Jennifer Liss

Therapy for Revolutionaries

In 2003, Nick Cooper, a 38-year-old independent journalist and activist based in Houston, came across an intriguing T-shirt in Brazil. It featured the anarchy symbol and an image of a capoeirista -- a player of capoeira Angola, an Afro-Brazilian art form developed by slaves that combines music, dancing and fighting. The T-shirt vendors explained it is for a practice called Soma, a kind of therapy that embraces anarchist politics as a way to achieve mental and physical health.

For Cooper, who'd played capoeira in the United States and who'd long had an interest in the anarchist movement, Soma piqued his interest immediately. And when he found out that the founder of Soma, 79-year-old Roberto Freire, is still alive and perfecting his technique, Cooper decided to buy a camera and return to Brazil to make a documentary on Soma.

The resulting 50-minute film, "Soma: An Anarchist Therapy," is finished, and Cooper spent the summer touring across the United States, screening it wherever he found an interest, from Unitarian churches to makeshift theaters in activists' backyards. He's enjoyed strawberry almond juice in Eugene and vegan chili hotdogs in Athens, and crashed on the couches of "crusty punks" half his age -- and all the while making biodiesel refill stops.

Cooper describes himself as an "anti-fascist fighting against nationalism, hierarchy, brutality and unsustainable living," and the ideas behind Soma therapy obviously resonate with him.

Beginning in the mid-1960s during Brazil's military regime, dissidents were disappeared and tortured. Psychologist Roberto Freire -- blind in one eye after being tortured by the military -- found that in a climate of mistrust, violence and paranoia, his fellow comrades were unlikely to seek out therapeutic help. Freire responded by abandoning psychoanalysis and inventing Soma, a therapy for revolutionaries that he calls "fast, efficient and liberating."

Soma is a group therapy where people come together for about 18 months to do physical exercises and engage in personal and political discussion. It combines ideas from Austrian Jewish psychologist Wilhelm Reich, capoeira Angola, and anarchism. And unlike traditional psychotherapy, Soma rejects the authority of the therapist: during a session, a therapist is present, but he or she participates equally with the other members of the group and does not draw conclusions or make analysis. There is an emphasis on pleasure and physical release. The documentary shows Soma groups deep in physical play, doing theater and movement exercises. Participants call the work difficult but "delicious."

Now decades later, Soma has spread across the world and is still liberating modern-day revolutionaries -- young people, artists and students -- who are fighting against the bourgeois and seeking liberation.

Cooper says that even learning about Soma can be helpful for "gringo activists," who Cooper believer are more familiar and comfortable critiquing the authoritarianism in the government or the larger society than within themselves. As he wrote in an email:

Keep reading... Show less

It Should Break Your Heart to Kill

To psych themselves up, Brian Turner explained, young U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq would repeat this line: "I'm going to go over there and shoot someone in the face." It was one way of building courage.

"The people over there -- insurgents, freedom fighters, enemies, whatever you want to call them -- were not only ready to kill us, but they knew how. And they were capable. For us, it was just war-gaming," Turner said.

But the line gnawed at Turner, who was an infantry team leader for a year in Iraq. So he wrote his fellow soldiers a poem, "Sadiq," which means friend in Arabic.

It ends: no matter/ what god shines down on you, no matter/ what crackling pain and anger/ you carry in your fists, my friend,/ it should break your heart to kill.

"By the end of the tour, nobody in the unit said the phrase anymore," he said. "They just wanted to go home."

Turner recently published "Here, Bullet," one of the few collections of published poems written by soldiers who served in Iraq. As both a trained solider and a trained poet, a war participant and a conscious observer, his voice and experience contribute a unique perspective.

And the book is garnering due national attention. "I can't say that I don't enjoy it," said the 38-year-old from Fresno, Calif., who served with the 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division. "But if it were a different book on a different subject, I might enjoy it more. All this comes from a war zone."

And a place of pain. "Eulogy," which Turner calls the book's emotional centerpiece, memorializes a friend who committed suicide while on duty in Iraq. It is difficult for Turner to consider that reflections such as "Eulogy" have thrust him into a literary spotlight.

But with his humble background and articulate soft-spokeness, Turner -- hobby punk musician turned poet-soldier -- doesn't come across as someone scrambling to break into the literati. When he transitioned out of the army last year, Turner taught online English classes and worked in construction, at one point holding four jobs. Now he teaches at Fresno City College, picks up electrician gigs on the side and recently moved in with his girlfriend. And he's back together with the garage band of his younger years, under a new name: the Burnouts.

In his twenties, Turner was a machinist writing lyrics (for the original Burnouts) and messing around with the three chords he knew. With rock star ambitions, he enrolled at California State University, Fresno, but soon settled for poetry. In 1992 he took a class with Fresno's poet darling, Philip Levine. Ignorant about the poetry scene, Turner was surprised to find the first class filled, standing room only. When Levine walked into the classroom and put down a mug, Turner recalled a woman shoving the celebrity token into her purse. Turner thought, 'Who is this guy?'

"I knew he was working class, a straight shooter kind of guy," he said. "I told him I don't care about grades or any of that bullshit, but I want to study with you."

And he did, graduated and took the extra $25 he had at the end of a month and put it toward the application fee for a poetry program at the University of Oregon. He got in. But with a hard-earned M.F.A. in hand, Turner turned away from academia or the modern bohemian living of other aspiring poets. He enlisted in the U.S. military. It was in the family, it would help pay off bills and it was adventure.

Keep reading... Show less

Growing Up in Jesus Land

When I worked at a domestic violence shelter in Chicago, a client told me that her husband had tied her arms around the base of the toilet and broke a broomstick across her legs. But, she said, that wasn't the worse part. The worst part started the next morning when she began to fear when he would beat her again.

In her memoir "Jesus Land," Julia Scheeres unlocks the door to her childhood home plagued with domestic abuse. And she skillfully captures a whole picture of children living in fear -- from the beatings and humiliation, to the expectant, when-next moments in between.

The on-going abuse in “Jesus Land” is devastating. Scheeres' father, who was a surgeon, beat her brother David with a 2-by-4, broke a bone, and then sent him to the very hospital where he worked. And shortly after the beating, when Scheeres' mother learned that young David had slit his wrists, she coldly responded: "Why can't I just have one day of peace?"(After she inspected his wounds: "They're surface cuts ... if you want to kill yourself, you slice down, not sideways.")

But "Jesus Land" truly rattled me as I read about the Scheeres family eating dinner -- Christian radio blaring through the intercom -- and no one saying anything.

"Jesus Land" is a horrific story honestly and beautifully told, and I read it with one hand over my eyes, afraid of what was unfolding. I didn't take a decent breath until I reached the last page, and even then, I first had to cry.

Set in the 1980s, Scheeres' first book bravely recounts her adolescence in a fundamentalist Christian household in rural Indiana with her two adopted black brothers. (Scheeres is white.) Her older brother, Jerome, frequently rapes Julia. Her younger brother, David, is her soft-spoken best friend and an optimist. Scheeres writes: "Despite everything, (David) still believes in the goodness of humankind, that our parents will someday welcome him home with open arms, that his friends will not betray him. That's the fundamental difference between us."

Julia and David fight both the harsh, racist outside world and their volatile home life. As David and Julia fend off the n-word taunts (and worse) at school and carefully sidestep their father's wrath at home, their mother methodically stuffs quackery Christian propaganda down their throats, exploiting the doctrine by using it to justify domestic abuse.

Life off of Country Road 50 soon ends for Julia and David, who are sent to Escuela Caribe, a Christian reform school in the Dominican Republic. They continue to suffer in the jungle. The reform school is a sort of torture camp for "problem" children. Teachers sucker-punch children for punishment. Housefathers demand pushups at 3 a.m. from teenage girls in their nightgowns. The students must ask permission to do everything, from sitting down to raising a fork. In a closed-door meeting, a founder of the program tells Julia that he once punished a 15-year-old "whore" by stripping her naked and beating her "black and blue." "And believe me," he says to Julia. "I would not hesitate to do it again." (After reading "Jesus Land," a friend of mine phoned Human Rights Watch. "Do you monitor Christian reform schools?" she asked.)

Scheeres' storytelling makes the pain of reading her memoir worthwhile. Through tight, descriptive prose, she reveals daily fundamentalist life -- showing that all things secular were, to David and her, part of a foreign and forbidden world. She discloses the disturbing images of a violent household: her shirtless brothers shooting hoops with matching welts across their backs.

And she doesn't shy away from addressing the stark racism in contemporary, rural Indiana. With narrative grace, Scheeres braids together these three subjects -- Christian fundamentalism, violence, and race -- while still portraying (sometimes comically) herself as a normal Farrah Fawcett-worshiping teen. "I used to pray all the time," she writes, "but cut back when I didn't see results. Jerome didn't stop bothering me, mother didn't get any happier, and my chest is still flat."

Julia's father abuses Jerome. Jerome rapes Julia. When Jerome runs away their father abuses David. And who do Julia and David abuse? Themselves, of course. David withdraws and blames himself for not being white. Julia swigs Southern Comfort in the morning before school.

David and Jerome have nothing in common but the color of their skin and the abuse. Julia is spared a certain amount of abuse and humiliation because she is white, and they all know it. But Scheeres' memoir does not sag with white guilt. She was spared the full intensity of the rod due to the privilege of her pale skin (and perhaps her gender), but she also experienced a type of racism as the freak sister of a black boy in a county of all white faces.

If there are reasons why parents systematically abuse their children and why neighbors, teachers and the law turn the other cheek, Scheeres does not investigate. She neither justifies the adults' shameful behavior nor berates them for it. And she isn't an armchair psychoanalyst. Simply, she tells the story of David and her.

It broke my heart to read that David died in a car crash when he was 20 because, at its core, "Jesus Land" is a platonic love story about a sister and a brother who spend their lives quietly trying to protect each other. Julia and David's story will make sense to anyone who has gone or would go to great lengths to defend a sibling. Like all good love stories, Julia and David's fight to survive, to be together, and to hold on to unrealistic dreams is believable and crushing.

Escuela Caribe still exists. The experiences of Escuela Caribe alumni can be read at the web site The Truth About New Horizons Youth Ministries.

The High Price of Donation

The ad in Jessica’s college newspaper said that she could make $80,000 donating her eggs. But "Jessica"* isn’t the tall blonde the ad called for. And her weight was a strike against her. A size 16, she weighs well over what most egg donation agencies will accept.

What she did have going for her is that she is the grandchild of Holocaust survivors. Jewish, Asian and Indian egg donors -- she would learn -- are in great demand.

So at 21 she decided to ditch the agency route and try to sell her eggs on her own. She said she loved the idea of helping infertile couples fulfill their desire to become parents. And the money she made would help her pay off credit card debt.

The first time she made $4,000 and had "the easiest donation of all time." But after the fourth donation she ended up in the emergency room with dehydration. It was her own fault, she says, and giggles over irresponsibly planning a road trip after the donation procedure. By the time she graduated, Jessica had earned $23,000 through egg donation.

Do her parents know she donated eggs for cash? No. Does she plan on donating again? Yes, this winter.

Jessica’s story may be more common than we think, because little is known about college students who donate their eggs. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) report that they do not collect information on donors’ age, race, income, or education levels.

But we do know that one in six American couples struggle with infertility, and the demand for viable eggs is increasing. Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) procedures performed in the U.S. increased 78 percent from 1996 to 2002, according to the CDC.

Outdoing Nature

"Caroline,"* who used to model, earned a high G.P.A. at a reputable liberal arts college. A three-time egg donor, she pocketed over $20,000 for her efforts. Now 25 and living in New Jersey with her husband and young child, she doesn’t regret a thing.

In many ways, students like Caroline fit the description of a perfect egg donor. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) says that younger women respond more favorably to the hormone medication used during the donor procedure, and their eggs result in higher pregnancy rates. Caroline’s good grades, hot looks, and spotless health history, combined with her young age made her a highly sought-after donor.

Darlene Pinkerton of the egg donation agency A Perfect Match says that 80 percent of her donors are college students. And Dawn Hunt, owner of Fertility Alternatives, says that 90 percent of her donors are college students.

Hunt used to advertise for egg donors in family and parenting publications. But dissatisfied with the lack of response, now she sticks almost exclusively with college publications.

A typical classified ad in a college publication will call for a donor under 29, physically attractive, with an impressive S.A.T. score. It will list a high dollar figure, but usually won't mention the procedure or the legal, medical or ethical risks. (One ad awkwardly and inaccurately encourages students to "donate to infertile couples some of the many eggs your body disposes monthly.")

For about five years the Stanford Daily has run a special classified section reserved for egg and sperm donation ads. Several years ago, a Stanford student suffered a stroke due to a rare reaction to one of the synthetic hormones used in egg donation. The current editor-in-chief does not know if the newspaper received any complaints about the classified section.

How It Works

How does egg donation work? First, a donor is screened for genetic diseases and H.I.V. She then undergoes a psychological evaluation. Once "approved," she is given synthetic hormones to self-administer over a series of weeks.

During a normal ovulation, a woman releases one egg. But the hormonal medication stimulates the donor’s ovaries to produce many eggs -- sometimes a few dozen. This is called "controlled super-ovulation."

Once the eggs are mature the donor receives an injection that triggers ovulation. Thirty-six hours later, the eggs are retrieved through the vagina with an ultrasound-guided needle. The menstrual cycle of both the donor and the recipient have been synchronized. After the eggs are fertilized, the embryos are placed in the recipient’s uterus. Hopefully, a pregnancy will stick.

The sale of body parts in the United States is illegal, explains Lynn Westphal, director of the Oocyte Donation Program at the Stanford Medical Center and a professor. However, it is perfectly legal for people to donate body parts -- like blood, sperm, eggs or organs -- and be compensated for their time, effort and discomfort.

Amy Turner also learned about egg donation through a school publication. Turner, who lives in Waxahachie, Texas, is a 22 year-old married mom putting herself through massage therapy school. She’s donated once, and her $2,000 compensation is going toward college tuition.

Compensation is a controversial issue. In some parts of the world, compensation for eggs is illegal. Typical compensation in California used to be $2,500, says Mary Cedarblade, an attorney who specializes in fertility issues. But as more people turned to egg donors to get pregnant it became harder to find donors, she explains. Cedarblade says that just last year the going rate in California was $5,000 per cycle. And now, she says, the average is about $5,500.

"Because of how invasive the egg donation process is, it would be unreasonable for someone to go through the process and not be compensated," says Westphal. "But how to determine what is the right compensation is a difficult thing."

"You have to look at it like you are helping someone who has tried thousands of times to get pregnant. I’m giving them the joy I had when I had my child," says Turner about her experience.

As professionals and donors point out, altruistic intentions can run as strong as the financial motivations.

"Infertile women do not choose to be infertile," Pinkerton writes in an email about her agency’s work. "When they find a donor they relate to and who resembles them they are transformed into women of hope."

Donor Risks

The first egg donation took place in 1984, but egg donation was relatively rare until about 10 years ago. In the early years of egg donation, there were a handful of studies indicating a possible connection between the hormonal treatments given to egg donors and certain cancers.

While it now appears that the risks are low, medical professionals are still uncertain if there will be long-term consequences for donors. Simply put, there is a lot we don’t know. And compared to its male counterpart -- sperm donation -- that involves a cup and a willing hand, egg donation is much more invasive and risky.

Westphal explains that the most common health risks she sees are bruising at the injection site and some bloating. Some women who "over respond" -- meaning they produce too many eggs -- may develop Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHS).

If untreated, a donor with OHS will experience significant swelling, a sense of discomfort, dehydration, moodiness, or possibly difficulty breathing. In a worse case scenario, her ovaries, under great stress, could be damaged.

"In general it should not affect the future fertility [of the donor]," she says. (There have been no documented cases.)

Julia Derek lived an egg donation nightmare, documented in her self-published book "Confessions of a Serial Egg Donor." In four years, Derek donated 12 times -- six times over the limit recommended by the ASRM. She made between $40,000-$50,000. However, as a result of the hormones and lack of care, Derek sunk into a severe, almost suicidal, depression.

A Swedish student in Los Angeles, Derek couldn’t legally work because she didn’t have a green card. She felt her only two choices to make a living as a student were egg donation or being a server under the table. She chose egg donation.

At first, the compensation got her out of a jam, but soon egg donation was funding her "L.A. lifestyle." She describes in her book speeding on the 405 freeway on her way to a comedy open mic while shooting Lupron (hormone used to stimulate ovulation) into her bruised inner thigh.

Derek found herself in a dependent relationship with her egg broker who encouraged her to continue donating despite the health risks. Her broker lied and misled her. "I’m lucky more things didn’t happen to me," she says.

How was Derek able to put herself at such a great medical risk? Weren’t there precautions in place to protect her?

Relying on "Good-faith" Regulation

The ASRM advises that "a good-faith effort should be made to avoid accepting women who have already made a high number of donations elsewhere." But if a donor chooses to travel to another clinic, her donation history does not travel with her. It is up to her to disclose that information. There is a concern that the higher the payment, the more likely prospective donors -- like Derek -- will be tempted to conceal crucial medical information.

And agencies, often referred to as brokers, play a controversial role in the play of egg donation. There is a concern that there is a conflict of interest if the broker is serving both the donor and the couple and collecting "finder’s fees."

An agency or a broker does not have to disclose all of the potential risks to a donor. And an inexperienced donor, who has not been properly advised or done her own research, could find herself in a vulnerable position.

After Turner’s egg extraction, she received a letter from her agency stating that she would not be able to continue donating. After the time she had committed to the first donation, she was shocked because she had counted on donating again. She also had learned that her agency’s compensation was significantly less than other agencies in Texas. She called to inquire about the letter and voice her complaints.

"They said it was basically none of my business. Thanks for your eggs. Screw you, bye," she says. (Her agency didn’t respond to this writer’s request for an interview.)

But like the donors, many brokers are also driven by both the financial reward and the desire to help a couple desperate for a child.

"I help facilitate everything. I’m there to remind the donor of her appointment and be her support system as well. I try to help out if she has questions," says Hunt, who was an egg donor before she started the agency.

She typically charges a fee between $3,000-$5,000 on top of what the donor receives. Hunt says she makes a good faith effort to follow the majority of the egg donation guidelines set by the ASRM. But some of the guidelines, she says, are not up to date.

Long-Term Consequences

The donors interviewed for this article don’t have ethical regrets. They all share a healthy curiosity about what their DNA will produce, but they are not preoccupied or haunted by the idea that there are young people growing up right now who share their DNA -- young people they will never meet.

Jessica’s seen pictures of "her" children, and she’s "totally curious" how they will turn out. But she doesn’t stay up at night thinking about it.

Nevertheless, ethical concerns are still an issue in the world of egg donation. Westphal says, "You don’t want people just doing this over and over, and you want to limit the number of children from any one donor."

There are legal considerations too. "The most important consideration is that a donor is not going to be held responsible for the child," says Cedarblade. (She does not know of this ever happening.)

It is also important, she says, that the donor not be held financially responsible for associated medical treatments or any complications that may arise.

A 21-year-old woman is able to vote, drink and be drafted, but many people wonder if a young college student with pressing financial needs (or wants) is in a position to make a responsible decision about whether or not to donate her eggs.

The considerations -- medical, ethical and legal -- are daunting, and the compensation is nothing short of seductive. But would a 30-year-old woman be prepared to make the same decision? In some ways, so little is known about the long-term consequences, that even the most cautious donor is still taking a risk.

Egg donation is a more complicated decision than choosing second semester classes, securing an internship, or making Friday night plans. College women need to be their own advocates, do their homework and invest time and thought before they proceed with egg donation.

Or as Jessica says, "I think my advice to college women is to not allow people to bully you through the process ... A lot of people get pressured into things they aren’t comfortable with. The language of altruism ... resembles blood donation. It can lead vulnerable women into a bad place. It is your life. You have to live with it for the rest of your life. You don’t want to be treated like equipment."

* The names of two donors have been changed at their request.

BRAND NEW STORIES

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.