White House caves and fully restores CNN reporter Jim Acosta's credentials - but issues draconian new rules for the press corps

White House caves and fully restores CNN reporter Jim Acosta's credentials  -  but issues draconian new rules for the press corps

CNN reporter Jim Acosta had his press credentials for the White House fully restored Monday after they had been pulled in response to his critical questioning of President Donald Trump about his anti-immigrant smears.

A court had already ordered the credentials to be restored, issuing a preliminary finding that the White House had violated Acosta's right to due process. The White House had considered only restoring the pass temporarily for the time required by the judge, but it caved and issued a full restoration Monday. 

However, in addition to the restoration of Acosta's pass, Press Secretary Sarah Sanders issued new draconian rules for the press corps: 

  1. A journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then will yield the floor to other journalists;
  2. At the discretion of the President or other White House official taking questions, a follow-up question or questions may be permitted; and where a follow up has been allowed and asked, the questioner will then yield the floor;
  3. “Yielding the floor” includes, when applicable, physically surrendering the microphone to White House staff for use by the next questioner;
  4. Failure to abide by any of rules (1)-(3) may result in suspension or revocation of the journalist’s hard pass.

In issuing these rules, the White House apparently hopes to be able to suspend reporters' credentials without running afoul of due process protections.

"So, out of their Acosta nonsense, the White House has made it a punishable violation for anyone to say 'could you please address the specific question I asked,' 'could you please provide an example,' or 'that’s actually not true' without their permission?" asked Toronto Star reporter Daniel Dale. "This has basically been standard procedure - don’t hog the mic, don’t ask a bunch of questions if the president wants to move on - but there hasn’t been a rule saying that asking a second question they didn’t approve is punishable by being kicked out of the White House forever."

Asking follow-up questions without explicit permission is so ubiquitous that it's hard to imagine the White House will punish every reporter who does so. However, Trump and Sanders are almost guaranteed to selectively use the rules when they want to punish specific reporters, perhaps for entirely unrelated reasons.

If it does so, the White House should expect to find itself back in court.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.