So much for Trump's big promise to America

22 June

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and his wife, Melania, on stage at a rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City on Sunday, Oct. 27, 2024. (Photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom)

The US Massive Ordnance Penetrator (“MOP”), weighing in at 30,000 pounds, was designed to destroy weapons of mass destruction buried in mountains or deep below the earth’s surface. The MOP is so heavy it can only be lifted by a B-2 bomber, which “can perform attack missions at altitudes of up to 50,000 feet.”

Israel does not own an MOP bomb or the B-2 bombers needed to carry it; both were developed and are owned exclusively by the United States Air Force. Although Trump claims credit for it, the MOP was developed in 2004 under the Bush administration, and US weapons engineers have tested and refined its capacities ever since.

Israel has been asking the US for an Ordnance Penetrator for years, and lobbied for it hard in 2004 during the George W. Bush administration. Until now, no prior administration would commit. But this week, Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu- either seeking to prolong his own rule, or because he found evidence of an “imminent” threat, depending on what media sources you consume, forced Trump’s hand by unilaterally attacking the sites of Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities. And, despite saying he’d decide in “two weeks,” on Saturday, Trump pulled the trigger.

Israel will fail to end Iran’s nuclear program without the MOP

Without the MOP, Israel’s laudable goal of ending Iran’s nuclear weapons proliferation-if, indeed, that is what Iran is up to- cannot succeed. There is no disagreement among military experts about the necessity of the bomber; it’s use is the only way to effectuate Israel’s goal of disabling Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities.

Netanyahu, however, started the attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities without consulting, conferring or strategizing with Trump, while Trump was still trying to get Iran to negotiate an end to its uranium enrichment. In March, Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, testified before Congress that the intelligence community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003.” Just last week, Trump was still trying to negotiate an agreement with Iran, and “remained hopefulthat his Middle East peace negotiator, Steve Witkoff, who had been scheduled to conduct another round of peace talks in the region Sunday, could soon get an agreement over the line.”

But out of nowhere, lacking any hint of strategy, and without any evidence to support an about face, Trump posted that everyone in Tehran, a city of 10 million, should “immediately evacuate,” and demanded Iran’s “unconditional surrender” then proceeded to bomb Iran.

So much for Trump’s oft-repeated promise to pull America out of endless wars.

Bibi played Trump’s hand

The Fordo enrichment lab, under the control of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, is a uranium enrichment facility buried deep in the mountains outside the Iranian city of Qom. It’s size, secrecy, and location led analysts to doubt Iran’s proffered non-military purpose of the facility, despite Gabbard’s assessment. Many experts agree that Iran built the Fordo lab for the covert production of weapons-gradehighly enriched uranium (HEU), making it a key target in Israel’s strikes.

Brett McGurk, who worked under four successive American presidents of both parties on Middle East issues, told the NYT, that Fordo has “been the crux” of Iran’s weapons development all along. McGurk, along with other weapons experts, agree that if Israel’s newest bombing campaign against Iran ends with Fordo still enriching uranium, Israel’s strike campaign will have failed.

US military strategists have been testing the MOP bomb in simulation labs enough to know that one bomb won’t do it. To successfully wreck Fordo, the attack will have to come in waves, with one B-2 firing one bomb after another down the same hole into the mountain. The operation as described was executed Saturday by an American pilot and crew.

A reality TV president would deploy the bomber to appear strong

The timing, in terms of US national security, could not have been worse. Trump is fresh off the heels of a globally embarrassing military parade that cost taxpayers $45 million.Hundreds of thousands of spectators were expected to attend, but most media outlets, including the New York Times and Wall Street Journal,reported spare attendance, extremely low energy, and mostly empty bleachers. The optics were painful. Trump’s Kim Jong-un style parade quickly became an international joke, with the most viral social media clip showing a tank rolling by empty spectator benches accompanied only by the lonely sound of creaking metal.

Fox News, of course, fawned over tanks in the street, and praised the parade with uninterrupted coverage. But the rest of the world saw the real spectacle happening at the same time: over 5 million people turned out to protest against Trump in over 2100 cities across the nation. The anti-Trump No Kings Day demonstration was hailed as the largest protest in US history.

Following this embarrassing split screen, publicized around the world, Trump embraced Israel’s ability to change the channel by bombing Iran and pulling the US into its war.

Trump, through arrogance, weakness, or ignorance, brought us here

It can’t be forgotten that Trump led us to this precarious path when he withdrew from the Iranian nuclear agreement in 2018, after it had been painstakingly hammered out among several nations including the US, Iran, France, Germany Britain, China and Russia. At the time he withdrew from the agreement, Trump’s move was expected to embolden hard-line forces in Iran, supercharging Iran within a Middle East arms race. If Bibi is to be believed, that is exactly what happened. President Obama, whose team negotiated the agreement, predicted that Trump’s withdrawal would “leave the world less safe,” and confronted with “a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East.”

And that losing choice is exactly where we faced when Trump, without Congressional action, without debate, without US intelligence, decided to go to war.

It was fairly obvious that Trump would do it. Trump’s parade flop denied him the spectacle of military lethality he so desperately craves. Deploying the bomber will now allow 24/7 Fox News, OAN, and Newsmax coverage of Trump beating his chest. Keep in mind that Trump is demanding a $1 trillion dollar defense budget while purporting to keep the US out of foreign entanglements. It’s only a matter of time before Senators put two and two together and figure out that Trump wants that $1trillion to morph the military into a domestic attack force to be deployed on American soil, against American citizens who live in democrat-run cities. Deploying the Ordnance against Iran will help delay that moment of realization and provide republicans with some diverting optics- cue Hegseth in aviator glasses manning a fighter jet. It could even help Trump’s budget negotiations.

It's too much to expect an effective Israel strategy from Trump, given that Netanyahu and his advisors are operating well above the second grade level of intellect parading in the White House. Afghanistan should have taught us—even Trump— that it is far easier to topple a hostile foreign regime than it is to replace it with a functioning government acceptable to its people. Israel, if it topples the Khamenei regime, could end up leaving Iran in the hands of violent factions even more dangerous than they are now.

Now having ordered the attack, Fox News will re-write the narrative and sell it as proof of Trump’s genius, which 45% of the country will buy, and the US will find itself in another Neanderthalic war that will never end.

Sabrina Haake is a 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. Her columns are found @ Alternet, MSN, Out South Florida, Raw Story,Salon,Smart News, and Windy City Times. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.

From Your Site Articles