenger,” they continue.

“The press and all people in the United States have the right to choose their own words and not be retaliated against by the government. The Constitution does not allow the government to control speech,” the AP says in its complaint.

Abramson and Davis note that there is a disturbing historical precedent for renaming places. For example, when he seized power in 1933, Adolf Hitler renamed streets and public places. Joseph Stalin renamed "Tsaritsyn" to "Stalingrad."

This is not Trump’s only bold foreign policy move. He has brought up reclaiming the Panama Canal, buying Greenland, turning Canada into the 51st state, and taking over Gaza. “Even if these are mere paper ambitions, the disdain Trump shows for international law is already doing irreparable harm,” they write.

READ MORE: 'Mistake': Some Republicans worry key proposal could cost them the midterms

“The ripple effect of Trump commandeering global waters reaches beyond the sea to all Americans," they continue. "His actions must be considered alongside his other executive orders on his first day back in office, declaring the arrival of immigrants at the southern border an “invasion” and suspending grants of asylum, no matter how dire the situation of refugees. When we let Trump scapegoat vulnerable immigrants for this country’s – and the world’s – problems, we are in fascist territory. That is why Trump’s renaming the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America is no laughing matter. It expresses a level of disrespect for Mexico that could well be a precursor for how strongmen treat peoples whom they first strip of dignity. Substitute Jew, Catholic, Turk, Armenian, Arab, gay or transgender for Trump’s talk of an invasion of aliens across the Gulf, and you get the point."

'Open for corruption': Conservative slams MAGA policies as recipe for 'fraud, bribery and graft'

President Donald Trump’s second term is defined by a sharp increase in corruption, Mona Charen, policy editor at the Bulwark, writes in a piece published Thursday.

“Is America open for corruption now?” Charen asks, “Unabashedly? Nakedly? Are we tossing aside not just our hard-won victories over infectious diseases but also the more than hundred-year battle against fraud, bribery, and graft?”

She notes that the country was rife with corruption in the 1800s, but reformers were able to fight back by passing transparency laws and stipulating that the civil service be independent. “And what do you know, it worked!” she writes.

READ MORE: 'Mistake': Some Republicans worry key proposal could cost them the midterms

Trump is ringing in a new era of corruption, she adds. “In his first month back in the White House, Donald Trump is yanking the rug out from under open, honest government and signaling a complete reversal to a time of rank corruption. There may be no historical analogue to the level of corruption Trump is inaugurating.”

One example is “conveniently labeled,” Charen writes. Trump signed an executive order telling Attorney General Pam Bondi to stop enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a law that prevents U.S. companies from bribing foreign government officials. Trump also shut down units in the federal government working on foreign election interference.

“In the Trump era there is no pretense of disinterested administration of justice,” she writes. “It is all friends/enemies now. In the first Trump administration, the Justice Department proposed a national database to keep tabs on police-misconduct cases. Biden created it. Trump just ended it. Police misconduct, after all, may be useful in the coming months and years.”

In addition, he fired more than a dozen inspectors general at federal agencies. These people are responsible for investigating government abuses and conducting audits. “My own office launched inspections to cut waste, fraud and abuse in Native American schools,” writes fired Interior Department Inspector General Mark Greenblatt.

READ MORE: 'Pure greed': Trump voters are rejecting a key Republican myth

“Sounds almost like what the DOGE is supposed to be doing, doesn’t it? If the DOGE project were even remotely sincere, Trump would be adding and empowering more IGs, not firing them. No, the presence of truly independent watchdogs is a threat to the Trumpist project, which is permitting agencies to be used to reward friends and punish foes,” Charen writes.

Elon Musk, she argues, plays a key role in this rise in corruption. “It’s hard to know where even to begin to describe the walking conflict of interest that is Elon Musk, who, with no transparency, is reportedly terminating or otherwise interfering in all manner of government agencies and offices, including many that touch on his business interests,” she adds.

“Trump’s America no longer fights the old foes of good government. It has hung a giant neon sign on our door proclaiming Open for Corruption,” she writes.

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.