} window.REBELMOUSE_LOW_TASKS_QUEUE.push(rm_fn_2b91649c1619b641d9d3a306a2d90942);
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

Here's what neoliberal Democrats who view Bernie Sanders as an 'existential threat' fail to realize

Here's what neoliberal Democrats who view Bernie Sanders as an 'existential threat' fail to realize
By Michael Stokes - Biden13, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79141909

Over the past few days, the mainstream Democrats’ war on Bernie Sanders has come out of the closet.  Recent articles in Politico and the Guardian, detail how centrist organizations like Third Way have been pushing the narrative that Sanders is unelectable.  The reason, according to Third Way leaders and other neoliberals, is the dreaded label of “socialist.”

There’s two things wrong with this premise.

First, Sanders has been a nationally known figure since 2015, and the label hasn’t hurt him much. He still polls better against Trump than any Democrat except Biden—and they're essentially tied at the moment in a race with Trump. And make no mistake, with Biden’s record of coddling Wall Street and big banks, backing the Iraq War, and a history of racist and sexist remarks, it’s Biden who is frighteningly unelectable.  He’d face the same fate as Hillary Clinton in 2016 if he got the nomination, because the vast majority of voters hold more progressive views and a centrist candidate just can’t generate the turnout Democrats need to win.

Yes, Republicans and a few older folks see the term “socialist” as a non-starter, but more people view capitalism negatively and many young people see socialism as a positive. Sanders himself has done a good job of defining exactly what democratic socialism is, and it lines up well with what voters say they want.

But the second thing that reveals how wrong the centrist neoliberals are, is that, until 2018—when Democrats were more progressive and the Party ran more progressive candidates—they’d been losing ground for nearly five decades. In the 1960’s about half of all voters registered as Democrats—today that number is only about 29 percent.  As recently as 1978, Democrats controlled both legislative branches in thirty-one states, while Republicans had majorities in only eleven.

By 2016 Republicans controlled both legislatures and the governorship in twenty-five states, while Democrats control all three institutions in just six states. Nebraska, which has a unicameral, nonpartisan legislature, isn’t counted in this total.  Meanwhile, thirty-four states have a Republican governor, while only fifteen are headed by a Democrat, and one—Alaska—is headed by an independent.

This losing trend directly parallels the Democratic Party’s drift to the center and then to the right. As groups like the Democratic Leadership Council embraced corporatism, and ran from New Deal and Great Society values, the Party lost ground.

In short, Democrats are on the verge of an existential crisis, but it’s centrism that is causing it.  In fact, in many ways Trump may be saving them.  He is so abhorrent and so manifestly unfit for the job, that enough people may turn out to vote him out to give the Democrats a victory.

But that’s not certain, and it’s far different than winning with a mandate in any case. And the country desperately needs a progressive mandate right now.

We as a country are sleepwalking into Armageddon.  The twin horsemen of the new apocalypse are ignorance and hate.

We are facing a real crisis—perhaps an existential one—in the form of the climate change, and it’s closer and more serious than we’ve been led to believe.

We have a press which thinks that covering both “sides” of a debate is more important than divining the truth behind the debate.  Balance has replaced accuracy, truth, data, and facts as the media’s polestar.  As a result, morons get equal time with sages.

We are seeing economic and political power concentrated into fewer and fewer hands, as corporations merge at a record pace, and wealth and income gets increasingly concentrated at the very top of our society.

Americans tend to believe that freedom is embedded in the documents our founders developed; it’s not. Rather, it derives from the collective cultural commitment to freedom that, until recently, was a part of our national DNA, and it is rooted firmly in ideas that come from the Enlightenment.  Without this foundation, our Constitution is just a thin piece of parchment, easily ripped to shreds.

And today, we are abandoning science, reason, and the Enlightenment values, and as a result, demagogues are wholesaling hate, blame and greed.  We are trading in a Constitution written from the frontal cortex, for a social fabric defined by the amygdala and the limbic lizard that resides there.

A centrist candidate—which, let’s be honest, means one who is beholden to the uber rich and corporations—cannot and will not address these truly existential issues. Only a progressive candidate can and will.

People understand two things. First, government has been taken over by oligarchs and second, it no longer represents them.  Some of them are mad as hell, and they vote for the likes of Trump because he at least shares their inchoate rage at the system, even if he reinforces it with his policies. Others are justifiably cynical and choose to stay home on election day.

That’s how Trump won in 2016. Targeting a few more votes from the mythical centerwon’t change that. Getting the no shows to show will. And only a progressive can do that.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.