• GET OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER!
  • The Right Wing
  • Religious right
  • GO AD FREE!
  • MAKE A ONE-TIME DONATION
  • GET OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER!
  • The Right Wing
  • Religious right
  • GO AD FREE!
  • MAKE A ONE-TIME DONATION
  1. Home
  2. / Home

Potential for threats from Trump in 14th Amendment case sways Colorado judge

Quentin Young, Colorado Newsline
24 September 2023

A lawyer for plaintiffs who are suing to block former President Donald Trump from the 2024 Colorado presidential ballot persuaded a judge to enter a protective order for witnesses and other people involved in the lawsuit, largely based on Trump’s history of “inflammatory” statements around other cases in which he is a defendant.

Denver District Court Judge Sarah B. Wallace during a Friday hearing said she had concerns for the “safety for the parties, for the lawyers and frankly for myself and my staff, based on what we’ve seen in other cases.”

After special counsel Jack Smith in June filed an indictment against Trump for alleged crimes around Jan. 6, Trump responded on Truth Social, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!” which prosecutors viewed as “inflammatory” and “intimidating.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyer who argued for the protective order, Sean Grimsley, also noted during the hearing before Wallace that Dave Williams, chair of the Colorado Republican Party, which this week joined the case as a so-called intervenor, called the filing of the Colorado lawsuit against Trump “treasonous” behavior.

“That’s code for, ‘The folks coming to court have committed a capital crime,'” Grimsley said.

The protective order bars “inflammatory” speech, based on remarks during the hearing.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

The suit was filed Sept. 6 by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington on behalf of six Colorado voters, who argue Trump is disqualified under a provision of the 14th Amendment that bars certain office-seekers who have engaged in insurrection.

The plaintiffs include former Republican U.S. representative from Rhode Island Claudine (Cmarada) Schneider, who now lives in Colorado; former Colorado House and Senate Majority Leader Norma Anderson, an unaffiliated voter who recently left the Republican party; Denver Post columnist and Republican activist Krista Kafer; Michelle Priola, Kathi Wright, and Christopher Castilian.

They argue Trump, the leading GOP candidate for president in 2024, is disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which says no person who took an oath to support the Constitution then had “engaged in insurrection … or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof” can hold any office in the United States.

The suit says Trump “tried to overthrow the results of the 2020 presidential election” and incited and “engaged in” the Jan. 6 insurrection.

The defendants are Trump and Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat.

Most of the Friday hearing concerned procedural matters. Trump’s lawyer in the case, Scott Gessler, a former Republican Colorado secretary of state, indicated he intends to try to get the case tossed under a recent Colorado law that protects people who exercise First Amendment rights from the threat of lawsuits — known as an anti-SLAPP law. The allegations against Trump in the case are all “based on his speech,” Gessler said.

“We believe it’s a winner,” Gessler said of the pending motion under anti-SLAPP — or “strategic lawsuits against public participation.”

Gessler had objected to the proposed protective order by arguing that witness tampering and intimidation are already outlawed and that Trump critics had also engaged in objectionable speech. He noted that Griswold has said Trump tried to “steal an election” and labeled the events of Jan. 6 an “insurrection.”

“That is definitely coming from other quarters,” Gessler said of what Grimsley had called “inflammatory” speech.

A five-day trial in the case is scheduled to start Oct. 30.

The case is seen as the first major test of the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause since the Civil War era. Other similar cases, such as one filed by Free Speech For People in Minnesota, are expected in other states.

SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.

DONATE

Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: info@coloradonewsline.com. Follow Colorado Newsline on Facebook and Twitter.

From Your Site Articles
  • Fulton County judge in Trump case orders jurors’ identities and images must be protected - Alternet.org ›
  • Judge shoots down Trump effort to halt lawsuit trying to disqualify him from ballot - Alternet.org ›
  • Trump denied by Colorado judge — again: report - Alternet.org ›
  • Trump lawyer denied — Colorado judge refuses to recuse from disqualification case: report - Alternet.org ›
  • 'Assaulted' Jan. 6 officers detail attack during Colorado hearing against Trump: report - Alternet.org ›
  • Trial in Colorado proves a Trump return would be America’s demise - Alternet.org ›
  • Inexperienced legal 'expert' closes out Colorado trial for team Trump - Alternet.org ›
  • 'Can’t pardon his way out': Veteran Trump journalist predicts his number of convictions by Nov 2024 - Alternet.org ›
  • 'Hopeful we’ll prevail': Lawyer aiming to kick Trump off CO ballot breaks down reason for appeal ›
  • 'That is not the law': Analyst slams 'First Amendment freak' Trump lawyer’s 'insane' argument ›
  • R.I. GOP defends Trump’s right to appear on 2024 ballot in Colorado - Alternet.org ›
  • Why Donald Trump should absolutely fear the 14th Amendment - Alternet.org ›
  • Trump disqualified from primary ballot in Colorado, state high court rules: report - Alternet.org ›
  • US Supreme Court will uphold Trump disqualification, top legal expert predicts - Alternet.org ›
  • Colorado GOP to scrap primary system and move to caucuses if Trump disqualification stands - Alternet.org ›
  • Colorado GOP and Trump aides scramble to arrange next steps after disqualification ruling: report - Alternet.org ›
  • 3 GOP lawmakers fight back against CO ruling by claiming Biden is an insurrectionist: report - Alternet.org ›
  • George Conway slams fellow analyst for 'complete nonsense' Trump disqualification argument: 'You know better' ›
  • US appeals court shoots down Trump’s immunity argument in lawsuit filed by Jan. 6 cops - Alternet.org ›
  • Why using Jan. 6 report to decide Trump’s disqualification from the ballot isn’t 'problematic': analyst ›
  • 'Urgent tone' of RI GOP email suggests party may miss deadline for 2024 Republican primary - Alternet.org ›
  • 'Serious violation': Ex-GOP governor explains why Trump disqualification from office is 'mandatory' ›
  • Legal expert makes conservative 'originalist' case against 'insurrectionist' Trump - Alternet.org ›
  • Donald Trump 'set the stage' for judges to receive thousands of death threats: report - Alternet.org ›
  • How to deal with the Trump threat - Alternet.org ›

Alternet

All Rights Reserved

View Non-AMP Version