MSNBC conservative goes down in flames trying to separate Trump’s incompetence from his corruption

MSNBC conservative goes down in flames trying to separate Trump’s incompetence from his corruption
Morning Joe Screengrab

MSNBC conservative Noah Rothman met furious pushback when he dismissed poll numbers as insignificant showing a growing majority of Americans support the impeachment of President Donald Trump.


The “Morning Joe” contributor argued that those numbers reflected the president’s approval rating and would not exert any pressure on congressional Republicans, but instead place greater pressure on Democrats to make their case for impeachment

“It’s incumbent on Democrats to make this case,” Rothman said. “Right now they are presenting a united front because it’s still primary season. Once we get into the general (election campaign) there will be more pressure on them to explain their position, but it’s incumbent on Democrats to make the case.”

Scarborough interrupted to challenge his fellow conservative.

“Noah, what case?” Scarborough said. “You’ve been shocked by — what case, though? You’ve been shocked by what’s happened. I don’t understand. You’re saying they have to make — Donald Trump has made the case, he makes in front of banks of cameras. This isn’t ‘who met at a secret meeting in Trump Tower in June of 2016?’ He’s asking our enemies to actually dig up dirt on domestic opponents. So what case do they have to make?”

Rothman said the 2020 election put Democrats in a precarious position, because they had to make the case for impeachment while also talking about the policies their primary voters care about.

“There’s no come-to-Jesus moment happening for Republicans,” Rothman said. “They have to explain why this is a very serious impeachable offense deeming removal from office, upending the 2020 election (and) an extraordinary constitutional remedy, and they cannot do that while also at the same time saying, ‘We have to talk about prescription drug pricing, too.'”

Co-host Mika Brzezinski cocked her head in confusion, as Rothman continued to lay out his argument that Democrats faced greater pressure in impeaching a historically unpopular president amid an election campaign.

“It’s important to talk about healthcare and the climate and all these other sundry issues which are very important, very critical to the Democratic agenda, but nowhere near as critical as explaining why a constitutional remedy reserved for the most extraordinary circumstances is merited in this case,” he said. “If they do make those two cases simultaneously, they will make both of them badly, and give Republicans an excuse to say why this is not the earth-ender, shattering moment that Democrats claim it is.”

Rothman conceded that Trump had committed an impeachable offense, but he said Democrats had not yet explained why the president should be removed from office — and MSNBC contributor Mike Barnicle agreed that lawmakers already had all the evidence they needed.

“All they would have to do is show yesterday’s press availability as he stood alongside the president of Italy and basically rewrote history, current and past, and basically said ISIS is okay, they’re not a big threat to us, they’re 7,000 miles away,” Barnicle said. “Because the Midwest, places like Missouri, places like Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota — those are the sons and daughters who are going to go fight the next war against ISIS.”

“He made the case yesterday for his incompetence,” Barnicle added. “His threat to the national security is a constant and present danger.”

Rothman said the president’s bizarre behavior was a separate issue from impeachment, and Barnicle immediately fired back.

“No, there’s only one issue,” he said. “There’s only one issue for a voter. Only one issue.”



Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.