New details emerge in secret grand jury case reportedly tied to Mueller - but it's not what anyone expected

New details emerge in secret grand jury case reportedly tied to Mueller  -  but it's not what anyone expected

Some suspected the defendant in a secret grand jury proceeding reportedly tied to Special Counsel Robert Mueller could have been the president, the vice president, or even one of the president's children.


All of those theories have proven to be wrong. But the truth, though not fully revealed, may turn out to be just as intriguing as any of those answers might have been.

Zoe Tillman, a BuzzFeed news reporter, was among the first to spot the newest development.

"Remember that mystery grand jury subpoena case argued last week in the DC Circuit?" Tillman said in a tweet. "A decision is out, and it's public, sort of — it's about a company (unnamed) owned by a country (unnamed). Court upheld the denial of a motion to quash the subpoena."

The revelation raises at least as many questions as it does answers. If, as has been reported, the case is brought by Mueller's team, it's not obvious which country and company would be under scrutiny. Russia is the most natural guess, but other foreign countries could have fallen into the scope of Mueller's investigation, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Trump and his associates' connections with these entities have drawn increasing scrutiny.

If this country and company turn out to be central to the investigation, the development could reveal a new branch of the investigation previously unreported.

The grand jury in question has subpoenaed information from the foreign company, but the country has claimed that it is immune from such a subpoena and that it would violate the country's own laws. The D.C. court, however, disagreed — and the court held the company in contempt for failing to comply. The corporation is continuing to appeal the case.

"Looks like it’s got a good shot to go to the Supreme Court on this point; the DC Circuit carved out a brand new ground for federal courts to exercise subject matter jurisdiction over foreign sovereigns (in criminal cases)," noted legal analyst Luppe Luppen.

Read the judgment below:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.