News from The Washington Post that top White House officials held a clandestine meeting Thursday with Republican Senators to map out a plan to limit the Senate impeachment trial while President Trump has been secretly “courting” Senate Republicans in an effort to gauge and gain their loyalty has many angered and alarmed.
The House is expected to pass articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, which would require the Senate to hold an impartial trial, over which the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court would preside. It very much is a legal proceeding with historic consequences for the future of America’s democracy.
Republicans appear to not have grasped this fact, not the gravity of their constitutional duties.
Many Americans are growing angered as a result. Some are calling the Senate impeachment trial “rigged” before it has even begun. Others are pointing out that this is akin to jurors meeting with the “defendant to discuss how long they think they have to let the trial go on.”
“Juries don’t collude with the accused criminals they’re judging,” one person on Twitter said. “Only collusion, only obstruction,” said another.
Take a look at the responses:
Meanwhile, the fact that the target of an investigation is conspiring with the very public servants who will serve as jurors on his trial is shocking to some.
I’m no judge or lawyer, but I don’t think the person on trial is supposed to have their lawyers and friends meet with the jury to decide how the trial can be made most beneficial to them……. right? https://t.co/izu0pu3t26
— Avi Bueno (@Avi_Bueno) November 21, 2019
Trump will be controlling his own impeachment trial in the Senatehttps://t.co/YbcSHauWRe
— Individual-1 (@codename_karla) November 21, 2019
I didn’t know the White House has a say in designing the impeachment trial procedure. Very convenient. https://t.co/PlsLrZzBhX
— Gabriel Snyder (@gabrielsnyder) November 21, 2019
“A group of Republican senators and senior White House officials met privately … to map out a strategy.”
Well, that raises no questions whatsoever. https://t.co/9k2ObktAg9
— Greg Greene (@ggreeneva) November 21, 2019
In case you accidentally believe the lies of @senatemajldr & @SenateGOP that Senators should be impartial jurors. Juries don’t collude with the accused criminals they’re judging. #ImpeachmentHearings Cc: @SenateDems https://t.co/5VYTemmztD
— BiblioRomancer (@biblioromancer) November 21, 2019
Only collusion, only obstruction. https://t.co/F3SuUzEx9v
— Nik Shah (@NikhaarShah) November 21, 2019
Well now we know. Trump has rigged the trial even tho no impeachment trial has been recommended.https://t.co/pMmuEJVrhC
— Tina Routhier (@tynab_r) November 21, 2019
WTF? The White House is discussing Trump’s trial with the senator/jurors? #impeachment White House and Republicans discuss limiting impeachment trial to two weeks https://t.co/BxomhbVzVg
— Michael Balter (@mbalter) November 21, 2019
Republicans: [denounce entirely routine closed-door depositions]
Also Republicans: [meet behind closed doors with Trump to discuss strategy for trial in which they themselves will be the jurors]https://t.co/I8k1O0uNO8— The Moscow Project (@moscow_project) November 21, 2019
jurors meet with defendant to discuss how long they think they have to let the trial go on before hanging the jury.
https://t.co/qc6zTbaPyb— johnbrummett (@johnbrummett) November 21, 2019
WHY does the @WhiteHouse have any say in a trial meant to hold #SCPOTUS @realdonaldtrump accountable for impeachable acts? Where’s @TheDemCoalition @IndivisibleTeam @MoveOn & other of @TheDemocrats’ organizations? #MarchOnDC https://t.co/nj3qgVoYk9
— John Zajaros (Jack) (@JohnZajaros) November 21, 2019
Republicans have already decided how they are going to acquit Trump. This will be a complete sham. #ImpeachmentHearings #TrumpBribery https://t.co/ghADEOlMYc
— BeUnshakeable (@beunshakeable) November 21, 2019
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.
It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
 |