Paul Krugman: Hypersensitive Wall Street snowflakes can’t handle criticism — so they're coming for Elizabeth Warren

Paul Krugman: Hypersensitive Wall Street snowflakes can’t handle criticism — so they're coming for Elizabeth Warren
Image via Screengrab.

Wall Street financiers have been complaining a lot about Sen. Elizabeth Warren lately, including her Medicare-for-all proposals. And economist Paul Krugman, in his latest New York Times column, cites these criticisms as a glaring example of Wall Street’s hypersensitivity.

“Let’s talk about the rational reasons Wall Street is worried about Warren,” Krugman asserts. “She is, of course, calling for major tax increases on the very wealthy, those with wealth exceeding $50 million, and the financial industry is strongly represented in that elite club. And since raising taxes on the wealthy is highly popular, it’s an idea a progressive president might actually be able to turn into real policy.”

Warren has stressed that she considers herself a “capitalist to my bones” and that she doesn’t consider herself anti-Wall Street. But she does believe in a tough love approach, and Krugman asserts that Wall Street can’t even handle mild criticism.

“Warren is also a big believer in stricter financial regulation,” Krugman explains. “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was highly effective until the Trump Administration set about gutting it, was her brainchild. So if you are a Wall Street billionaire, rational self-interest might well induce you to oppose Warren.”

Hypersensitivity on Wall Street, Krugman notes, is nothing new: they were equally thin-skinned when Barack Obama was president.

“Obama treated Wall Street with kid gloves,” Krugman observes. “In the aftermath of a devastating financial crisis, his administration bailed out collapsing institutions on favorable terms. He and Democrats in Congress did impose some new regulations, but they were very mild compared with the regulations put in place after the banking crisis of the 1930s.”

Krugman wraps ups his column by stressing that given Wall Street’s history of fearing even mild regulations, one must take their response to Warren with a grain of salt.

“You should beware of Wall Street claims that progressive policies would have dire effects,” Krugman advises. “Claims don’t reflect deep economic wisdom; to a large extent, they’re coming from people with vast wealth but fragile egos, whose rants should be discounted appropriately.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.