Watchdog demands to know if drug maker Gilead is sitting on possible COVID-19 treatment due to patent and profit concerns

Watchdog demands to know if drug maker Gilead is sitting on possible COVID-19 treatment due to patent and profit concerns
U.S. Army 1st Lt. Colton Whitehouse, critical care nurse from Urban Augmentation Medical Task Force – 627, works to provide medical care to a COVID-19 patient alongside Baptist Hospital medical staff, in San Antonio, Texas, July 10, 2020. The UAMTF is comprised of Soldiers with various medical specialties from the 627th Hospital Center, Fort Carson, Colo., and deployed to support San Antonio hospitals during the COVID-19 response. U.S. Northern Command, through U.S. Army North, is providing military support to states in need. (U.S. Army photo illustration by Luis A. Deya) (Photo cropped due to patient privacy sensitivity)

As Covid-19 cases and deaths continue an upward trajectory in the United States, a watchdog group and allied scientists Tuesday urged the federal government and Gilead, the maker of the promising drug remdesivir, to explain why they have not pursued a similar treatment that might be cheaper for consumers though possibly less profitable to the company.


The drug in question, known as GS-4441524, closely resembles remdesivir in chemical makeup, Public Citizen and scientist co-signers wrote in a joint letter to Gilead and United States federal government agencies including the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

Specifically, Public Citizen et al noted that GS-4441524:

  • Has demonstrated marked effectiveness and safety in the treatment of a lethal coronavirus infection in cats;
  • Has been shown in cultured cells to have antiviral activity against the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 that appears to be similar or superior to that of remdesivir, and at levels achievable in the body with low toxicity;
  • Enters lung cells and is converted to its active form that halts reproduction of the coronavirus;
  • Is a smaller molecule and is more water soluble than remdesivir, possibly facilitating its use in oral or inhaled forms for treatment of COVID-19, whereas remdesivir is currently limited to intravenous use only;
  • Is substantially easier to manufacture than remdesivir; and
  • In humans, following injection of remdesivir, GS-441524 is the predominant substance that provides antiviral therapeutic effects in the lungs.

In its letter, Public Citizen expressed concern over the drug's development and the possible motivations the company may have for putting one drug into trials over the other.

"It is unclear why Gilead and federal scientists have not been pursuing GS-441524 as aggressively as remdesivir, but the answer may be found in the corporation’s patent holdings," the group said. "Gilead holds patents on both agents, but the earliest patent approval date on remdesivir is 2015, whereas the earliest on GS-441524 is 2010. As a result, the corporation’s monopoly over remdesivir may last five years longer than that for GS-441524, allowing Gilead to make substantially greater profits from the sale of remdesivir as a COVID-19 treatment."

In June, Gilead announced it will charge between $2,300 and $3,100 for a five-day course of remdesivir, a potential for treatment for patients in advanced stages of Covid-19. The move angered lawmakers, including Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who pointed to the company's profit margins and drug development timeline as an example of excessive greed of the pharmaceutical industry, particularly amidst a global pandemic.

The United States Food and Drug Administration granted emergency authorization for the use of remdesivir in treatment of Covid-19 in May, and Gilead's stock prices have skyrocketed since. Barron's reported this week that remdesivir sales could top $3 billion this year.

As Public Citizen has noted, U.S. taxpayers helped fund remdesivir development research, yet Gilead seems intent on making citizens around the world pay a premium for this potentially life-saving treatment.

The call for study of GS-441524 comes as Trump administration officials, and President Donald Trump himself, continue to push for a Covid-19 vaccine against the backdrop of the looming November 2020 presidential election.

As journalists and concerned citizens question how well scientists can study and vet a vaccine and its long-term effects on an exceedingly short timeline, Trump administration officials have asserted the media doesn't want to see the president succeed with regards to vaccine development.

"I'm convinced that the reporters don't want a vaccine, sir. They don't," Moncef Slaoui, chief advisor to chief adviser to Operation Warp Speed, the White House's program aimed at expediting Covid-19 vaccine development, told Health and Human Service Assistant Secretary Michael Caputo last week on an official HHS podcast.

The Trump administration bought up virtually all of the global supply of remdesivir earlier this year, angering world leaders and public health experts. Now, advocates want to make sure the treatment is available to those who need it. Michael Abrams, a health researcher with Public Citizen's Health Research Group and lead author of the Tuesday's letter, expressed frustration with the Trump administrations apparent lack of concern for remdesivir affordability for the general public.

"It is sadly predictable that Big Pharma responds to a global pandemic by trying to bring to market only those drugs that maximize its profits," said Abrams. "What is alarming here is that federal scientists and Trump administration regulators appear to be willing partners with Gilead in decisions that run distinctly counter to the government’s primary imperative of advancing public health during this worldwide crisis."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close