} window.REBELMOUSE_LOW_TASKS_QUEUE.push(rm_fn_c603c695021f72d48f308690762cffcf);
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

New documents reveal the military has paid Trump's Scotland resort more than $180,000

New documents reveal the military has paid Trump's Scotland resort more than $180,000
Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

Under President Donald Trump, the U.S. military has spent more than $180,000 at the Trump Turnberry resort in Scotland while service members have been stopped at the Glasgow Prestwick airport, according to a Pentagon letter sent to the House Oversight Committee.


Politico first reported on and published the letter on Wednesday.

It reveals that since August 2017, the military has in the last two years or so spent $124,578 in expenditures on the property, in addition to an unspecified addition $59,729.12, as the letter explained:

Frustratingly, this accounting notes that in the two years prior to Aug. 9, 2017, the military also spent $64,380.78 at Trump Turnberry. This is significantly less than the amount spent in the time period in which Trump was the only president, and it leaves unclear whether the Pentagon was spending money at the resort while President Barack Obama was in office.

This is a key question that we need to answer to determine how corrupt the arrangement is. But make no mistake — the evidence as it stands shows a clearly corrupting relationship between the military and the president's business.

The letter indicates that the rates paid at the resort were within the acceptable limit for military members abroad, but even if that's true, it doesn't eliminate the conflict of interest. The military is still spending money at a facility that is owned privately by the commander in chief. Even if Trump's position had no effect on the military's choice of accommodations, it still would reflect are corrupting and unethical conflict of interest. It's unethical, in part, because the public can't be confident that the president isn't using improper influence to direct government funds toward his hotel, or that members of the military aren't making choices that they believe will earn them favor from the president by helping to personally enrich him. It's also not clear if the government was overpaying Trump by making unnecessary stops or staying longer than necessary, or if Trump was getting a leg up on his competitors by being in charge of the U.S. military.

The Pentagon has said reviewing the relevant procedures regarding travel accommodations, and the House Oversight Committee is continuing to investigate the matter.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close