Sources close to Jared Kushner say he distanced himself from the Big Lie — others are skeptical

Sources close to Jared Kushner say he distanced himself from the Big Lie — others are skeptical
Bank

Sixteen months into Joe Biden’s presidency, countless MAGA Republicans — hoping to stay in former President Donald Trump’s good graces — openly promote the Big Lie and refuse to admit that Biden won the 2020 presidential election. But one Republican who hasn’t been openly pushing the Big Lie is the ex-president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who served as a White House senior adviser in the Trump Administration.

According to New York Times reporter Peter Baker, Kushner was already making plans for a post-Trump Administration life a few days after Election Night 2020 — and didn’t buy into the Big Lie.

“On Thursday, November 5, 2020, barely 24 hours after President Donald J. Trump claimed in the middle of the night that ‘frankly, we did win this election,’ Jared Kushner woke up in his Kalorama mansion and announced to his wife that it was time to leave Washington,” Baker reports in an article published on June 8. “‘We’re moving to Miami,’ he said. The election had not even been called for Joseph R. Biden Jr., but as Mr. Kushner later told the story to aides and associates, the White House’s young power couple felt no need to wait for the official results. They saw which way the votes were going and understood that, barring some unforeseen surprise, the president had lost his bid for a second term — even if he refused to accept it himself.”

Although there was a considerable amount of turnover during Trump’s four years in the White House, Kushner and Ivanka Trump were on board throughout his presidency. But when Biden won the 2020 election, according to Baker’s sources, Kushner was ready to move on.

“No matter how vociferously Mr. Trump claimed otherwise, neither Mr. Kushner nor Ivanka Trump believed then or later that the election had been stolen, according to people close to them,” Baker explains. “While the president spent the hours and days after the polls closed complaining about imagined fraud in battleground states and plotting a strategy to hold on to power, his daughter and son-in-law were already washing their hands of the Trump presidency.”

Baker continues, “Their decision to move on opened a vacuum around the president that was filled by conspiracy theorists like Rudolph W. Giuliani and Sidney Powell, who relayed to Mr. Trump farcically false stories of dead voters, stuffed ballot boxes, corrupted voting machines and foreign plots. Concluding that the president would not listen even to family members urging him to accept the results, Mr. Kushner told Mr. Trump that he would not be involved if Mr. Giuliani were in charge, according to people he confided in, effectively ceding the field to those who would try to overturn the election.”

Baker and The New Yorker’s Susan Glasser are the authors of the forthcoming book, “The Divider: Trump in the White House, 2017-2021,” due out on September 20. Baker’s reporting on Kushner’s “post-election activities” in his Times article, he notes, is based on interviews conducted for the book.

“Mr. Kushner’s decision to withdraw from the most consequential moment of the Trump presidency left few effective counterweights to the plotters seeking to subvert the will of the voters to hang on to power,” Baker reports. “While the president’s son-in-law had arguably been the most influential adviser to the president through four years, weighing in at times and carefully cultivating his reputation, he chose at that pivotal moment to focus instead on his personal project of Middle East diplomacy.”

Baker’s June 8 article has been receiving a great deal of attention on social media, and some Twitter users are skeptical that Kushner distanced himself from the Big Lie to the degree that Baker’s sources say.

Journalist Mark Jacob, a former Chicago Tribune/Chicago Sun-Times editor, dismissed the article as “image rehab” for Kushner:

Journalist Craig Calcaterra was highly critical as well, slamming the Times as “Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump's P.R. operation.”

Other Twitter users cautioned against viewing Kushner in a favorable light. Here are some of their comments:





Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.