CDC abruptly reverses its dangerous testing advice after NYT revealed improper political pressure

CDC abruptly reverses its dangerous testing advice after NYT revealed improper political pressure
Image via Shutterstock.

In August, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention drew a great deal of criticism in the medical community for posting guidelines saying that people who had been in close contact with someone who was infected with COVID-19 didn’t need to get tested if they weren’t showing any symptoms. But on Friday, the Associated Press reports, the CDC dropped that guidance, recommending a coronavirus test for anyone has who been in close contact with someone who was infected.


One person who “applauded the change,” according to AP’s Mike Stobbe, was Dr. Silvia Chiang, an expert on pediatric infectious diseases at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. The guidance posted by the CDC in August, Chiang said, was “not consistent with the basic principles of controlling an epidemic.”

Now, the CDC is recommending that anyone who has spent 15 minutes or more within six feet of someone who tested positive for coronavirus needs to get a test. The guidelines posted on August 24, in contrast, said that people who don’t have any symptoms “do not necessarily need a test” even after spending more than 15 minutes around someone who had been infected.

The CDC’s website now states:

Due to the significance of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission, this guidance further reinforces the need to test asymptomatic persons, including close contacts of a person with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection.

CDC officials, Stobbe reported, have been “evasive about why they had made the change in August, and some outside observers speculated it was forced on the CDC by political appointees within” President Donald Trump’s administration.

Trump officials have been insisting that the guidelines posted in August originated at the CDC and were not the result of any type of political pressure. But on Thursday, the New York Times’ Apoorva Mandavilli reported:

A heavily criticized recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month about who should be tested for the coronavirus was not written by CDC scientists and was posted to the agency’s website despite their serious objections, according to several people familiar with the matter as well as internal documents obtained by the New York Times.

According to Mandavilli, “Officials told the Times this week that the Department of Health and Human Services did the rewriting and then ‘dropped’ it into the CDC’s public website, flouting the agency’s strict scientific review process.”

An anonymously quoted source described by Mandavilli as a “federal official with knowledge of the matter” told the Times, “That was a doc that came from the top down, from the HHS and the task force. That policy does not reflect what many people at the CDC feel should be the policy.”

#story_page_post_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.