Fox News scrambles desperately to cover for Trump after Mick Mulvaney's big confession

Fox News scrambles desperately to cover for Trump after Mick Mulvaney's big confession
Laura Ingraham image by Gage Skidmore, Wikipedia

Although Acting White House Chief of Staff was trying to defend President Donald Trump at a news conference on Thursday, he didn’t do the president any favor when he admitted that Trump had a quid pro quo with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. As an impeachment inquiry hangs over Trump's head, he and his defenders' primary defense was to deny the existence of any quid pro quo — despite the mounting evidence.

And two of Trump’s biggest sycophants in the right-wing media, Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity, both jumped through hoops trying to discredit Mulvaney and convince their audiences that a quid pro quo between Trump and Zelensky never existed.

In their impeachment inquiry, House Democrats argue that Trump and his allies pressured Ukraine to get political dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. The existence of a quid pro quo for congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine as part of the scheme, though not necessary to show an abuse of power or high crime, would exacerbate the offense. Mulvaney, during the press conference, admitted that the White House withheld military aid to Ukraine in exchange for a related investigation, even though it had been strongly denied by Trump's team. Later, Mulvaney tried to lie and say he never said what he said.

This slip clearly sent shockwaves through Fox News, where some of Trump's most devoted followers hang their hats.

Thursday night on her Fox News program, “The Ingraham Angle,” Ingraham told her guests, “I’m not piling on Mulvaney. I don’t want to do that.” But she tried to give the impression that Mulvaney didn’t choose his words well because he lacked legal expertise.

“When you have a legal issue before a lot of people who aren’t lawyers, the last thing you want to do is try to get out there and say a whole bunch of things really fast and then say, ‘well, the context was — and going back, and the reach back was’ — and then, there’s not enough of a pause between one thought and another,” Ingraham said.

But Mulvaney does, in fact, have a legal background. Mulvaney, now 52, graduated from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Law School in 1992. And before he went into politics, Mulvaney practiced law at the firm James, McElroy & Diehl for half a decade. Mulvaney was a lawyer long before he was a Republican politician (he was first elected to the South Carolina House of Representatives in 2006 and was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010).

While Ingraham claimed that she wasn’t trying to insult or belittle Mulvaney — even though she was — Hannity was overtly insulting to the acting White House chief of staff on his radio program, “The Sean Hannity Show” (which he hosts in addition to his evening show on Fox News).

Hannity told listeners, “What is Mulvaney even talking about? I just think he's dumb, I really do. I don’t even think he knows what he’s talking about. That’s my take on it.”

Hannity went on to claim that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was trying to orchestrate a “Soviet-style impeachment coup” against Trump and that Mulvaney failed to comprehend what was going on.

“You don’t need a chief of staff's idiotic interpretation of things, when the president and the president of Ukraine and everybody else can read it all themselves,” Hannity told listeners. “That’s what’s amazing.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.