Fox News host Laura Ingraham continues to downplay threat posed by coronavirus with flu comparison

Fox News host Laura Ingraham continues to downplay threat posed by coronavirus with flu comparison
Gage Skidmore

Fox News host Laura Ingraham continued to downplay the threat posed by the new coronavirus Thursday night by inaccurately comparing it to the flu. More than 50,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 over the last month, and the respiratory disease has become the leading cause of death in the U.S.

"We were told the virus was far more lethal than the flu," she said. "That was terrifying. Now, we know it's likely to be closer to maybe a really aggressive flu season."

Health experts have warned for months against likening the coronavirus to the flu, because doing so not only downplays its lethalness but also the many difficulties of fighting the pandemic. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, explained the key differences between the flu and the coronavirus to Ingraham's Fox News colleague Chris Wallace on March 15.

"One, it's brand new so we don't have any prior experience about what it's going to do — what it's dynamic's going to be," he said. "Number two, it spreads very easily. There's no doubt about that. It isn't like some of the other outbreaks that we had that just didn't adapt itself to spread among humans. And number three, it's very serious in the sense of morbidity and mortality, particularly among — and very heavily weighted — towards individuals who are more susceptible: the elderly and those with underlying conditions."

Asked directly if the virus was more lethal than the flu, Fauci replied: "Well yes, I mean it just is — and we've got to face that fact."

Additionally, the coronavirus pandemic is not like an aggressive flu season in that during an aggressive flu season, countries across the world do not impose extreme social distancing measures and economic shutdowns in order to blunt the death toll.

Ingraham cited recent reports of antibody tests, which indicate the virus "spread under the radar" in major U.S. cities earlier than previously thought.

"That means more people were exposed to it, and many of those had innate immunity to it," she said.

Health officials have cautioned that we cannot yet be sure what immunity might look like, though studies are underway.

"There is no proof at this point that the development of an antibody response will be protective," professor of pathology at Harvard Medical School David Walt told Bloomberg last week. "There is no evidence yet that people can't be reinfected with the virus."

Ingraham also pointed to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's, D-N.Y., daily presentation from earlier that afternoon, in which he said the latest data suggested that COVID-19 had a fatality rate of about 0.5% in his state. That would be about half the CDC's early estimates if true but still be five times more lethal than the flu.

The Fox News host on Wednesday dedicated more than five minutes of airtime to mocking CNN anchors who tested positive for COVID-19.

CNN's coverage, she and guest Raymond Arroyo, the lead anchor of the news division for Eternal Word Television Network, claimed, "seems to be a deliberate attempt to graft" network talent onto a pandemic.

"They're always kind of nasty to us," Ingraham added as she belittled three journalists who contracted the disease.

Twitter earlier this removed removed some of Ingraham's tweets for violating its coronavirus misinformation policy by pushing an unapproved drug treatment which was a mainstay of President Trump's public reassurances.

Minutes after likening the virus to the flu on Thursday's show, the Fox News host suggested a prolonged pandemic would hurt Trump's odds in November. The longer the country is shut down, she said, "the less likely it is Trump will win re-election.

You can watch the clip below via Twitter

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.