Clarence Thomas pens scathing attack suggesting Supreme Court should overturn same-sex marriage
Obergefell v. Hodges was the landmark 2015 ruling in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. Two of the dissenters in that ruling were Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito — and now, Thomas and Alito are calling for that decision to be overturned. This comes at a time when there is a very real possibility that Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a far-right social conservative nominated by President Donald Trump, will be replacing the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
In a petition, Thomas and Alito argue that Obergefell was an attack on religious freedom, saying, "The Court has created a problem that only it can fix. Until then, Obergefell will continue to have 'ruinous consequences for religious liberty.'"
Half a decade ago, the majority in Obergefell v. Hodges came from both the left and the right. Justice Anthony Kennedy, nominated by President Ronald Reagan in 1987, sided with Ginsburg in that decision. Kennedy was fiscally conservative, yet his libertarian streak showed itself when he agreed with Ginsburg on social issues like gay rights, same-sex marriage and abortion.
But the makeup of the Supreme Court has changed a lot since Obergefell. The late Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the dissenters in Obergefell, died in 2016 and was replaced by Justice Neal Gorsuch — another social conservative — in 2017. Replacing Scalia with Gorsuch wasn't a game-changer for the High Court, but when Kennedy announced his retirement in 2018 and was replaced by the more socially conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, that was a game-changer. And now, with Barrett likely to replace Ginsburg, the Supreme Court is facing the possibility of an even greater game-changer — one in which Obergefell could be in danger along with Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, Lawrence v. Texas and many other right-to-privacy decisions.
- 'Under a cloud': A stunningly arrogant Supreme Court opinion threatens Pennsylvania ballots - Alternet.org ›
- A Supreme Court justice just tore into Democrats and lit his claims to impartiality on fire - Alternet.org ›
- Listen: Supreme Court hearing gets awkward as conservative Alito runs roughshod over chief justice Roberts - Alternet.org ›
- The Supreme Court has launched a ‘holy war on science and reason’: NY attorney - Alternet.org ›
- 'Cannot bless sin': Vatican launches unprovoked attack on same-sex marriages - Alternet.org ›
- Trump caught on tape turning a wedding speech at Mar-a-Lago into a rambling anti-Biden diatribe - Alternet.org ›
- Legal reporter reveals how the Supreme Court 'radically altered' a key part of US law in the dark of night - Alternet.org ›
- The Supreme Court is pushing a skewed view of religious freedom — as a major Church-state case looms - Alternet.org ›
- Legal reporter argues even Antonin Scalia would be 'aghast' at the right-wing Supreme Court justices - Alternet.org ›
- How the COVID-19 pandemic made Clarence Thomas go from 'monkish silence' to 'gregarious engagement': report - Alternet.org ›
- Clarence Thomas is lone dissenter in free speech SCOTUS case involving cursing teenager - Alternet.org ›
- A Supreme Court justice's awful ruling reveals he has internalized Trump's 'Big Lie' - Alternet.org ›
- Legal scholar argues that the 'myth' of Justice Scalia conceals the truth about his 'dangerous' legacy - Alternet.org ›
- Right-wing Supreme Court may be looking to deal 'massive blow' to freedom of the press: report - Alternet.org ›