Julian Assange's lawyer blasts Justice Department as 'irresponsible' for doing exactly what WikiLeaks does

Julian Assange's lawyer blasts Justice Department as 'irresponsible' for doing exactly what WikiLeaks does

On Thursday evening, George Washington University's Seamus Hughes noticed something interesting in a filing from federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia: an apparent reference to an indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.


There are thorny legal questions about the implication of an Assange indictment for press freedom and national security. However, there is a remarkable irony in the fact that Assange's attorney is now complaining it was "irresponsible" for federal prosecutors "to put in a public filing information that clearly was not intended for the public and without any notice."

In other words, WikiLeaks' entire business model.

A longtime "transparency" activist friendly with Russia, Assange's organization has spent years publishing classified information from Western nations on its website — by coincidence often in ways that benefit the Kremlin — and played a key role in releasing stolen documents from Democratic officials during the 2016 election. Some of President Donald Trump's associates, including former strategist Roger Stone, face questioning in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation over their potential ties to WikiLeaks.

Assange has been hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012, to evade an international arrest warrant in connection with rape charges in Sweden. Those charges were eventually dropped, but he is still wanted by British authorities for violating bail.

Assange refuses to leave the embassy, where Ecuador has granted him asylum, because he believes the United States will seek to have him extradited over WikiLeaks activity — something that, for the first time, there is now evidence the Justice Department may seek to do.

According to The New York Times, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office said Assange "was not the intended name for this filing." Aside from that reference, none of the rest of the document mentions Assange or anything relating to him. It is not clear what the Justice Department is considering charging Assange with, or whether they will actually move forward.

But whatever happens, it is notable that, quite by accident, the Justice Department made Assange a victim of his own tactics.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.