After 10 years of fighting ACA, Republicans still has no clue what to do if Supreme Court strikes it down

After 10 years of fighting ACA, Republicans still has no clue what to do if Supreme Court strikes it down
Image via Shutterstock.

The nation's health insurers are preparing for a massive increase in Affordable Care Act and private Medicaid plan customers, primarily people who've lost their employer-provided insurance along with their jobs in this pandemic. The big companies—Centene, Cigna, Anthem, and Molina—are preparing for the influx this and next quarter. These and large companies, including Aetna, UnitedHealth Group, and myriad Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, also contract with the state to administer expanded Medicaid programs.


Tens of millions of people could be turning to the coverage provided under the ACA, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Urban Institute predict, at a time when the Trump administration is arguing in the Supreme Court that the entire law should be struck down.

It's bad enough that the Trump administration doesn't have any kind of adequate plan for covering the care of the people who become ill with the novel coronavirus. It also has absolutely no plan for covering the people who will lose their jobs and their coverage. It has absolutely no plan for covering the people who recover from the novel coronavirus and will carry it as a preexisting condition should those protections disappear with the ACA.

Even Senate Republicans are getting antsy about the fact that they've got nothing and what that's going to mean for this November. "When you have a full-employment economy and everybody is working, you know that's one thing. But now we don't have that," Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn said recently in a Washington Post interview. "Obviously, we hope to get back there, but there may be some other things we need to do, just like we've done on spending $3 trillion to deal with the emergency to get people get through this."

Excuses, excuses. "I think it does make it difficult for us to have credibility when that is still out there. To me, we shouldn't worry about that; we should be focusing on reforming the health-care system itself and not paying attention to the ACA," Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) told the Post. He's now apparently over fighting over Obamacare and has given up on the 10-year-old constitutional argument about its very existence, saying instead that Republicans should be figuring out how to provide affordable coverage. "I always thought that was an inherent contradiction, not only for the administration but most of my cohorts. I think that's a waste of time," he said. That's what he gets for being a Republican. Apparently he missed the orientation?

Sen. Lamar Alexander has been around for every Obamacare fight, including voting in 2017 to repeal it—a vote John McCain derailed. But here he is criticizing the Trump administration for arguing that the law should be (checks notes) repealed: "I thought the Justice Department's argument was really flimsy. […] What they are arguing was that when we voted to get rid of the individual mandate, we voted to get rid of Obamacare. I don't know one single senator that thought that."

They all thought that. They couldn't repeal the whole law, so they settled for second best when they repealed the individual mandate in the tax scam bill. And then the chips fell in a completely predictably stupid way. Republican states saw a completely specious legal argument to destroy the law, a crazy Republican judge advanced it, a crazy Republican appeals court agreed, and now a pretty crazy Republican Supreme Court majority working on behalf of a completely unhinged Republican president might just take this ridiculously bad legal argument to the bank and end health coverage for millions of people. In—or in the direct aftermath of—a pandemic.

And the most pathetic thing right now, after 10 years of fighting over the ACA, after all the legal battles, after being in a fucking global pandemic, is that not one single Republican can put forward a healthcare plan that could replace Obamacare. And they're somehow in charge.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close