Jason Horowitz

Barack Obama Courts the Faithful

Chicago -- Barack Obama got out of the car a block early so everyone would see him walk to the picket line.

With a gray BlackBerry holstered between black pants and white dress shirt, the candidate immediately inserted himself into the rotating loop of striking hotel workers on Michigan Avenue. He shook hands, slapped backs and sang some lines of a pro-union chant. One worker handed him a "Unite Here!" placard, and he happily waved it above his head. Minutes later, as more than a dozen television cameras and reporters watched intently, he traded it in for a bullhorn.

"You are going to have a friend in the White House who believes that workers can organize," Mr. Obama shouted to the workers. "Who believes in union."

The crowd cheered, and after a Spanish translation, cheered again.

With more primary money in the bank than fund-raising juggernaut Hillary Clinton, Mr. Obama has now set about the more fundamental business of cementing the loyalty of the Democratic Party base. The $33 million he raised in the second fund-raising quarter from a record 258,000 individual donors gives him fuel to chase Mrs. Clinton and begin to close the sizeable leads she holds in surveys of many key primary states. But to do that, he needs the backing of organized Democratic constituencies whose can translate their support into votes.

"I think some of it is that the campaign is starting to heat up so you are starting to see more events like this," Mr. Obama said at a press conference following the union event on July 16. "What is true is that in the first two or three months you are so busy building infrastructure that sometimes your schedule gets much more crowded. And we are now in the phase of the campaign where people are listening much more carefully and we have the opportunity to amplify these critical issues."

Those critical issues -- unionization, gun control, civil rights, progressive taxation and abortion rights -- just happen to be the traditional linchpins of Democratic politics. And Mr. Obama, who likes to say that he believes in a different kind of politics, is tackling them aggressively.

On July 12, he co-sponsored legislation in the Senate to close a tax loophole that permitted hedge fund investors, who happen to be some of the most generous contributors to his campaign, to pay levies on billions of dollars in profit at a lower rate than most income earners. The issue, which was first raised by John Edwards, put pressure on the rest of a Democratic field that enjoys lucrative support from the wealthy financiers. On July 13, after originally giving a noncommittal answer, Mrs. Clinton also said she supported taxing the investors like regular corporations.

"I think it should be a no-brainer issue for Democratic and Republican candidates," Mr. Obama said when asked why not everyone had jumped on the issue immediately. "The way our tax code is now structured has exacerbated inequality in the society."

Mr. Obama's emphasis on traditional base-consolidation was illustrated nicely by a flurry of events aimed at key Democratic constituencies in mid-July

On a Sunday morning, Mr. Obama's motorcade arrived at the Vernon Park Church of God in the beleaguered Far South Side of Chicago. In the blocks around the church, bored-looking boys walked around with jeans cinched around their thighs under long white T-shirts. A woman in a wheelchair propelled herself against a red traffic light using her one good foot like a skateboarder. Abandoned lots surrounded empty restaurants with names like "Steaks and Lemonade." Here, gun violence had touched many residents personally, including the church's own pastor, whose mother and brother were murdered.

Mr. Obama had come to express outrage, as he uniquely can in this election, about the pall of gang violence that hangs over many black communities. Before speaking, he sat in a dark suit and blue striped tie under one of two large screens that said "Responsive Reading. Benefit of Obedience." He bobbed his head as a gospel choir sang to the organ and drums. When he was introduced to speak, the crowd erupted in cheers and hoots and the padded clapping of ushers in white gloves.

Mr. Obama has at times disappointed on the stump with seemingly deliberate displays of oratorical restraint, especially in front of audiences that tend to see him as the race's most charismatic candidate. But in black churches, like in Selma back in March and here in Chicago, he has tended to display the full sweep his rhetorical skill.

On that Sunday, he used it to attack enemies of gun control and the prosecutors of the war in Iraq, two issues central to the black voters who will be decisive in picking the party's nominee.

From the pulpit, he advocated the permanent reinstatement of a ban on assault weapons and more stringent regulations on gun dealers.

"And there is only one reason that hasn't been done and that is the power of the gun lobby in Washington," said Mr. Obama. Talking about the cultural differences between gun users in inner cities and rural settings, he said he recognized that many gun owners "want to hunt with their fathers, they want to hunt with their sons. I respect that. If you want to go hunt, go hunt. Nobody is trying to take your rifle or your shotgun away."

But, building to a crescendo, Mr. Obama added, "It is time for us to stand up and say enough. Enough to the gun lobby -- we're not going to take it no more."

(A man in the crowd called out "Preach, Mr. President," at which point Mr. Obama promptly seemed to reign himself in.)

Before he finished, he made sure to insert some references to the Iraq war, which has been perhaps the single most galvanizing issue so far in the primary. Mr. Obama opposed the war from the Illinois State Senate in 2002 and does not carry the burden of having voted for its authorization, as Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Edwards do. He has used that advantage to curry favor with the antiwar bloc, but has recently stepped up his criticism of the administration, and of Mrs. Clinton, whose plan to stop the war he has called "convoluted."

Obama told the 300 church-goers and seven television cameras that the war was depriving inner cities of much-needed recourses. "We are spending $275 million a day to try to keep people from killing each other in another land," he said from the pulpit, "right when a war is being fought right on the streets of Chicago."

Less than an hour later, Mr. Obama was standing in downtown Chicago, in front of an association of the country's leading trial lawyers, a traditional Democratic cash cow, brandishing his Harvard Law School and constitutional law credentials and decrying what he called the Bush administration's abuses of justice.

"Special interests are trying at every step to close courtroom doors to people who have been injured and defrauded out of their life savings," said Mr. Obama, to the members of the American Association for Justice (formerly the Association of Trial Lawyers of America -- itself a special interest group reviled on the political right).

"If we hope to break the special interest cycle, if we hope to truly transform this country, if we hope to live up to the ideals of opportunity and fairness and equality, that animated the life of this nation, then we have to change our politics too," he said.

But Mr. Obama's changed politics, in many ways, looks a lot like the traditional Democratic route to the nomination. Union organizers on that Monday said that his picket-line march, which Mr. Obama took care to say was not a political "stunt," could well help him with the powerful hotel workers union in Nevada, an early primary state.

Officials in the campaign said that Mr. Obama would be using the $33 million in second-quarter donations to make more campaign forays into the early primary states. And he'll continue to show up at events like the one on July 17 organized by Planned Parenthood, the women's abortion rights group. (Mr. Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, and Mrs. Clinton also attended.)

When asked on the following Monday how he could catch up to Mrs. Clinton, who he trails nationally and in every primary state but South Carolina, Mr. Obama seemed confident that his efforts to reach out to the base would be successful.

"We're not worried about polling. At this point we're worried about building enthusiasm at the grass roots," he said above the clamor of the striking hotel workers behind him. "The fund-raising is an expression of the enthusiasm at the grass roots level. That's why we've got 258,000 donors."

This article first appeared in the New York Observer and is reprinted with permission.

Is John Edwards Setting the Agenda for the Democratic Nomination?

CHARLESTON, S.C. -- John Edwards may not be leading in the polls. But, he would like to stress, he is leading on the issues.

"I don't need to read a poll, I don't need to see a focus group and I don't need to see what the other candidates are saying," said Mr. Edwards, sitting next to his wife in a blue van pulling away from Kitty's Fine Foods in Charleston. "I know exactly what I would do as president and that's why I have been leading on these issues. And it is exactly the kind of leadership I will provide as president."

Mr. Edwards and his campaign are rallying around the idea that he has demonstrated leadership by getting out front early on major issues, advocating "big change" and then almost daring his rivals to follow his example.

He rejects the notion that there's anything political about it.

"You describe it as if it is some kind of strategic maneuver," said Mr. Edwards, turning around in his seat to face his questioner. "I'm not waiting for anybody else's position. I know what my own views are and I'm going to lead on it."

But he certainly wants to make sure everyone knows it.

During a CNN/YouTube debate of Democratic presidential candidates on the night of July 23, Mr. Edwards said, almost apropos of nothing, "I would challenge every Democrat on this stage today to commit to raising the minimum wage to $9.50 an hour by the year 2012."

The line drew applause.

On Tuesday afternoon, after a campaign stop about global warming in McClellanville, he again raised the issue of raising the minimum wage. He told reporters that the "inside Washington" types on the debate stage had failed to respond to his call for an increase.

"So I'm challenging Senator Clinton and Senator Obama and all the other Democrats" to match him, he said.

He has raced to the fore on other issues as well. His call for Congress to strip the funding for the war in Iraq, which he apologized for voting to authorize in 2002, preceded decisions by Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton to abandon their more measured positions on setting a timeline for withdrawal.

Mr. Edwards was the first major candidate this election cycle to deliver a health care plan, which required all Americans to be covered, and to lead a boycott -- that the other major candidates eventually joined -- against participating in a televised debate on Fox.

He stringently opposed a loophole allowing super-rich hedge fund investors to pay extremely low taxes despite collecting a salary from the New York hedge fund firm Fortress. Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton, both major beneficiaries of hedge fund money, soon followed suit.

Whenever Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton have offered proposals similar to his, Mr. Edwards seems to have reacted by further sharpening his pitch -- and by reminding his audiences of who had been their first.

On the afternoon of July 24, for example, he told a meeting of steel workers in a union hall in Georgetown, S.C., that he had no interest in negotiating with pharmaceutical companies to improve health care.

"The time to negotiate with them is after we beat them," he said, contrasting himself with candidates favoring a more moderate approach. He then proceeded to list all the other issues he says he came out first on.

"You're showing leadership, that's the issue," said Mr. Edwards' deputy campaign manager Jonathan Prince after the debate on Monday. "Does anybody really think that these guys would have been in favor of defunding the war if we didn't?"

Joe Trippi, Edwards' top strategic advisor -- and the former campaign manager to a certain trend-setting, if ultimately unsuccessful, candidate named Howard Dean -- added, "I don't think there is any doubt that John Edwards has been setting the agenda."

But whatever moral victories Mr. Edwards has won so far over his main Democratic rivals have yet to translate into concrete political gain. Despite adoration from liberal bloggers, he trails in public polls of Democrats nearly everywhere except Iowa, where he has spent far more time than his opponents, and his fund-raising totals have been dwarfed by Mrs. Clinton's and Mr. Obama's.

And where the Edwards campaign presents his outspokenness as an act of bravery, his rivals see a candidate fading in the polls and desperately seeking attention by telling voters what they want to hear before they forget about him.

"I really wouldn't interpret it that if somebody in a campaign gave a speech, it decides the issues," said Mark Penn, Mrs. Clinton's chief pollster and political strategist. Mrs. Clinton, he said, "has been an actual leader for many years. If she's president she's going to drive the agenda in many ways."

Former Governor Tom Vilsack of Iowa, a major Clinton supporter, said he "vehemently" disagreed with the notion that Mrs. Clinton was at all following Mr. Edwards on any issues, especially the war in Iraq.

"In the area of Iraq, her plan is far more comprehensive," said Mr. Vilsack. "I don't know that he has come out with a comprehensive discussion of Iraq other than he wants to get the troops out."

Mr. Obama's campaign, too, took sharp issue with the notion that their candidate had taken any positions in reaction to Mr. Edwards.

"Obama spoke out against the war in 2003, and he has been a consistent opponent since then, so there has been no reason to apologize for his vote," said Jen Psaki, a spokesperson for Mr. Obama.

Mr. Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, said that Mr. Edwards did not have the same responsibilities and commitments as an elected official.

"Certainly Senator Edwards, as someone who left elective office to run for president, has more flexibility," he said, before adding that there was "nothing path-breaking about the proposals he is making."

The only thing Mr. Edwards had achieved by being first with a health plan, an Iraq plan or a concrete proposal on the minimum wage, both campaigns said, was to be first. They would have gotten around to making their own proposals regardless of what Mr. Edwards did.

In the van, Mr. Edwards reacted angrily to that notion.

"Get to them when?" asked Mr. Edwards, when confronted with that logic. "When you start a campaign for the presidency of the United States you better have a very clear idea about what you want to do as president from day one."

At this point, Mr. Edwards' wife Elizabeth -- who is one of the campaign's best draws and who acts as her husband's closest adviser -- jumped in. "This tells you something about how he will be as president. He is not going to wait and drag his feet on these issues," she said. "And I think it tells you a great deal about his style of leadership."

She said that none of her husband's positions were the result of political calculation, and that if anything, Mr. Edwards was the one candidate among the front-runners whose political positions reflected his life's work.

"This is not something we came to recently. And what's more -- it is the story, unlike, I think, every candidate except Dennis Kucinich -- this is actually the story of his life," she said. "This is not a coat you put on for the campaign. This is something inside him."

"This is who I am," Mr. Edwards added. "I would do this if I weren't running for president."

This article first appeared in the New York Observer and is reprinted with permission.

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.