'Absurd!': US billionaires pay lower tax rate than working class for first time
The Wall Street Journal editorial board took Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to task for backing out of a proposal to indicate the price of President Donald Trump’s tariff on each affected Amazon product.
The White House responded harshly to the proposal, declaring the move a "hostile and political act by Amazon" at a televised morning briefing, but Trump late praised Bezos for changing his mind Tuesday
“He solved the problem very quickly and he did the right thing," Trump said. "He's a good guy."
READ MORE: 'Extraordinary step': Johnson changing House rule to prevent national security 'investigation'
But the board wants to know why Trump would want to hide the price of his tariffs if he truly intends for them to replace the U.S. income tax.
“Why is he afraid to let Americans see what they’re paying? Instead of owning its policy, the White House has bullied Amazon to keep quiet about what it will cost,” the board wrote.
The public would have valued Amazon’s price transparency, the board argues. “Tariffs are taxes, and it’s helpful to know how policy choices affect final prices. Some shoppers might say the additional cost is worth it to support Mr. Trump’s policy. But there’s no denying that they’re paying, and everyone is better off knowing how much.”
The board went on to explain that ride-sharing platforms understand the dynamic. After each trip, riders get an itemized bill showing what portion of their fare includes tolls, fees and taxes. Hotels also list local taxes with customer bills.
READ MORE: Busted: MSNBC fact-checker corrects Karoline Leavitt's critical error
“Mr. Trump likes to say foreign exporters bear all the costs of tariffs, with none passed on to customers. Economists disagree, as in a 2020 study showing that final consumers bore the burden of Mr. Trump’s first-term tariffs. Like taxes, tariffs add a certain dollar figure to an impacted product’s sticker price, and prices on Amazon, which serves as a clearinghouse for heavily tariffed Chinese item, could rise considerably.
“Voters who pay little attention to the macroeconomy will notice a direct markup on items they buy,” the board says. In fact, “consumers are already feeling the tariff pain, whether or not retailers quantify it on their websites. White House denials won’t change that, but repealing the tariffs would.”
Read the full WSJ editorial post here.
From Your Site Articles
- 'Hostile and political act': Analyst says Leavitt just revealed 'Trump’s weakness' ›
- 'Big Kahuna': CNN’s Brianna Keilar schools Republican who claims inflation isn't rising ›
- 'Sold out the US': MAGA rages against Amazon after report it would display Trump tariff cost ›
- 'Dangerous dictator': How Trump 'bullied' Bezos to drop plan to display Amazon tariff cost - Alternet.org ›
- This children’s book is a 'cautionary tale' about Trump’s endless 'demands': ex-RNC chair - Alternet.org ›
- 'A lot of uncertainty': How Trump is aggravating a troubled housing market - Alternet.org ›
- Why one of the world's richest men is bowing down in fear of Trump's brutal revenge - Alternet.org ›
- 'Great cover for increased pricing': CEOs say Trump policies help them gouge customers - Alternet.org ›
- 'Trump’s little errand boys': Ex-Republican warns GOP 'looking for a cheat code' in midterms - Alternet.org ›
- 'Maximum chaos': Shoppers furious over 'extortion' due to this controversial Trump policy - Alternet.org ›
Related Articles Around the Web