Environment

Fish Futures

The multibillion-dollar aquaculture industry is serving up farmed salmon in huge numbers. The bad news is that this cultivated catch lacks the nutritional value of wild salmon, and fish farming poses an ecological nightmare to the oceans.
For years, fish has been touted to Americans as the food that keeps the Japanese trim and their hearts hardy. Every nutrition textbook lists fish -- specifically fatty, cold water ocean fish, like salmon, mackerel, sardines, and herring -- as the best sources of omega-3 essential fatty acids and protein.

These days, you can't buy a diet book without reading about the restorative properties of omega-3s. In "The Healthy Kitchen," Andrew Weil and Rosie Daley, Oprah's favorite chef, recommend fish every other day, especially salmon. Omega-3 act as an anti-inflammatory against autoimmune disease, builds bones, staves off depression ("Prozac of the deep," some call it), and steadies the rhythm of the heart, and that's the short list. In April, two more long-term studies, reported in the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association, announced that eating omega-3-rich fish at least once a week significantly cuts the chance of your keeling over from a clogged ticker.

The fervor for fish coincides with the bad rep meat and poultry have taken on over the last decade. Since at least four children died and more than 700 people fell ill from eating contaminated hamburgers at Jack in the Box during the winter of 1992-93, meat and poultry have been associated with a gang of bacterial "superbugs" carried mainly by livestock feces. Then came Mad Cow disease.

"Our fish orders shot up when Mad Cow came out," says Emeryville restaurateur Adam Weig. Far and away, the fish that customers want is salmon.

"I can't buy enough of it," says Ted Iijima, fish manager at the Berkeley Bowl grocery, as he scours the pre-dawn San Francisco docks for salmon a week before Mother's Day. "Come winter, for the first time, I'm going to buy salmon that's been frozen during the season," he confides almost sotto voce. "The people in Berkeley, especially, want to know, 'Is this fish wild or farmed? How much mercury is in it? Does it come from polluted waters?' The season'll be over, but my customers still want wild salmon."

Unfortunately, wild salmon aren't always in season, nor is there enough to go around. But that's not to worry. In the era of the global marketplace, there is a plan B: fish farms.

More than half of the salmon Americans eat is farmed, that is, not hunted and dragged flailing from the sea but raised docilely in giant sea cages floating in the ocean, where they grow big and fast on high protein diets, just like their feed lot and henhouse friends.

"The demand is going to increase and the world's ability to produce commercially caught fish has pretty much peaked," says Dan Swecker, secretary-treasurer of the Washington (State) Fish Growers Association and also a state senator. "The increased demand is going to have to be supplied by aquaculture" -- meaning farmed -- "products."

If he's right, and if it will, there's still the little matter of its record. Much of the nutritional benefit of wild fish is lost in the farmed variety because of their artificial diets. Proximity to farmed salmon has led to rampant disease and decline among native fish in every part of the world except the Pacific Northwest...so far. Meanwhile, genetically engineered salmon await FDA approval, part of the vast, uncontrolled biologic experiment in which we are all subjects. The dilemma is apparent: To fill an extraordinary demand built on genuine need, the multibillion dollar aquaculture industry has turned the carnivorous salmon into a plant eater, while changing its look, taste and nutritional value. The dilemma doesn't end there: If they ruin the seas to grow an inferior product, can you call it a solution?

Fat Farm

Dan Swecker is speaking over the phone from St. Petersburg, Florida, where he is attending a National Association of State Aquaculture Coordinators. World aquaculture is a bustling $56 billion-a-year global enterprise and salmon is a top performer. It's in 37 percent of all American food establishments, and more than 70 percent of the "white tablecloth" joints, more than any other fish.

A study of the global aquaculture industry, released last year by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, called salmon farming "the most important agriculture industry in the world." Nor is it a business for small fry anymore. As of three years ago, all nine ocean-based salmon farms in the state of Washington (with Maine, the only two states that produce farmed salmon), were absorbed by one Norwegian company, Pan Fish, the world's third largest fish producer. The industry has been consolidating rapidly. Six companies, from the Netherlands, Norway and Canada, now produce over half of the world's farmed salmon. In British Columbia, it's the same as Washington except, with laxer environmental laws and 10 times the farms, Pan Fish shares control with a handful of multinational giants.

The magic word is consistency, as Eric Schlosser so ably noted in his book about the McDonaldization of everything, "Fast Food Nation." Farmed salmon avoids the inconsistency of ocean fish.

"Farmed salmon is much more consistent than wild salmon," says Swecker. "You can grow it year-round. The buyer can expect to have it on his doorstep 52 weeks a year. He can plan a restaurant menu. And the people he serves can plan on having it when they go there. Anytime you can standardize something it makes it more convenient, instead of wasting a lot of time looking for alternatives."

The salmon he's talking about is not the one you fish for past the Golden Gate Bridge. That's Pacific salmon, of which there are five different West Coast species -- Chinook (King), Coho (Silver), Sockeye, Pink and Chum -- and a sixth in Asia. Each has different characteristics: more oil, more fat, more flavor, different flavor.

The salmon Swecker means is Atlantic salmon. Nearly all the farmed salmon in the world is the single Atlantic species. The first West Coast fish farmers bred Coho and Chinook, back in the '70s, but the darn things wouldn't quit swimming. That made the farmers mad, since swimming burns fat, ill-advised in a business that sells by the pound. So they brought in Atlantics, who don't mind treading water for a living.

At first the farmers tried to re-create their natural diet, feeding them lots of fish. But salmon can eat 10 times their body weight, which meant they were killing 10 pounds of fish, or some substantial fraction, for every pound of product. So fish feed manufacturers started adding vegetable proteins, such as soy, canola, corn gluten, animal byproducts, including poultry and feathers, and vitamin and mineral supplements. Fish feed currently consists of only 35 percent fish, and falling.

Like herbivorous cattle fed meat, carnivorous fish are now largely vegetarians. The result is a blander fish, which, according to Swecker, is just what the public wants. "American consumers generally prefer bland white fish as a major preference," he says. "It's not so 'fishy.'"

It also has less nutritional value, says Frank Hu, the lead author of the 16-year study of omega-3 and cardiac disease that appeared in April's Journal of the American Medical Association. Hu is assistant professor of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health.

"Farm fish usually doesn't contain much omega-3 at all. Only fish from the oceans contain many omega-3 essential fatty acids." Essential fatty acids are not produced by the body and must be absorbed through food. The April study did not look at farmed fish, although Hu says "previous studies have documented that."

"Depending on what kind of food they're eating, it will store in the body as omega-3 or -6. Fish in farms eat mostly corn or soybean and will store omega-6 in the body. Wild fish and algae will be stored as omega-3."

Omega-6s are found in vegetable oils and processed foods, among others. They have a contrary, though balancing, effect on 3s. A one-to-one ratio is ideal, according to the American Cancer Society. However, "many Americans have 10 to 20 times more omega-6s than omega-3s in their systems," ACS says. Studies show that women with breast cancer have two-to-five times more omega-6s than omega-3 fatty acids in their systems." When diets high in omega-6s are fed to fish, the result is the same as Junior shoveling Big Macs down his gullet: it super-sizes 'em.

Bland or no, consumers still prefer their salmon to look like salmon, which is why feed manufacturers add astaxanthin, a chemical analog of the actual pigment, to pink up the flesh. As with omega-3, wild salmon have pink flesh due to their diet. Farmed salmon, living like couch potatoes, each confined to an area the size of a bathtub, bloat and grow white with fat. Concerned market researchers cornered shoppers with "SalmoFan"TM color cards produced by Roche, the drug company behind astaxanthin, and learned something important: "Deeply colored flesh was associated with higher quality, better tasting salmon," according to sales literature for Sysco, the giant food service supplier. "This market research indicated that consumers may be willing to pay more for deeply colored salmon."

The color that resonated strongest with the targeted group was Number 33, which, in the Big Box carton of Crayolas, falls midway between "Red-orange" and "Tickle Me Pink."

You Can't Go Home Again

This year's salmon season has been a good one for California fishermen, with Chinook (King) salmon reeling in at 20 pounds. Northern Alaska is actually having a bumper year. Good, of course, is relative. The 6,000 winter run Chinook salmon fished off California last year was disastrous compared to the 100,000 in 1967. At the same time, it's 300 times better than the measly 200 from 1990.

What improvement there is in the salmon population is due to the creation of hatcheries by the state and federal governments, especially in the decades after W.W. II, to offset the damage to spawning grounds from dam construction and the subsequent diversion of water. Hatcheries capture returning females, strip them of their eggs, and fertilize them, producing millions of viable eggs instead of hundreds or thousands. They then raise the fry in protected tanks until they can be released into the wild. They even truck many of them directly to the ocean, to make sure they get there. Some 80 percent of the salmon off of California are hatchery bred.

Every Pacific salmon species has been on and off the endangered list in the last decade, owing to the devastation of their spawning grounds, including the once mighty Klamath, Snake and Columbia rivers, now trickles of their former selves. Those have been dammed, diverted and drained, with the downstream Klamath water, for example, so hot, scarce and polluted that it's killed hundreds of thousands of salmon in the last few years. The impact is not just on fish, but also on the people, towns and river-dependent economies that live off them. Today, the Coho are nearly extinct in the Klamath, winter-run Sacramento River Chinook are on the endangered list, and Chum are threatened in the Hood and Columbia Rivers.

By contrast, aquaculture is every politician's dream. Salmon farming in British Columbia is a $250 million industry, providing well over 2,000 full-time, year-round jobs in small country towns around Vancouver and Victoria. The farms purchase nearly all of their supplies and services in the same vicinity. Farmed salmon is the province's largest agricultural export. The same good fortune explains why the recession-bogged governments of Ireland, Iceland and others are eagerly exploring ways to jump in on the aquaculture business, despite its many drawbacks.

The principal drawback is that it's an ecological nightmare. "Fish farming degrades coastal waters through discharge of nutrients and chemicals, and it disrupts coastal ecosystems by the introduction of exotic species," writes Rosamond L. Naylor, senior fellow at Stanford's Center for Environmental Science and Policy, and the author of numerous cross-disciplinary studies on aquaculture. In the Pacific, Atlantic salmon are exotic. "The ocean's capacity to assimilate wastes and maintain viable fish populations is being challenged by aquaculture's continued growth."

While waste, disease and ecological havoc have been largely quiescent in the Pacific Northwest, the rest of the world has experienced very different results. In Norway, a particularly noxious parasite called Gyrodactylus salaris, imported from a Swedish fish farm, single-handedly wiped out every salmon in dozens of farms and rivers. Sea lice, found in the single digits on wild salmon, grow fruitful and multiply in the close confines of sea cages.

In Scotland, the farmed fish industry has been blamed for a toxin that is ruining the shellfish industry there, although, as elsewhere, numerous factors are at play. Scottish farmed salmon also suffer from heart disease, ignited by the stressful conditions of farm life.

In Chile, a pending study by Claudio Miranda, of the Laboratory of Aquatic Pathology, found antibiotic-resistant bacteria in fish farm effluent that was "significantly higher" than the influent, the feed or any other element. Chile reportedly uses many times more antibiotics on their fish than elsewhere.

In the U.S., according to Dan Swecker and others, vaccines, which are given early on in much smaller quantities, have greatly reduced the need for antibiotics. One of the two is necessary, because, just as with feedlot animals, diseases are otherwise rife in 10,000-square-foot cages packed gill-to-gill with fish that eat and swim in their own muck.

In the past year in Maine, the salmon farming industry was forced to destroy two and a half million fish afflicted with Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISA). The same disease shut down the industry in New Brunswick two years earlier. First identified in Norway in 1984, ISA soon spread to Scotland, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Chile. To date, it has not hit the Pacific Coast.

North to Alaska

Reports such as these have clearly shaken the state of Alaska, in which wild salmon account for hundreds of millions of tourist and commercial fishing dollars, as well as the sustenance of many citizens. Salmon farms are banned in that state. In 1999, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game issued a "white paper," renewed this past March, on the perils of the Atlantic salmon invasion. It pulls no punches about the alien fish: "The farming of Atlantic salmon by other states and nations poses a new and perhaps more devastating threat to the survival and abundance of wild Pacific salmon" than even the historical ravages of "dams, urbanization and deforestation."

More than disease or drugs or devastation of the sea floor, Alaska is worried about the colonization of its waters by Atlantic salmon escaping from ocean-based sea cages. "The annual release of tens of thousands of Atlantic salmon into the Pacific Coast ecosystem amounts to biological pollution of the ocean and poses an enormous threat to wild Pacific salmon," the White Paper states. While it is a different species, and thus unlikely to interbreed, "introductions of non-native species have frequently resulted in unexpected and often catastrophic consequences from habitat destruction, diseases or parasites, hybridization, reproductive proliferation, and predation and competition."

The industry, backed by the federal government, downplays those worries. A National Marine Fisheries Service report on "The Net Pen Salmon Farming Industry in the Pacific Northwest," released last year, insists there is "little or no risk" of hybridization and colonization of Atlantic salmon in the Pacific. The report notes decades of aggressive yet unsuccessful attempts to introduce Atlantics as sport fish. It estimates that one million Atlantic salmon have escaped from sea cages into Puget Sound and British Columbia since 1990 with no evident propagation. It says that "few prey items of any sort have been found in the stomach contents of escaped Atlantic salmon which have been recaptured."

In other words, the domesticated salmon, which are able to live for months without eating, as are wild fish returning to spawn, have thus far been unable to establish themselves in the Pacific Ocean.

John P. Volpe, a professor of invasion biology at the University of Alberta, disputes that, saying conditions have changed. Diminishing native stocks and devastated habitats have left Pacifics more vulnerable than ever. Volpe says he's found Atlantic salmon in 80 percent of the British Columbian streams he's recently surveyed, including 14 adults in one stretch of one river.

Frankenfish

Of potentially greater concern are genetically engineered salmon, dubbed "frankenfish" by their detractors and currently under review by the FDA. A Waltham, Massachusetts company, Aquabounty, Inc. has taken Chinook growth hormones and spliced them onto the Atlantic salmon genome, halving the time necessary to grow farmed salmon. Farmed salmon already grow at least twice as fast and wild fish.

The real solution, the "sustainable" one, will take longer than the two-to-four-year attention span of most politicians or even the public: stop trawlers that destroy the ocean floor and kill four times more fish than they want (the so-called "bycatch" is thrown overboard, dead or dying); stop killing species faster than they can reproduce; clean up the oceans; restore freshwater habitats, and make it worthwhile for countries to not pollute, instead of the opposite.

"Destruction of the sea actually works to the fish farmers' advantage," says Anne Mossness, co-chair of the Industrial Fish Farm Reform Project for the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, a non-profit advocacy group. "The more they pollute the sea, the more they can prove the need for their product."

"The Russian Far East has tremendous potential as a worldwide producer of wild salmon, for example," says Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman's Associations. "They could easily match Alaska's wild salmon production, if they could institute the infrastructure and management to make sure it gets to the plate. It would provide an economic incentive to control the watersheds, stop poaching and protect the environment from pipelines, mining and timber harvesting."

For the time being, aquariums and zoos around the country have joined forces with the organic food movement to encourage the use of sustainable seafood and hopefully slow or reverse the decline of wild fin- and shellfish. California's Monterey Bay Aquarium, along with several partners, has developed a comprehensive "Seafood Watch" program, complete with Web site and downloadable wallet cards that list safe and at-risk species. To learn more about Seafood Watch, visit //www.mbayaq.org/cr/seafoodwatch.asp.

Bud Hazelkorn has reported extensively on meat and poultry issues for PBS Frontline, The New York Times and other publications.
Sign Up!
Get AlterNet's Daily Newsletter in Your Inbox
+ sign up for additional lists
[x]
Select additional lists by selecting the checkboxes below before clicking Subscribe:
Activism
Drugs
Economy
Education
Election 2018
Environment
Food
Media
World