'His business model is chaos': Ex-Trump Homeland Security official says president can't keep country safe

'His business model is chaos': Ex-Trump Homeland Security official says president can't keep country safe
Travis Gettys
Rambling Trump flops hard after Limbaugh asks how he will protect people with pre-existing conditions

A former Homeland Security official is speaking out about the difficulty she faced trying to protect the country while working in President Donald Trump's administration.

Elizabeth Neumann, former Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Counterterrorism and Threat Prevention, penned an op-ed that was published to USA Today on Tuesday morning. According to Neumann, Trump's erratic and combative behavior during the first presidential debate was nothing more than a glimpse into how he governs on a daily basis inside the White House.

"Everything we saw during the first presidential debate is indicative of how President Donald Trump behaves in the White House," Neumann said.

Neumann went on to offer a vivid description of Trump's business model as she slammed the president for his lack of organization and leadership. Neumann, a known conservative who admits she supported Trump in 2016, says debate moderator and Fox News host Chris Wallace experienced what White House staffers experience on a regular day.

First 2020 Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden www.youtube.com

She added, "His business model is chaos. He has no organization, no leadership, and sees every interaction as a contest or a battle, even when it doesn't have to be. Chris Wallace now knows how so many administration staffers feel — and how I felt when the president got in the way of me doing my job. He is dangerous for our country."

The former Homeland Security assistant secretary went on to express concern about the sharp rise of white nationalist violence. Despite repeated warnings about white supremacists and nationalists being the largest deadly domestic threat in the United States, Neumann noted that the president responded to Homeland Security's report the same way he did during the presidential debate: by refusing to denounce white nationalism.

My time in office coincided with a dramatic rise in white nationalist violence, but my colleagues and I couldn't get the president to help address the problem. At the debate, America saw what I saw in the administration: President Trump refuses to distance himself from white nationalists.

Neumann recalled the terrorist attack in El Paso as she explained how Trump's rhetoric influences the actions of extremist groups.

"I realized after watching the White House response to the terrorist attack in El Paso that his rhetoric was a recruitment tool for violent extremist groups," Neumann wrote. "The president bears some responsibility for the deaths of Americans at the hands of these violent extremists."

She concluded with a reminder about the government's role in protecting the American public as she posed a compelling question about supporting Trump for a second presidential term.

"Your government is supposed to perform some basic functions; keeping you and your family safe is primary among them," she said. "In 2016, I voted for President Trump. But when someone asked me if I could vote for him again, after he time and again refused to keep Americans safe — how could I say anything but no?"

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.