North Carolina court strikes down the worst gerrymander in modern history

North Carolina court strikes down the worst gerrymander in modern history

On Monday, a bipartisan panel of state court judges delivered a monumental victory against the worst gerrymander in modern history when it blocked North Carolina from using its Republican-drawn congressional map in the 2020 elections and ordered the GOP-run legislature to come up with a fairer replacement.


The court granted the Democratic plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction against the map before the case goes to trial on the merits, citing the mountain of evidence of the map's discriminatory intent and effects.

The evidence against the congressional map is, in fact, overwhelming: Republicans explicitly stated that it was a "political gerrymander" drawn to maintain the GOP's 10-3 advantage in the state's 13-member congressional delegation—and admitted they didn't go further only because they thought it was literally impossible to draw a map that would guarantee them 11 seats.

Republicans made this admission in a perverse defense of a new map they created in 2016 after their previous districts were invalidated for illegally diminishing the power of black voters. In other words, said the GOP, we didn't draw a racial gerrymander—we drew a partisan gerrymander (never mind that race and party are strongly correlated).

That display of chutzpah already came close to derailing Republicans last year, when a federal court found that partisan gerrymanders did indeed violate the U.S. Constitution. The GOP was bailed out, though, when conservatives on the Supreme Court ruled that claims of excessive partisanship in electoral maps couldn't be litigated in the federal court system. However, Chief Justice John Roberts noted in his opinion that such maps could be challenged in state court under state constitutions—advice the plaintiffs took to heart.

With the GOP's smoking gun confession in hand, the plaintiffs relied solely on state constitutional protections to invalidate the map, and it's now the second time this decade that North Carolina Republicans have seen their congressional map struck down. This latest defeat also comes right on the heels of another loss for Republicans: A September ruling saw this same court unanimously throw out the GOP's legislative gerrymanders, all but guaranteeing that Republicans will lose at trial if the congressional case goes that far.

Republicans didn’t appeal their loss in the legislative gerrymandering case, likely because they feared an even worse defeat before the state Supreme Court, which would set a binding precedent statewide. However, they may be less inclined to give up on their congressional map so easily.

The GOP's current strategy relies on arguing that it's too late to redraw the districts for 2020, with the candidate filing period for the March 3 primary beginning on Dec. 2. Since a new map will be required after the next census in 2020 in any event, a long enough delay would run out the clock on this lawsuit. However, this gambit is likely to fail. Back in 2016, Republicans' congressional gerrymander was struck down and redrawn in February of that year, without adversely effecting the administration of North Carolina’s elections.

Republican legislators will likely get another chance to draw new maps, which would be subject to the court's approval. However, given the GOP’s lengthy history of violating the rights of voters, it’s possible the judges could step in to draw their own districts instead. Either way, after four elections with the most extreme congressional gerrymanders of the last several decades, North Carolina voters could finally enjoy a much fairer map next year.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.