As Sen. Bernie Sanders and other progressives call for direct and uniform monthly payments to every person in the U.S. amid the coronavirus crisis, Senate Republicans have reportedly put forth a plan designed to ensure that poor people most in need of financial support receive less money than those with higher incomes.
The Washington Post reported Thursday that while stimulus talks between the White House and Congress remain in flux, “one leading GOP plan would offer $1,200 to most taxpayers but only $600 to poor families who pay less in taxes.”
“The benefit would begin phasing out for people with more than $75,000 in annual income,” the Post reported. It is unclear how the phase-in would work, tweeted the Post‘s Jeff Stein.
“This is madness, and cruel,” Annie Lowrey, staff writer for The Atlantic, said of the Republican proposal.
“Senate GOP on brand as always trying to screw poor people,” added Andrew Grinberg of Clean Water Action.
To the dismay of progressives who support universal programs over mean-tested policies, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have long supported so-called “trapezoid” programs that phase in benefits at the bottom of the income distribution and phase them out at higher incomes.
In a conference call on Wednesday, according to the Post, House Democratic leaders unanimously agreed that “any cash payments should be means-tested to exclude the wealthiest Americans, a sentiment the White House appears to share.”
David Sirota, speechwriter for Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) presidential campaign, voiced his frustration with the bipartisan consensus in favor of means-testing over universal programs in a series of tweets on Thursday.
Instead of piling layers of complexity on the front end through means-testing, Sirota argued the federal government should send monthly checks to every household and then raise taxes on the wealthy to ensure a more progressive distribution of income.
“$2,000 checks every month to every household during the emergency, means test it by raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires,” Sirota tweeted. “There—I just did the work of 500 Democratic lanyards in Washington who are trying to make good policy seem complex, even when it can be simple.”
As Common Dreams reported, Sanders on Tuesday proposed a $2 trillion stimulus plan that would send $2,000 in monthly payments to every American—both children and adults and regardless of income—for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Cut checks to every household, tax billionaires.
THIS IS NOT HARD
— David Sirota (@davidsirota) March 19, 2020
Senate Republicans’ means-tested proposal comes as the Trump White House is rushing to assemble a $1 trillion fiscal stimulus package as the U.S. economy barrels toward a potentially devastating recession.
In addition to possible direct payments to U.S. households, the White House stimulus proposal is also expected to request tens of billions of dollars in bailout money to industries hit hard by the coronavirus crisis, including airlines, hotels, and casinos.
The folks getting economically hurt by the #CoronaPandemic are more likely to be low-wage workers with unstable hours. Meanwhile, several trillion dollars have been pumped into the banking sector for the benefit of Wall Street. #FightFor15 https://t.co/7SxXxRYCm7 #SaveWorkers pic.twitter.com/D2bvVxqDVh
— MoveOn (@MoveOn) March 19, 2020
Politico reported late Wednesday that House Democrats are putting together their own stimulus plan as a “counter-offer.”
“The House Democratic plan will incorporate proposals from several panels and is expected to include additional unemployment insurance payments, expanded Medicaid coverage, an airline rescue package, relief for homeowners and renters, support for small businesses, and additional food security measures,” Politico noted.
As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has faced criticism from progressives for refusing to support direct cash payments without means-testing.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) wrote in a series of tweets Thursday that while increased funding for means-tested programs like Medicaid is a laudable and necessary goal, “we must deliver universal funds now!”
“Means-testing inevitably creates more administrative costs, red tape, and the ability for bureaucrats to deny benefits,” said Omar. “Universal programs ensure that every American has a stake in our policies—that’s why programs like Social Security are so successful.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.
It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.