alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

'They're afraid': GOP slammed for enabling Trump as McConnell blocks resolution condemning assault on peaceful protesters

'They're afraid': GOP slammed for enabling Trump as McConnell blocks resolution condemning assault on peaceful protesters
President Donald J. Trump arrives in the House chamber and is greeted by members of Congress prior to delivering his State of the Union address Tuesday, Feb. 4, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. (Official White House Photo by Andrea Hanks)

As many Senate Republicans either refused to answer questions about the police assault on peaceful protesters in the nation's capital Monday or openly praised President Donald Trump for the brutal crackdown, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Tuesday blocked the passage of a Democratic resolution condemning Trump for violating the constitutional rights of demonstrators by "ordering federal officers to use gas and rubber bullets" against them.

Senate Democrats attempted to pass the non-binding resolution by unanimous consent, but the Kentucky Republican objected and put forth his own measure that stripped out any mention of the president.

"It's very simple why the Republican leader objected to our resolution and offered this one instead," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said in a floor speech, referring to McConnell's alternative resolution. "It's because they do not want to condemn what the president did, though every fair-minded American of any political party would."

In an appearance on MSNBC Tuesday evening as mass protests over the police killing of George Floyd continued in the nation's capital and across the country, Schumer called the Senate GOP's enabling of Trump "appalling" and slammed the president's deployment of military vehicles and personnel to the streets of Washington, D.C. as "just like a dictatorship."

The Daily Beast reported that Trump personally instructed military helicopters to fly low over demonstrators in D.C. and "has pressed aides and Pentagon officials for graphic details on the kind of armored vehicles, military units, aircraft, and even 'tanks' that they could potentially send" to U.S. cities.

"They're afraid. They're afraid of Donald Trump," Schumer said of Senate Republicans. "And that leads to Donald Trump getting worse and worse and worse. It's appalling."

Schumer introduced the Democratic resolution hours before the Washington Post, citing anonymous federal officials, reported Tuesday that Attorney General William Barr personally ordered law enforcement officials to beat back the peaceful demonstrators gathered near the White House in order to clear the path for Trump's walk to St. John's Episcopal Church.

Soldiers from the D.C. National Guard and the U.S. Park Police moved on the peaceful protesters, beating them with batons and firing tear gas into crowds, as Trump delivered an incendiary and militaristic speech in the Rose Garden of the White House—remarks that Democratic lawmakers condemned as a fascistic "declaration of war" against the public.

The U.S. Park Police subsequently claimed that despite numerous witness accounts, tear gas was not used against the demonstrators—a denial that has been touted by the Trump's 2020 reelection campaign. But as Vox's Alex Ward reported Tuesday, the narrative does not stand up to scrutiny.

"Nathan Baca, a reporter for WUSA9 in Washington, D.C., picked up a canister used during the Monday assault. It's not a smoke canister, but it does launch 'OC' gas which 'Causes same tears, tight breath and comes out green,'" Ward wrote. "Other journalists who covered the protests in person that evening say without a doubt that law enforcement used tear gas, a chemical irritant that can cause those exposed to it to want to vomit."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.