These Are the Insane Limits the White House and Senate Republicans Have Imposed on the FBI's Investigation of Kavanaugh: Report

These Are the Insane Limits the White House and Senate Republicans Have Imposed on the FBI's Investigation of Kavanaugh: Report

Rich text editor, edit-body-und-0-value, press ALT 0 for help.

The New York Times is reporting the scope of the FBI's supplemental background check into Judge Brett Kavanaugh is so "limited" and "narrow" it could be completed today.


After President Trump agreed to order the Bureau to reopen its check on the Supreme Court nominee, many were outraged upon learning the third accuser, Julie Swetnick, would not be interviewed. Anger and outrage over the weekend escalated when it was revealed White House Counsel Don McGahn, seemingly with Judge Kavanaugh himself, created a list of witnesses the FBI could interview – effectively barring the FBI from interviewing several important witnesses.

A Sunday New York Times article reveals just how much the White House has tied the FBI's hands – despite President Trump's seemingly false claim that he wants FBI agents "to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion."

Calling it "an abbreviated investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct," the Times reports the review "involves interviewing four potential witnesses."

Just four.

The "F.B.I. was directed by the White House and Senate Republicans to interview just four people: Mark Judge and P.J. Smyth, high school friends of Judge Kavanaugh’s; Leland Keyser, a high school friend of one of Judge Kavanaugh’s accusers, Christine Blasey Ford; and Deborah Ramirez, another of the judge’s accusers."

That list does not include Dr. Blasey Ford or Judge Kavanaugh.

Dr. Blasey Ford's attorney told the Times they have repeatedly tried to reach the FBI but have received no response.

"Officials said the F.B.I.’s 'limited' supplemental background check of Judge Kavanaugh could be finished by Monday morning," the Times reports.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close