The growing gap between right-wing media narratives and street reality

Obvious as it seems that the string of videos and stories spreading distrust for ICE and Homeland Security agents is spurring widening street protest of deportation policy, apparently it all seems like foreign, made-up stuff to much of MAGA.

It all worsened yesterday with another fatal shooting by federal agents that triggered more dispute, more street confrontations, and more dueling narratives about blame. What all should have been able to agree on immediately is the sole finding that Minneapolis has become a powder keg that requires de-escalation.

If people stick solely to the storylines being promoted in right-leaning media, the stories have not been fully told about citizens being pulled through car windows by masked ICE officers, or the fatal shooting of a protestor at point blank range or about agents using a five-year-old as a pawn in a deportation arrest.

Instead, the story consistently being told on Fox and many other sites is one of left-wing "agitators" who are interfering with totally legal Homeland Security efforts to enforce the law in blue cities that seek to hide lawbreakers. They see chaos and insurrection, not the possibility of misconduct by agents. Played up are accounts of a resolute Homeland Security effort and allied Justice Department prosecutions of those who would dare to stand in the way, even threatening brave agents flooding Minneapolis and other cities to save us from serious criminals.

In an essay in Salon, Sophia Tesfaye notes that MAGA is "flailing" in learning that there is a significant protest going on because they have not been hearing about its causes, including the use of five-year-old Liam Conejo-Arias, now held somewhere with his father.

"To many Americans, the viral image of a child swept up in an enforcement dragnet is horrifying. Yet in the right-wing media silo, the reaction — if there has been any at all — is not concern but suspicion."

Another Fatal Shooting

Yesterday's shooting involved a U.S. citizen, identified as Alex J. Pretti, 37, who was lawfully carrying a 9 mm, semi-automatic handgun in an open carry permit in Minnesota, with Homeland Security again labeling the victim as a "domestic terrorist." Pretti, a nurse, had no criminal record other than parking tickets. As in the previous shooting incidents, federal officials were not cooperating with local officials or making themselves available for investigation.

Multiple videos did not back up the Homeland Security explanation from ICE operations chief Greg Bovino who said the agents reacted under fear. Local officials said the circumstances needed investigation by an outside agency.

Federal agents looking to arrest another person saw Pretti approaching to help someone they had pushed to the ground and pepper-sprayed. They then sprayed him and subdued him. They reacted to seeing his holstered gun by taking the gun and shooting him with their own weapons. Videos showed Pretti held a phone not a gun, and that he showed no confrontational action before at least six agents had Pretti on the ground, striking him with fists. Multiple shots were fired likely from more than one agent.

No one questions that the incident drew a crowd within a half-hour, though there were conflicting reports and lots of live video on whether protesters were "interfering" or "attacking" federal agents.

What you want to believe may depend a lot on who is telling the story. Local officials said it showed federal armies should leave the state. Donald Trump said it showed local officials were "inciting" interference with federal agencies.

Patterns of Propaganda

It's a pattern of this Trump administration to lean on the media for storytelling that matches more with its ideology than that supporting First Amendment examination of what government is doing.

Through FCC pressure, unwarranted lawsuits, ridicule of reporters and expulsion of journalists at the Pentagon and White House who do not agree to promote Trump ideologies, the White House promotes propaganda to seek acceptance only of self-serving explanations. This Trump administration is out to control the message like a fictional Ministry of Truth.

The whole basis of a democracy requires listening to the voters, not the enforced training of voters to hear only what one partisan view of government says it must accept. The democratization of media voices through internet and social posts, podcasts, alternative media outlets is providing its own check on whatever arrogance is perceived as coming from mainstream news outlets, which continue in most instances to insist on seeking verification and evidence over opinion alone.

Whether immigration, economics, the endless 2020 election loss rewrites, the Trump White House response is the same: Believe only what we are telling you. Documents, sworn testimony, even videos of thuggery in Minneapolis or from January 6, 2021, couldn't be true if it does not promote Trump. The message in this case is the medium, and it is no wonder that media that do not promote the message are considered enemies.

The problem, of course, is that eventually even the loyalists come to see that there is something seriously wrong with what they are being told. As Trump's credibility disappears for claiming that some foreign country is paying for tariffs that we pay as a new national sales tax or that jobs are plentiful when they are not, or that supermarket prices are falling when they are rising, it all starts to play out as increased political vulnerability.

Political Consequences

Trump's net approval among Gen Z voters, especially young men, has plummeted from positive 10 points in February 2025 to negative 32 points now, a catastrophic 42-point drop in less than a year, according to a New York Times/Siena poll. While Trump's approval on immigration was 50-50 among voters in March 2025, now 61% disapprove, including seven in 10 independents who say ICE has gone too far.

Yet, much of the concern about deportation tactics by an army of masked, camouflaged Homeland Security troops is passing by without serious questioning in right-leaning media outlets. There has been little coverage of ICE agents stopping people at random or failure to get warrants before entering homes or the use of tear gas and other chemical irritants against non-violent protesters, who are regularly described as agitators. Homeland Security offers arguments about the nature of the protests, which become headlines; often the explanations are at odds with available video of the incident in question.

At some point, it must become apparent that whatever the perceived bias of "mainstream" news sites, the experience of what is being promoted on Fox, Breitbart, Newsmax and lots of right-wing podcasting is at odds with what millions of neighbors are experiencing. In that context, the breakaway of podcaster Joe Rogan to focus on excessive ICE tactics daily now is significant.

Maybe enough confusion will prompt viewers to look at more than one source for news.