Last Monday at lunch in a Spanish restaurant in New York City, server #228 earned $12. Tuesday at lunch, $14. Thursday night and Friday night: $480 total. On Saturday morning at lunch, she made $75. Last summer, in August, the slowest restaurant month of the year (except in vacation towns), she made less than $500 -- and didn't make rent.
Thanks to tipping, restaurant service is one of the most erratically paid professions in the United States. In some states, tips comprise 100 percent of a server's income, and all but seven have separate, decreased minimum wages for tipped employees. On the federal level, the minimum hourly wage for tipped employees is $2.15. In Kansas, it's $1.59.
With a wage this low, most or all of it is diverted to payroll taxes, leaving servers and often table bussers and food runners to survive on the whims of their wining and dining guests.
So how do servers survive? As it turns out, many of them don't -- servers have a greater turnover rate than virtually any other profession. Tipping is part of the problem, according to Michael Lynn, associate professor of Consumer Behavior at Cornell University's Hotel School and an expert on tipping norms and practices, "Part of it has to do with tipping itself. It's an unsure source of income. If you are a professional server making money on tips, it is difficult to establish credit ratings and to buy a house."
Lynn highlights the effect that high turnover rates have on the profession. "Because there is a high turnover, the practice becomes less efficient," she says. "The service can suffer when an employer says, 'I don't want to invest money in training servers who are not going to be around in a few months.' In this country, we have a generally more poorly trained workforce because of that turnover."
Currently, servers in this country are young, transient and a dime a dozen. In 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor reported a server workforce of 2.25 million. Around one-quarter of all food- and beverage-related workers are 16 to 19 years old -- about six times the proportion of all workers. The job of a server was rated as one of the top five private sector occupations with the highest number of job vacancies, indicating an extremely high turnover.
Anatomy of a tip
So what is average for a tip? The expected rate used to be 15 percent of the total bill, but these days, especially in urban areas, tips are much closer to 20 percent. According to Zagat Survey's 2006 Top Restaurant Survey, the average restaurant tip in the United States is 18.7 percent.
And where do the tips go? Servers invariably have to "tip out" -- pool together and share -- their nightly income with other service staff such as bartenders, bussers and runners, and often a coffee guy and bar back as well. A tip-out can be as much as 40 percent or as little as 10 percent. Each restaurant develops a unique method of division. Generally, but by no means without exception, bartenders are paid the most, then servers and runners, and then everyone else.
A server's income varies to an incredible degree. One server I interviewed said he makes around $45 a night. If that server worked five nights a week and took a month off a year, his annual income before taxes would be $10,800. On the other side of the spectrum, senior servers at top restaurants in New York City can make $100,000 a year -- or more.
Tipping for good weather forecasts and good looks
What is surprising is that, among the factors that determine how much money a server makes, quality of service is fairly insignificant. The Center for Hospitality Research at Cornell University, where Lynn works, found in a 20-year study that level of service explained only a miniscule two percent of the variation between tips. "Literally how sunny it is outside has the same impact on a tip as good service does," says Lynn. "The relationship between tips and service is weak enough that you have to really question the incentive for servers to give good service."
The Center for Hospitality Research lists a number of other factors that affect your tip, many of which are completely out of a server's control. Good weather, good moods and a piece of candy with the check are all important tip boosters. For the server, being attractive improves your tip, being a woman improves your tip, and being an attractive woman exponentially increases it.
In fact, Lynn goes so far as to question the legality of tipping in America. According to Lynn, there is conclusive evidence that being white and/or female has a positive effect on a tip. "Tipping as it is currently practiced is probably unlawful. It is against the law to discriminate on the basis of sex and skin color. The Civil Rights Act states that any time race, sex or age has a dispirited impact on the employee, the job is unlawful. If I was the owner of a large restaurant, I would be afraid of a class action suit."
But there are more subtle factors -- offering your customers a good weather forecast increases a tip. Seating a small party at a big table increases a tip. Wearing unusual ornaments or articles of clothing increases your tip. A busy restaurant increases a tip. And more than we may realize, it is all about making the numbers look nice. "People don't like to leave change. They round numbers," says New York-based restaurant consultant Arlene Spiegel. "People round up from the total -- it might end up being 15 percent or it might end up being 20 percent."
For Holly Binghamton, a server at a small Italian restaurant in the theater district of New York City, who you serve is more important than how you serve. "I think it totally depends on the customer. New Yorkers and groups of men tip me well. Tourists and old people don't. Some people tip 15 percent no matter what. Or else they'll verbal tip you, which is even more annoying." 'Verbal tipping' is the term for profuse complimenting on food or service in the place of leaving a good tip.
The popularity of the restaurant is an enormous factor in server income -- unlike with managers, chefs, line cooks, dishwashers and anyone else in the 'back of the house,' if no one comes in, servers don't get paid. Jessica Scranton, a server at the Border Cafe in Cambridge, Mass., notes how the popularity of her restaurant keeps the tips coming in. "At the last place I worked, I would walk out of there with almost no money on slow days. At the Border Cafe, though it's less expensive, it is always busy, so I always make money."
"It also depends on when you work," points out Toby Hargrove, a former server who worked in restaurants in Philadelphia for ten years. "If you only work Friday and Saturday nights, you will make more money. People tip more on weekends, for sure."
Increasingly, the grumblings about the restaurant industry and how-tos on increasing servers' tips are happening online. One website, BitterWaitress.com, receives somewhere in the range of 50,000 hits a week, and there are more. At WaiterRant.net and ShamelessRestaurants.com, and on the discussion boards at FoodServiceLiberationFront.com, servers, diners and everyone in between spar over tipping etiquette and expectation.
Despite the bevy of online discontents about the job and research showing that in most cases the level of service does not increase tips, the overall message about the tipping system on these sites is positive -- your tip is in your control, and it can work to your advantage. As BitterWaitress.com proprietor Chris Fehlinger asserts, "The current tipping system is imperfect, but it can work if you work it."
I'm an actor -- serving just pays the bills
Most servers are not in it for the long term -- Binghamton's true calling is dance, Scranton is a photographer and Hargrove currently works for an environmental consulting firm.
Health insurance, benefits and job security for servers tend to be dismal. Fully half of all servers in this country work on a part-time basis, which changes what is expected of management in terms of health care and benefits.
At B R Guest Restaurants, a New York-based restaurant corporation that owns restaurants and hotels around the country, servers get health insurance after working for the company for six months. While this may sound horrific, it is actually a good deal compared to most other restaurants. In general, insurance and benefits are a gray area -- there is often a way to qualify, but only if you work a certain number of hours per week, and since servers don't take home a paycheck, clocking in and out is not a priority.
"It is a trade-off," says Binghamton. "Serving is a good job because you can leave and come back fairly easily, but you don't get any of the benefits of a contracted position." Hargrove has worked in four different restaurants, and not a single one offered health insurance or any other benefits. "I was never anywhere for more than three years, so I didn't even ask if benefits were an option."
In some ways, the unpredictability of a server's income and benefits fits right into the culture of the industry, where more than half of all restaurants fail in their first year, and 73 percent fail in their first five years. Restaurant success is an uncertain thing, and very few have the winning formula. As Carol King, a consultant to the hospitality industry, writes in Professional Dining Room Management, "Payroll is by far the largest cost in the operation of a dining room. It includes not only direct hourly wages of service staff but also a number of related costs, sometimes referred to as fringes." Apparently, health insurance and benefits are 'fringes' in the restaurant industry
How to tip in Belgrade
The system in this country differs from other countries in that servers don't get a base salary, which is something not everyone realizes. "What the guests don't know is that servers are not making any money during the time they aren't taking tables, when they are setting up," says Spiegel. "That is where I think that guests are misled."
And If American guests don't understand the pay structure at restaurants, forget about tourists. "Foreigners don't tip," says Travis Raye, a server at Mex & Co in New York. "Europeans should get a memo at the border: 'You need to tip 20 percent,'" jokes Binghamton.
In virtually every other country in the world, the system is completely different -- servers are paid a living wage and tips are supplementary. In Australia, New Zealand and most of Europe, tips come in the range of 5 percent to 10 percent. In South Africa, the average tip is 10 percent. In Vietnam, tipping is illegal. Apart from the United States, big tippers can be found in Canada, the Cayman Islands, Mexico, Ireland, Scotland, Israel, Russia and Saudi Arabia, where servers expect somewhere between 10 percent and 15 percent.
So why is the United States the exception? Lynn has researched tipping customs around the world, and found that countries with the most extroverted and neurotic citizens tip the most, inside and out of the restaurant industry; the United States leads in both categories. Writes Lynn, "These findings suggest that consumers value tipping as a way of getting attention and royal treatment from servers," which explains the high incidence of extroverts in the good-tipper pool. As for the neurotics, Lynn believes people further see tipping "as a way of reducing anxiety or discomfort about having another human being serve them."
Most servers like the prospect of being able to control how much money they make, but many seem disillusioned and would like to see the States behave more like the rest of the world. At Per Se, chef Thomas Keller's New York creation and perhaps the city's top restaurant, gratuity was worked into the cost of the meal last September amid a flurry of publicity and debate. Keller was rebuked for being "un-American," and studies were dug up that claimed 80 percent of diners prefer to decide how much they would like to tip.
How servers feel remains unstudied, but a round of questioning found a variety of opinions. "They should get a bigger wage," says Hargrove, "That's part of the reason I left." Scranton, however, thinks even the idea of pooling tips is "horrible." "Some people really work really hard and others are lazy, and you should make the money you deserve to make!" Binghamton, on the other hand, says she would like to see more consistency in her income referring to lunch shifts and slow nights, "I am sick of working for free. We should get a wage."
Diamonds are beautiful, and we all know that they are forever. But what do you do when your desire for some ice comes into conflict with the industry's horrendous trade and labor practices? Buying diamonds can be morally hazardous, but luckily for you and me there are some less egregious and even eco-friendly options.
The most well-publicized protest against the diamond industry takes issue with "conflict" or "blood" diamonds, which are defined by the U.N. as "rough diamonds used by rebel movements to finance their military activities," primarily in Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Liberia and Sierra Leone. Though there are 10,000 U.N. peacekeeping forces in Sierra Leone, the Rebel Army (RUF) has fought to control over three-quarters of the country and virtually every diamond mine in the region since 1991, including areas of neighboring Guinea. According to Physicians for Human Rights, the RUF has forced relocation of millions of Sierra Leoneans and committed serious human rights abuses that extend from rape to child soldiering and beyond. Amnesty International estimates that these rough 'conflict' diamonds make up about 10 percent of the world's diamond trade. In 2001 the Washington Post reported that Al Qaida brings in millions of dollars from illegal sales of diamonds mined by rebels in Sierra Leone.
The human cost
The diamond industry estimates that conflict diamonds make up 4 percent of the world's total, but others have claimed that the percentage is much higher: anywhere from 10 percent to 20 percent of the rough diamond trade.
Preventing the sale of "conflict" diamonds has been the objective of numerous campaigns since colonialism, and many of these have achieved considerable success, primarily in raising awareness of the issue. In May 2000, a group of African nations met in Kimberley, South Africa, to develop a process of certification for each diamond to ensure no civil conflict was aided by that diamond's production. After obtaining certification, no diamond would be allowed to travel across a national border without a certificate attached.
But there have been serious questions raised about the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS), mainly because the process puts the onus on member nations themselves to certify diamonds and monitor borders without an independent outsider keeping an objective eye. Unsurprisingly there have been various reports of forged certificates, loose borders controls and faulty or inconsistent certification schemes, and many say that the process is nothing more than a publicity stunt.
Importing nations in North America and Europe have not participated officially in the Kimberly Process, but many have accepted its validity and support its policies in lieu of sponsoring their own certification schemes. In April 2003, President Bush signed the Clean Diamond Trade Act, requiring all diamonds entering the United States to bear a Kimberly Process Certificate. Yet, if the scheme itself is flawed, requiring their certification to enter the country is quite beside the point.
The environmental impact
The other major problem with the KPCS is that it applies sanctions only to the funding of armed conflict in certain areas, ignoring the environmental impact of diamond mining and the exploitation of miners, cutters and polishers who work in the industry. In the first place, traditional diamond mining is extremely taxing environmentally. Most diamonds are mined by excavating a known diamond-bearing "pipe." This process is called "open-pit" mining and employs hydraulic shovels to remove ore material. Hard rock is drilled and blasted so the material can be extracted, leaving mines that can be as large as a mile wide and 3,500 feet deep.
|Open-pit mine in West Africa.|
A further 20 per cent of diamonds are mined from the bottom of riverbeds, called alluvial mining. These diamonds tend to be of exceptional value. Alluvial mining involves removing tons of riverbed in order to expose the diamonds, an act that devastates river ecosystems. Furthermore, alluvial mining has a history of child labor: After the riverbed has been excavated, children often comb the remaining area for diamonds.
Serious charges of child labor and unconscionable working conditions have also been brought against cutting and polishing centers in India and Thailand, where most rough diamonds are rerouted through Belgium and England to be prepared for sale.
|Alluvial mining in Sierra Leone.|
But fear not. There are many possibilities left on your plate for buying diamonds without contributing to this mountain of dread. You can buy secondhand or antique diamonds, Canadian diamonds and synthetic diamonds.
The smallest footprint prize goes to buying secondhand. The logic is simple: If you buy a preowned diamond, you and the previous owner are splitting the cost of the environmental and social damage by preventing another diamond sale. As the hardest material on earth, diamonds are quite durable, so you don't even have to worry about it looking worse for the wear. However, it should be noted that antique (over 100 years old), estate (from around the 1950s), and vintage (anything preowned) diamonds are an entirely different playing field -- most of these diamonds have been cut by hand and tend to take on a subtler hue. Antique and estate diamonds are in high demand for these unique qualities, so don't expect to pay much less than what you would for a new one.
Secondhand diamonds can be found in vintage jewelry stores and antique stores and markets across the country.
Topazery.com is an online antique, estate and vintage jewelry store located in Atlanta that has some information about the difference between new and old diamonds, as well as buying information.
Faycullen.com is a Florida antique, estate and vintage dealer that sells internationally.
In 1991, diamond deposits were discovered in the Northwest Territories of Canada. Before diamonds were mined, the Canadian government investigated the environmental toll of mining the diamonds, and in 1999, Canada's first diamond mine opened for business. The diamonds are mined, cut and polished in Canada, where these practices are closely monitored and each diamond is issued a government certification that guarantees all environmental standards of operation have been met.
Ascertaining your diamond's country of origin is definitely a good idea, and buying a diamond from a developed country increases your chances of getting a gem that has not been mined, cut or polished by an underpaid and mistreated worker. Kimberley, Australia, is home to the world's largest single producer of diamonds, the Argyle Diamond Mine. Other mines are located in Australia and New Zealand, and the one diamond mine in the United States is at Kelsey Lake in Colorado. Diamonds from these countries tend to be more expensive than those mined in developing countries.
Igloodiamonds.com sells to the U.S. with overnight delivery. Expediency and sustainability guaranteed!<
In this tourism site for Canada's Northwest Territories, there is a large historical and informational section about Canadian diamond mining that includes a timeline and specifics about environmental guidelines.
Synthetic diamonds are chemically, physically and optically identical to found diamonds, and so will satisfy your every sparkling craving, usually at a fraction of the price. Synthetic diamonds have been around since the 1960s, but only in the summer of 2003 did a factory in Florida called Gemesis perfect a process for producing gem diamonds ready for market. Though others are beginning to follow, Gemesis is currently the only U.S.-based supplier.
The De Beers Diamond Trading Co. is so petrified of what synthetic diamonds will do to business that it offers to install synthetic diamond detection machines in gem labs at no charge to the lab owners and have launched a large buyer beware campaign detailing the importance of "authenticity." From a global economic perspective, buying synthetic diamonds is without a doubt the best contribution a consumer can make to toppling the current monopolistic industry and paving the way for a more affordable and environmentally sustainable gem industry. Still, synthetic diamond production involves recreating the conditions under which diamonds are naturally formed 100 miles under the earth's surface, which can be expensive and requires a lot of time and energy from scientists and engineers.
Gemesis.com is former U.S. Army General Carter Clarke's diamond-making company in Sarasota, Fla. Clarke is the first to make synthetic gem diamonds specializing in colored gems. This site has buying options and information about the company and the industry.
Apollodiamond.com is a diamond producer whose products will purportedly be ready for sale in the coming year. This site has details about the technological aspects of production.