Federal judge skeptical about GOP lawsuit to throw out ‘naked’ absentee ballots in Pennsylvania

Federal judge skeptical about GOP lawsuit to throw out ‘naked’ absentee ballots in Pennsylvania
Photo via Shutterstock.

On Wednesday morning, November 4 at a hearing in Philadelphia, a federal judge expressed skepticism over a lawsuit by Republican congressional candidate Kathy Barnette — who argued that voters should not have a chance to fix or "cure" problems with so-called "naked" absentee voter ballots in Pennsylvania.

At the hearing, U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Savage — according to Politico reporters Katherine Landergan and Josh Gerstein — "said he was dubious of arguments from a lawyer for GOP congressional candidate Kathy Barnette, who argued that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had concluded that the law prohibits counties from allowing voters who erred in completing or packaging their mail-in ballots to correct those mistakes."

Savage, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said, "I'm not sure about that. Is that exactly what was said, or is what was said was that there is no mandatory requirement that the election board do that?.... Wasn't the legislative intent of the statute we are talking about to franchise, not disenfranchise, voters?"

But Thomas Breth, an attorney representing Barnette in the lawsuit, argued, "this isn't disenfranchising voters. They can't do this unless the election code provides them the authority to do this."

Savage, however, was unconvinced that a voter shouldn't have a chance to fix a miscast absentee ballot or cast a provisional ballot. The judge told Breth, "it counts as your vote, but your vote is not counted."

Barnette's lawsuit deals with a practice in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania in the Philadelphia suburbs that allows voters to fix "naked ballots."

Barnette is a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in Pennsylvania's 4th Congressional District.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.