October 08, 2015
To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest updates from TomDispatch.com here.
<p>Not so long ago, it was science fiction. Now, it’s hard science -- and that should frighten us all. The latest reports from the prestigious and sober Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) make increasingly hair-raising reading, suggesting that the planet is approaching possible moments of irreversible damage in a fashion and at a speed that had not been anticipated.</p><p>Scientists have long worried that climate change will not continue to advance in a “linear” fashion, with the planet getting a little bit hotter most years. Instead, they fear, humanity could someday experience “non-linear” climate shifts (also known as “singularities” or “tipping points”) after which there would be sudden and irreversible change of a catastrophic nature. This was the premise of the 2004 climate-disaster film <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_After_Tomorrow" target="_blank"><em>The Day After Tomorrow</em></a>. In that movie -- most notable for its vivid scenes of a frozen-over New York City -- melting polar ice causes a disruption in the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Atlantic_Current" target="_blank">North Atlantic Current</a>, which in turn triggers a series of catastrophic storms and disasters. At the time of its release, many knowledgeable scientists <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/may/14/climatechange" target="_blank">derided</a> the film’s premise, insisting that the confluence of events it portrayed was unlikely or simply impossible.</p><p>Fast forward 11 years and the prospect of such calamitous tipping points in the North Atlantic or elsewhere no longer looks improbable. In fact, climate scientists have begun to note <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/09/07/new-studies-deepen-concerns-about-a-climate-change-wild-card/" target="_blank">early indicators</a> of possible catastrophes.</p><p>Take the disruption of the North Atlantic Current, the pivotal event in <em>The Day After Tomorrow</em>. Essentially an extension of the Gulf Stream, that deep-sea current <a href="http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/en/kommunikation/fragen-zu-klima-faq/what-is-the-gulf-stream.html" target="_blank">carries</a> relatively warm salty water from the South Atlantic and the Caribbean to the northern reaches of the Atlantic. In the process, it helps keep Europe warmer than it would otherwise be. Once its salty water flows into sub-Arctic areas carried by this prolific stream, it gets colder and heavier, sinks to lower depths, and starts a return trip to warmer climes in the south where the whole process begins again.</p><p>So long as this “<a href="http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/kits/currents/06conveyor.html" target="_blank">global conveyor belt</a>” -- known to scientists as the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, or <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/1_1_Eemian_OceanCurrents_today.jpg" target="_blank">AMOC</a> -- keeps functioning, the Gulf Stream will also continue to bring warmer waters to the eastern United States and Europe. Should it be disrupted, however, the whole system might break down, in which case the Euro-Atlantic climate could turn colder and more storm-prone. Such a disruption might occur if the vast Greenland ice sheet melts in a significant way, as indeed is already <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jul/14/global-warming-is-causing-rain-to-melt-the-greenland-ice-sheet">beginning to happen</a> today, pouring large quantities of salt-free fresh water into the Atlantic Ocean. Because of its lighter weight, this newly introduced water will remain close to the surface, preventing the submergence of salty water from the south and so effectively shutting down the conveyor belt. Indeed, exactly this process now seems to be <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/03/23/global-warming-is-now-slowing-down-the-circulation-of-the-oceans-with-potentially-dire-consequences/" target="_blank">underway</a>.</p><p>By all accounts, 2015 is likely to wind up as the hottest year on record, with large parts of the world suffering from severe <a href="http://www.weather.com/forecast/news/europe-heat-wave-record-highs-june-july-2015" target="_blank">heat waves</a> and <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/176029/tomgram%3A_subhankar_banerjee,_fire_at_world%27s_end/" target="_blank">wildfires</a>. Despite all this, however, a <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/map-percentile-mntp/201412-201502.gif" target="_blank">stretch</a> of the North Atlantic below Iceland and Greenland is experiencing <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201508" target="_blank">all-time cold temperatures</a>, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. What explains this anomaly? According to scientists from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Pennsylvania State University, among other institutions, the most likely <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/09/24/why-some-scientists-are-worried-about-a-cold-blob-in-the-north-atlantic-ocean/" target="_blank">explanation</a> is the arrival in the area of cold water from the Greenland ice sheet that is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/08/28/why-nasas-so-worried-that-greenlands-melting-could-speed-up/" target="_blank">melting</a> ever more rapidly thanks to climate change. Because this meltwater starts out salt-free, it has remained near the surface and so, as predicted, is slowing the northern advance of warmer water from the North Atlantic Current.</p><p>So far, the AMOC has not suffered a dramatic shutdown, but it <em>is</em> slowing, and scientists <a href="http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/2413393/greenlands_glaciers_more_vulnerable_to_rapid_melting.html" target="_blank">worry</a> that a rapid increase in Greenland ice melt as the Arctic continues to warm will pour ever more meltwater into the North Atlantic, severely disrupting the conveyor system. That would, indeed, constitute a major <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2015/03/whats-going-on-in-the-north-atlantic/" target="_blank">tipping point</a>, with severe consequences for Europe and eastern North America. Not only would Europe experience colder temperatures on an otherwise warmer planet, but coastal North America could witness higher sea levels than those predicted from climate change alone because the Gulf Stream <a href="http://www.odu.edu/news/2013/2/gulf_stream_sea_leve#.VgbMxSvOuSp" target="_blank">tends</a> to pull sea water away from the eastern U.S. and push it toward Europe. If it were to fail, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/03/23/global-warming-is-now-slowing-down-the-circulation-of-the-oceans-with-potentially-dire-consequences" target="_blank">rising</a> sea levels could endanger cities like New York and Boston. Indeed, scientists discovered that just such a slowing of the AMOC helped produce a sea-level rise of <a href="http://uanews.org/story/sea-level-spiked-for-two-years-along-ne-north-america" target="_blank">four inches</a> from New York to Newfoundland in 2009 and 2010.</p><p>In its 2014 report on the status of global warming, the IPCC indicated that the likelihood of the AMOC collapsing before the end of this century remains relatively low. But some studies <a href="http://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate2554.epdf" target="_blank">suggest</a> that the conveyor system is already 15%-20% below normal with Greenland’s melting still in an early stage. Once that process switches into high gear, the potential for the sort of breakdown that was once science fiction <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2015/03/whats-going-on-in-the-north-atlantic/" target="_blank">starts to look</a> all too real.</p><p><strong>Tipping Points on the Horizon</strong></p><p>In a 2014 <a href="https://ipcc-wg2.gov/AR5/report/full-report/" target="_blank">report</a>, “Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability,” Working Group II of the IPCC identified three other natural systems already showing early-warning signs of catastrophic tipping points: the Arctic, coral reefs, and the Amazonian forest. All three, the report suggested, could experience massive and irreversible changes with profound implications for human societies.</p><p>The Arctic comes in for particular scrutiny because it has experienced more warming than any other region on the planet and because the impact of climate change there is already <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/12/arctic-sea-ice-polar-bears" target="_blank">so obvious</a>. As the report put it, “For the Arctic region, new evidence indicates a biophysical regime shift is taking place, with cascading impacts on physical systems, ecosystems, and human livelihoods.”</p><p>This has begun with a massive melt of sea ice in the region and a resulting threat to native marine species. “For Arctic marine biota,” the report notes, “the rapid reduction of summer ice covers causes a tipping element that is now severely affecting pelagic [sub-surface] ecosystems as well as ice-dependent mammals such as seals and polar bears.” Other flora and fauna of the Arctic biome are also demonstrating stress related to climate change. For example, vast areas of tundra are being invaded by shrubs and small trees, decimating the habitats of some animal species and increasing the risk of fires.</p><p>This Arctic “regime shift” affects many other aspects of the ecosystem as well. Higher temperatures, for instance, have meant widespread thawing and melting of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permafrost" target="_blank">permafrost</a>, the frozen soil and water that undergirds much of the Arctic landmass. In this lies another possible tipping-point danger, since frozen soils contain more than twice the carbon now present in the atmosphere. As the permafrost melts, some of this carbon is released in the form of <a href="http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/ch4.html" target="_blank">methane</a>, a potent greenhouse gas with many times the warming potential of carbon dioxide and other such gases. In other words, as the IPCC noted, any significant melting of Arctic permafrost will “create a potentially strong positive feedback to accelerate Arctic (and global) warming.” This, in fact, could prove to be more than a tipping point. It could be a planetary catastrophe.</p><p>Along with these biophysical effects, the warming of the Arctic is threatening the livelihoods and lifestyles of the indigenous peoples of the region. The loss of summer sea ice, for example, has endangered the marine species on which many such communities depend for food and the preservation of their cultural traditions. Meanwhile, melting permafrost and coastal erosion due to sea-level rise have <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/02/24/the-remote-alaskan-village-that-needs-to-be-relocated-due-to-climate-change/" target="_blank">threatened</a> the very existence of their coastal villages. In September, President Obama <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obama-takes-on-climate-change-the-rolling-stone-interview-20150923" target="_blank">visited</a> Kotzebue, a village in Alaska some 30 miles above the Arctic Circle that could disappear as a result of melting permafrost, rising sea levels, and ever bigger storm surges.</p><p><strong>Coral Reefs at Risk</strong></p><p>Another crucial ecosystem that's showing signs of heading toward an irreversible tipping point is the world's constellation of coral reefs. Remarkably enough, although such reefs make up less than 1% of the Earth’s surface area, they <a href="http://ocean.si.edu/corals-and-coral-reefs" target="_blank">house</a> up to 25% of all marine life. They are, that is, essential for both the health of the oceans and of fishing communities, as well as of those who depend on fish for a significant part of their diet. According to one estimate, some <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/global/the-coral-triangle/2015/sep/25/wwf-worlds-richest-reef-system-could-soon-succumb-to-climate-change" target="_blank">850 million people</a> rely on coral reefs for their food security.</p><p>Corals, which are colonies of tiny animals related to sea anemones, have proven highly sensitive to changes in the acidity and temperature of their surrounding waters, both of which are rising due to the absorption of excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. As a result, in a visually dramatic process called “bleaching,” coral populations have been dying out globally. According to a recent study by the Worldwide Fund for Nature, coral reef extent has <a href="http://assets.wwf.org.uk/custom/stories/living_blue_planet/" target="_blank">declined</a> by 50% in the last 30 years and all reefs could disappear as early as 2050 if current rates of ocean warming and acidification continue.</p><p>“This irreversible loss of biodiversity,” reports the IPCC, will have “significant consequences for regional marine ecosystems as well as the human livelihoods that depend on them.” Indeed, the growing evidence of such losses “strengthens the conclusion that increased mass bleaching of corals constitutes a strong warning signal for the singular event that would constitute the irreversible loss of an entire biome.”</p><p><strong>Amazonian Dry-Out</strong></p><p>The Amazon has long been viewed as the epitome of a tropical rainforest, with extraordinary plant and animal diversity. The Amazonian tree cover also plays a vital role in reducing the pace of global warming by absorbing vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere during the process of photosynthesis. For years, however, the Amazon has been increasingly devastated by a process of <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/01/amazon-rain-forest/wallace-text" target="_blank">deforestation</a>, as settlers from Brazil’s coastal regions clear land for farming and ranching, and loggers (many operating illegally) harvest timber for wood products. Now, as if to add insult to injury, the region faces a new threat from climate change: tree mortality due to a rise in <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/amazon-rainforest-is-at-higher-risk-of-tree-loss-16649" target="_blank">severe drought</a> and the increased forest fire risk that accompanies it.</p><p>Although it can rain year-round in the <a href="http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/where_we_work/amazon/about_the_amazon/" target="_blank">Amazon region</a>, there is a distinct wet season with heavy rainfall and a dry season with much less of it. An extended dry season with little rain can endanger the survival of many trees and increase the risk of wildfires. Research conducted by scientists at the University of Texas has found that the dry season in the southern Amazonian region has grown by a week every decade since 1980 while the annual fire season has lengthened. “The dry season over the southern Amazon is already marginal for maintaining rainforest,” <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/amazon-rainforest-is-at-higher-risk-of-tree-loss-16649" target="_blank">says</a> Rong Fu, the leader of the research team. “At some point, if it becomes too long, the rainforest will reach a tipping point” and disappear.</p><p>Because the Amazon harbors perhaps the <a href="http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/where_we_work/amazon/about_the_amazon/" target="_blank">largest array</a> of distinctive flora and fauna on the planet, its loss would represent an irreversible blow to global biodiversity. In addition, the region hosts some of the <a href="http://www.survivalinternational.org/tribes/uncontacted-brazil" target="_blank">largest assemblages</a> of indigenous peoples still practicing their traditional ways of life. Even if their lives were saved (through relocation to urban slums or government encampments), the loss of their cultures, representing thousands of years of adaptation to a demanding environment, would be a blow for all humankind.</p><p>As in the case of the Arctic and coral reefs, the collapse of the Amazon will have what the IPCC terms “cascading impacts,” devastating ecosystems, diminishing biodiversity, and destroying the ways of life of indigenous peoples. Worse yet, as with the melting of the Arctic, so the drying-out of Amazonia is likely to feed into climate change, heightening its intensity and so sparking yet more tipping points on a planet increasingly close to the brink.</p><p>In its report, the IPCC, whose analysis tends, if anything, to be on the conservative side of climate science, indicated that the Amazon faced a relatively low risk of dying out by 2100. However, a 2009 study conducted by Britain’s famed Meteorological (Met) Office suggests that the risk is far greater than previously assumed. Even if global temperatures were to be held to an increase of 2 degrees Celsius, the study notes, as much as 40% of the Amazon would perish within a century; with 3 degrees of warming, up to 75% would vanish; and with 4 degrees, 85% would die. “The forest as we know it would effectively be gone,” <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/mar/11/amazon-global-warming-trees" target="_blank">said</a> Met researcher Vicky Pope.</p><p><strong>Of Tipping Points and Singularities</strong></p><p>These four natural systems are by no means the only ones that could face devastating tipping points in the years to come. The IPCC report and other scientific studies hint at further biomes that show early signs of potential catastrophe. But these four are sufficiently advanced to tell us that we need to look at climate change in a new way: not as a slow, linear process to which we can adapt over time, but as a non-linear set of events involving dramatic and irreversible changes to the global ecosphere.</p><p>The difference is critical: linear change gives us the luxury of time to devise and implement curbs on greenhouse gas emissions, and to construct protective measures such as sea walls. Non-linear change puts a crimp on time and confronts us with the possibility of relatively sudden, devastating climate shifts against which no defensive measures can protect us.</p><p>Were the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to fail, for example, there would be nothing we could do to turn it back on, nor would we be able to recreate coral reefs or resurrect the Amazon. Add in one other factor: when natural systems of this magnitude fail, should we not expect human systems to fail as well? No one can answer this question with certainty, but we do know that earlier human societies <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0143117009/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20" target="_blank">collapsed</a> when faced with other kinds of profound changes in climate.</p><p>All of this should be on the minds of delegates to the upcoming <a href="http://unfccc.int/meetings/paris_nov_2015/meeting/8926.php" target="_blank">climate summit</a> in Paris, a meeting focused on adopting an international set of restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions. Each participating nation is obliged to submit a set of measures it is ready to take, <a href="http://unfccc.int/focus/indc_portal/items/8766.php" target="_blank">known as</a> “intended nationally determined contributions,” or INDCs, aimed at achieving the overall goal of preventing planetary warming from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius. However, the INDCs submitted to date, including those from the United States and China, suggest a distinctly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/28/world/limited-progress-seen-even-as-more-nations-step-up-on-climate.html" target="_blank">incremental approach</a> to the problem. Unfortunately, if planetary tipping points are in our future, this mindset will not measure up. It’s time to start thinking instead in terms of civilizational survival.</p>
Keep reading... Show less