Trump appointed a judicial nominee who's so bad even Republicans hate him

Trump appointed a judicial nominee who's so bad even Republicans hate him
Image via MSNBC Screengrab

Steven Menashi, a current Trump White House legal adviser who works with Stephen Miller's immigration working group and is Education Secretary Betsy DeVos' right-hand man, seemed to be a shoo-in for a lifetime appointment to the federal judiciary. Because the Republican Senate would confirm a ham sandwich.


Unfortunately for Menashi, he's not a ham sandwich. He's an arrogant asshole who refused to answer even Republican members' questions in his confirmation hearing last week. Even Sen. Lindsey Graham, Trump's wannabe BFF, had issues with Menashi's refusal to answer questions, jumping in during questioning by Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin to try to make Menashi answer whether he worked on "the administration's decision to end deferred deportation for undocumented immigrants who are receiving treatment for life-threatening illnesses." Graham told Menashi "That's not an unfair question. […] It's a specific question. Did you give legal advice on the subject matter?"

Menashi finally conceded he "may" have worked on it, but couldn't recall. It got to a point where he was chided by Republican senators for refusing to cooperate. "This isn't supposed to be a game," Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told him. "We're supposed to try to understand not how you're going to rule but how you’re going to think."

Now Kennedy is saying it's "doubtful" he'll vote for Menashi when/if he comes up for a committee vote. Saying he was "very annoyed" by Menashi's performance, Kennedy told HuffPost’s Jennifer Bendery "I don't know enough about him to be able to say he'd be a good judge. And that was the whole point of having a hearing. […] I'm tired of it. He should answer the questions."

This defection would be a really good excuse for Graham to convince the White House to pull the nomination. Menashi is so bad that even Susan Collins would have a really hard time voting for him. He's got a history of publishing rabidly sexist and anti-gay writings and statements, and has defended racists and spread Islamaphobic myths. So it might be easier all around if the nomination just goes away. But it's worth noting that all of these nightmarish things he's done and said aren't about to disqualify him in Republicans' minds; it's because he wasn't adequately deferential to them in his hearing. Whatever it takes.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close