Former top Republican officials slam Trump's asylum ban as plainly illegal in Supreme Court brief

Former top Republican officials slam Trump's asylum ban as plainly illegal in Supreme Court brief

On Monday, BuzzFeed News reported that a group of longtime Republican legal officials filed an amicus brief advising the Supreme Court that President Donald Trump's efforts to shut down the border to asylum seekers are illegal, and that "the government's position is simply wrong."

The friend-of-the-court brief was filed by William Webster, the former director of both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Central Intelligence Agency; two former acting attorneys general, Peter Keisler and Stuart Gerson; and nine others, former DOJ official and Supreme Court advocate Carter Phillips and former State Department officials John Bellinger III and Samuel Witten.

The Trump administration's two-step effort included a federal rule and presidential proclamation that, when taken together, would bar asylum claims by those who enter the southern border outside of ports of entry. A federal judge put the new policy on hold before Thanksgiving, and the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit turned down the Justice Department's request to put that injunction on hold.

The brief notes that under federal law, any migrant who crosses the southern border illegally outside "'a designated port of arrival ... may apply for asylum," and that "The Attorney General's regulation is inconsistent with the plain text and meaning of [that law]."

The new rules, which were enacted in early November, forbid people from applying for asylum if they do not arrive through a port of entry. In addition to contradicting federal statute, this rule forces people to wait in terrible conditions at entryways where border officials are blocking migrants who try to cross in the first place. After the American Civil Liberties Union sued, a federal judge in San Francisco blocked enforcement of the policy, saying "Whatever the scope of the President's authority, he may not rewrite the immigration laws to impose a condition that Congress has expressly forbidden."

Currently, the Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to lift the injunction while the case is appealed.

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.