William Barr says he 'can't even tell you' what's in the emoluments clause

William Barr says he 'can't even tell you' what's in the emoluments clause
Image via Shutterstock

Nominee for attorney general William Barr sat down on Tuesday morning for a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. This was the first opportunity for Democratic senators to talk with Barr, since, even though he met with Republicans, he refused to meet with Democrats in advance of the hearing, blaming Trump’s government shutdown.

The hearing is still in its early going, but it has already produced at least one startling moment. In questioning, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein questioned Barr about any limits on a sitting executive, during which Barr was careful to skirt around the idea of whether or not indictment was possible.

Barr: If a president attempts to intervene in a matter he has a stake in, to protect himself, that should first be looked at as a breach of his constitutional duties. Whether it also violates a statute … depending on what comes into play and what all the facts are.

But it was Feinstein’s follow-up that drew the real jaw-dropper.

Feinstein: Including the emoluments clause of the Constitution?

Barr: I ... Well ... I think there’s a dispute about what the emoluments clause relates to. I had not personally researched the emoluments clause. I can’t even tell you what it says at this point.

Barr then mentioned that he understood that there were emoluments cases under litigation, but apparently that was not enough of a reason to brush up on that area of law.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.